Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "oldjit".
Did you mean:
oldbit
2012 Jul 11
3
[LLVMdev] mcjit
Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit?
There is the oldjit too; it's still being used?
Thanks.
Reed
2012 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] mcjit
On 11.07.2012, at 14:39, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit?
>
> There is the oldjit too; it's still being used?
The most prominent user of the MC JIT is probably LLDB.
The only issue with MCJIT I know of is the lack of windows support, and I expect oldjit to go away once that is sorted out. Switching between the JIT implementations is really trivial and transparent, if you d...
2012 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] mcjit
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Benjamin Kramer wrote:
>
> On 11.07.2012, at 14:39, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit?
>>
>> There is the oldjit too; it's still being used?
>
> The most prominent user of the MC JIT is probably LLDB.
>
> The only issue with MCJIT I know of is the lack of windows support, and I expect oldjit to go away once that is sorted out. Switching between the JIT implementations is really trivial and t...
2012 Jul 31
3
[LLVMdev] mcjit
...gt;>
>> On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Benjamin Kramer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 11.07.2012, at 14:39, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit?
>>>>
>>>> There is the oldjit too; it's still being used?
>>>
>>> The most prominent user of the MC JIT is probably LLDB.
>>>
>>> The only issue with MCJIT I know of is the lack of windows support, and I expect oldjit to go away once that is sorted out. Switching between the JIT implement...
2012 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] mcjit
...2012, at 6:04 AM, Benjamin Kramer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11.07.2012, at 14:39, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know which projects rely on mcjit?
>>>>>
>>>>> There is the oldjit too; it's still being used?
>>>>
>>>> The most prominent user of the MC JIT is probably LLDB.
>>>>
>>>> The only issue with MCJIT I know of is the lack of windows support, and I expect oldjit to go away once that is sorted out. Switching between t...
2017 Jun 12
2
Possible with enableJIT function
....1
> print(paste("At end memory used is", mem_used()))
[1] "At end memory used is 29126472"
</output>
Indeed memory used increases in each pass of the for loop.
I have added these two lines at the top of the code after the library(pryr) invocation.
library(compiler)
oldJIT <- enableJIT(0)
This resolves the issue in the sense that memory used remains constant after the first iteration.
Output in the for loop is now:
<output>
[1] "nleqslv iteration 1 and memory used is 24487784"
[1] "nleqslv iteration 2 and memory used is 24495816"
[1] &qu...
2017 Jun 13
0
Possible with enableJIT function
...ed is", mem_used()))
> [1] "At end memory used is 29126472"
> </output>
>
> Indeed memory used increases in each pass of the for loop.
>
> I have added these two lines at the top of the code after the library(pryr) invocation.
>
> library(compiler)
> oldJIT <- enableJIT(0)
>
> This resolves the issue in the sense that memory used remains constant after the first iteration.
> Output in the for loop is now:
> <output>
> [1] "nleqslv iteration 1 and memory used is 24487784"
> [1] "nleqslv iteration 2 and memory u...