Me: not experienced with Rails or Ruby, Problem: Ubuntu 9.04 server in my shop ...couldn''t get Apache2.2 + Passenger + Rails to work for Redmine. (No answer at Redmine list and I don''t think its their problem anyway). Also couldn''t get Apache2.2 and just Rails to work, though some people said it would. Webrick works. Goal: run Redmine on a server that also runs PHP and other web services. No port numbers in URL. Separate VirtualHost for Rails from PHP apps. Error: no matches for route...."path to various css and js files" ..... the site actually works very very slowly, but the graphics and layouts and javascripts don''t. Main question: Is it impossible to get Apache 2.2 to work with Rails without Passenger or Mongrel Cluster? Indirect evidence on Rails documentation makes it sound like you need Mongrel for the routes that don''t go to an actual file? Tried: many differing Apache configs, fastcgi vs fcgid, with or without Passenger, other Rails apps ( simple hello world works in present config) reset permissions and ownership, checked paths, scratched head, made coffee... Ideas? thanks John
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:42 AM, John <j_1-wTtCUEYctdrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Me: not experienced with Rails or Ruby, > > Problem: Ubuntu 9.04 server in my shop ...couldn''t get Apache2.2 + > Passenger + Rails to work for Redmine. (No answer at Redmine list and > I don''t think its their problem anyway). Also couldn''t get Apache2.2 > and just Rails to work, though some people said it would. Webrick > works. > > Goal: run Redmine on a server that also runs PHP and other web > services. No port numbers in URL. Separate VirtualHost for Rails from > PHP apps. > > Error: no matches for route...."path to various css and js > files" ..... the site actually works very very slowly, but the > graphics and layouts and javascripts don''t. > > Main question: Is it impossible to get Apache 2.2 to work with Rails > without Passenger or Mongrel Cluster? Indirect evidence on Rails > documentation makes it sound like you need Mongrel for the routes that > don''t go to an actual file? > > Tried: many differing Apache configs, fastcgi vs fcgid, with or > without Passenger, other Rails apps ( simple hello world works in > present config) reset permissions and ownership, checked paths, > scratched head, made coffee... > > > Ideas?Can you "pastie" some configs and some errors? I have Apache 2.2.13 + Rails + Redmine + PHP running on a home server with Arch Linux, so either is one of your configurations or your packages. How did you installed all your (this problem related) software pieces? Cheers. -- Leonardo Mateo. There''s no place like ~
John wrote:> Me: not experienced with Rails or Ruby, > > Problem: Ubuntu 9.04 server in my shop ...couldn''t get Apache2.2 + > Passenger + Rails to work for Redmine. (No answer at Redmine list and > I don''t think its their problem anyway). Also couldn''t get Apache2.2 > and just Rails to work, though some people said it would. Webrick > works. > > Goal: run Redmine on a server that also runs PHP and other web > services. No port numbers in URL. Separate VirtualHost for Rails from > PHP apps. > > Error: no matches for route...."path to various css and js > files" ..... the site actually works very very slowly, but the > graphics and layouts and javascripts don''t. > > Main question: Is it impossible to get Apache 2.2 to work with Rails > without Passenger or Mongrel Cluster? Indirect evidence on Rails > documentation makes it sound like you need Mongrel for the routes that > don''t go to an actual file?There are other ways, but Passenger is by far the easiest -- it should be about as easy as setting up PHP. Have you checked the Passenger docs and confirmed that your vhost configuration is correct?> > Tried: many differing Apache configs, fastcgi vs fcgid, with or > without Passenger,Passenger should be all you need -- no Mongrel or FastCGI.> other Rails apps ( simple hello world works in > present config)Then perhaps this *is* a Redmine issue.> The reset permissions and ownership, checked paths, > scratched head, made coffee...And unfortunately we can''t really help you, since you haven''t provided any error messages or config files to diagnose... Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > > Ideas? > > thanks > John-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
