Here what I have tv_show.rb class TvShow < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :tv_show_managers has_many :customers, :through => :tv_show_managers attr_accessible :description end tv_show_manager.rb class TvShowManager < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :customer belongs_to :tv_show attr_accessible :activated_field, :customer_id, :friendship_group_id, :modify_on, :tv_show_id, :visible end customer.rb class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :date_of_birth has_one :customized has_one :customer_state has_many :tv_show_managers has_many :tv_shows, :through => :tv_show_managers attr_accessible :approval_pending, :consent, :first, :is_activated, :last, :last_visited, :normal_avatar, :organization_level_id, :password, :registered_on, :security_answer, :security_level, :security_question, :timezone, :username, :version end Essentially A customer may have many managers. A Manager is assign to one tv_show What his wrong with my code? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
On 16 July 2012 15:29, Jean-Sébastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Here what I have > tv_show.rb > class TvShow < ActiveRecord::Base > > has_many :tv_show_managers > has_many :customers, :through => :tv_show_managers > > attr_accessible :description > end > > tv_show_manager.rb > class TvShowManager < ActiveRecord::Base > > belongs_to :customer > belongs_to :tv_show > attr_accessible :activated_field, :customer_id, :friendship_group_id, > :modify_on, :tv_show_id, :visible > end > > customer.rb > class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base > > has_one :date_of_birth > has_one :customized > has_one :customer_state > has_many :tv_show_managers > has_many :tv_shows, :through => :tv_show_managers > attr_accessible :approval_pending, :consent, :first, :is_activated, > :last, :last_visited, :normal_avatar, :organization_level_id, :password, > :registered_on, :security_answer, :security_level, :security_question, > :timezone, :username, :version > end > > Essentially A customer may have many managers. A Manager is assign to > one tv_show > > What his wrong with my code?Give us a clue. Are you getting an error of some sort? If so it might be helpful to tell us what it is, we are not telepathic (at least I am not). Don''t forget to show us the bit of code generating the error if any. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Colin Law wrote in post #1068920:> On 16 July 2012 15:29, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> tv_show_manager.rb >> >> >> Essentially A customer may have many managers. A Manager is assign to >> one tv_show >> >> What his wrong with my code? > > Give us a clue. Are you getting an error of some sort? If so it > might be helpful to tell us what it is, we are not telepathic (at > least I am not). Don''t forget to show us the bit of code generating > the error if any. > > ColinSorry, I am using activeadmin has a backend. When creating a new manager, on the field Customer I see customer, but when it comes to show possible tv_show it show me #<TvShow:0xb69ca84 which i am assuming is making a reference to memory because the relations don''t work. Not to sure how to test it in Ruby console otherwise -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
On 16 July 2012 16:03, Jean-Sébastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Colin Law wrote in post #1068920: >> On 16 July 2012 15:29, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> tv_show_manager.rb >>> >>> >>> Essentially A customer may have many managers. A Manager is assign to >>> one tv_show >>> >>> What his wrong with my code? >> >> Give us a clue. Are you getting an error of some sort? If so it >> might be helpful to tell us what it is, we are not telepathic (at >> least I am not). Don''t forget to show us the bit of code generating >> the error if any. >> >> Colin > > Sorry, > > I am using activeadmin has a backend. When creating a new manager, on > the field Customer I see customer, but when it comes to show possible > tv_show it show me #<TvShow:0xb69ca84 which i am assuming is making a > reference to memory because the relations don''t work. Not to sure how to > test it in Ruby console otherwiseIs it your code that is showing it wrong or is it inside activeadmin? If it is your code then show us the bit of code displaying it. If it is activeadmin then I can''t help I am afraid. Colin> > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US. >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Colin Law wrote in post #1068930:> On 16 July 2012 16:03, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> Give us a clue. Are you getting an error of some sort? If so it >> tv_show it show me #<TvShow:0xb69ca84 which i am assuming is making a >> reference to memory because the relations don''t work. Not to sure how to >> test it in Ruby console otherwise > > Is it your code that is showing it wrong or is it inside activeadmin? > If it is your code then show us the bit of code displaying it. If it > is activeadmin then I can''t help I am afraid. > > ColinI believe it is active_admin, but i am just wondering if the Association above seem to be correct, or i am totally missing the point of ruby on rails association, like did i make mistake -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
