Pablo Fernandes Yahoo wrote:> Hi Andy and All,
>
> Thank you so much for your explain. I really apreciated it. I was thiking
> about this UDP question and bandwidth shaping... i saw the same udp
> connections pass through the shaping of the cable modem and CBQ in a linux
> box.
As I said I''ve not used CBQ - The LARTC section does say it is hard to
configure and may not always work.
>
> Anyway, this is an example of my CBQ configuration.... Is it ok? This
> configuration can carry on maximun of 1500 users. After 1500 users, the
> process ksoftirqd spend 99% of CPU fulltime and the connections get very
> crap. I''m telling this just because it could help to see if my
> configurations are o kor wrong. Here it goes:
I also haven''t tried shaping at ISP sized configurations.
One thing I notice is you attach TBF to classes, I don''t see that in
the
examples.
If the ip addresses are in groups it may be better to read the hashing
filters section of the howto and see if the filtering can be optimised.
Maybe someone with more experience of big setups can help you more than
me. As a customer I quite like being policed rather than shaped, so that
could be something to look into.
Andy.