see next reply, thanks On Sep 30, 1:16 am, Leonardo Mateo <leonardoma...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:42 AM, John <j...-wTtCUEYctdrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Me: not experienced with Rails or Ruby, > > > Problem: Ubuntu 9.04 server in my shop ...couldn''t get Apache2.2 + > > Passenger + Rails to work for Redmine. (No answer at Redmine list and > > I don''t think its their problem anyway). Also couldn''t get Apache2.2 > > and just Rails to work, though some people said it would. Webrick > > works. > > > Goal: run Redmine on a server that also runs PHP and other web > > services. No port numbers in URL. Separate VirtualHost for Rails from > > PHP apps. > > > Error: no matches for route...."path to various css and js > > files" ..... the site actually works very very slowly, but the > > graphics and layouts and javascripts don''t. > > > Main question: Is it impossible to get Apache 2.2 to work with Rails > > without Passenger or Mongrel Cluster? Indirect evidence on Rails > > documentation makes it sound like you need Mongrel for the routes that > > don''t go to an actual file? > > > Tried: many differing Apache configs, fastcgi vs fcgid, with or > > without Passenger, other Rails apps ( simple hello world works in > > present config) reset permissions and ownership, checked paths, > > scratched head, made coffee... > > > Ideas? > > Can you "pastie" some configs and some errors? I have Apache 2.2.13 + > Rails + Redmine + PHP running on a home server with Arch Linux, so > either is one of your configurations or your packages. > How did you installed all your (this problem related) software pieces? > > Cheers. > > -- > Leonardo Mateo. > There''s no place like ~
Yeah thanks. I didn''t post up apache configs because I wanted first to know which path, Passenger vs no Passenger vs Mongrel cluster to take, so I could focus on one, and then ask better questions. I''ll start over tomorrow when I am back in the office and re-load Passenger and see what happens.> > > other Rails apps ( simple hello world works in > > present config) > > Then perhaps this *is* a Redmine issue.well, here''s my logic: a simple hello world rails app works, but it doesn''t have complex routes or stylesheets or javascript files, and those are failing. When I try Webrick Redmine works correctly, therefore *something or a lack of something* is interfering with Ruby''s ability ( or Rails?) to route to these files when I use Apache . .> > And unfortunately we can''t really help you, since you haven''t provided > any error messages or config files to diagnose... > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > mar...-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
OK I am back with some better data.
I have Apache2.2 set up with a VirtualHost for the Rails site and
loading fcgid not fastcgi. Apache is sending all requests to the base
URL to dispatch.fcgi and the Redmine site checks the db and loads very
slowly without any CSS or Javascript. The Redmine error message is "no
route matches..."
1) Apache virtualhost:
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerAdmin me-QcrkscW70Lc@public.gmane.org
ServerName redmine..com
DocumentRoot /var/www/redmine/public/
<Directory "/var/www/redmine/public">
Options Indexes +ExecCGI FollowSymLinks
AddHandler fcgid-script .fcgi
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
</Directory>
ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log
LogLevel debug
</VirtualHost>
2) The .htaccess file in the public directory ( /var/www/redmine/
public):
Options +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI
##################################
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ dispatch.fcgi [QSA,L]
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^$ index.html [QSA]
RewriteRule ^([^.]+)$ $1.html [QSA]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
<IfModule mod_fcgid.c>
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ dispatch.fcgi [QSA,L]
</IfModule>
<IfModule !mod_fcgid.c>
<IfModule mod_cgi.c>
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ dispatch.cgi [QSA,L]
</IfModule>
</IfModule>
#########################################
3) the error messages from production.log in redmine:
ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches "/plugin_assets/
redmine_issues_group/stylesheets/stylesheet.css" with
{:method=>:get}):
and for "/stylesheets/jstoolbar.css"
and for "/javascripts/application.js" and so on....
