nmbd is using a lot of cpu: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 22681 root 20 0 10080 1520 1084 R 99.0 0.3 146:30.78 nmbd log.nmbd logs 30-40 messages per second:: [2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(212) process_name_registration_request: unicast name registration request received for name SEC00159925E132<00> from IP 10.10.10.102 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. Error - should be sent to WINS server [2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(212) process_name_registration_request: unicast name registration request received for name SEC00159925E132<00> from IP 10.10.10.102 on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. Error - should be sent to WINS server nmbd is not set up as a WINS server. The DHCP server only hands out addreses above 10.10.10.120, so .102 should not exist, and, in fact, 10.10.10.102 can't be found: ping 10.10.10.102 PING 10.10.10.102 (10.10.10.102) 56(84) bytes of data. From 10.10.10.2 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable So, why does nmbd chew up so many cpu cycles dealing with this. And, any clue where 10.10.10.102 is?? I don't need a WINS server. sean
sean darcy
2008-May-17 17:09 UTC
[Samba] Re: nmbd using 80-90% cpu for name reg from phantom
sean darcy wrote:> nmbd is using a lot of cpu: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 22681 root 20 0 10080 1520 1084 R 99.0 0.3 146:30.78 nmbd > > log.nmbd logs 30-40 messages per second:: > > [2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(212) > process_name_registration_request: unicast name registration request > received for name SEC00159925E132<00> from IP 10.10.10.102 on subnet > UNICAST_SUBNET. Error - should be sent to WINS server > [2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(212) > process_name_registration_request: unicast name registration request > received for name SEC00159925E132<00> from IP 10.10.10.102 on subnet > UNICAST_SUBNET. Error - should be sent to WINS server > > nmbd is not set up as a WINS server. > > The DHCP server only hands out addreses above 10.10.10.120, so .102 > should not exist, and, in fact, 10.10.10.102 can't be found: > > ping 10.10.10.102 > PING 10.10.10.102 (10.10.10.102) 56(84) bytes of data. > From 10.10.10.2 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable > > So, why does nmbd chew up so many cpu cycles dealing with this. > > And, any clue where 10.10.10.102 is?? > > I don't need a WINS server. > > sean >Well, turning on wins support solved it. So even if I don't need it, I'll have it. Odd that it's required. No idea what it did with the phantom. sean