So essentially you''re trying to do something like this?
modelname.where(:name => "foo").union(modelname.where(:name =>
"bar"))
Since it''s the same model, I don''t think there''s a
reason to use a union in
this case. Isn''t this really just an OR operator?
select * from modelname where name = "foo" or name = "bar"
Couldn''t you just use the or operator like so?
modelname.where("name = ? or name = ?", "foo",
"bar").order("something")
Granted, your WHERE clause is probably more complex than that, but the
principle should be the same.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/8LKcfxmrF3gJ.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.