4) The routes.rb file from redmine ( note these routes work under
WeBrick)
ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map|
# Add your own custom routes here.
# The priority is based upon order of creation: first created ->
highest priority.
# Here''s a sample route:
# map.connect ''products/:id'', :controller =>
''catalog'', :action =>
''view''
# Keep in mind you can assign values other than :controller
and :action
# Allow Redmine plugins to map routes and potentially override them
Rails.plugins.each do |plugin|
map.from_plugin plugin.name.to_sym
end
map.home '''', :controller => ''welcome''
map.signin ''login'', :controller =>
''account'', :action => ''login''
map.signout ''logout'', :controller =>
''account'', :action => ''logout''
map.connect ''wiki/:id/:page/:action'', :controller =>
''wiki'', :page
=> nil
map.connect ''roles/workflow/:id/:role_id/:tracker_id'',
:controller
=> ''roles'', :action => ''workflow''
map.connect ''help/:ctrl/:page'', :controller =>
''help''
#map.connect '':controller/:action/:id/:sort_key/:sort_order''
map.connect ''issues/:issue_id/relations/:action/:id'',
:controller =>
''issue_relations''
map.connect ''projects/:project_id/issues/:action'',
:controller =>
''issues''
map.connect ''projects/:project_id/news/:action'', :controller
=>
''news''
map.connect ''projects/:project_id/documents/:action'',
:controller =>
''documents''
map.connect ''projects/:project_id/boards/:action/:id'',
:controller
=> ''boards''
map.connect ''projects/:project_id/timelog/:action/:id'',
:controller
=> ''timelog'', :project_id => /.+/
map.connect ''boards/:board_id/topics/:action/:id'',
:controller =>
''messages''
map.with_options :controller => ''repositories'' do |omap|
omap.repositories_show ''repositories/browse/:id/*path'',
:action =>
''browse''
omap.repositories_changes ''repositories/changes/:id/
*path'', :action => ''changes''
omap.repositories_diff ''repositories/diff/:id/*path'',
:action =>
''diff''
omap.repositories_entry ''repositories/entry/:id/*path'',
:action =>
''entry''
omap.repositories_entry ''repositories/annotate/:id/*path'',
:action
=> ''annotate''
omap.repositories_revision ''repositories/
revision/:id/:rev'', :action => ''revision''
end
map.connect ''attachments/:id'', :controller =>
''attachments'', :action
=> ''show'', :id => /\d+/
map.connect ''attachments/:id/:filename'', :controller =>
''attachments'', :action => ''show'', :id
=> /\d+/, :filename => /.*/
map.connect ''attachments/download/:id/:filename'',
:controller =>
''attachments'', :action => ''download'', :id
=> /\d+/, :filename => /.*/
# Allow downloading Web Service WSDL as a file with an extension
# instead of a file named ''wsdl''
map.connect '':controller/service.wsdl'', :action =>
''wsdl''
