Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't
run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I
be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA
dev people..
Regards,
Marc.
Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com
[24.0.95.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC665016
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 22 May 2001 18:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thewunders.com ([24.3.60.159]) by
femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20
201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010523015452.BRRL10235.femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com@thewunders.com>;
Tue, 22 May 2001 18:54:52 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Tim Wunder <twunder@iwmail.com>
To: Bunny Pfau <bunny@hao.ucar.edu>, samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Rename and Delete... (samba mgt share permissions troubles)
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:47:21 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <200105222120.PAA09539@jabba.hao.ucar.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200105222120.PAA09539@jabba.hao.ucar.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052219081200.00703@thewunders.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 05:20 pm, Bunny Pfau wrote:> ->
> -> I disagree that all three of those activities are
"equivalent".
> -> Unix/linux handles them as if they were, but they are not. You are
not
> -> "just modifying the contents of the parent directory" when
you delete.
> -> When you delete, you are essentially setting the contents of the file
to
> -> null. Also, it seems logical that a file's name be considered
part of
> -> it's contents. Changing it's name should be interpretted that
way.
> ->
> -> Regards,
> -> Tim
> Indeed you are "just modifying the contents of the parent
directory" when
> deleting a file under UNIX.
>
No, you're not. You are "essentially", ie in essence, ie in the
user's eyes,
ie for all intents and purposes, ie effectively, ie the net effect of the
action is..... "setting the contents of the file to null". What
happens when
a user deletes a file that he doesn't own, nor have permission to write to?
The file becomes unavailable to the owner, and everyone else who happens to
have read permission on it. It becomes non-existent to everyone, ie
"null".
The o/s accomplishes that end result by modifying the directory, But the
means of accomplishing the net result is not relevant.
> The directory is the place that stores the name of the file and references
> the inode, which itself contains and references the file contents.
> When you remove a file, you are altering the directory, and, of course,
> putting that inode back on the free-inode list and the associated blocks
> back on the free block list. But you aren't truly "setting the
contents
> of the file to null." You're only indicating that that inode and
those
> blocks are available to be reused. It serves the same purpose, but
> the operation is somewhat different.
>
> Bunny Pfau
Let's see... I say that "I disagree that all three of those activities
are
"equivalent"", in reference to writing, renaming and deleting
files.
dictionary.com defines "equivalent" thusly:
"Equal, as in value, force, or meaning. Having similar or identical
effects.
Being essentially equal, all things considered: a wish that was equivalent to
a command. "
in Mathematics: "Capable of being put into a one-to-one relationship. Used
of
two sets. Having virtually identical or corresponding parts."
I KNOW what ACTUALLY happens (for the most part), froma technical point of
view. The fact that the file's contents are still on the disk, physically,
is
irrelevant to the user. (BTW, I didn't say that the contents of the file is
"truly" set to null, I said "essentially".) Can any unix
user retrieve that
data after it's deleted? Can the owner of the file, who gave it read only
permission to only those in his group, retrieve that data (without special
software and without 'root' priveledges) after another user, who
DOESN'T have
write permission on the file, deletes it? The fact that it's only the
filename in the inode of the directory (or FAT, if you're on Winders or DOS)
that is deleted, blah, blah, blah, doesn't matter. The file is deleted, and,
from the user's perspective, unretrievable. Hence, "all things
considered",
it's contents are no longer there. Meaning they are CHANGED. What physically
happens, what the O/S has to do to make it happen, are NOT relevant to the
end result. Only the end result is relevant. And the end result is that
someone who cannot write to a file, cannot change the file, cannot edit the
file, CAN delete the file, CAN make a new file OF THE SAME NAME, with
DIFFERENT CONTENT and save it to the SAME directory. That, I'm afraid, is
"equivalent" to writing to the file.
The sticky bit , er, "kludge", as Neil (ngoldber@mitre.org) referred
to it,
addresses the fallacy of correctness that POSIX compliant unices appear to
want to adhere to. The simple fact of the matter is, that a file that's
deleted or renamed, from the perspective of the USER, is CHANGED, reWRITTEN,
That UNIX/POSIX/linux wants to handle it differently is counter-intuitive
and, simply, wrong. To hold onto that perspective is, for lack of a better
word, stupid.
So, feel free to "correct" me. Tell me again how the file doesn't
get
changed, the directory gets changed. Enlighten me on the intricacies of UNIX
and POSIX-compliance. I'll say again that if I can read a file that I'm
not
alowwed to write to, save it under a different name, delete the original file
and rename my new file to the original, then I have just written to a file
that I don't have permission to write to.
(There... you may not agree with me, but I feel better getting THAT off my
chest...)
Regards,
Tim
Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com
[24.0.95.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFD14D59
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 22 May 2001 19:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thewunders.com ([24.3.60.159]) by
femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20
201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010523020448.CCKC10235.femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com@thewunders.com>;
Tue, 22 May 2001 19:04:48 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Tim Wunder <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
To: Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com, Tim Wunder
<wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Subject: Re: File Permissions
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:57:12 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
References: <85256A54.0075B349.00@patapsco.com>
In-Reply-To: <85256A54.0075B349.00@patapsco.com>
Organization: RESCO/Baltimore
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052221571201.00932@thewunders.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Joe,
I don't think there is a specific reference to "delete readonly"
in the
smb.conf file. I'll be sure to check that first thing tomorrow, though. If
the default is "yes", then adding "delete readonly = no" to
the smb.conf file
should work.
Thanks,
Tim
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 05:25 pm, Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com
wrote:> Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO
> 05/22/2001 05:25 PM
>
> Tim,
>
> you don't have "delete readonly = yes" in your smb.conf? if
this is set to
> yes, then users can delete read only files if they have write permission on
> the directory.
>
> --Joe
>
> >>Hi,
> >>New to the list, apologies if this has been adressed before.
> >>
> >>Win 2K Pro SP1, Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0
> >>
> >>I asked this on the newsgroup and no one has responded, yet. Any
ideas
> >>on how to make this work?
> >>
> >>We have a Management share, mgt, that is only visible to
management. All
> >>members of group mgt have read access to the files. I also want to
allow
> >>those in that group to create directories beneath all existing
> >>directories. But, I don't want to allow users to be able to
change or
> >>modify other users files.
> >>
> >>The share is configured with a create mask of 0744, and a directory
mask
> >>of 0775. @mgt is listed in the write list for the share.
> >>
> >>If the user's default group is mgt and he or she can read and
write on
> >>the mgt share fine. When he/she create a folder, or directory, on
the
> >>mgt share, it gets the group mgt, with rwxrwxr-x permissions
(0775),
> >>which is OK. When they create a file in the folder, it gets group
mgt
> >>with permissions rwxr--r-- (0744), again, this is OK. Another user
in
> >>the mgt group can open the file and read it, but they cannot open
it,
> >>edit it and save it, unless they save it as another file.
> >>
> >>The problem is, that same user, who can't EDIT the file from an
> >>application, can re-name it AND delete it. So, if they want to EDIT
the
> >>file, they just open it, save it under another name, delete the
original
> >>and rename the new one back to the original. Now they have
read/write
> >>permission on the file.
> >>
> >>Is it possible to prevent this?
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Tim
Return-Path: <drankin@cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from io.cox-internet.com (unknown [208.180.118.41]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ED05185 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 22 May 2001 19:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by io.cox-internet.com
(InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110 license
dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
<20010523020726.JUGQ29067.io@cox-internet.com>; Tue, 22 May 2001
21:07:26 -0500
Message-ID: <3B0B1BA2.A39ADF5@cox-internet.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:08:34 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin@cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: eivynn <eivynn@online.no>, samba <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: VPN and Samba
References: <3B0BAE57@epostleser.online.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
eivynn wrote:>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> Does anyone know how I can setup VPN with my Linux box to reach and logon
to
> Samba (on the same box) through the Internet?
