Greg Hauptmann
2008-Nov-20 21:22 UTC
should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)" (doesn''t seem to for me) i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date validation. ................ class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable column :start_date, :date validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) end ................ tks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rick
2008-Nov-21 19:22 UTC
Re: should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
Greg, validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a simple case (one day granularity) you''re asking for a list that''s 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. My guess is it''s a good thing it didn''t work ;-) Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. Rick On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, > :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)" > (doesn''t seem to for me) > > i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date validation. > > ................ > class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable > column :start_date, :date > validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - > 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) > end > ................ > > tks--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Greg Hauptmann
2008-Nov-22 06:08 UTC
Re: should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
I''ve actually run with the following: def validate errors.add(''start_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if !start_date.kind_of?(Date) errors.add(''end_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if !end_date.kind_of?(Date) end Its seems that the Rails controller tries to convert it to Date and either succeeds or fails (without throwing an exception). So I just test to see at the subsequent validate stage whether there is a Date object or not On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Rick <Richard.T.Lloyd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Greg, > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a > simple case (one day granularity) you''re asking for a list that''s > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. > > My guess is it''s a good thing it didn''t work ;-) > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. > > Rick > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > wrote: >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)" >> (doesn''t seem to for me) >> >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date validation. >> >> ................ >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable >> column :start_date, :date >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) >> end >> ................ >> >> tks > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rick
2008-Nov-22 11:04 UTC
Re: should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
Right, but back to your initial question, I don''t think my initial answer was even close to the mark. I believe the problem you''re having is that the validates_inclusion is looking for an enumeration hanging off the :in. i.e. [1,2,3,4,5] or 1..5 will work but (My Name Is Frank)..(Your Name Is Louie) somehow doesn''t look right, does it? You''re doing :in => (Sun, 22 Nov 1908)..(Sun, 22 Nov 2108) which just isn''t going to happen. Try converting to Julian days, that way you''ll be bounded with two positive integers. Rick On Nov 21, 8:08 pm, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I''ve actually run with the following: > > def validate > errors.add(''start_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if > !start_date.kind_of?(Date) > errors.add(''end_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if !end_date.kind_of?(Date) > end > > Its seems that the Rails controller tries to convert it to Date and > either succeeds or fails (without throwing an exception). So I just > test to see at the subsequent validate stage whether there is a Date > object or not > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Greg, > > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a > > simple case (one day granularity) you''re asking for a list that''s > > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. > > > My guess is it''s a good thing it didn''t work ;-) > > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. > > > Rick > > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > wrote: > >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, > >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)" > >> (doesn''t seem to for me) > > >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date validation. > > >> ................ > >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable > >> column :start_date, :date > >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - > >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) > >> end > >> ................ > > >> tks--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rick
2008-Nov-22 11:30 UTC
Re: should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
Greg - you might take a look at time_with_zone.rb in ActiveSupport - I''m looking at 2.2.0 but I know it''s in 2.1.2 as well. a = Time.now a.is_a?(Time) => true a = "My name is Fred" a.is_a?(Time) => false Maybe closer to what you need? Rick On Nov 22, 1:04 am, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Right, but back to your initial question, I don''t think my initial > answer was even close to the mark. > > I believe the problem you''re having is that the validates_inclusion is > looking for an enumeration hanging off the :in. i.e. [1,2,3,4,5] or > 1..5 will work but (My Name Is Frank)..(Your Name Is Louie) somehow > doesn''t look right, does it? > > You''re doing :in => (Sun, 22 Nov 1908)..(Sun, 22 Nov 2108) > which just isn''t going to happen. Try converting to Julian days, that > way you''ll be bounded with two positive integers. > > Rick > > On Nov 21, 8:08 pm, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > wrote: > > > I''ve actually run with the following: > > > def validate > > errors.add(''start_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if > > !start_date.kind_of?(Date) > > errors.add(''end_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if !end_date.kind_of?(Date) > > end > > > Its seems that the Rails controller tries to convert it to Date and > > either succeeds or fails (without throwing an exception). So I just > > test to see at the subsequent validate stage whether there is a Date > > object or not > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > Greg, > > > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a > > > simple case (one day granularity) you''re asking for a list that''s > > > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. > > > > My guess is it''s a good thing it didn''t work ;-) > > > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. > > > > Rick > > > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > > wrote: > > >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, > > >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)" > > >> (doesn''t seem to for me) > > > >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date validation. > > > >> ................ > > >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable > > >> column :start_date, :date > > >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - > > >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) > > >> end > > >> ................ > > > >> tks--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Frederick Cheung
2008-Nov-22 13:26 UTC
Re: should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
On 21 Nov 2008, at 19:22, Rick wrote:> > Greg, > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a > simple case (one day granularity) you''re asking for a list that''s > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. >ranges are enumerable and ruby is smart enough to keep it as a range, eg r = (-1000000000..1000000000) does not create a 2 billion element array Fred> My guess is it''s a good thing it didn''t work ;-) > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. > > Rick > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > wrote: >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + >> 100.years)" >> (doesn''t seem to for me) >> >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date >> validation. >> >> ................ >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable >> column :start_date, :date >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) >> end >> ................ >> >> tks > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Greg Hauptmann
2008-Nov-22 23:52 UTC
Re: should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
thanks - I''m specifically looking at Dates so I might stick with the below that seems to be working fine... errors.add(''start_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if !start_date.kind_of?(Date) cheers On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Rick <Richard.T.Lloyd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Greg - you might take a look at time_with_zone.rb in ActiveSupport - > I''m looking at 2.2.0 but I know it''s in 2.1.2 as well. > > a = Time.now > a.is_a?(Time) => true > a = "My name is Fred" > a.is_a?(Time) => false > > Maybe closer to what you need? > > Rick > > On Nov 22, 1:04 am, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> Right, but back to your initial question, I don''t think my initial >> answer was even close to the mark. >> >> I believe the problem you''re having is that the validates_inclusion is >> looking for an enumeration hanging off the :in. i.e. [1,2,3,4,5] or >> 1..5 will work but (My Name Is Frank)..(Your Name Is Louie) somehow >> doesn''t look right, does it? >> >> You''re doing :in => (Sun, 22 Nov 1908)..(Sun, 22 Nov 2108) >> which just isn''t going to happen. Try converting to Julian days, that >> way you''ll be bounded with two positive integers. >> >> Rick >> >> On Nov 21, 8:08 pm, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> >> wrote: >> >> > I''ve actually run with the following: >> >> > def validate >> > errors.add(''start_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if >> > !start_date.kind_of?(Date) >> > errors.add(''end_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if !end_date.kind_of?(Date) >> > end >> >> > Its seems that the Rails controller tries to convert it to Date and >> > either succeeds or fails (without throwing an exception). So I just >> > test to see at the subsequent validate stage whether there is a Date >> > object or not >> >> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >> > > Greg, >> >> > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a >> > > simple case (one day granularity) you''re asking for a list that''s >> > > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. >> >> > > My guess is it''s a good thing it didn''t work ;-) >> >> > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. >> >> > > Rick >> >> > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> >> > > wrote: >> > >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, >> > >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)" >> > >> (doesn''t seem to for me) >> >> > >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date validation. >> >> > >> ................ >> > >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable >> > >> column :start_date, :date >> > >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - >> > >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) >> > >> end >> > >> ................ >> >> > >> tks > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Rick
2008-Nov-24 21:05 UTC
Re: should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)"
Hello Greg, So here it is. After a couple of mail exchanges with Fred, I need to tell you that I was wrong from the start. Your initial code as given, validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) will work in the case where :start_date is the name of one of your records fields and is a member of the Time class. Sorry if my confused meander wasted too much of your time. Thanks for your help Fred. Rick On Nov 22, 1:52 pm, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> thanks - I''m specifically looking at Dates so I might stick with the > below that seems to be working fine... > > errors.add(''start_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if > !start_date.kind_of?(Date) > > cheers > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Greg - you might take a look at time_with_zone.rb in ActiveSupport - > > I''m looking at 2.2.0 but I know it''s in 2.1.2 as well. > > > a = Time.now > > a.is_a?(Time) => true > > a = "My name is Fred" > > a.is_a?(Time) => false > > > Maybe closer to what you need? > > > Rick > > > On Nov 22, 1:04 am, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> Right, but back to your initial question, I don''t think my initial > >> answer was even close to the mark. > > >> I believe the problem you''re having is that the validates_inclusion is > >> looking for an enumeration hanging off the :in. i.e. [1,2,3,4,5] or > >> 1..5 will work but (My Name Is Frank)..(Your Name Is Louie) somehow > >> doesn''t look right, does it? > > >> You''re doing :in => (Sun, 22 Nov 1908)..(Sun, 22 Nov 2108) > >> which just isn''t going to happen. Try converting to Julian days, that > >> way you''ll be bounded with two positive integers. > > >> Rick > > >> On Nov 21, 8:08 pm, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > >> wrote: > > >> > I''ve actually run with the following: > > >> > def validate > >> > errors.add(''start_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if > >> > !start_date.kind_of?(Date) > >> > errors.add(''end_date'', ''is not in Date format'') if !end_date.kind_of?(Date) > >> > end > > >> > Its seems that the Rails controller tries to convert it to Date and > >> > either succeeds or fails (without throwing an exception). So I just > >> > test to see at the subsequent validate stage whether there is a Date > >> > object or not > > >> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Rick <Richard.T.Ll...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > >> > > Greg, > > >> > > validates_inclusion_of is looking for :in to be an enumeration. In a > >> > > simple case (one day granularity) you''re asking for a list that''s > >> > > 365.25 * 200 => 73050 items long. > > >> > > My guess is it''s a good thing it didn''t work ;-) > > >> > > Maybe you want to go for a min/max check here. > > >> > > Rick > > >> > > On Nov 20, 11:22 am, "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.r...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> wondering if should this work? - "validates_inclusion_of :start_date, > >> > >> :in => (Time.now.to_date - 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years)" > >> > >> (doesn''t seem to for me) > > >> > >> i.e. should I be able to "validates_inclusion_of" to do date validation. > > >> > >> ................ > >> > >> class GraphOptions < ActiveRecord::BaseWithoutTable > >> > >> column :start_date, :date > >> > >> validates_inclusion_of :start_date, :in => (Time.now.to_date - > >> > >> 100.years)..(Time.now.to_date + 100.years) > >> > >> end > >> > >> ................ > > >> > >> tks--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---