# Install the default route as the lowest priority.
map.connect '':controller/:action/:id''
end
################
thanks,
John
John wrote: [...]>> > other Rails apps ( simple hello world works in >> > present config) >> >> Then perhaps this *is* a Redmine issue. > > well, here''s my logic: a simple hello world rails app works, but it > doesn''t have complex routes or stylesheets or javascript files,It *does* have stylesheets and JS. The default welcome page in a new Rails app uses both.> and > those are failing. When I try Webrick Redmine works correctly, > therefore *something or a lack of something* is interfering with > Ruby''s ability ( or Rails?) to route to these files when I use > Apache . > > .Again, I think this is an issue with Redmine, or at least with the interaction between Redmine and Passenger (which is strange -- I''ve used them together with no problem). You might check in Redmine''s forums. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
John wrote:> OK I am back with some better data. > I have Apache2.2 set up with a VirtualHost for the Rails site and > loading fcgid not fastcgi. Apache is sending all requests to the base > URL to dispatch.fcgi and the Redmine site checks the db and loads very > slowly without any CSS or Javascript. The Redmine error message is "no > route matches..." > > 1) Apache virtualhost: > <VirtualHost *:80> > ServerAdmin me-QcrkscW70Lc@public.gmane.org > ServerName redmine..com > DocumentRoot /var/www/redmine/public/ > > <Directory "/var/www/redmine/public"> > Options Indexes +ExecCGI FollowSymLinks > AddHandler fcgid-script .fcgi > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > </Directory> > > ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log > LogLevel debug > </VirtualHost>[...] Are you using Passenger? If so, then you don''t need fcgi. Please read the Passenger documentation. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
No passenger. just Apache and Rails. On Oct 1, 12:46 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas- s.net> wrote:> John wrote: > > OK I am back with some better data. > > I have Apache2.2 set up with a VirtualHost for the Rails site and > > loading fcgid not fastcgi. Apache is sending all requests to the base > > URL to dispatch.fcgi and the Redmine site checks the db and loads very > > slowly without any CSS or Javascript. The Redmine error message is "no > > route matches..." > > > 1) Apache virtualhost: > > <VirtualHost *:80> > > ServerAdmin m...-QcrkscW70Lc@public.gmane.org > > ServerName redmine..com > > DocumentRoot /var/www/redmine/public/ > > > <Directory "/var/www/redmine/public"> > > Options Indexes +ExecCGI FollowSymLinks > > AddHandler fcgid-script .fcgi > > Order allow,deny > > Allow from all > > </Directory> > > > ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log > > LogLevel debug > > </VirtualHost> > > [...] > > Are you using Passenger? If so, then you don''t need fcgi. Please read > the Passenger documentation. > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > mar...-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
You ARE going to need SOMETHING that will execute the rails environment. Apache does NOT have the required environment out-of-the- box to run rails. You will need something like: fcgi thin mongrel passenger (recommended)
I am using fcgi and Redmine is accessing the database and building the page, but it can''t route to *some* files. As stated above I am not experienced with Ruby or Rails so I can''t tell when Rails is doing something or Ruby is, but I am assuming database access is all Ruby and therefore Rails must be working partially. But somethings wrong and maybe thats it.... I got here because I couldn''t get Passenger to work....but if the consensus is for using passenger I''ll go back to it, I just got tired of changing too many things at once. thanks, john On Oct 1, 3:15 pm, heimdull <fre...-RCI/mp9mI1I6GGFevw1D/A@public.gmane.org> wrote:> You ARE going to need SOMETHING that will execute the rails > environment. Apache does NOT have the required environment out-of-the- > box to run rails. You will need something like: > > fcgi > thin > mongrel > passenger (recommended)
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:26 AM, John <j_1-wTtCUEYctdrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > I am using fcgi and Redmine is accessing the database and building the > page, but it can''t route to *some* files. > > As stated above I am not experienced with Ruby or Rails so I can''t > tell when Rails is doing something or Ruby is, but I am assuming > database access is all Ruby and therefore Rails must be working > partially. But somethings wrong and maybe thats it.... I got here > because I couldn''t get Passenger to work....but if the consensus is > for using passenger I''ll go back to it, I just got tired of changing > too many things at once. >I''d strongly recommend you to use passenger, and it should work out of the box. If it doensn''t, you should describe your rails environment and how you installed, because I''ve experienced problems with debian(like)? packages. You should install only rubygems from Ubuntu packages, then install the gem rubygems-update, and then run update_rubygems (check if it''s in the path), and after that install all your gems via gem and not via apt-get/aptitude/synaptic. After that install passenger, build the apache module, create your apache config files, define your vhost, and should work. That''s how I''ve done it in serveral computers, including Ubuntu, Debian and a couple of Arch Linux. Hope it helps. Cheers. PS: Please, try to avoid top-posting, is really hard to follow the conversation with that. -- Leonardo Mateo. There''s no place like ~