> I will need help to set up both clients and server, please.
>
> Sincerely Eivin Hustveit
> University Student
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
It depends on "what you are trying to connect to what." Two scenarios:
(1) Use IPSEC for:
LAN1=>LINUX/SAMBA==>INTERNET/VPN==>LINUX/SAMBA=>LAN2
(2) Use pptpd for: WinXX client==>INTERNET/VPN==>LINUX/SAMBA=>LAN
I use (2). See poptop.lineo.com for the poptop pptpd software and
config. Don't forget to set IP_Forward=true if you go this route. I have
a cable connection and both ends and this setup really works well.
--
David Rankin
Rankin*Bertin, PLLC
Nacogdoches, Texas
Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de
[212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E95642F4
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 22 May 2001 23:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id IAA29515; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:41:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP
id IAA00195; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:41:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA10442; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:41:00 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:41:00 +0200
From: Michael Ott <Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de>
To: Benjamin Grogg <benjamin.grogg@hta-bi.bfh.ch>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: SuSE 7.1 and Samba 2.2.0
Message-ID: <20010523084100.D4183@erlm.siemens.de>
Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de
References: <3B0A1044.79F4C64A@hta-bi.bfh.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <3B0A1044.79F4C64A@hta-bi.bfh.ch>; from
benjamin.grogg@hta-bi.bfh.ch on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:07:48AM +0200
Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hallo benny!
> I update Samba 2.0.7 to 2.2.0. I use the following parameters :
>
> ./configure --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --with-sbmount
> --with-privatedir=/etc/private --libdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/log
> --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba
try it with this again:
--with-configdir=DIR
--
Gru_ & bye
Michael Ott
---------------------------------
- Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL -
- Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 -
- 91050 Erlangen -
- Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 -
- Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de -
---------------------------------
open-source and you have much fun
Return-Path: <asalford@wire-nuts.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from server1.wire-nuts.com (24-240-161-85.hsacorp.net
[24.240.161.85]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0D0C4424
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 00:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5642 invoked from network); 23 May 2001 07:12:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO asalford.wire-nuts.com) (192.168.1.41) by
192.168.1.4 with SMTP; 23 May 2001 07:12:39 -0000
From: Andrew Alford <asalford@wire-nuts.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:06:47 GMT
Message-ID: <20010523.10064721@asalford.wire-nuts.com>
Subject: samba-2.2.0-user authentication issues
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Reply-To: asalford@wire-nuts.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.2;Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
To all:
Thanks in advance!!!
I am running samba 2.2.0 on RH 6.1. I am having difficulty with
authenticating users. I compiled samba with pam support & installed the
pam patch as well. I can connect on some shares using guest on security
= user but, when I start trying to authenticate users on the system I am
getting "password incorrect." It also fails locally using smbclient
and
not setting the U% feature. I am trying to connect with win98 client &
have encrypt passwords set to yes on the server. The Server does give a
home listing for the user but, can't connect to it. The user I am trying
to connect with has entries in both system & samba password databases.
*** note *** I did upgrade from 2.0.7. Everything was working on that
system and figured migration would not be complex at all. Things were
working on that system quite well.
Only with security set to share can I connect. With this configuration
set I can connect to hdb1 & hdc1. I am using [test] just as it says.
Here is my smb.conf file:
[global]
workgroup = Wire-nuts.com
security = share
browsable = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
password level = 3
update encrypted = yes
os level = 34
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
domain logons = yes
local master = yes
log level = 0
log file = /usr/local/samba/lib/log.%m
include = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m
[homes]
guest ok = no
read only = no
browsable = no
[hdb1]
comment = For testing only, please
path = /mnt/hdb1
read only = no
guest ok = yes
[hdc1]
comment = For testing only, please
path = /mnt/hdc1
read only = no
guest ok = yes
[test]
comment = For testing only, please
browseable = yes
read only = no
valid users = asalford
path = /export/samba/test
Thanks,
Andy
Return-Path: <damir.horvat@ibe.si>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from dioda.ibe.si (dioda.ibe.si [194.249.225.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117E34227 for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 00:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ibe.si ([172.16.11.170]) by dioda.ibe.si (8.8.7/8.8.6)
with ESMTP id JAA05125 for <samba@samba.org.>; Wed, 23 May 2001
09:33:16 +0200
Message-Id: <200105230733.JAA05125@dioda.ibe.si>
Received: from IBE/SpoolDir by ibe.si (Mercury 1.44); 23 May 01 09:33:10
+1
Received: from SpoolDir by IBE (Mercury 1.44); 23 May 01 09:32:45 +1
From: "Damir Horvat" <damir.horvat@ibe.si>
Organization: IBE
To: samba@samba.org
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:32:44 +0200
Subject: win2k(beta3) and samba 2.0.6 (openbsd)
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12a)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello!
I've just install Win2k Beta3 and was looking in Network
Neighborhood and saw my Samba shares running on OpenBSD.
Samba is 2.0.6 and I'm NOT using encrypted passwords (I have
mostly win95 in LAN).
I didn't have a chance to try this on full Win2k version yet, but is it
possible for full Win2k ver. not to use encrypted password when
talking to Samba?
Regards,
Damir
Return-Path: <david.bouriaud@ac-rouen.fr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from necker.ac-rouen.fr (smtp.ac-rouen.fr [194.167.110.3]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50C54D69 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 01:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ac-rouen.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
necker.ac-rouen.fr (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4N8snV19902 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:54:50 +0200
Message-ID: <3B0B7AC3.CA8B775@ac-rouen.fr>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:54:27 +0200
From: David BOURIAUD <david.bouriaud@ac-rouen.fr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Help about defining a share.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi the list !
I come to you because I've got a problem to define a share. Here is the
way I'd like it to work :
I've got users that belongs to a group G and that are guests in a group
which can be G1, G2, or G3.
I'd like to have three levels of shares :
[home]
path = /home/%u/samba
which have read/write access for the user. No problems for this.
[service]
path=/home/%g
No problem here as well, it will point to /home/G
but now, how can I make a share that would point to
/home/G1, /home/G2, or /home/G3 depending on the group the user is
invited in ?
thanks in advance for your help.
--
David BOURIAUD
----------------------------------------------------------
In a world without walls or fences, what use do we have
for windows or gates ?
----------------------------------------------------------
ICQ#102562021
Return-Path: <j.m.maurer@student.utwente.nl>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from studict.student.utwente.nl (studict.student.utwente.nl
[130.89.220.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F8742F4
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 02:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from student.utwente.nl (swi55.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.18.74])
by studict.student.utwente.nl (8.9.3/MQT) with ESMTP id LAA22417 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:39:32 +0200 (METDST)
Message-ID: <3B0B8553.E727F6A1@student.utwente.nl>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:39:31 +0200
From: "j.m.maurer" <j.m.maurer@student.utwente.nl>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.19-2cs i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: libsmbclient
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi All!
I would like to write a samba app which uses the "libsmbclient"
library,
so I got samba 2.2 from CVS and compiled it.... but no libsmbclient.so
was
created! Does anyone know how to get a libsmbclient.so library??
Thnx in advance!
Marc
Return-Path: <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 603834244 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23
May 2001 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as2-232.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.10.232]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f4NA9Ps19932; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:09:26 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root@yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
UAA11366; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:09:13 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet@piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
UAA23761; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:09:12 +1000
Message-ID: <3B0B8C47.73D49C84@bartlett.house>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 20:09:11 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asalford@wire-nuts.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: samba-2.2.0-user authentication issues
References: <20010523.10064721@asalford.wire-nuts.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Andrew Alford wrote:>
> To all:
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
>
> I am running samba 2.2.0 on RH 6.1. I am having difficulty with
> authenticating users. I compiled samba with pam support & installed
the
> pam patch as well.
Which PAM patch? If its one of the various things I have written it
would be advisable to contact me off-list to see which particuar version
you have, and which partiular state of brokenness it was in :-) Note
that I was testing agaist the moving SAMBA_2_2 branch, not the 2.2.0
release. If the patch was by another author it I would like to know, as
I didn't think anybody else was looking at this area (beside the samba
team, and they just patch the tree directly).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet@pcug.org.au
Return-Path: <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C44C148B9 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23
May 2001 03:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as2-232.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.10.232]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f4NACAs20232; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:12:10 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root@yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
UAA11380; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:11:57 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet@piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
UAA23781; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:11:57 +1000
Message-ID: <3B0B8CED.8332FE07@bartlett.house>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 20:11:57 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: MRZ <mrz.pct@home.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Binding Windows to TCP/IP - Alternative?
References: <20010523014111.NJH29518.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@mustang.pc
t.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
MRZ wrote:>
> Hi folks.
> Couldn't find this when I searched the archives, and didn't know
where this should have been sent, so here goes.
>
> >From my understanding of the SAMBA documentation it appears to be a
necessity to bind Win9x clients to both TCP/IP and MS Client to successfully
access an SMB Server. This effectively removes the first line of defense (and
almost the only one at that!) available to make a Win9x box more secure.
Nobody is forcing you to *share* files from the box, and you don't have
to bind MS Client to your Dial-up adapter.
>
> Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share
doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the
docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed
by the SAMBA dev people..
Nope. Samba runs Netbios over TCP/IP, and cannot operate in any other
configuration.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet@pcug.org.au
Return-Path: <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from hermes.toad.net (hermes.toad.net [162.33.130.251]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AFA4BB5 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rescobaltimore.com (resco.dslwan.toad.net
[162.33.157.18]) by hermes.toad.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f4NCNXY31479; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:23:33 -0400
Message-ID: <3B0BABDE.9155C977@rescobaltimore.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:23:58 -0400
From: Tim Wunder <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Organization: RESCO/Baltimore
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com
Cc: Tim Wunder <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>, samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: File Permissions
References: <85256A54.0075B349.00@patapsco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Joe,
I did not have "delete readonly = yes" in the smb.conf file, and it
turns out that when left unspecified, the default is no. I added the
line "delete readonly = no" to the smb.conf file, anyway, and, as
expected, it still behaves the same. The Sticky Bit is the answer, but I
don't know how to get samba to set the sticky bit. A create mask of 1775
didn't work, even though I think it should. For now, I'm going back to
the create mask of 0755 and I'll make the top directory of the share
writeable, with the sticky bit set, and the owner root. That way, no
one, but the owner and root, can delete files and folders in the top
directory, and each user will have control of the files created in their
own directories. That'll work for what we need.
Regards,
Tim
Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com wrote:>
> Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO
> 05/22/2001 05:25 PM
>
> Tim,
>
> you don't have "delete readonly = yes" in your smb.conf? if
this is set to yes,
> then users can delete read only files if they have write permission on the
> directory.
>
> --Joe
>
> >>Hi,
> >>New to the list, apologies if this has been adressed before.
> >>
> >>Win 2K Pro SP1, Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0
> >>
> >>I asked this on the newsgroup and no one has responded, yet. Any
ideas
> >>on how to make this work?
> >>
> >>We have a Management share, mgt, that is only visible to
management. All
> >>members of group mgt have read access to the files. I also want to
allow
> >>those in that group to create directories beneath all existing
> >>directories. But, I don't want to allow users to be able to
change or
> >>modify other users files.
> >>
> >>The share is configured with a create mask of 0744, and a directory
mask
> >>of 0775. @mgt is listed in the write list for the share.
> >>
> >>If the user's default group is mgt and he or she can read and
write on
> >>the mgt share fine. When he/she create a folder, or directory, on
the
> >>mgt share, it gets the group mgt, with rwxrwxr-x permissions
(0775),
> >>which is OK. When they create a file in the folder, it gets group
mgt
> >>with permissions rwxr--r-- (0744), again, this is OK. Another user
in
> >>the mgt group can open the file and read it, but they cannot open
it,
> >>edit it and save it, unless they save it as another file.
> >>
> >>The problem is, that same user, who can't EDIT the file from an
> >>application, can re-name it AND delete it. So, if they want to EDIT
the
> >>file, they just open it, save it under another name, delete the
original
> >>and rename the new one back to the original. Now they have
read/write
> >>permission on the file.
> >>
> >>Is it possible to prevent this?
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Tim
Return-Path: <Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from pm05sm.rst.cw.net (PM05SM.RST.CW.NET [204.71.247.140]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1203E4C7A for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Blackfoot.patapsco ([206.99.206.98]) by pm05sm.rst.cw.net
(PMDF V6.0-24 #42206) with ESMTP id <0GDS02B2HFVLO6@pm05sm.rst.cw.net>
for samba@lists.samba.org; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:26:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from patapsco.com (bendigo.patapsco [192.9.200.190]) by
Blackfoot.patapsco (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA20641; Wed, 23 May
2001 08:26:09 -0400
Received: by patapsco.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
85256A55.00444DFA ; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:26:04 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:25:58 -0400
From: Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com
Subject: Re: File Permissions
To: Tim Wunder <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Message-id: <85256A55.00444C68.00@patapsco.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-disposition: inline
X-Lotus-FromDomain: PATAPSCO
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO
05/23/2001 08:25 AM
Tim,
The default is no, so if there is no reference to it, you should be fine there.
Have you tried 'inherit permissions'? If you set this to 'yes'
new directories
will assume the permissions of the parent directory. I know setgid is
inherited, and I believe the sticky bit is too, but you would have to test and
see. Also new files assume the RW permissions of the directory. I have this
set as a global paramater, that way I know what the directories are in each
place if someone creates it. I don't have to mess with the create, force
create, directory, and force directory masks. Inherit permissions overrides
this.
Good Luck,
Joe
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Hi Joe,
I don't think there is a specific reference to "delete readonly"
in the
smb.conf file. I'll be sure to check that first thing tomorrow, though. If
the default is "yes", then adding "delete readonly = no" to
the smb.conf file
should work.
Thanks,
Tim
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 05:25 pm, Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com
wrote:> Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO
> 05/22/2001 05:25 PM
>
> Tim,
>
> you don't have "delete readonly = yes" in your smb.conf? if
this is set to
> yes, then users can delete read only files if they have write permission on
> the directory.
>
> --Joe
Return-Path: <dm@hejoe.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from n05.sp.ba.dlr.de (n05.sp.ba.dlr.de [129.247.27.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCAA4AA3 for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kora2.nz.dlr.de (root@kora2.nz.dlr.de [129.247.236.11])
by n05.sp.ba.dlr.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4NCT6D26876 for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:29:21 +0200
Received: from hejoe.de (hejoe.de [192.108.54.6]) by kora2.nz.dlr.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17334 for <samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23
May 2001 14:28:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from hejoe.de (IDENT:dm@photon.hejoe.int [192.168.1.42]) by
hejoe.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f4NCSrS22485 for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:28:54 +0200
Message-ID: <3B0BAD05.A3647F26@hejoe.de>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:28:53 +0200
From: Dirk Maass <dm@hejoe.de>
Organization: HeJoe GmbH
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-8030 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: smbmount: password handling
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
is the following a known (perhaps already fixed) bug?
I use smbmount (samba-2.2.0-20010417) to mount a share to a RH 7.1 box (kernel
2.4.4).
There are various ways to specify the password for a user with partly different
behavior when the
password is a bit strange.
If the password has a comma inside, the command
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password='bv,jwt'
or
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password=bv\,jwt
fails, while
export PASSWD='bv,jwt'
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester
succeeds.
That password works well too, when it is specified in a credential file:
printf "username = tester\npassword = bv,jwt\n" >smb.cred
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o credentials=smb.cred
But there is another issue with the credential file: Leading spaces in the
password-string are not
recognized.
(e.g. ' bvcjwt' ). While the line
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password=\ bvcjwt
does it's job!
Regards
Dirk Maa_
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB288463E for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA21164; Wed, 23 May 2001
07:39:40 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 23:29:04 -0500
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
To: Claus Jeppesen <jeppesen@mrl.ucsb.edu>
Cc: samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: SP2, WIN2K, and Samba2.2.0.
Message-ID: <20010522232904.W21459@pogo.plainjoe.org>
References: <3B0A8662.108DF075@mrl.ucsb.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3B0A8662.108DF075@mrl.ucsb.edu>; from
jeppesen@mrl.ucsb.edu on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:31:47 -0500
X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4
Lines: 26
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Tue, 22 May 2001 10:31:47 Claus Jeppesen wrote:>
> I've been using Samba2.2.0 since it was released 4/17/01 -
> in the meantime Microsoft has released sp2 for
> Win2K. It now seems that I cannot get Win2K workstations
> with sp2 to join a Samba controlled domain. I saw a
> rumor that sp2 "breaks" Samba PDC - it that correct ?
Yes. The problems will be addressed and fixed in the
2.2.1 release (soon). Many are already fixed in the SAMBA_2_2
cvs tree.
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <jhill2@maine.rr.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.maine.rr.com (smtp-server.maine.rr.com
[204.210.65.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988E04F0A
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jhill ([24.25.180.29]) by mail.maine.rr.com (Post.Office
MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with SMTP id
com; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:51:48 -0400
Message-ID: <005f01c0e386$183938e0$d500a8c0@sawmillmanager.com>
From: "John Hill" <jhill@sawmillmanager.com>
To: "Tim Wunder" <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>,
<Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <85256A54.0075B349.00@patapsco.com>
<3B0BABDE.9155C977@rescobaltimore.com>
Subject: Re: File Permissions
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:44:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I tried using "force directory mode = 1775" and it worked for me.
Once
again though I am using SCO OpenServer 5.0.5 and 1.9.18p2.
John Hill
Logical Systems, Inc.
258 Main Street
P.O. Box 649
Yarmouth, ME 04096
Phone: (207) 846-3669
Fax: (207) 846-3804
E-Mail: jhill@sawmillmanager.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Wunder" <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
To: <Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com>
Cc: "Tim Wunder" <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>;
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: File Permissions
Hi Joe,
I did not have "delete readonly = yes" in the smb.conf file, and it
turns out that when left unspecified, the default is no. I added the
line "delete readonly = no" to the smb.conf file, anyway, and, as
expected, it still behaves the same. The Sticky Bit is the answer, but I
don't know how to get samba to set the sticky bit. A create mask of 1775
didn't work, even though I think it should. For now, I'm going back to
the create mask of 0755 and I'll make the top directory of the share
writeable, with the sticky bit set, and the owner root. That way, no
one, but the owner and root, can delete files and folders in the top
directory, and each user will have control of the files created in their
own directories. That'll work for what we need.
Regards,
Tim
Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com wrote:>
> Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO
> 05/22/2001 05:25 PM
>
> Tim,
>
> you don't have "delete readonly = yes" in your smb.conf? if
this is set
to yes,> then users can delete read only files if they have write permission on the
> directory.
>
> --Joe
>
> >>Hi,
> >>New to the list, apologies if this has been adressed before.
> >>
> >>Win 2K Pro SP1, Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0
> >>
> >>I asked this on the newsgroup and no one has responded, yet. Any
ideas
> >>on how to make this work?
> >>
> >>We have a Management share, mgt, that is only visible to
management. All
> >>members of group mgt have read access to the files. I also want to
allow
> >>those in that group to create directories beneath all existing
> >>directories. But, I don't want to allow users to be able to
change or
> >>modify other users files.
> >>
> >>The share is configured with a create mask of 0744, and a directory
mask
> >>of 0775. @mgt is listed in the write list for the share.
> >>
> >>If the user's default group is mgt and he or she can read and
write on
> >>the mgt share fine. When he/she create a folder, or directory, on
the
> >>mgt share, it gets the group mgt, with rwxrwxr-x permissions
(0775),
> >>which is OK. When they create a file in the folder, it gets group
mgt
> >>with permissions rwxr--r-- (0744), again, this is OK. Another user
in
> >>the mgt group can open the file and read it, but they cannot open
it,
> >>edit it and save it, unless they save it as another file.
> >>
> >>The problem is, that same user, who can't EDIT the file from an
> >>application, can re-name it AND delete it. So, if they want to EDIT
the
> >>file, they just open it, save it under another name, delete the
original
> >>and rename the new one back to the original. Now they have
read/write
> >>permission on the file.
> >>
> >>Is it possible to prevent this?
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from sushi.toad.net (sushi.toad.net [162.33.130.105]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84415467E for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 06:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rescobaltimore.com (resco.dslwan.toad.net
[162.33.157.18]) by sushi.toad.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f4NDJ1r28491; Wed, 23 May 2001 09:19:01 -0400
Message-ID: <3B0BB8DE.5137832A@rescobaltimore.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:19:26 -0400
From: Tim Wunder <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Organization: RESCO/Baltimore
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Hill <jhill@sawmillmanager.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: File Permissions
References: <85256A54.0075B349.00@patapsco.com>
<3B0BABDE.9155C977@rescobaltimore.com>
<005f01c0e386$183938e0$d500a8c0@sawmillmanager.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi John,
THANK YOU! I tried 'directory mask = 1775' and that didn't work.
'force
directory mode = 1775' DID work. Upon further review, it appears that
the 'directory mask' setting affects the mapping of DOS permissions to
Unix. Since there is no DOS sticky bit, trying to mask for the sticky
bit fails. But, because 'force directory mode' forces the Unix
permissions onto the newly created directory, and linux knows about the
sticky bit, a sticky bit setting here works. It least that's how I
understand it now.
For kicks, I added 'force directory security mode = 000' so users will
be able to change permissions on the directory.
Boy... I'm really learning alot from this list. I just hope this feeble
mind of mine will be able to remember half the s--t I'm learning...
Regards,
Tim
John Hill wrote:>
> I tried using "force directory mode = 1775" and it worked for me.
Once
> again though I am using SCO OpenServer 5.0.5 and 1.9.18p2.
>
> John Hill
> Logical Systems, Inc.
> 258 Main Street
> P.O. Box 649
> Yarmouth, ME 04096
>
> Phone: (207) 846-3669
> Fax: (207) 846-3804
> E-Mail: jhill@sawmillmanager.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Wunder" <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
> To: <Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com>
> Cc: "Tim Wunder" <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>;
<samba@lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:23 AM
> Subject: Re: File Permissions
>
> Hi Joe,
> I did not have "delete readonly = yes" in the smb.conf file, and
it
> turns out that when left unspecified, the default is no. I added the
> line "delete readonly = no" to the smb.conf file, anyway, and, as
> expected, it still behaves the same. The Sticky Bit is the answer, but I
> don't know how to get samba to set the sticky bit. A create mask of
1775
> didn't work, even though I think it should. For now, I'm going back
to
> the create mask of 0755 and I'll make the top directory of the share
> writeable, with the sticky bit set, and the owner root. That way, no
> one, but the owner and root, can delete files and folders in the top
> directory, and each user will have control of the files created in their
> own directories. That'll work for what we need.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com wrote:
> >
> > Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO
> > 05/22/2001 05:25 PM
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > you don't have "delete readonly = yes" in your smb.conf?
if this is set
> to yes,
> > then users can delete read only files if they have write permission on
the
> > directory.
> >
> > --Joe
> >
> > >>Hi,
> > >>New to the list, apologies if this has been adressed before.
> > >>
> > >>Win 2K Pro SP1, Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0
> > >>
> > >>I asked this on the newsgroup and no one has responded, yet.
Any ideas
> > >>on how to make this work?
> > >>
> > >>We have a Management share, mgt, that is only visible to
management. All
> > >>members of group mgt have read access to the files. I also
want to allow
> > >>those in that group to create directories beneath all existing
> > >>directories. But, I don't want to allow users to be able
to change or
> > >>modify other users files.
> > >>
> > >>The share is configured with a create mask of 0744, and a
directory mask
> > >>of 0775. @mgt is listed in the write list for the share.
> > >>
> > >>If the user's default group is mgt and he or she can read
and write on
> > >>the mgt share fine. When he/she create a folder, or directory,
on the
> > >>mgt share, it gets the group mgt, with rwxrwxr-x permissions
(0775),
> > >>which is OK. When they create a file in the folder, it gets
group mgt
> > >>with permissions rwxr--r-- (0744), again, this is OK. Another
user in
> > >>the mgt group can open the file and read it, but they cannot
open it,
> > >>edit it and save it, unless they save it as another file.
> > >>
> > >>The problem is, that same user, who can't EDIT the file
from an
> > >>application, can re-name it AND delete it. So, if they want to
EDIT the
> > >>file, they just open it, save it under another name, delete
the original
> > >>and rename the new one back to the original. Now they have
read/write
> > >>permission on the file.
> > >>
> > >>Is it possible to prevent this?
> > >>
> > >>Regards,
> > >>Tim
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <royt@subexgroup.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1B54C2F for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 06:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 18:52:09 +0530
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:03:10
-0000
Message-ID: <01C0E3BB.0264E4D0.royt@subexgroup.com>
From: Roy Thomas <royt@subexgroup.com>
Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" <royt@subexgroup.com>
To: 'Roy Thomas' <royt@subexgroup.com>, 'Gerald Carter'
<gcarter@valinux.com>
Cc: 'Jeremy Allison' <jeremy@valinux.com>,
"'samba@samba.org'"
<samba@samba.org>
Subject: RE: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 - BUG
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:03:09 -0000
Organization: SSL
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba@samba.org
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
HI jerry
I tried with the CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch...I am to able see the win9x shares...
i am also able to see the User list to assign access....But when i tried to
acces this
share from a W2K machine it say's Access denied. though the user has been
given
access to that particular shared folder.
what could be the problem
Roy,
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:27 PM
To: royt @ subexgroup . com
Cc: 'Jeremy Allison'; 'samba-ntdom @ samba . org'
Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2
On Thu, 17 May 2001 16:23:49 Roy Thomas wrote:>
> hi all
> pls someone update me on the status of o user lists for
> Win9x in user mode security where sould i get this
..> It was updated recently that Samba latest testing has been done on
> o user lists for Win9x in user mode security
> (this one patch update i need very badly)
> And a few other things....... could someone help me on where
> i could download this samba version(which has all
> these updates) from should i use the CVS or the
> alpha version..................
See http://samba.org/samba/cvs.html
Use the SAMBA_2_2 branch.
Cheers, jerry
Return-Path: <ioann@cais.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from stmpy-3.cais.net (stmpy-3.cais.net [205.252.14.73]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9543F4BEE for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 07:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CORIANDER (209-9-221-98.sdsl.cais.net [209.9.221.98]) by
stmpy-3.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f4NEBuK03982 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:11:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: "John Johnson" <ioann@cais.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Install Printer Drivers - Samba 2.2.0
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:11:10 -0400
Message-ID: <000a01c0e392$3828eb30$0c00000a@CORIANDER>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm trying to properly configure printing, and I'm able to see my Samba
printer, but every time I try to install a printer driver from my Win2K box,
the driver is installed into my \winnt\system32\... directory, not to the
W32X86 folder I've created on the PDC. Can anyone suggest a fix?
Thank in advance,
John
My smb.conf follows:
[global]
netbios name = FILES
workgroup = XANADU
os level = 64
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
local master = yes
wins support = yes
status = yes
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
domain logons = yes
logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u
logon drive = H:
logon home = \\%L\%U\.profile
logon script = scripts/default.bat
time server = yes
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
[netlogon]
path = /etc/samba/netlogon
writeable = no
browseable = no
write list = ntadmin
[profiles]
path = /etc/samba/ntprofile
writeable = yes
browseable = no
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
[homes]
guest ok = no
read only = no
[print$]
path = /etc/samba/printers
guest ok = yes
browseable = yes
read only = yes
write list = ntadmin root john
[printers]
printable = yes
browseable = yes
path = /var/spool/lpd/lpr
create mode= = 0700
available = yes
Return-Path: <pboucher@robotel.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from server.robotel.dhs.org (g95-107.citenet.net
[209.41.143.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32C64558
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 07:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from robotel.ca ([192.168.1.10]) by server.robotel.dhs.org
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4NEgh812929 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:42:43 -0400
Message-ID: <3B0BCC50.818821ED@robotel.ca>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:42:24 -0400
From: Patrick Boucher <pboucher@robotel.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: how to show share only to Valid user ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greetings,
I have this Fileserver with alot of Share available. My question is:
How can i show share only to the valid user list ?
Because right now, Everybody that look in network neigborhood (windows
98) will see all of my Shares even if they do not have acces to it.
I know about the browseable option.. But if i say no, nobody will be
able to "see" them.
I'm looking for an options like: browseable = yes is username is in
valid user
Does somebody have an idea?
--
Patrick Boucher
Return-Path: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from relay3.mail.uk.psi.net (relay3.mail.uk.psi.net
[154.32.109.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC994DA9
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.plasmon.co.uk ([193.115.5.217]) by
relay3.mail.uk.psi.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 152aBb-0007nm-00
for samba@lists.samba.org; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:04:32 +0100
Subject: Windows 98 Samba performance
To: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OFF414C800.B00F08A9-ON80256A55.00519D12@plasmon.co.uk>
From: bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:03:19 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Melbourn01/SVR/Plasmon(Release
5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 05/23/2001 04:03:34 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Please help!
I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a FreeBSD (4.1) RAID box. Copying files of
approximately 500Kb from a Windoze '98 box is giving absoultely dire
performance, in the region of 500Kb/s.
On the same network I have run the same test from NT - FreeBSD which gives
about 3.7Mb/s and from Windoze '98 - Linux (running Samba 2.0.7) which
gives around 4Mb/s so it appears the problem is to do with FreeBSD.
The fact that Win98 - Linux provides decent figures suggests it isn't a
Samba thing which was my first suspicion but I have reached the end of the
road with what to try next.
Any advice/suggestions would be gratefully received.
Thanks,
Ben Black
Return-Path: <pzoltan@fw.hu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from bpdcwm01.bpcl.broadband.hu (bpdcwm01.bpcl.broadband.hu
[195.184.181.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C05459E
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [195.184.174.221] (gep17-3963.miskcatv.broadband.hu
[195.184.174.221]) by bpdcwm01.bpcl.broadband.hu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with
SMTP id f4NFHpK28146 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001
17:17:58 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Zoltan Perhacs <pzoltan@fw.hu>
Subject: Samba with multiple workgroups
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:15:40 +0200
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <MWMail.lmbpaqjm@host.none>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I would like to know, that is it possible to control multiple workgroups with
Samba
(like with Windows NT Domain controller) and how, or not ?
