Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit? There is the oldjit too; it's still being used? Thanks. Reed
> There is the oldjit too; it's still being used?Our project still use old jit since mcjit is not so reliable. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
On 11.07.2012, at 14:39, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:> Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit? > > There is the oldjit too; it's still being used?The most prominent user of the MC JIT is probably LLDB. The only issue with MCJIT I know of is the lack of windows support, and I expect oldjit to go away once that is sorted out. Switching between the JIT implementations is really trivial and transparent, if you don't have to support windows it's worth a try. - Ben
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Benjamin Kramer wrote:> > On 11.07.2012, at 14:39, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit? >> >> There is the oldjit too; it's still being used? > > The most prominent user of the MC JIT is probably LLDB. > > The only issue with MCJIT I know of is the lack of windows support, and I expect oldjit to go away once that is sorted out. Switching between the JIT implementations is really trivial and transparent, if you don't have to support windows it's worth a try. >MCJIT also doesn't yet support lazy compilation. That's not a big problem to add; it's just not been necessary for anyone yet. -Jim