Thanks Leonardo, I did do some installs using Ubuntu-Debian packages, but I think I''ll follow your advice on using only the gems install, also using Passenger. P is still not working, so I''ll strip it and Rails out and start over. I don''t agree about top-posting, to me bottom-posting is perverse, but will gladly do whatever the list style is. Most Linux lists do top- posting but I ain''t religious about it. John On Oct 2, 1:25 am, Leonardo Mateo <leonardoma...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I''d strongly recommend you to use passenger, ... > You should install only rubygems from Ubuntu packages, then install > the gem rubygems-update, and then run update_rubygems (check if it''s > in the path), and after that install all your gems via gem and not via > apt-get/aptitude/synaptic. > After that install passenger, > > PS: Please, try to avoid top-posting, is really hard to follow the > conversation with that. > > -- > Leonardo Mateo. > There''s no place like ~
Marnen Laibow-Koser
2009-Oct-02 18:33 UTC
Top-posting -- was: Re: Apache2.2 + what to get Rails
John wrote:> Thanks Leonardo, I did do some installs using Ubuntu-Debian packages, > but I think I''ll follow your advice on using only the gems install, > also using Passenger. P is still not working, so I''ll strip it and > Rails out and start over. > > I don''t agree about top-posting, to me bottom-posting is perverse, but > will gladly do whatever the list style is.Um, how is it "perverse" to follow conversational order -- that is, to do things like> What OS do you use,Mac OS X> and what version?Snow Leopard. That''s how it would be in a conversation. It is perverse to do anything else, I think.> Most Linux lists do top- > postingI doubt that. I think most people just don''t care to fight with e-mail clients that make top-posting easier.> but I ain''t religious about it.Nor I, usually. But top-posting *is* harder to follow, especially if (like me) you prefer the greater clarity of going line by line.> > JohnBest, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www.marnen.org marnen-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I''ve run into random problems before when trying to get passenger to work. They were dependent on the particular environment I was installing to and generally had to do with the ways I like to customize my ruby/rails environment (so probably not worth me posting). That said, the investment of time is really worth the payoff, in my opinion. Once you have it set up and working, it reduces a lot of the hassle of managing your rails applications, and handles multiple concurrent requests without you having to worry about it. That said, particularly if you''re on a machine with limited resources (like a cheap, small VM) or non-standard ruby/rails installations, there will be up-front costs of time and effort in order to get your installation going. On Oct 2, 11:33 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas- s.net> wrote:> John wrote: > > Thanks Leonardo, I did do some installs using Ubuntu-Debian packages, > > but I think I''ll follow your advice on using only the gems install, > > also using Passenger. P is still not working, so I''ll strip it and > > Rails out and start over. > > > I don''t agree about top-posting, to me bottom-posting is perverse, but > > will gladly do whatever the list style is. > > Um, how is it "perverse" to follow conversational order -- that is, to > do things like> What OS do you use, > Mac OS X > > and what version? > > Snow Leopard. > > That''s how it would be in a conversation. It is perverse to do anything > else, I think. > > > Most Linux lists do top- > > posting > > I doubt that. I think most people just don''t care to fight with e-mail > clients that make top-posting easier. > > > but I ain''t religious about it. > > Nor I, usually. But top-posting *is* harder to follow, especially if > (like me) you prefer the greater clarity of going line by line. > > > > > John > > Best, > -- > Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp://www.marnen.org > mar...-sbuyVjPbboAdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Oct 2, 11:33 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser <rails-mailing-l...@andreas- s.net> wrote:>.... > > > but I ain''t religious about it. > > Nor I, usually. But top-posting *is* harder to follow, especially if > (like me) you prefer the greater clarity of going line by line. >sure Marnen, I have no quibble with that and do it all the time, but *I* find it awkward to scroll through a long quote that I myself wrote or have already read just to get to the meat&potatoes. My biggest complaint is misuse of digests and failure to trim quotes. Non- computer lists are terrible at staying OT....whoops I digress! - ripping everything out and starting over with rubygems, Rails and Passenger. John
Thanks everybody!
