orfest-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
2007-Jul-17 10:28 UTC
Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
Hello, I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and what is better to use. Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of features or general convinience? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Matthew Rudy
2007-Jul-17 10:39 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
I really like Aptana/RadRails, it takes a while to load, but has all the convenience functions I need built-in (rakes, generates, servers) I work on projects that involve at least 5 dependent projects, so it''s nice to define each "Project" in the IDE, and avoid navigating my actual subversion structure. Boom!!! orfest-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:> Hello, > > I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and > what is better to use. > > Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of > features or general convinience?-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Nikolay Kurtov
2007-Jul-17 10:50 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
Aptana? personally I don''t like it''s Data Navigator. On Jul 17, 5:39 pm, Matthew Rudy <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I really like Aptana/RadRails, > > it takes a while to load, > but has all the convenience functions I need built-in > (rakes, generates, servers) > > I work on projects that involve at least 5 dependent projects, > so it''s nice to define each "Project" in the IDE, > and avoid navigating my actual subversion structure. > > Boom!!! > > orf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > > Hello, > > > I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and > > what is better to use. > > > Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of > > features or general convinience? > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
orfest-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
2007-Jul-17 11:02 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
But I have never seen any analogue of it''s Data Navigator. I even cannot imagine how to improve or replace it. Obviously this thing is not very good. Maybe somebody will share his opinion about how to replace this feature, how he would like to see it implemented. I have to continue using mysql-front --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
gene.tani-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
2007-Jul-17 13:21 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
On Jul 17, 3:28 am, "orf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" <orf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Hello, > > I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and > what is better to use. > > Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of > features or general convinience?i was reading this post, which reminded me there''ll be a flood of releases soon: Aptana, IntelliJ, CodeGear, NetBeans, maybe komodo and textmate http://www.nullcreations.net/entry/komodo-4-1-beta --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
orfest-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
2007-Jul-17 13:29 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
Do you know if NetBeans has an analogue of Data Navigator? On Jul 17, 8:21 pm, "gene.t...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" <gene.t...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On Jul 17, 3:28 am, "orf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" <orf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and > > what is better to use. > > > Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of > > features or general convinience? > > i was reading this post, which reminded me there''ll be a flood of > releases soon: Aptana, IntelliJ, CodeGear, NetBeans, maybe komodo and > textmate > > http://www.nullcreations.net/entry/komodo-4-1-beta--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
James Moore
2007-Jul-31 14:45 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
I used the data navigator in Aptana/RadRails occasionally, but MySQL has a perfectly good native one, and presumably Postgres/whatever have really good native tools as well. Why is having this in the IDE useful? (Am I missing something productive here?) There is one in NetBeans, but out of the box it only comes with a JDBC-ODBC Bridge driver. Not terribly useful, but I''ve never cared - I just run the MySQL Query Browser, or a command line. - James Moore --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I am using Aptana/RadRails. I have become spoiled by Eclipse for Java because you can F3 (Open Declaration) on any function name or variable name and it''s declaration is opened up for you. I don''t think this functionality exists in RadRails as far as I can tell. orfest-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:> Hello, > > I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and > what is better to use. > > Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of > features or general convinience?-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Pascal Friederich
2007-Jul-31 22:20 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
aptana for rails, heidi sql for database manipulation over and out! On Jul 31, 6:53 pm, "Robin H." <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I am using Aptana/RadRails. I have become spoiled by Eclipse for Java > because you can F3 (Open Declaration) on any function name or variable > name and it''s declaration is opened up for you. I don''t think this > functionality exists in RadRails as far as I can tell. > > orf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > > Hello, > > > I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and > > what is better to use. > > > Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of > > features or general convinience? > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Michael Slater
2007-Aug-07 04:13 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
In NetBeans you can control-click on a method name and it opens the file that contains the method definition with the cursor positioned at the start of the definition. Very helpful! Michael www.mslater.com On Jul 31, 9:53 am, "Robin H." <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I am using Aptana/RadRails. I have become spoiled by Eclipse for Java > because you can F3 (Open Declaration) on any function name or variable > name and it''s declaration is opened up for you. I don''t think this > functionality exists in RadRails as far as I can tell. > > orf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: > > Hello, > > > I see that there were a huge discussions about, what IDE is good and > > what is better to use. > > > Can you tell, what exactly don''t you like in IDE''s, is it lack of > > features or general convinience? > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Michael Slater
2007-Aug-07 04:15 UTC
Re: Why you are not satisfied with Ruby on Rails IDE''s?
As a DB interface, I like SQLyog as a MySQL GUI (on Windows) -- lots of useful features, including built-in SSH tunneling (if you get the paid version) and synchronization between dbs. Michael www.mslater.com On Jul 31, 7:45 am, "James Moore" <jamesthepi...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I used the data navigator in Aptana/RadRails occasionally, but MySQL > has a perfectly good native one, and presumably Postgres/whatever have > really good native tools as well. Why is having this in the IDE > useful? (Am I missing something productive here?) > > There is one in NetBeans, but out of the box it only comes with a > JDBC-ODBC Bridge driver. Not terribly useful, but I''ve never cared - > I just run the MySQL Query Browser, or a command line. > > James Moore--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---