On 16 July 2012 16:31, Jean-Sébastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Colin Law wrote in post #1068930: >> On 16 July 2012 16:03, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>>> Give us a clue. Are you getting an error of some sort? If so it >>> tv_show it show me #<TvShow:0xb69ca84 which i am assuming is making a >>> reference to memory because the relations don''t work. Not to sure how to >>> test it in Ruby console otherwise >> >> Is it your code that is showing it wrong or is it inside activeadmin? >> If it is your code then show us the bit of code displaying it. If it >> is activeadmin then I can''t help I am afraid. >> >> Colin > > I believe it is active_admin, but i am just wondering if the Association > above seem to be correct, or i am totally missing the point of ruby on > rails association, like did i make mistakeIt looks ok to me. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Colin Law wrote in post #1068932:> On 16 July 2012 16:31, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> >>> Colin >> >> I believe it is active_admin, but i am just wondering if the Association >> above seem to be correct, or i am totally missing the point of ruby on >> rails association, like did i make mistake > > It looks ok to me. > > ColinI come from mySQL where I would have 3 tables Customer TvShowManager TvShow JOHN JEAN tv_show_id(1) 1 Simpson HEATHER JEAN tv_show_id(2) 2 Familly Guy JASON JASON tv_show_id(3) 3 Simpson HEATHER tv_show_id(4) 4 Batman HEATHER tv_show_id(5) 5 Stargate Customer may have many tv_show_managers, and many tv_show through tv_show_managers Tv_show_Managers belongs_to customer Tv_show_Managers belongs_to tv_show Tv_show has_one tv_show_manager Tv_show has_one customer, through tv_show_manager Is it possible, or is dead wrong? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
On 16 July 2012 16:43, Jean-Sébastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Colin Law wrote in post #1068932: >> On 16 July 2012 16:31, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Colin >>> >>> I believe it is active_admin, but i am just wondering if the Association >>> above seem to be correct, or i am totally missing the point of ruby on >>> rails association, like did i make mistake >> >> It looks ok to me. >> >> Colin > > I come from mySQL where I would have 3 tables > > Customer TvShowManager TvShow > JOHN JEAN tv_show_id(1) 1 Simpson > HEATHER JEAN tv_show_id(2) 2 Familly Guy > JASON JASON tv_show_id(3) 3 Simpson > HEATHER tv_show_id(4) 4 Batman > HEATHER tv_show_id(5) 5 Stargate > > Customer may have many tv_show_managers, and many tv_show through > tv_show_managers > > Tv_show_Managers belongs_to customer > Tv_show_Managers belongs_to tv_show > > Tv_show has_one tv_show_manager > Tv_show has_one customer, through tv_show_manager > > > Is it possible, or is dead wrong?As I said it looks ok to me. Show us your db/schema.rb Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Colin Law wrote in post #1068939:> On 16 July 2012 16:43, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> >> >> Is it possible, or is dead wrong? > As I said it looks ok to me. Show us your db/schema.rb > > ColinThis is my schema # encoding: UTF-8 # This file is auto-generated from the current state of the database. Instead # of editing this file, please use the migrations feature of Active Record to # incrementally modify your database, and then regenerate this schema definition. # # Note that this schema.rb definition is the authoritative source for your # database schema. If you need to create the application database on another # system, you should be using db:schema:load, not running all the migrations # from scratch. The latter is a flawed and unsustainable approach (the more migrations # you''ll amass, the slower it''ll run and the greater likelihood for issues). # # It''s strongly recommended to check this file into your version control system. ActiveRecord::Schema.define(:version => 20120713204006) do create_table "customers", :force => true do |t| t.string "first" t.string "last" t.string "username" t.string "password" t.boolean "consent" t.string "normal_avatar" t.string "security_question" t.string "security_answer" t.integer "security_level" t.integer "organization_level_id" t.integer "version" t.string "timezone" t.datetime "last_visited" t.datetime "registered_on" t.boolean "is_activated" t.boolean "approval_pending" t.datetime "created_at", :null => false t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false end create_table "customizeds", :force => true do |t| t.integer "customer_id" t.string "background" t.datetime "created_at", :null => false t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false end create_table "date_of_births", :force => true do |t| t.date "customer_date" t.integer "customer_id" t.datetime "modify_on" t.integer "friendship_group_id" t.boolean "visible" t.boolean "activated_field" t.datetime "created_at", :null => false t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false end create_table "friendship_groups", :force => true do |t| t.string "description" t.datetime "created_at", :null => false t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false end create_table "tv_show_managers", :force => true do |t| t.integer "tv_show_id" t.integer "customer_id" t.datetime "modify_on" t.integer "friendship_group_id" t.boolean "visible" t.boolean "activated_field" t.datetime "created_at", :null => false t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false end create_table "tv_shows", :force => true do |t| t.string "description" t.datetime "created_at", :null => false t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false end end But i think its looks good, should i also reinforce in my model foreign key so it doesnt get confused -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
