search for: bb24

...following control flow graph, there is a call to malloc inserted in block BB12. In order to avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and BB22. That is, a free is inserted in all the paths from BB12...

...ph, there is a call to malloc inserted in block BB12. In order to >> avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 >> because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think >> of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both >> BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new >> block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to >> happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and >> BB22. That is, a free is...

...gt; flow graph, there is a call to malloc inserted in block BB12. In order to > avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 > because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think > of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both > BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new > block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to > happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and > BB22. That is, a free is inserted in all...

...a call to malloc inserted in block BB12. In order to >>> avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 >>> because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think >>> of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both >>> BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new >>> block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to >>> happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and >>> BB22. Th...

...alloc inserted in block BB12. In order to >>>> avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 >>>> because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think >>>> of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both >>>> BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new >>>> block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to >>>> happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and >>&...

...low graph, there is a call to malloc inserted in block > BB12. In order to avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free > cannot be inserted in BB23 because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. > There are two ways to go I can think of here. One way is to insert a > new basic block, say BB24, to connect both BB21 and BB22 and a free > can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new block BB24 has to > post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to happen before > BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and BB22. > That is, a free is inserted in all...

...alloc inserted in block BB12. In order to >>>> avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 >>>> because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think >>>> of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both >>>> BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new >>>> block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to >>>> happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 and >>&...

...ed in block BB12. In order to >>>>> avoid memory leak, free's are needed. The free cannot be inserted in BB23 >>>>> because BB23 is not dominated by BB12. There are two ways to go I can think >>>>> of here. One way is to insert a new basic block, say BB24, to connect both >>>>> BB21 and BB22 and a free can be inserted into the new block BB24. The new >>>>> block BB24 has to post-dominate BB12 and all the users of malloc have to >>>>> happen before BB24. Another way to go is to insert a free in both BB21 a...

On 30/04/2020 11:44, Olaf Dreyer wrote: > Hi, > > I restored the last backup with the 4.11.6 setup. This is working fine > and i can confirm that my AD is set up with a single forwarding zone, > there is no _msdsc zone. On this 4.11.6 setup also the Windows DNS > Tool does not complain. When upgrading to 4.12.2 DNS administration > fails again with

Good evening, Pierre. Here is an example to you. attached. run with -disable-lazy-comilation. It is *as-is* for Win32 but might be applicable to *-linux-elf more smartly. It does get llvm::Function* by function ptr(not name!), and clone a specialized function, and execute specialized one in the same context as parent lli. > - In a running program, can I get pointers to the llvm Module that

Hello ! I wanted to experiment with partial evaluation and llvm seems to be the right tool for this, but since I'm new to it of course I'm a bit lost ! I'll try to explain what I want to do in the simplest possible way : I have a C program. In this program, there is a function f( a,b ). I have a value A for a. I want to specialise f() so I get a function fA( b ) which is the same as