search for: mayur

Hi Mayur, > On 24 Nov 2014, at 07:00, MAYUR PANDEY <mayur.p at samsung.com> wrote: > In the assembly generated with O0, we are getting the "blx" instruction whereas with O1 we get "bx" (in 3.4.2 we used to get "blx" for both O0 and O1). > > Is this because...

Hi all, Are there any scale limitations in terms of how many nodes can be in a single Gluster Cluster or how much storage capacity can be managed in a single cluster? What are some of the large deployments out there that you know of? Thanks, Mayur ***************************Legal Disclaimer*************************** "This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the mess...

...should have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. And the part of code which you mentioned is not getting hit at all. Maybe some difference in parsing is there. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > >> for the following code: >> >> struct X >> { >> X(); >> }; >> >> struct Y >> { >> operator X() const; >> }; >> >> X a = { Y() }; // reports error: no matching c...

...anted to know what could be the use cases of implementing these. When I tried implementing these and wrote test cases for the same, the test cases would be optimized in InstructionSimplify before hitting the code in Instruction Combining. Can anyone suggest me where I might be going wrong. Thanks, Mayur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160612/d12fd9d7/attachment.html>

I'm not really an overload resolution expert, so I could be wrong. Anyway, please file a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs/), and our overload resolution experts will take a look. :) -Eli On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > Actually it should have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. > And the part of code which you mentioned is not getting hit at all. Maybe > some difference in parsing is there. > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eli...

...ax is dead at the end of the function and should not be being relied upon by the calling code. I believe this is a red-herring to whatever your actual bug is. Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Mayur Pandey [mayurthebond at gmail.com] Sent: 01 December 2012 11:13 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] operator overloading fails while debugging with gdb for i386 Problem seems not only with operator overloading, It occurs with struct value returning also. gdb while debugging ex...

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 at 03:32, Mayur Dewaikar <mdewaikar at commvault.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any scale limitations in terms of how many nodes can be in a > single Gluster Cluster or how much storage capacity can be managed in a > single cluster? What are some of the large deployments out there that y...

...rmally the overloading is occuring. eg: A1 three = one + two results {x = 6, y = 8}. On checking the assembly, a suspicious entry is found which may be related for the failure: #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:this <- undef #DEBUG_VALUE: operator+:second <- undef -- Thanx & Regards *Mayur Pandey * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121129/75068cf8/attachment.html>

...cx, 4(%edx)* .loc 1 13 2 popl %esi popl %edi ret $4 But while returning int value clang returns with eax... as expect. Problem comes with when used struct/class Is the behaviour of llvm as per the standards or is this a bug?? On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > For the given test: > > class A1 { > int x; > int y; > > public: > > A1(int a, int b) > { > x=a; > y=b; > } > > A1 operator+(const A1&); > }; > > > A1 A1::operator+(const...

...d not be > being relied upon by the calling code. > > I believe this is a red-herring to whatever your actual bug is. > > Cheers, > > James > ________________________________________ > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf > Of Mayur Pandey [mayurthebond at gmail.com] > Sent: 01 December 2012 11:13 > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] operator overloading fails while debugging with gdb > for i386 > > Problem seems not only with operator overloading, It occurs with struct > value retur...

...85}: Dropped frame with ts=21132 and len=20 JB_GET {now=1185}: now < next=2121 I have tried increasing the jitter buffer from 200 to 1000 ms but with same result. Am I missing anything here? How can I determine what is causing asterisk to drop the audio frames? Regards, Mayur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071226/3d9f53a2/attachment.htm

...mplicit move constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'Y' to 'X &&' for 1st argument struct X ^ testfile.C:3:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided X(); ^ 1 error generated. -- Thanx & Regards *Mayur Pandey * +91-9742959541 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130924/86017a0b/attachment.html>

Hi, I would like to configure asterisk to allow INVITE for hold to pass through it and not provide music on hold by itself. Can anyone help me out here? Regards, Mayur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080221/dee4c2d7/attachment.htm

...ion appears in package repo and VLC icon on the Accessories; but The problem is when I click on it displays nothing. And also one error occured it was asking for AMD video drivers but my PC is Intel based. Confused !! Seeking for guidance, Thank you !! -- *Cheers, Mayur*.

...ose and give SIP INFO to the SIP client. However it fails to detect some of the digits (which is random) hence the correct sequence of digits is not received at the SIP client. I have tried setting relaxdtmf=yes in sip.conf but that does not seem to help. Can anyone help me out here? Regards, Mayur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080112/346eb71c/attachment.htm

On 2 December 2012 08:12, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com> wrote: > So is this just a coincidence for g++ that eax points to this address and > gdb prints the right value on the command print sum(one,two)?? The code is small, and the structure is probably set at the end of the block, so I think it's not t...

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > for the following code: > > struct X > { > X(); > }; > > struct Y > { > operator X() const; > }; > > X a = { Y() }; // reports error: no matching constructor for > initialization of 'X' > X...

...eems asterisk is seeing the INVITE from SIP proxy as INVITE coming from client (this is I guess as per the lookup that asterisk performs). However is there a way to have it first match the INVITE host IP rather than FROM user first? Or rather is there a way to have this setup working? Regards, Mayur -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080131/e8470bfc/attachment.htm

...n convention" : The caller passes an additional hidden first parameter to the caller. That parameter contains the address at which the value being returned should be stored. On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 2 December 2012 08:12, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com> wrote: > > So is this just a coincidence for g++ that eax points to this address and > > gdb prints the right value on the command print sum(one,two)?? > > The code is small, and the structure is probably set at the end of the > block, s...

On 3 December 2012 10:42, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com> wrote: > So this seems to be the cause of the problem. I guess you're mixing two different problems. First, is the possible lack of conformance with the ABI you state, which I can't comment since I don't know that ABI very well. Second, is th...