I''ve upgraded an existing application from 2.1 to 2.2.2. All of the integration tests failed, complaining about there being no ''secret'' defined in the session_store configuration options. There isn''t a secret defined, since we don''t use the cookie session store (it''s a wap site, and many phone browsers don''t support cookies). Setting the secret to an appropriate value fixed all the tests. It looks like the database_manager is hardcoded to be a CookieStore in rack_process.rb. Is there any plan on getting integration tests to use the actual configured cookie store? Or should we be finding a better way to do higher level integration tests? Thanks, Darren --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
What I ended up doing was overriding the default options in RackRequest. In test.rb, I added class ActionController::RackRequest DEFAULT_SESSION_OPTIONS = { :database_manager => CGI::Session::MemoryStore, # store data in memory :prefix => "ruby_sess.", # prefix session file names :session_path => "/", # available to all paths in app :session_key => "_session_id", :cookie_only => false, :session_http_only=> true } end I get a warning about the constant already being defined, but it''s better than having the tests fail. Also see <http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/1453- gets-in-integration-test-unless-you-are-using-cookie-sessions>. Lee On Nov 22, 5:51 pm, Darren <darren.b...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I''ve upgraded an existing application from 2.1 to 2.2.2. All of the > integration tests failed, complaining about there being no ''secret'' > defined in the session_store configuration options. There isn''t a > secret defined, since we don''t use the cookie session store (it''s a > wap site, and many phone browsers don''t support cookies). Setting the > secret to an appropriate value fixed all the tests. > > It looks like the database_manager is hardcoded to be a CookieStore in > rack_process.rb. > > Is there any plan on getting integration tests to use the actual > configured cookie store? Or should we be finding a better way to do > higher level integration tests? > > Thanks, > Darren--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Someone to give me the configuration for "config.action_controller.session_store = :active_record_store" ?! Thanks. On 9 déc 2008, 21:49, Lee Fyock <lee.fy...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> What I ended up doing was overriding the default options in > RackRequest. > > In test.rb, I added > > class ActionController::RackRequest > DEFAULT_SESSION_OPTIONS = { > :database_manager => CGI::Session::MemoryStore, # store data in > memory > :prefix => "ruby_sess.", # prefix session file names > :session_path => "/", # available to all paths in > app > :session_key => "_session_id", > :cookie_only => false, > :session_http_only=> true > } > end > > I get a warning about the constant already being defined, but it''s > better than having the tests fail. > > Also see <http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/1453- > gets-in-integration-test-unless-you-are-using-cookie-sessions>. > > Lee > > On Nov 22, 5:51 pm, Darren <darren.b...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > I''ve upgraded an existing application from 2.1 to 2.2.2. All of the > > integration tests failed, complaining about there being no ''secret'' > > defined in the session_store configuration options. There isn''t a > > secret defined, since we don''t use the cookie session store (it''s a > > wap site, and many phone browsers don''t support cookies). Setting the > > secret to an appropriate value fixed all the tests. > > > It looks like the database_manager is hardcoded to be a CookieStore in > > rack_process.rb. > > > Is there any plan on getting integration tests to use the actual > > configured cookie store? Or should we be finding a better way to do > > higher level integration tests? > > > Thanks, > > Darren--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Ok the good configuration for Session store une database by ActiveRecord is : class ActionController::RackRequest DEFAULT_SESSION_OPTIONS = { :database_manager => CGI::Session::ActiveRecordStore, :cookie_only => false, :session_http_only=> true } end Add this code in integration test. On 20 jan, 15:59, Zaphod Beeblebrox <joel.aze...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Someone to give me the configuration for > "config.action_controller.session_store = :active_record_store" ?! > > Thanks. > > On 9 déc 2008, 21:49, Lee Fyock <lee.fy...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > What I ended up doing was overriding the default options in > > RackRequest. > > > In test.rb, I added > > > class ActionController::RackRequest > > DEFAULT_SESSION_OPTIONS = { > > :database_manager => CGI::Session::MemoryStore, # store data in > > memory > > :prefix => "ruby_sess.", # prefix session file names > > :session_path => "/", # available to all paths in > > app > > :session_key => "_session_id", > > :cookie_only => false, > > :session_http_only=> true > > } > > end > > > I get a warning about the constant already being defined, but it''s > > better than having the tests fail. > > > Also see <http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/1453- > > gets-in-integration-test-unless-you-are-using-cookie-sessions>. > > > Lee > > > On Nov 22, 5:51 pm, Darren <darren.b...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > I''ve upgraded an existing application from 2.1 to 2.2.2. All of the > > > integration tests failed, complaining about there being no ''secret'' > > > defined in the session_store configuration options. There isn''t a > > > secret defined, since we don''t use the cookie session store (it''s a > > > wap site, and many phone browsers don''t support cookies). Setting the > > > secret to an appropriate value fixed all the tests. > > > > It looks like the database_manager is hardcoded to be a CookieStore in > > > rack_process.rb. > > > > Is there any plan on getting integration tests to use the actual > > > configured cookie store? Or should we be finding a better way to do > > > higher level integration tests? > > > > Thanks, > > > Darren--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---