When reading this thread it occured to me that one could reserve i0 as an integer type that is semantically identical to iN where N is the size of (i8*) in bits. But on the other hand I just woke up, so this might be a silly idea :-) Cheers, Gabor
On May 7, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Gabor Greif wrote:> When reading this thread it occured to me that > one could reserve i0 as an integer type that > is semantically identical to iN where N is > the size of (i8*) in bits. > > But on the other hand I just woke up, so this > might be a silly idea :-)The word opaque comes to mind. The basic question is, do you want people to be able to understand this stuff, or is it more like the bitcode file, you don't care that it is unreadable?
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
- [LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends?
- [LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends?
- [LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends?
- [LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence