Hi all,
I have been writing a pass to heapify some alloca's (it is
pessimistization, not optimization). For example, in the following control
flow graph, there is a call to malloc inserted in block BB12. In order to
avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23
because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think
of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both
BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new
block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to
happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and
BB22. That is, a free is inserted in all the paths from BB12 to all exits
after all users of malloc to avoid memory leak. I wonder whether there is
any pass that does similar analysis in order to avoid duplication of
efforts.
BB10 (entry)
/ \
BB11 BB12 (malloc)
/ / \
BB13 / BB15
\ / / \
\ / BB18 BB19
\ / \ /
BB20 BB21 BB22
\ | /
\ | /
\ | /
\ | /
BB23 (exit)
Any advice is appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131112/95ca8ec8/attachment.html>
PRE normally uses a latest placement algorithm to do something of the sort. I don't know about GVN/PRE, but older version of PRE might have it. Just placing the calls to free at the predecessors (dominated by BB12) of the dominance frontier of BB12 seems to work, however. Is there anything wrong with this? H. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Bin Tzeng <bintzeng at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > I have been writing a pass to heapify some alloca's (it is > pessimistization, not optimization). For example, in the following control > flow graph, there is a call to malloc inserted in block BB12. In order to > avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 > because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think > of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both > BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new > block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to > happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and > BB22. That is, a free is inserted in all the paths from BB12 to all exits > after all users of malloc to avoid memory leak. I wonder whether there is > any pass that does similar analysis in order to avoid duplication of > efforts. > > BB10 (entry) > / \ > BB11 BB12 (malloc) > / / \ > BB13 / BB15 > \ / / \ > \ / BB18 BB19 > \ / \ / > BB20 BB21 BB22 > \ | / > \ | / > \ | / > \ | / > BB23 (exit) > > Any advice is appreciated. Thanks in advance! > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131113/7cdd9717/attachment.html>
Hi Henrique, Thanks for the quick reply! On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Henrique Santos < henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote:> PRE normally uses a latest placement algorithm to do something of the sort. > I don't know about GVN/PRE, but older version of PRE might have it. > Just placing the calls to free at the predecessors (dominated by BB12) of > the dominance frontier of BB12 seems to work, however. Is there anything > wrong with this? >It seems that placing the calls to free at the predecessors of dominance frontier is inadequate. It is possible that there are exit blocks that are dominated by BB12 (calls to malloc). I guess we can also insert calls to free at these exit blocks too.> H. > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Bin Tzeng <bintzeng at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have been writing a pass to heapify some alloca's (it is >> pessimistization, not optimization). For example, in the following control >> flow graph, there is a call to malloc inserted in block BB12. In order to >> avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 >> because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think >> of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both >> BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new >> block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to >> happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and >> BB22. That is, a free is inserted in all the paths from BB12 to all exits >> after all users of malloc to avoid memory leak. I wonder whether there is >> any pass that does similar analysis in order to avoid duplication of >> efforts. >> >> BB10 (entry) >> / \ >> BB11 BB12 (malloc) >> / / \ >> BB13 / BB15 >> \ / / \ >> \ / BB18 BB19 >> \ / \ / >> BB20 BB21 BB22 >> \ | / >> \ | / >> \ | / >> \ | / >> BB23 (exit) >> >> Any advice is appreciated. Thanks in advance! >> Bill >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131112/95fe2dd6/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
- [LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
- [LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
- [LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak
- [LLVMdev] dominator, post-dominator and memory leak