Redmine is working correctly now. I am not certain what changed, as
my settings look like they did before, so I must have the magic
combination. Passenger is nowloaded via the gem instead of manually
before. For the sake of the next newbie, here''s what I did:
starting with a 9.04 Ubuntu server, running Apache2.2 and Mysql and
Ruby in the usual way, with build tools installed, and root access:
install the Redmine app following their directions
apt-get install rubygems1.8
run "gem install rubygems-update"
run "update_rubygems" note: this will clean out your gems
run "gem install rails --VERSION=2.1.2" required by Redmine app
run "gem install mysql"
run "gem install passenger"
run "passenger-install-apache2-module" follow instructions
restart Apache
####################
heres the relevant part of my default configuration file from apache2/
sites-available:
LoadModule passenger_module /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/
passenger-2.2.5/ext/apache2/mod_passenger.so
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerAdmin me-hcDgGtZH8xNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
ServerName redmine.example.com
DocumentRoot /var/www/redmine/public/
PassengerRoot /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.5
PassengerRuby /usr/bin/ruby1.8
<Directory "/var/www/redmine/public/">
Options Indexes +ExecCGI FollowSymLinks
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
</Directory>
ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log
LogLevel debug
</VirtualHost>
#############
and heres the .htaccess file........
Options +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ dispatch.cgi [QSA,L]
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^$ index.html [QSA]
RewriteRule ^([^.]+)$ $1.html [QSA]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
ErrorDocument 500 "<h2>Application error</h2>Rails application
REDMINE failed to start properly"
##############
and here''s what gem says I have:
*** LOCAL GEMS ***
actionmailer (2.3.4, 2.1.2)
actionpack (2.3.4, 2.1.2)
activerecord (2.3.4, 2.1.2)
activeresource (2.3.4, 2.1.2)
activesupport (2.3.4, 2.1.2)
fastthread (1.0.7)
mysql (2.8.1)
passenger (2.2.5)
rack (1.0.0)
rails (2.1.2)
rake (0.8.7)
rubygems-update (1.3.5)
########################
and heres what dpkg says I have for ruby:
root@dizzy:/var/www/redmine/public# dpkg -l |grep ruby
libapache-ruby1.8
1.2.6-2
libapache2-mod-ruby
1.2.6-2
libbreakpoint-ruby1.8
0.5.1-2
libbuilder-ruby1.8
2.1.2-1
libcmdparse2-ruby1.8
2.0.2-2
libdaemons-ruby1.8
1.0.10-2
liberb-ruby
4.2
libfcgi-ruby1.8
0.8.7-4.1
liblog4r-ruby1.8
1.0.5-7
libmmap-ruby1.8
0.2.6-3
libmocha-ruby1.8
0.9.0-1
libncurses-ruby1.8
1.1-3
libopenssl-ruby1.8
1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1
libreadline-ruby1.8
1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1
libredcloth-ruby1.8 3.0.99.0.svn.
20060519-1
libruby
4.2
libruby1.8
1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1
libsqlite3-ruby1.8
1.2.4-2
libxml-simple-ruby
1.0.11-2
rake
0.8.1-3
rdoc
4.2
ruby
4.2
ruby1.8
1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1
ruby1.8-dev
1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1
ruby1.8-examples
1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1
rubygems-doc
1.3.1-1
rubygems1.8
1.3.1-1
####################
thanks again.
