I''ve just deployed my RoR app to a host that uses dispatch.cgi instead of Mongrel and came across this issue when using AJAX. The same issue has been highlighted a year ago, (on this list) <http:// groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/ 872fed1ff554c9a4> and (on Rails Trac) <http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ ticket/10365>. In short, when some browsers enact the default remote_form_for, remote_function or observe_field procedures (which produce Ajax.Updater calls), the call fails and in the log appears: Status: 500 Internal Server Error can''t modify frozen string /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.2.2/lib/action_controller/ request.rb:598:in `gsub!'' The issue appears to be worked around by adding ":method => :get" to each remote_function/observe_field call, but this is far from ideal, and is definitely still going to cause headaches. The calls use the POST method by default, it seems. Are there any developments on this bug? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
emanuele tozzato
2009-Apr-02 12:06 UTC
Re: "can''t modify frozen string" error in Ajax.Updater
I had the same problem deploying an application to hostgator, and I remember the bug would only show up using safari.. I did not find any solution other than moving the app to DreamHost.. iPhonized! On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Heath <hraftery-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Status: 500 Internal Server Error > can''t modify frozen string > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.2.2/lib/action_controller/ > request.rb:598:in `gsub!'' > > The issue appears to be worked around by adding ":method => :get" to > each remote_function/observe_field call, but this is far from ideal, > and is definitely still going to cause headaches. The calls use the > POST method by default, it seems. > > Are there any developments on this bug?--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---