If the loop gets unrolled by 4x I think SLP could cover it.
I guess the loopvectorizer should in theory be able to do this, so you could
look into why it isn’t doing it, perhaps by checking the debug log.
—escha
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Tom Chen via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Do anyone know how to get LLVM's vectorizer to work on this code?
> ```
> struct pair {
> int x[4], y[4];
> };
>
> void foo(int n, struct pair *a, int *restrict rx, int *restrict ry) {
> int x = 0, y = 0;
> for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> x += (a+(i/4))->x[i%4];
> y += (a+(i/4))->y[i%4];
> }
> *rx = x;
> *ry = y;
> }
> ```
> I have a pass that converts structures such as {int, int} into {int x 4,
int x 4}, but the transformation is profitable if it can work with the
vectorizer.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev