Rails - Nov 2008 - Code changes are ignored due to code minor ver. were cached

Hi there!
I study Ruby on Rails and met a problem.

I placed a class definition code for class which is NOT a Model into
separate file, assume MyToolClass.rb

Then I started working on controller code and required
''MyToolClass''

While working on controller code I also corrected some code in
MyToolClass.rb, but it seemed, that changes in MyTooolClass.rb were
ignored by Rails until I had restarted Mongrel.

Q#1: Please write to me how can I tell Rails to reread source files
those were changed after last use.

Q#:2 Where to place files like MyToolclass.rb, which are nither Model,
nor Controller?


Thank you for your attention.
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Nov 18, 3:04 pm, Zhoran Tvalve
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> Hi there!
> I study Ruby on Rails and met a problem.
>
> I placed a class definition code for class which is NOT a Model into
> separate file, assume MyToolClass.rb
>
> Then I started working on controller code and required
''MyToolClass''
>
use require_dependency instead of require.

Fred
> While working on controller code I also corrected some code in
> MyToolClass.rb, but it seemed, that changes in MyTooolClass.rb were
> ignored by Rails until I had restarted Mongrel.
>
> Q#1: Please write to me how can I tell Rails to reread source files
> those were changed after last use.
>
> Q#:2 Where to place files like MyToolclass.rb, which are nither Model,
> nor Controller?
>
> Thank you for your attention.
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

On Nov 18, 10:03 am, Frederick Cheung
<frederick.che...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> On Nov 18, 3:04 pm, Zhoran Tvalve
<rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi there!
> > I study Ruby on Rails and met a problem.
>
> > I placed a class definition code for class which is NOT a Model into
> > separate file, assume MyToolClass.rb
>
> > Then I started working on controller code and required
''MyToolClass''
>
> use require_dependency instead of require.
>
> Fred
But if the file name follows conventions (so a class named MyToolClass
would go in a file named app/models/my_tool_class.rb or lib/
my_tool_class.rb), then no require or require_dependency should be
needed and code changes will be automatically reloaded in development
mode.

If you''re not following naming conventions, then do as Fred
suggests :-)

Jeff

www.purpleworkshops.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Jeff Cohen wrote:
> On Nov 18, 10:03�am, Frederick Cheung
<frederick.che...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> use require_dependency instead of require.
>>
>> Fred
> 
> But if the file name follows conventions (so a class named MyToolClass
> would go in a file named app/models/my_tool_class.rb or lib/
> my_tool_class.rb), then no require or require_dependency should be
> needed and code changes will be automatically reloaded in development
> mode.
> 
> If you''re not following naming conventions, then do as Fred
> suggests :-)
> 
> Jeff
> 
> www.purpleworkshops.com
Many thanks, guys!
I put each my class into it''s own file in app''s lib directory
following
naming conventions and Voila! After that every change in these files are 
incorporated immediately without require or require_dependency calls. 
That''s great!
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---