Leonardo Mateo
2009-Oct-03 09:05 UTC
Re: Top-posting -- was: Re: Apache2.2 + what to get Rails
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:55 PM, John <j_1-wTtCUEYctdrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Thanks everybody! > Redmine is working correctly now. I am not certain what changed,I am. You only used package management for rubygems :)> as > my settings look like they did before, so I must have the magic > combination. Passenger is nowloaded via the gem instead of manually > before. For the sake of the next newbie, here''s what I did: > > starting with a 9.04 Ubuntu server, running Apache2.2 and Mysql and > Ruby in the usual way, with build tools installed, and root access: > > install the Redmine app following their directions > > apt-get install rubygems1.8 > run "gem install rubygems-update" > run "update_rubygems" note: this will clean out your gems > run "gem install rails --VERSION=2.1.2" required by Redmine app > run "gem install mysql" > run "gem install passenger" > run "passenger-install-apache2-module" follow instructions > > restart Apache > > #################### > > heres the relevant part of my default configuration file from apache2/ > sites-available: > > > LoadModule passenger_module /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ > passenger-2.2.5/ext/apache2/mod_passenger.so > > <VirtualHost *:80> > ServerAdmin me-hcDgGtZH8xNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org > ServerName redmine.example.com > DocumentRoot /var/www/redmine/public/ > PassengerRoot /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.2.5 > PassengerRuby /usr/bin/ruby1.8 > > <Directory "/var/www/redmine/public/"> > Options Indexes +ExecCGI FollowSymLinks > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > </Directory> > > ErrorLog /var/log/apache2/error.log > LogLevel debug > > </VirtualHost> > > ############# > > and heres the .htaccess file........ > > Options +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI > RewriteRule ^(.*)$ dispatch.cgi [QSA,L] > RewriteEngine On > > RewriteRule ^$ index.html [QSA] > RewriteRule ^([^.]+)$ $1.html [QSA] > RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f > > ErrorDocument 500 "<h2>Application error</h2>Rails application > REDMINE failed to start properly" > > ############## > > and here''s what gem says I have: > > *** LOCAL GEMS *** > > actionmailer (2.3.4, 2.1.2) > actionpack (2.3.4, 2.1.2) > activerecord (2.3.4, 2.1.2) > activeresource (2.3.4, 2.1.2) > activesupport (2.3.4, 2.1.2) > fastthread (1.0.7) > mysql (2.8.1) > passenger (2.2.5) > rack (1.0.0) > rails (2.1.2) > rake (0.8.7) > rubygems-update (1.3.5) > > ######################## > > and heres what dpkg says I have for ruby: > > root@dizzy:/var/www/redmine/public# dpkg -l |grep ruby > libapache-ruby1.8 > 1.2.6-2 > libapache2-mod-ruby > 1.2.6-2 > libbreakpoint-ruby1.8 > 0.5.1-2 > libbuilder-ruby1.8 > 2.1.2-1 > libcmdparse2-ruby1.8 > 2.0.2-2 > libdaemons-ruby1.8 > 1.0.10-2 > liberb-ruby > 4.2 > libfcgi-ruby1.8 > 0.8.7-4.1 > liblog4r-ruby1.8 > 1.0.5-7 > libmmap-ruby1.8 > 0.2.6-3 > libmocha-ruby1.8 > 0.9.0-1 > libncurses-ruby1.8 > 1.1-3 > libopenssl-ruby1.8 > 1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1 > libreadline-ruby1.8 > 1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1 > libredcloth-ruby1.8 3.0.99.0.svn. > 20060519-1 > libruby > 4.2 > libruby1.8 > 1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1 > libsqlite3-ruby1.8 > 1.2.4-2 > libxml-simple-ruby > 1.0.11-2 > rake > 0.8.1-3 > rdoc > 4.2 > ruby > 4.2 > ruby1.8 > 1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1 > ruby1.8-dev > 1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1 > ruby1.8-examples > 1.8.7.72-3ubuntu0.1 > rubygems-doc > 1.3.1-1 > rubygems1.8 > 1.3.1-1 > > #################### > > thanks again. > > > > > > > >-- Leonardo Mateo. There''s no place like ~