search for: btrfs_add_free_space

...assume this doesn''t happen in 2.6.38? > Here''s the important bits (by my guess) I have on screen from the kernel panic: > > Bug at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1246 > Bug type: invalid opcode: 0000 > Kernel not tainted, running on an ASUSTek 1005HAG > EIP is at btrfs_add_free_space+0x285/0x39a [btrfs] You will probably need to provide a more complete copy of the panic message. Let''s see what the btrfs developers say. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

...; + cache->space_info->bytes_may_use += len; } spin_unlock(&cache->lock); spin_unlock(&cache->space_info->lock); @@ -4683,27 +4715,8 @@ void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, WARN_ON(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &buf->bflags)); btrfs_add_free_space(cache, buf->start, buf->len); - ret = btrfs_update_reserved_bytes(cache, buf->len, 0, 0); - if (ret == -EAGAIN) { - /* block group became read-only */ - btrfs_update_reserved_bytes(cache, buf->len, 0, 1); - goto out; - } - - ret = 1; - spin_lock(&block_rsv->lock); - i...

...; + cache->space_info->bytes_may_use += len; } spin_unlock(&cache->lock); spin_unlock(&cache->space_info->lock); @@ -4683,27 +4714,8 @@ void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, WARN_ON(test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &buf->bflags)); btrfs_add_free_space(cache, buf->start, buf->len); - ret = btrfs_update_reserved_bytes(cache, buf->len, 0, 0); - if (ret == -EAGAIN) { - /* block group became read-only */ - btrfs_update_reserved_bytes(cache, buf->len, 0, 1); - goto out; - } - - ret = 1; - spin_lock(&block_rsv->lock); - i...

...set_extent_dirty(root->fs_info->pinned_extents, bytenr, bytenr + num_bytes - 1, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL); + if (reserved) + trace_btrfs_reserved_extent_free(root, bytenr, num_bytes); return 0; } @@ -5966,6 +5968,7 @@ void btrfs_free_tree_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_add_free_space(cache, buf->start, buf->len); btrfs_update_reserved_bytes(cache, buf->len, RESERVE_FREE); + trace_btrfs_reserved_extent_free(root, buf->start, buf->len); pin = 0; } out: @@ -6593,8 +6596,6 @@ again: } } - trace_btrfs_reserved_extent_alloc(root, ins->objectid, ins-...

...iddle, and make sure we can + * remove space that covers adjacent extent entries. + */ +static int test_extents(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache) +{ + int ret = 0; + + printk(KERN_ERR "Running extent only tests\n"); + + /* First just make sure we can remove an entire entry */ + ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, 0, 4 * 1024 * 1024); + if (ret) { + printk(KERN_ERR "Error adding initial extents %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 0, 4 * 1024 * 1024); + if (ret) { + printk(KERN_ERR "Error removing extent %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + if (...

The biggest one is a fix for fstrim, and there''s a fix for on-disk free space cache. Others are small fixes and cleanups. The last three have been sent weeks ago. The patchset is also available in this repo: git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel.git for-chris Note there''s a small confict with Al Viro''s vfs changes. Li Zefan (11): Btrfs: add pinned extents to

...rfs_free_space, offset_index); + unlink_free_space(ctl, info); + if (info->bitmap) + free(info->bitmap); + free(info); + } +} + +void btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group) +{ + __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(block_group->free_space_ctl); +} + +int btrfs_add_free_space(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl, u64 offset, + u64 bytes) +{ + struct btrfs_free_space *info; + int ret = 0; + + info = calloc(1, sizeof(*info)); + if (!info) + return -ENOMEM; + + info->offset = offset; + info->bytes = bytes; + + try_merge_free_space(ctl, info); + + ret = link_free_spac...

Hi gang, I was a little surprised to see that patch go by recently which fixed an endian bug. I went to see how sparse checking looked and it was.. broken. I got it going again in my Fedora environment. Most of the patches are just cleanups, but there *were* three real bugs lurking in all that sparse warning spam. So I maintain that it''s worth our time to keep it going and fix

If we have particularly full nodes, we could call btrfs_node_blockptr up to 32 times, which is 32 pairs of kmap/kunmap, which _sucks_. So go ahead and map the extent buffer while we look for readahead targets. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

...tes_super += stripe_len; ret = add_excluded_extent(root, logical[nr], stripe_len); - BUG_ON(ret); + btrfs_fixable_bug_on(ret); } kfree(logical); @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static u64 add_new_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, total_added += size; ret = btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, start, size); - BUG_ON(ret); + btrfs_fixable_bug_on(ret); start = extent_end + 1; } else { break; @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static u64 add_new_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, size = end - start; total_added += size; ret = btrfs_add_fr...