Is there a way to add auto-completion and spell checking to RadRails. If the answer is no is there another windows based text-editor that has autocompletion like textmate does? Thanks, Seth -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I''m definitely curious as well about Radrails (just started using it, but don''t know all the configuration options or available eclipse plugins). As far as other options that work on windows...you might check out http://www.jedit.org/ and http://rubyjedit.org/. Jedit probably does most of what you want. Also check out this article http://ifakedit.com/log/2006/02/19/jedit-tutorial-a-how-to-on-abbreviations-superabbrevs-in-html-ruby-on-rails-and-more/ and any newer related blogs for how to make jedit more like textmate for rails. John-Scott --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
You should try rRoRED- http://www.plasmacode.com/ -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
For what it''s worth, I use RadRails on both Linux and Windows. But, lately, I''ve been using RoRED on my Windows laptop, as it is much leaner and faster. -Larry On 10/10/06, Eric <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > You should try rRoRED- http://www.plasmacode.com/ > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > >-- Best Regards, -Larry "Work, work, work...there is no satisfactory alternative." --- E.Taft Benson --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I tried all of them ( except RubyInSteel, I have it, and even sterted it in my VS session, but not played) and I found that no one is providing autocomplete. I am still waiting if someone will implement it. As well I am missing built-in possibility to use scp/sftp sessions to work with remote files on my Linux box from my Windows box. If this is can be done including autocomplete and LXR-like code browsing - I gonna be happy. All the Best! Serge. Larry Kelly wrote:> For what it''s worth, I use RadRails on both Linux and Windows. But, > lately, I''ve been using RoRED on my Windows laptop, as it is much > leaner and faster. > -Larry > > On 10/10/06, Eric <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> You should try rRoRED- http://www.plasmacode.com/ >> >> -- >> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >> >> > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 10/10/06, Sergey Kuznetsov <rails-9a/WvBvX2Qpg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> As well I am missing built-in possibility to use scp/sftp sessions to > work with remote files on my Linux box > from my Windows box.Install the jEdit FTP plugin from the Plugin Manager window...it does sftp out of the box. - Jake --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Jake, Thanks a lot for the clue. I never used jEdit before ( even I heard about it a lot ), I just downloaded it, and installing different plug-ins. It looks quite nice. I am going to play with it, and I will share my thoughts and feelings about doing RoR jEdit way. All the Best! Sergey. Jake Cutter wrote:> On 10/10/06, *Sergey Kuznetsov* <rails-9a/WvBvX2Qpg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org > <mailto:rails-9a/WvBvX2Qpg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>> wrote: > > As well I am missing built-in possibility to use scp/sftp sessions to > work with remote files on my Linux box > from my Windows box. > > > > Install the jEdit FTP plugin from the Plugin Manager window...it does > sftp out of the box. > > - Jake > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RoRED has autocomplete but you have to write what will be the shorcuts for what code... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 10/10/06, Eric <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > RoRED has autocomplete but you have to write what will be the shorcuts > for what code... >As most people understand it, that''s not autocomplete. You can call it macros or snippets or whatever. Real autocompletion means that things like method names will automatically available and completed as references to them are typed, without having to predefine anything except the method itself. It''s a subtle difference, but important enough to keep straight. -- James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
We have *real* autocomplete/ IntelliSense in the current beta of Ruby In Steel Developer (commercial) edition. This doesn''t solve your problem at the moment as the Developer Edition won''t be available until January :-( However... you may find some of our informaton of use when evaluating Ruby ''IntelliSense''. Having ''drop down completion lists'' does not make IntelliSense. For real IntelliSense you need the following: 1) Correct type inference - is it an array, a hash, a custom class etc.? IntelliSense should only provide the appropriate completion list for each object. 2) Correct scoping - what methods / accessors etc. are available in class A, module B, class C which desecneds from class D and mixes in module E etc. etc. 3) Correct context - Consider the problem: a single file may contain a variable, x. At one point in the code x is a string, at another point an array, at some other point it is a custom object. You should see only the *correct list* for x at each point in the file. In an editor you have the freedom to move around the code visiting each different version of x ''out of sequence'' and the IntelliSense still should show the appropriate completion list at any point where x occurs (not trivial!). You can find some more detailed discussion here: http://www.sapphiresteel.com/IntelliSense-in-depth http://www.sapphiresteel.com/Ruby-IntelliSense-the-finer-points I shall record some Camtasia movies shortly to demo the finer details of IntelliSense inference, scoping and context. best wishes Huw Ruby In Steel Ruby For Visual Studio 2005 http://www.sapphiresteel.com -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Eric wrote:> RoRED has autocomplete but you have to write what will be the shorcuts > for what code... > >This is different. This is not real auto-complete. Okay. I tried jEdit, and I was impressed by it. It has SFTP and it has autocomplete I wanted. And it''s surprisingly quite fast. All the Best! Sergey. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I am thinking about some hack, around ruby interpreter. when you do ruby -c it complies the code but not executes it. If you can get that execution tree, you will have an complete information for Intellisense. All the Best! Sergey. Huw Collingbourne wrote:> We have *real* autocomplete/ IntelliSense in the current beta of Ruby In > Steel Developer (commercial) edition. This doesn''t solve your problem at > the moment as the Developer Edition won''t be available until January :-( > > However... you may find some of our informaton of use when evaluating > Ruby ''IntelliSense''. Having ''drop down completion lists'' does not make > IntelliSense. > > For real IntelliSense you need the following: > > 1) Correct type inference > - is it an array, a hash, a custom class etc.? IntelliSense should only > provide the appropriate completion list for each object. > > 2) Correct scoping > - what methods / accessors etc. are available in class A, module B, > class C which desecneds from class D and mixes in module E etc. etc. > > 3) Correct context > - Consider the problem: a single file may contain a variable, x. At one > point in the code x is a string, at another point an array, at some > other point it is a custom object. You should see only the *correct > list* for x at each point in the file. In an editor you have the freedom > to move around the code visiting each different version of x ''out of > sequence'' and the IntelliSense still should show the appropriate > completion list at any point where x occurs (not trivial!). > > You can find some more detailed discussion here: > > http://www.sapphiresteel.com/IntelliSense-in-depth > http://www.sapphiresteel.com/Ruby-IntelliSense-the-finer-points > > I shall record some Camtasia movies shortly to demo the finer details of > IntelliSense inference, scoping and context. > > best wishes > Huw > > Ruby In Steel > Ruby For Visual Studio 2005 > http://www.sapphiresteel.com > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Huw, You are doing the very good job by making your RiS. The problem is that your product can be used only on VS which is not multi-platform. In this case I more interested in jEdit with SFTP plugin, or even better in VIM plugin with the idea I just shared in my previous email, with Intellisense feature via hacking the Ruby parser unit. I am most of my time using the text console on remote server. All the Best! Sergey. Huw Collingbourne wrote:> We have *real* autocomplete/ IntelliSense in the current beta of Ruby In > Steel Developer (commercial) edition. This doesn''t solve your problem at > the moment as the Developer Edition won''t be available until January :-( > > However... you may find some of our informaton of use when evaluating > Ruby ''IntelliSense''. Having ''drop down completion lists'' does not make > IntelliSense. > > For real IntelliSense you need the following: > > 1) Correct type inference > - is it an array, a hash, a custom class etc.? IntelliSense should only > provide the appropriate completion list for each object. > > 2) Correct scoping > - what methods / accessors etc. are available in class A, module B, > class C which desecneds from class D and mixes in module E etc. etc. > > 3) Correct context > - Consider the problem: a single file may contain a variable, x. At one > point in the code x is a string, at another point an array, at some > other point it is a custom object. You should see only the *correct > list* for x at each point in the file. In an editor you have the freedom > to move around the code visiting each different version of x ''out of > sequence'' and the IntelliSense still should show the appropriate > completion list at any point where x occurs (not trivial!). > > You can find some more detailed discussion here: > > http://www.sapphiresteel.com/IntelliSense-in-depth > http://www.sapphiresteel.com/Ruby-IntelliSense-the-finer-points > > I shall record some Camtasia movies shortly to demo the finer details of > IntelliSense inference, scoping and context. > > best wishes > Huw > > Ruby In Steel > Ruby For Visual Studio 2005 > http://www.sapphiresteel.com > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Sergey Kuznetsov wrote:> Huw, > > You are doing the very good job by making your RiS. The problem is that > your product can be used only > on VS which is not multi-platform.It is true that the development environment is based in Visual Studio. We made that decision for the simple reason that we felt that VS offers the most powerful toolset available and we want to leverage the full suite of tools (debugging/editing/database/intellisense/snippets/project management/ etc. etc) for Ruby. The Ruby applications developed using Ruby In Steel are not platform dependent, however. We have made no modifications to the Ruby interpreter or toolset so any apps you create with Ruby In Steel have the same cross-platform portability as all others. best wishes Huw Ruby In Steel Ruby For Visual Studio 2005 http://www.sapphiresteel.com -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Huw, Huw Collingbourne wrote:> Sergey Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Huw, >> >> You are doing the very good job by making your RiS. The problem is that >> your product can be used only >> on VS which is not multi-platform. >> > > The Ruby applications developed using Ruby In Steel are not platform > dependent, however. We have made no modifications to the Ruby > interpreter or toolset so any apps you create with Ruby In Steel have > the same cross-platform portability as all others. >I was not talking about the Ruby application code itself. I was talking about the VS as a development platform which is not platform-independent. In this case Eclipse is have more chances to be more popular then VS, because it is platform-independent and has the same features as a VS has, and second of all Eclipse if free and anyone can make a plugin for Eclipse as well as anyone can download it for free. I do understand that you are making commercial product and you probably have a family you have to feed like I do but open-source just changed the way ow making business in the software area, now we as a programmers have to find different models of selling business, not directly on the software. I am not convincing you to move out of the model you choose but just shared my feelings about the profession I spent 23 years on and I see how it changes. At this moment it more profitable to be in hardware sales and in support than to be a programmer. It looks like we are going back to the sixties-seventies when software was just a free addition to the hardware :) All the Best! Sergey. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 10/10/06, Sergey Kuznetsov <rails-9a/WvBvX2Qpg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> In this case Eclipse is have more chances to be more popular then > VS, because it is platform-independent > and has the same features as a VS has, and second of all Eclipse if free > and anyone can make a plugin for Eclipse > as well as anyone can download it for free.Not all Eclipse plug-ins are free (as-in speech or beer). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---