Thanks
Zoltan Perhacs
Return-Path: <don_mccall@hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from palrel2.hp.com (palrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.234]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDC2454D for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay2.corp.hp.com (xparelay2.corp.hp.com
[15.58.137.112]) by palrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A8829A2;
Wed, 23 May 2001 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlbh1.atl.hp.com (xatlbh1.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.186]) by
xparelay2.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12D01F50F; Wed, 23 May
2001 08:16:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh1.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <LL8LJTW1>; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:26:25 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050A64@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>
To: 'Patrick Boucher' <pboucher@robotel.ca>, samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: how to show share only to Valid user ?
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:26:24 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Sorry Patrick,
There's no such configuration option to do what you want. Either a share is
browseable, or it's not.
There are probably some kludgey ways to do this, like having separate
smb.conf.username
files for each of the valid users, so that these shares are only shared out
when the connection being made is FROM one of the valid users, but depending
on how many users we're talking about, this could be tedious to implement
and/or maintain.
ie, in the global section of your smb.conf add:
include = shares.%u
and create files named shares.validuser1 shares.validuser2 ....
where shares.validuser contain the service definition(s) for the shares you
want only those valid users to see, and remove the service definitions(s)
from you main smb.conf file.
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Boucher [mailto:pboucher@robotel.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:42 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: how to show share only to Valid user ?
Greetings,
I have this Fileserver with alot of Share available. My question is:
How can i show share only to the valid user list ?
Because right now, Everybody that look in network neigborhood (windows
98) will see all of my Shares even if they do not have acces to it.
I know about the browseable option.. But if i say no, nobody will be
able to "see" them.
I'm looking for an options like: browseable = yes is username is in
valid user
Does somebody have an idea?
--
Patrick Boucher
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94A604F41 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14
port:3591]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id:
<979@intsrv> for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001
16:42:06
+0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>
Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<KSXN5X0D>; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:42:16 +0100
Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749365@EMAILSRV>
From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>
To: "Samba (E-mail)" <samba@lists.samba.org>, "SNTDom
(E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Quota
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:42:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Does quota automatically turn on at startup in RedHat 7? It was
preinstalled...
--
C.S.Mager
charlie@csmager.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: AOL Systems [mailto:web@aolsystems.com]
Sent: 23 May 2001 17:46
To: Mager Charles WB
Subject: Re: Quota
yes i hope this will help you aliitle but im not an expert this is only that
i know of.
pls edit your fstab add usrquota and grpquota
Settingup Quota (Beginners View)
then add a file
#touch /home/quota.user
#touch /home/quota.group
#touch /var/quota.user
#touch /var/quota.group
then make them all chmod 600
this is for testing the quota
#useradd admin
#edquota -g admin
#reboot
#edquota -u admin
#edquota -g admin
#reboot
#edquota -u admin
#quotas -u admin
#reboot
edquota -u admin
Quotas for user admin
for IDE(for recomended partion)
/dev/hda6: block in use:0,limits(soft=0,hard=0)
/dev/hda9:block in use:0,limits(soft=0,hard0)
inodes inuse:0, limits(soft=0,hard=0)
pls. cahnge soft=0 to any no.that u want this serve as how many MB you want
them to have example: 5000 = 5MB of space /dev/hda6
vi -i
shift :wq to write and exit
then quota for the group
#edquota -g popusers
#pico /etc/group
group
popusers:x:45:*
edquota -t
Quota Tools
#quota -u admin
#quota -a
edquota -p admin awk -F: '$ 3 > 500 {print $1} /etc/passwd'
where * -is equal to the name you want to set a quota
where t -is setting up the time usually 1 week memo
This serve a guide for you but not 100% perfeect in setuping your quota
there are many ways speacilly for expert users of linux.Keep it up and keep
posting questions if u have.im also very new in this field but i hope i
contribute to you in making solution to your problem
Thanks God bless and more power
Respectfully
AOL
www.aolsystems.com
Mager Charles WB wrote:
> Is there any way of setting a limit on the sizes of home-areas?
>
> --
> C.S.Mager
> charlie@csmager.co.uk
>
> This email and the information that it contains may be confidential,
> legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended
> recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise)
> arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any
> information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are
> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
> and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for
> any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
This email and the information that it contains may be confidential,
legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended
recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise)
arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any
information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for
any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium.
Return-Path: <pboucher@robotel.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from server.robotel.dhs.org (g95-107.citenet.net
[209.41.143.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6634FA2
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from robotel.ca ([192.168.1.10]) by server.robotel.dhs.org
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4NFoU813088 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:50:30 -0400
Message-ID: <3B0BDC32.34EBA288@robotel.ca>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:50:10 -0400
From: Patrick Boucher <pboucher@robotel.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: what version am i running ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greetings,
I have this stupid question, RedHat 7.0 is install with Samba 2.0.8
installed.
When i type rpm -q samba
i get the answer
Samba 2.0.8-1-7-1
I try to upgrade my version to samba2.0.9
My question is: How can i be "sure" that it is Samba 2.0.9 that i am
Using..
Is there an option like: smb -version or something ?
--
Patrick Boucher
Return-Path: <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from sushi.toad.net (sushi.toad.net [162.33.130.105]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDD34FCA for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rescobaltimore.com (resco.dslwan.toad.net
[162.33.157.18]) by sushi.toad.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f4NFuhr07248; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:56:43 -0400
Message-ID: <3B0BDDD6.80CD6E24@rescobaltimore.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:57:10 -0400
From: Tim Wunder <wundertp@rescobaltimore.com>
Organization: RESCO/Baltimore
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "'Patrick Boucher'" <pboucher@robotel.ca>
Cc: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>,
samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: how to show share only to Valid user ?
References: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050A64@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Patrick,
The mgt share that we have is set up as not browsable and no one can
browse to it, not even those who are allowed access to it. This is
accomplished by removing world executable permission from the linux
side. The permission on the directory shared is rwxrwx--T (1770)the T is
the indicator that the sticky bit is set). Only the owner, root, and
members of the group, mgt, can read and write to it. No one can browse
it.
You can access the share by typing \\<server name>\<share name> in
the
explorer nav bar, if you're in the mgt group, that is. The relevant
section of my smb.conf file looks like this:
valid users = @adm, @mgt
read list = @adm, @mgt
write list = @adm, @mgt, tpw
force group = +mgt
directory mask = 00
force directory mode = 01770
force directory security mode = 00
browseable = No
HTH,
Tim
"MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" wrote:>
> Sorry Patrick,
> There's no such configuration option to do what you want. Either a
share is
>
> browseable, or it's not.
> There are probably some kludgey ways to do this, like having separate
> smb.conf.username
> files for each of the valid users, so that these shares are only shared out
> when the connection being made is FROM one of the valid users, but
depending
> on how many users we're talking about, this could be tedious to
implement
> and/or maintain.
>
> ie, in the global section of your smb.conf add:
> include = shares.%u
>
> and create files named shares.validuser1 shares.validuser2 ....
> where shares.validuser contain the service definition(s) for the shares
you
> want only those valid users to see, and remove the service definitions(s)
> from you main smb.conf file.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Don
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Boucher [mailto:pboucher@robotel.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:42 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: how to show share only to Valid user ?
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have this Fileserver with alot of Share available. My question is:
> How can i show share only to the valid user list ?
> Because right now, Everybody that look in network neigborhood (windows
> 98) will see all of my Shares even if they do not have acces to it.
>
> I know about the browseable option.. But if i say no, nobody will be
> able to "see" them.
>
> I'm looking for an options like: browseable = yes is username is in
> valid user
>
> Does somebody have an idea?
>
> --
> Patrick Boucher
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from relay3.mail.uk.psi.net (relay3.mail.uk.psi.net
[154.32.109.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E22450D;
Wed, 23 May 2001 08:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.plasmon.co.uk ([193.115.5.217]) by
relay3.mail.uk.psi.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 152b0r-0002ld-00;
Wed, 23 May 2001 16:57:30 +0100
Subject: Re: what version am i running ?
To: Patrick Boucher <pboucher@robotel.ca>
Cc: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org>,
samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF2DB37251.23DDB3CB-ON80256A55.0057854B@plasmon.co.uk>
From: bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:56:16 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Melbourn01/SVR/Plasmon(Release
5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 05/23/2001 04:56:32 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
smbd -V
??
Patrick Boucher
<pboucher@robotel To:
"samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org>
.ca> cc:
Sent by: Subject: what version am i
running ?
samba-admin@lists
.samba.org
23/05/2001 16:50
Greetings,
I have this stupid question, RedHat 7.0 is install with Samba 2.0.8
installed.
When i type rpm -q samba
i get the answer
Samba 2.0.8-1-7-1
I try to upgrade my version to samba2.0.9
My question is: How can i be "sure" that it is Samba 2.0.9 that i am
Using..
Is there an option like: smb -version or something ?
--
Patrick Boucher
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <sledgehammer2010@yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from web12904.mail.yahoo.com (web12904.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.174.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 486764EF3
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010523160218.12905.qmail@web12904.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.88.65.98] by web12904.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 23 May
2001 09:02:18 PDT
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dhruva Reddy <sledgehammer2010@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: what version am i running ?
To: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org>
In-Reply-To: <3B0BDC32.34EBA288@robotel.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
smbd -V
--- Patrick Boucher <pboucher@robotel.ca> wrote:> Greetings,
>
> I have this stupid question, RedHat 7.0 is
> install with Samba 2.0.8
> installed.
> When i type rpm -q samba
> i get the answer
> Samba 2.0.8-1-7-1
> I try to upgrade my version to samba2.0.9
>
> My question is: How can i be "sure" that it is Samba
> 2.0.9 that i am
> Using..
> Is there an option like: smb -version or something ?
>
>
> --
> Patrick Boucher
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
> URL and read the
> instructions:
http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <urban@teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from fungus.svenskatest.se (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DF744D5
for <samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fw.teststation.com (srvfwume.svenskatest.se
[212.32.186.210]) by fungus.svenskatest.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
TAA15283; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:08:36 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from COLA by fw.teststation.com via smtpd (for
fungus.teststation.com [212.32.186.211]) with SMTP; 23 May 2001
16:44:58 UT
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:08:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw@cola.teststation.com>
To: Dirk Maass <dm@hejoe.de>
Cc: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: smbmount: password handling
In-Reply-To: <3B0BAD05.A3647F26@hejoe.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105231850480.25178-100000@cola.teststation.c
om>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Dirk Maass wrote:
> Hi all,
> is the following a known (perhaps already fixed) bug?
Known but, not fixed ... <time passes> ... but now perhaps it is.
Patch vs samba 2.2.0:
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbmount-2.2.0-option.patch
Please test.
> If the password has a comma inside, the command
> smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o
username=tester,password='bv,jwt'
> or
> smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password=bv\,jwt
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password='bv\,jwt'
or
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password=bv\\,jwt
should now work.
>
> But there is another issue with the credential file: Leading spaces in the
password-string are not
> recognized.
> (e.g. ' bvcjwt' ). While the line
username = \ foo\ \
password = \ bvcjwt
should now also work in the credentials file. A similar fix could be
useful for smbclient if anyone is interested.
Note that if you have an actual \ in the password that needs escaping now,
ie it needs to be \\. For example:
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password=bv\\\\jwt
smbmount //wserv/tester /mnt/test -o username=tester,password='bv\\jwt'
/Urban
Return-Path: <don_mccall@hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from atlrel1.hp.com (atlrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.210]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ECD45C0 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amrelay1.boi.hp.com (amrelay1.boi.hp.com [15.56.8.24]) by
atlrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3414BCB1; Wed, 23 May 2001
13:21:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh1.atl.hp.com (xatlbh1.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.186]) by
amrelay1.boi.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id
LAA16248; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:21:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by xatlbh1.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <LL8LJ68Q>; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:21:44 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050A67@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>
To: "'Patrick Boucher'" <pboucher@robotel.ca>,
samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: what version am i running ?
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:21:43 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Patrick,
Yes, in fact;
smbd -V
will give you the version of the daemon you are running.
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Boucher [mailto:pboucher@robotel.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:50 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: what version am i running ?
Greetings,
I have this stupid question, RedHat 7.0 is install with Samba 2.0.8
installed.
When i type rpm -q samba
i get the answer
Samba 2.0.8-1-7-1
I try to upgrade my version to samba2.0.9
My question is: How can i be "sure" that it is Samba 2.0.9 that i am
Using..
Is there an option like: smb -version or something ?
--
Patrick Boucher
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <herb@chomps.engr.sgi.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CD84620 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23
May 2001 10:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2])
by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not
authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for
unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id KAA06236;
Wed, 23 May 2001 10:30:06 -0700 (PDT) mail_from
(herb@chomps.engr.sgi.com)
Received: from chomps.engr.sgi.com (chomps.engr.sgi.com [163.154.35.63])
by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA75159; Wed,
23 May 2001 10:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chomps.engr.sgi.com (chomps.engr.sgi.com [163.154.35.63])
by chomps.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA61544; Wed,
23 May 2001 10:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3B0BF365.D3469C97@chomps.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:29:09 -0700
From: Herb Lewis <herb@chomps.engr.sgi.com>
Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP22)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>
Cc: "'Patrick Boucher'" <pboucher@robotel.ca>,
samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: how to show share only to Valid user ?
References: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050A64@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
"MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" wrote:>
> Sorry Patrick,
> There's no such configuration option to do what you want. Either a
share is
>
> browseable, or it's not.
> There are probably some kludgey ways to do this, like having separate
> smb.conf.username
> files for each of the valid users, so that these shares are only shared out
> when the connection being made is FROM one of the valid users, but
depending
> on how many users we're talking about, this could be tedious to
implement
> and/or maintain.
>
> ie, in the global section of your smb.conf add:
> include = shares.%u
>
> and create files named shares.validuser1 shares.validuser2 ....
> where shares.validuser contain the service definition(s) for the shares
you
> want only those valid users to see, and remove the service definitions(s)
> from you main smb.conf file.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Don
I don't think this would work (I admit I haven't tried it though). Most
browsing is done as the guest user.
--
=====================================================================Herb Lewis
Silicon Graphics
Networking Engineer 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy MS-510
Strategic Software Organization Mountain View, CA 94043-1351
herb@sgi.com Tel: 650-933-2177
http://www.sgi.com Fax: 650-932-2177
=====================================================================
Return-Path: <beatriz@emonterrey.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [207.248.53.226]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4781C4668 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emabraxas ([192.168.1.100]) by localhost.localdomain
(8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f4NHkx120032 for <samba@lists.samba.org>;
Wed, 23 May 2001 12:47:01 -0500
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Beatriz_E._Duran_Casta=F1eda?="
<beatriz@emonterrey.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: 7.1 or 7.0
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:49:32 -0500
Message-ID: <KLENLIALNMPEGGPELPCIAEOICAAA.beatriz@emonterrey.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Are there the rpms of samba, samba-client and samba-common (version 2.2.0)?
Return-Path: <drankin@cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba@us5.samba.org
Received: from europa.cox-internet.com (europa-cox.cox-internet.com
[208.180.118.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7291D4F9C
for <samba@us5.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by
europa.cox-internet.com (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110
license dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
<20010523181352.JQAD1750.europa@cox-internet.com>; Wed, 23 May 2001
13:13:52 -0500
Message-ID: <3B0BFE69.8429BA00@cox-internet.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:16:09 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin@cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-NSCPCD (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk
Cc: Samba <samba@us5.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Windows 98 Samba performance
References: <OFF414C800.B00F08A9-ON80256A55.00519D12@plasmon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk wrote:
> Please help!
