search for: performexpensivechecks

Hi All, Are there any bots that do any testing with clang/llvm built with XDEBUG (i.e. expensive checking)? I'm seeing 36 lit tests that currently hit asserts that are checked when XDEBUG is enabled. The checks that I'm hitting are: - DominatorTree::verifyDomTree() - DAGTypeLegalizer::PerformExpensiveChecks() - SelectionDAG checkForCyclesHelper Are these known issues or should I file bugs for them? -- Geoff Berry Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

...ondag-cse.ll > hits assert when LLVM compiled with XDEBUG > <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27485> 14:13:03 > 27483 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27483> librarie Common C > unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [SelectionDAG] LegalizeTypes hits > asserts in PerformExpensiveChecks when compiled with XDEBUG > <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27483> 14:12:59 > 27484 <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27484> librarie Backend: > unassignedbugs at nondot.org NEW --- [ARM] Codegen/Thumb/segmented-stacks.ll > hits assert when llvm compiled w/ XDEBU...

Yeah, they are just triggered by lit check tests. I’ll file some bugs today, though it looks like Quentin may have already filed bugs for some of these. -- Geoff Berry Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project From: Daniel Berlin [mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org] Sent: Friday,