search for: pandey

...ough it. Please review it and let me know your feedbacks as soon as possible. I haven't written much about automated testing as I haven't written any test yet ( I will learn writing automated tests before April end ). Link to my Proposal -> https://www.dropbox.com/s/5fwq7ia6bpoo2p4/Ayush_Pandey_GSoC_Proposal.pdf?dl=0 Regards, Ayush Pandey.

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >&gt...

...get it to work. So, my basic question is - In Asterisk, Can we have same extension number in different contexts? For example: [Context_company_1] exten => 200,1,,, [context_company_2] Exten =>200,1,.. [context_company_3] Exten =>200,1,.. Thanks Uma Pandey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041108/92b990a9/attachment.htm

...have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. And the part of code which you mentioned is not getting hit at all. Maybe some difference in parsing is there. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > >> for the following code: >> >> struct X >> { >> X(); >> }; >> >> struct Y >> { >> operator X() const; >> }; >> >> X a = { Y() }; // reports error: no matching construc...

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 10:27 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >&g...

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on >>>> http://www.vmxray.com/ >>...

Hi Mayur, > On 24 Nov 2014, at 07:00, MAYUR PANDEY <mayur.p at samsung.com> wrote: > In the assembly generated with O0, we are getting the "blx" instruction whereas with O1 we get "bx" (in 3.4.2 we used to get "blx" for both O0 and O1). > > Is this because of this patch: [llvm] r214959 - ARM: do not...

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/ >> . >> I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being >> shown. >> All the stuff related ot the local user was not visible at all. >> After I restarted...

I'm not really an overload resolution expert, so I could be wrong. Anyway, please file a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs/), and our overload resolution experts will take a look. :) -Eli On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > Actually it should have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. > And the part of code which you mentioned is not getting hit at all. Maybe > some difference in parsing is there. > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eli Friedma...

...started my VM, the OS gets stuck here ( http://i.stack.imgur.com/KVYxV.png). Even after trying the single user login it was stuck there. But the emergency mode worked alright. On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:37 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 06:28 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> Hi, >> I am working on Centos6.6 on a VirtualBox on Windows Host. Today I started >> to have booting issues in the OS. It won't get past the loading screen. I >> checked and found that the files related to the user "cloudera" on the >> syst...

...dead at the end of the function and should not be being relied upon by the calling code. I believe this is a red-herring to whatever your actual bug is. Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Mayur Pandey [mayurthebond at gmail.com] Sent: 01 December 2012 11:13 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] operator overloading fails while debugging with gdb for i386 Problem seems not only with operator overloading, It occurs with struct value returning also. gdb while debugging expects t...

...the overloading is occuring. eg: A1 three = one + two results {x = 6, y = 8}. On checking the assembly, a suspicious entry is found which may be related for the failure: #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:this <- undef #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:second <- undef -- Thanx & Regards *Mayur Pandey * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121129/75068cf8/attachment.html>

...ted to root were accessible. This is why I was am not able to do a single user login but an emergency login was possible. This is just a guess. This all happened due to some update in the Virtual Machine that I use to run CentOS. Is there any workaround for this issue? Thanks and regards, Animesh Pandey

...%edx)* .loc 1 13 2 popl %esi popl %edi ret $4 But while returning int value clang returns with eax... as expect. Problem comes with when used struct/class Is the behaviour of llvm as per the standards or is this a bug?? On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > For the given test: > > class A1 { > int x; > int y; > > public: > > A1(int a, int b) > { > x=a; > y=b; > } > > A1 operator+(const A1&); > }; > > > A1 A1::operator+(const A1&amp...

On 06/14/2015 10:27 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On...

...*, unsigned long long **c*)* This is against statement "Conceptually,in operation, like ‘/’ or ‘%’, no function is called, so no header is provided for *__udivmodti4* etc. – and we should not call them explicitly in our code." but wanted to know more on it. Thank you! Regards, Vivek JP Pandey, Software Professional, *+91-7775054441* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200521/2effa903/attachment.html>

...be > being relied upon by the calling code. > > I believe this is a red-herring to whatever your actual bug is. > > Cheers, > > James > ________________________________________ > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf > Of Mayur Pandey [mayurthebond at gmail.com] > Sent: 01 December 2012 11:13 > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] operator overloading fails while debugging with gdb > for i386 > > Problem seems not only with operator overloading, It occurs with struct > value returning al...

...ments are empty, referencing x(1) and x(n) cause a Segmentation fault, and cause R to crash. Acepack author and maintainer Rob Tibshirani <tibs at utstat.toronto.edu> has been contacted with this information. This is not a bug with R, but with acepack, and should be closed. Neha Pandey <neha.pandey at gmail.com> Vikram Aggarwal <vikram at mayin.org> -- Vikram Aggarwal: http://www.mayin.org/~aragorn/

On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On...

...uments to function ?libpri_copy_string? q931.c:3608: error: too many arguments to function ?libpri_copy_string? q931.c: In function ?pri_internal_clear?: q931.c:3695: error: too many arguments to function ?libpri_copy_string? make: *** [q931.o] Error 1 Please help me out. Thanking you, Preeta Pandey Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. Spread environmental awareness. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged...