Ok. Like I said, I am not too concerned with one or two llcbeta failures. That's expected. Thx, Evan On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <arnold.schwaighofer at gmail.com > wrote:> Another round ;) Sadly not beer. > > tested against r42630 darwin-x86: > SPASS llc-beta still fails > > thanks for the patience > > On 5 Oct 2007, at 20:58, Evan Cheng wrote: > >> Yes please. >>> okay then i'll make tailcallopt switch stack adjusting behaviour? > > > > the patch for the test suite (when/if it's needed) would be > something like: > >>>>> > --- Makefile.programs (revision 42630) > +++ Makefile.programs (working copy) > @@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ > LLCBETAOPTION := -sched=simple > endif > ifeq ($(ARCH),x86) > -LLCBETAOPTION := -enable-x86-conv-3-addr > +LLCBETAOPTION := -tailcallopt > +# -enable-x86-conv-3-addr > #-regalloc=local -fast > #-disable-rematerialization > #-disable-fp-elim > >>>>> > > > gee i am tired really have to go to bed now. > regards > > <tailcall-r42653-llvm.patch> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
There have been some changes in X86RegisterInfo.cpp that make my last patch not merge. Also there was an error in my code concerning how inreg parameters were lowered. the latest version of the patch does not fail the SPASS llc-beta test anymore (darwin-x86). if/when someone has the time to look at it - i would be happy to mail it. i think i should no longer clobber the mailing list with my patches :) regards arnold On 7 Oct 2007, at 00:04, Evan Cheng wrote:> Ok. Like I said, I am not too concerned with one or two llcbeta > failures. That's expected. > > Thx, > > Evan >
On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:> There have been some changes in X86RegisterInfo.cpp that make my last > patch not merge.Sorry, I know it's a moving target. :-)> > Also there was an error in my code concerning how inreg parameters > were lowered. > > the latest version of the patch does not fail the SPASS llc-beta test > anymore (darwin-x86).Very nice.> > if/when someone has the time to look at it - i would be happy to mail > it. i think i should no longer clobber the mailing list with my > patches :)Send it my way please. Thanks, Evan> > > regards arnold > > > On 7 Oct 2007, at 00:04, Evan Cheng wrote: > >> Ok. Like I said, I am not too concerned with one or two llcbeta >> failures. That's expected. >> >> Thx, >> >> Evan >> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev