Hi All, Are there any bots that do any testing with clang/llvm built with XDEBUG (i.e. expensive checking)? I'm seeing 36 lit tests that currently hit asserts that are checked when XDEBUG is enabled. The checks that I'm hitting are: - DominatorTree::verifyDomTree() - DAGTypeLegalizer::PerformExpensiveChecks() - SelectionDAG checkForCyclesHelper Are these known issues or should I file bugs for them? -- Geoff Berry Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
I don't believe we do. Adding one would be a good idea if anyone has a spare machine lying around... Philip On 04/21/2016 01:18 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev wrote:> Hi All, > > Are there any bots that do any testing with clang/llvm built with XDEBUG > (i.e. expensive checking)? I'm seeing 36 lit tests that currently hit > asserts that are checked when XDEBUG is enabled. The checks that I'm > hitting are: > - DominatorTree::verifyDomTree() > - DAGTypeLegalizer::PerformExpensiveChecks() > - SelectionDAG checkForCyclesHelper > > Are these known issues or should I file bugs for them? > > -- > Geoff Berry > Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux > Foundation Collaborative Project > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Hi All, > > Are there any bots that do any testing with clang/llvm built with XDEBUG > (i.e. expensive checking)? I'm seeing 36 lit tests that currently hit > asserts that are checked when XDEBUG is enabled. The checks that I'm > hitting are: > - DominatorTree::verifyDomTree() >This seems super bad ;) Have a testcase? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160422/c11513ac/attachment.html>
Yeah, they are just triggered by lit check tests. I’ll file some bugs today, though it looks like Quentin may have already filed bugs for some of these. -- Geoff Berry Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project From: Daniel Berlin [mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 12:05 PM To: Geoff Berry <gberry at codeaurora.org> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] XDEBUG build bots? On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: Hi All, Are there any bots that do any testing with clang/llvm built with XDEBUG (i.e. expensive checking)? I'm seeing 36 lit tests that currently hit asserts that are checked when XDEBUG is enabled. The checks that I'm hitting are: - DominatorTree::verifyDomTree() This seems super bad ;) Have a testcase? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160422/93652970/attachment.html>