On 16 July 2012 17:01, Jean-Sébastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Colin Law wrote in post #1068939: >> On 16 July 2012 16:43, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> Is it possible, or is dead wrong? >> As I said it looks ok to me. Show us your db/schema.rb >> >> Colin > > This is my schema > > # encoding: UTF-8 > # This file is auto-generated from the current state of the database. > Instead > # of editing this file, please use the migrations feature of Active > Record to > # incrementally modify your database, and then regenerate this schema > definition. > # > # Note that this schema.rb definition is the authoritative source for > your > # database schema. If you need to create the application database on > another > # system, you should be using db:schema:load, not running all the > migrations > # from scratch. The latter is a flawed and unsustainable approach (the > more migrations > # you''ll amass, the slower it''ll run and the greater likelihood for > issues). > # > # It''s strongly recommended to check this file into your version control > system. > > ActiveRecord::Schema.define(:version => 20120713204006) do > > create_table "customers", :force => true do |t| > t.string "first" > t.string "last" > t.string "username" > t.string "password" > t.boolean "consent" > t.string "normal_avatar" > t.string "security_question" > t.string "security_answer" > t.integer "security_level" > t.integer "organization_level_id" > t.integer "version" > t.string "timezone" > t.datetime "last_visited" > t.datetime "registered_on" > t.boolean "is_activated" > t.boolean "approval_pending" > t.datetime "created_at", :null => false > t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false > end > > create_table "customizeds", :force => true do |t| > t.integer "customer_id" > t.string "background" > t.datetime "created_at", :null => false > t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false > end > > create_table "date_of_births", :force => true do |t| > t.date "customer_date" > t.integer "customer_id" > t.datetime "modify_on" > t.integer "friendship_group_id" > t.boolean "visible" > t.boolean "activated_field" > t.datetime "created_at", :null => false > t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false > end > > create_table "friendship_groups", :force => true do |t| > t.string "description" > t.datetime "created_at", :null => false > t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false > end > > create_table "tv_show_managers", :force => true do |t| > t.integer "tv_show_id" > t.integer "customer_id" > t.datetime "modify_on" > t.integer "friendship_group_id" > t.boolean "visible" > t.boolean "activated_field" > t.datetime "created_at", :null => false > t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false > end > > create_table "tv_shows", :force => true do |t| > t.string "description" > t.datetime "created_at", :null => false > t.datetime "updated_at", :null => false > end > > end > > But i think its looks good, should i also reinforce in my model foreign > key so it doesnt get confusedIt looks ok to me. Not sure what you mean by reinforcing the foreign key. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Colin Law wrote in post #1068942:> On 16 July 2012 17:01, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >> # database schema. If you need to create the application database on >> >> t.string "security_answer" >> end >> t.integer "customer_id" >> t.datetime "created_at", :null => false >> t.datetime "created_at", :null => false >> >> But i think its looks good, should i also reinforce in my model foreign >> key so it doesnt get confused > > It looks ok to me. Not sure what you mean by reinforcing the foreign > key. > > ColinIn the model tv_show_manager Tv_show_Managers belongs_to customer, foreign_key: "customer_id" Tv_show_Managers belongs_to tv_show, foreign_key: "tv_show_id" Is it helpfull for ruby to understand exactly which field is which or its just a waste? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
On 16 July 2012 17:18, Jean-Sébastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Colin Law wrote in post #1068942: >> On 16 July 2012 17:01, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> >>> # database schema. If you need to create the application database on >>> >>> t.string "security_answer" >>> end >>> t.integer "customer_id" >>> t.datetime "created_at", :null => false >>> t.datetime "created_at", :null => false >>> >>> But i think its looks good, should i also reinforce in my model foreign >>> key so it doesnt get confused >> >> It looks ok to me. Not sure what you mean by reinforcing the foreign >> key. >> >> Colin > > In the model tv_show_manager > > Tv_show_Managers belongs_to customer, foreign_key: "customer_id" > Tv_show_Managers belongs_to tv_show, foreign_key: "tv_show_id" > > > Is it helpfull for ruby to understand exactly which field is which or > its just a waste?It is not required, it makes no difference to Rails, since it already the default, but may confuse a reader as he/she will wonder why it is there. I suspect your problem is something to do with the way you are using activeadmin Colin> > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US. >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
Colin Law wrote in post #1068946:> On 16 July 2012 17:18, Jean-Sbastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > I suspect your problem is something to do with the way you are using > activeadmin > > ColinGuess so thanks for you help! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-US.
When I do an association, I create an association by integer id field correct? If i want to see in my form how to see the description instead of the id how would i proceed? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
On 16 July 2012 21:30, Jean-Sébastien D. <lists-fsXkhYbjdPsEEoCn2XhGlw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> When I do an association, I create an association by integer id field > correct? If i want to see in my form how to see the description instead > of the id how would i proceed?To answer such basic questions I suggest you work right through some rails tutorials. railstutorial.org is good and is free to use online. Work right through, entering the code and checking that it works, including doing all the exercises and then you will have a good grasp of the basics of rails and will be able to answer these questions yourself. Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.