Ben Hutchings
2011-Apr-25 20:15 UTC
Re: Bug#624131: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 22:05 +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:> Package: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae > Version: 2.6.39~rc4-1~experimental.1 > Severity: normal > Tags: experimental > > By simply stressing the system with some I/O, I can make it crash within > seconds. I''m not setting a higher severity because the bug is in an > experimental file system in an experimental kernel.I assume this doesn''t happen in 2.6.38?> Here''s the important bits (by my guess) I have on screen from the kernel panic: > > Bug at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1246 > Bug type: invalid opcode: 0000 > Kernel not tainted, running on an ASUSTek 1005HAG > EIP is at btrfs_add_free_space+0x285/0x39a [btrfs]You will probably need to provide a more complete copy of the panic message. Let''s see what the btrfs developers say. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Maik Zumstrull
2011-Apr-25 20:18 UTC
Re: Bug#624131: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 22:15, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 22:05 +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:>> By simply stressing the system with some I/O, I can make it crash within >> seconds. I''m not setting a higher severity because the bug is in an >> experimental file system in an experimental kernel. > > I assume this doesn''t happen in 2.6.38?Not that I''ve noticed. I don''t use that netbook much, but given how quickly it happens with .39, I say I would have noticed.>> Here''s the important bits (by my guess) I have on screen from the kernel panic: >> >> Bug at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1246 >> Bug type: invalid opcode: 0000 >> Kernel not tainted, running on an ASUSTek 1005HAG >> EIP is at btrfs_add_free_space+0x285/0x39a [btrfs] > > You will probably need to provide a more complete copy of the panic > message.I thought as much, but other than taking a picture of the screen, I don''t know how. I am prepared to cooperate fully in the debugging effort, though. :-) You or they can tell me what is required. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Peter Stuge
2011-Apr-25 20:50 UTC
Re: Bug#624131: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code
Maik Zumstrull wrote:> >> Bug at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1246 > >> Bug type: invalid opcode: 0000 > >> Kernel not tainted, running on an ASUSTek 1005HAG > >> EIP is at btrfs_add_free_space+0x285/0x39a [btrfs] > > > > You will probably need to provide a more complete copy of the panic > > message. > > I thought as much, but other than taking a picture of the screen, I > don''t know how.Take a picture and ideally transcribe it after reboot. //Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
cwillu
2011-Apr-25 21:05 UTC
Re: Bug#624131: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> wrote:> Maik Zumstrull wrote: >> >> Bug at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1246 >> >> Bug type: invalid opcode: 0000 >> >> Kernel not tainted, running on an ASUSTek 1005HAG >> >> EIP is at btrfs_add_free_space+0x285/0x39a [btrfs] >> > >> > You will probably need to provide a more complete copy of the panic >> > message. >> >> I thought as much, but other than taking a picture of the screen, I >> don''t know how. > > Take a picture and ideally transcribe it after reboot.Known issue; josef sent a patch (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/10261) that should fix it, or you can mount with clear_cache on each boot as a workaround. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ben Hutchings
2011-Apr-26 03:59 UTC
Re: Bug#624131: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 15:05 -0600, cwillu wrote:> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> wrote: > > Maik Zumstrull wrote: > >> >> Bug at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1246 > >> >> Bug type: invalid opcode: 0000 > >> >> Kernel not tainted, running on an ASUSTek 1005HAG > >> >> EIP is at btrfs_add_free_space+0x285/0x39a [btrfs] > >> > > >> > You will probably need to provide a more complete copy of the panic > >> > message. > >> > >> I thought as much, but other than taking a picture of the screen, I > >> don''t know how. > > > > Take a picture and ideally transcribe it after reboot. > > Known issue; josef sent a patch > (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/10261) that > should fix it, or you can mount with clear_cache on each boot as a > workaround.This fix doesn''t seem to be in your for-linux branch yet. Please can you ensure that this (or an alternate fix) is included in 2.6.39. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.