samba - Jul 2010 - samba entry in ldap

Hello everyone,

I have a object in the first level of my LDAP database. It's name is 
sambaDomainName=MyDomain. It's a sambaDomain class object.

When i installed LAM this week, it complained that there is no 
"ou=Domains" entry in my base, and offered to create it. All blue
until
here.

Now, when i try to access the samba3 configs of some user, it says that 
i do not have a samba3 domain, but i do have. I think that LAM only 
check the existance of a sambaDomain object inside the ou=Domains entry.

My question is: there is any problem in having the sambaDomainName 
object in the first level of the ldap tree instead of having it inside 
of the ou=Domains? Is this an LAM issue or something that can affect the 
operation of my domain in someway?

Tks in advance.
-- 
Leonardo Carneiro

> My question is: there is any problem in having the sambaDomainName 
> object in the first level of the ldap tree instead of having it inside 
> of the ou=Domains? Is this an LAM issue or something that can affect the 
> operation of my domain in someway?
I have used both configurations and both work correctly. It is a matter of 
organization. I suppose that if you do have more than one domain it will 
be better to have their entries under ou=Domains.