CentOS - May 2013 - CentOS 6.4 Samba 3.6.9 Regression

Anyone know the reason RHEL bumped Samba from 3.5.10 to 3.6.9? This version
has a regression with BackupExec and Veeam backing up to network shares. I
receive access denied errors. Samba is in security=user mode and not joined
to a domain. If I downgrade just the Samba packages to the CentOS 6.3
version 3.5.10 everything works again. I've found a couple of bug reports
and the one suggested fix "acl check permissions = no" doesn't
work.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8414
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918537

Thanks,
Ryan

On 05/12/2013 09:20 AM, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> Anyone know the reason RHEL bumped Samba from 3.5.10 to 3.6.9? This version
> has a regression with BackupExec and Veeam backing up to network shares. I
> receive access denied errors. Samba is in security=user mode and not joined
> to a domain. If I downgrade just the Samba packages to the CentOS 6.3
> version 3.5.10 everything works again. I've found a couple of bug
reports
> and the one suggested fix "acl check permissions = no"
doesn't work.
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8414
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918537
Look at comment #23 here:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8676#c23

As to why it was upgraded, who knows ... we build what is released,
rational on a rebase is above our paygrade :D

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20130513/14e7d9e2/attachment-0002.sig>