>
> I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a FreeBSD (4.1) RAID box. Copying files of
> approximately 500Kb from a Windoze '98 box is giving absoultely dire
> performance, in the region of 500Kb/s.
>
> On the same network I have run the same test from NT - FreeBSD which gives
> about 3.7Mb/s and from Windoze '98 - Linux (running Samba 2.0.7) which
> gives around 4Mb/s so it appears the problem is to do with FreeBSD.
>
> The fact that Win98 - Linux provides decent figures suggests it isn't a
> Samba thing which was my first suspicion but I have reached the end of the
> road with what to try next.
>
> Any advice/suggestions would be gratefully received.
>
Ben, I have had the exact same problem in the past. See all my posts from
about a month ago. We never found an answer because the problem disappeared on
its own. It still occurrs from time to time, but I haven't had time to
investigate further. Some times I get about 5Mps other times it takes forever
to copy 800k from Win98 to Linux.
--
David Rankin
Nacogdoches, Texas
Return-Path: <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Delivered-To: samba@us5.samba.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net
[216.118.21.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44985078
for <samba@us5.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by
leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCE510F40F; Wed, 23
May 2001 13:20:18 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <093b01c0e3b5$06b53ae0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: "David Rankin" <drankin@cox-internet.com>,
<bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Cc: "Samba" <samba@us5.samba.org>,
<samba-technical@freebsd.org>
References: <OFF414C800.B00F08A9-ON80256A55.00519D12@plasmon.co.uk>
<3B0BFE69.8429BA00@cox-internet.com>
Subject: Re: Windows 98 Samba performance
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:20:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I managed to fix the problem by turning off raw writes on FreeBSD, but
cannot seem to get any help from any of the developers on this one and I've
tried every since 2.0.5.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Rankin" <drankin@cox-internet.com>
To: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Cc: "Samba" <samba@us5.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Windows 98 Samba performance
> bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk wrote:
>
> > Please help!
> >
> > I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a FreeBSD (4.1) RAID box. Copying files of
> > approximately 500Kb from a Windoze '98 box is giving absoultely
dire
> > performance, in the region of 500Kb/s.
> >
> > On the same network I have run the same test from NT - FreeBSD which
gives> > about 3.7Mb/s and from Windoze '98 - Linux (running Samba 2.0.7)
which
> > gives around 4Mb/s so it appears the problem is to do with FreeBSD.
> >
> > The fact that Win98 - Linux provides decent figures suggests it
isn't a
> > Samba thing which was my first suspicion but I have reached the end of
the> > road with what to try next.
> >
> > Any advice/suggestions would be gratefully received.
> >
>
> Ben, I have had the exact same problem in the past. See all my posts from
> about a month ago. We never found an answer because the problem
disappeared on> its own. It still occurrs from time to time, but I haven't had time to
> investigate further. Some times I get about 5Mps other times it takes
forever> to copy 800k from Win98 to Linux.
>
>
> --
> David Rankin
> Nacogdoches, Texas
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <mikef@matchmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mmp-linux.matchmail.com
(adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.194.239.202]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B60F5105 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mmp240.matchmail.com (mikef-linux.matchmail.com)
[10.0.0.240] by mmp-linux.matchmail.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1
(Debian)) id 152dqI-0002gr-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:58:46 -0700
Received: from mikef by mikef-linux.matchmail.com with local (Exim 3.12
#1 (Debian)) id 152dqN-0002cC-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:58:51 -0700
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:58:51 -0700
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Samba ML <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Possible to inject entries into samba WINS database?
Message-ID: <20010523115851.D4995@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>, Samba ML
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I have samba 2.0.7 with Auth to NTDC on NT4 SP6a. Samba is acting as WINS
server.
After having to upgrade the samba server, all WINS have been re-added to the
database except for the DC (#1d). Though, the entry for Master Browser has
been added (#1e).
How do I get this entry into the database? Can I do anything on the NTDC
besides a restart to add this entry? Is there a unix util?
TIA,
Mike
Return-Path: <mikef@matchmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mmp-linux.matchmail.com
(adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.194.239.202]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE064228 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mmp240.matchmail.com (mikef-linux.matchmail.com)
[10.0.0.240] by mmp-linux.matchmail.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1
(Debian)) id 152dy3-0002ns-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:06:47 -0700
Received: from mikef by mikef-linux.matchmail.com with local (Exim 3.12
#1 (Debian)) id 152dy9-0002lE-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:06:53 -0700
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:06:53 -0700
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Samba ML <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: nmbd thinks there are two subnets when there is really only
one?
Message-ID: <20010523120653.E4995@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>, Samba ML
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Let's start with the log (at level 6):
[2001/05/23 11:49:16, 4, pid=13413, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292)
dump_workgroups()
dump workgroup on subnet 10.0.0.4: netmask= 255.255.255.0:
MATCHMAIL(1) current master browser = MMP_NT
MMP-LINUX 40019a23 (mmp-linux server (Samba 2.0.7) mmp-linux)
MMP_NT 4006124b ()
[2001/05/23 11:49:16, 4, pid=13413, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292)
dump_workgroups()
dump workgroup on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: netmask= 10.0.0.4:
MATCHMAIL(1) current master browser = UNKNOWN
MMP-LINUX 40099a23 (mmp-linux server (Samba 2.0.7) mmp-linux)
This computer is acting as a busy file server, and wins server.
Is this second entry because of the wins server? Why has it used the
specific IP of the server as a subnet?
I'm attaching my smb.conf for inspection.
Could this have anything to do with my other wins question in my other
message today?
TIA,
Mike
Return-Path: <kyoshida@mesco.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from megapathdsl.net (snowbird.megapath.net [216.200.176.7])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED964228 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.32.131.46] (HELO hydro.mesco.com) by megapathdsl.net
(CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.3) with SMTP id 23537447 for
samba@lists.samba.org; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:17:37 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@mesco.com>
Organization: Municipal Engineering Services Co., P.A.
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Windows 98 Samba performance
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:19:00 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <OFF414C800.B00F08A9-ON80256A55.00519D12@plasmon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <OFF414C800.B00F08A9-ON80256A55.00519D12@plasmon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052315190002.10267@hydro.mesco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Check the following link. You may be able to fix it by simply applying the
patch available there.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q236/9/26.asp
Kohei
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 11:03, bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk
wrote:> Please help!
>
> I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a FreeBSD (4.1) RAID box. Copying files of
> approximately 500Kb from a Windoze '98 box is giving absoultely dire
> performance, in the region of 500Kb/s.
>
> On the same network I have run the same test from NT - FreeBSD which gives
> about 3.7Mb/s and from Windoze '98 - Linux (running Samba 2.0.7) which
> gives around 4Mb/s so it appears the problem is to do with FreeBSD.
>
> The fact that Win98 - Linux provides decent figures suggests it isn't a
> Samba thing which was my first suspicion but I have reached the end of the
> road with what to try next.
>
> Any advice/suggestions would be gratefully received.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben Black
Return-Path: <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM (gw2zz.thiokol.com [209.37.209.131])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96F20511F for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from THIOKOL-Message_Server by NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM with
Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:23:21 -0600
Message-Id: <sb0bb9c9.023@NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:22:56 -0600
From: "Dave Peat" <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I recently installed Mandrake 8.0. Now, I can't seem to get SWAT
running. When I type nmap <machine name> it says:
901/tcp open samba-swat.
In /etc/services, 901/tcp and 901/udp are there withOUT a #.
I'm not really familiar with xinetd.conf or xinetd.d, but I have edited
the swat file (removing the line that said something like
# default=on
I have SAMBA running (I ran smbclient aginst my machine) but I can't
seem to get SWAT to run. I can't connect from the browser on that
machine or any other. The services file looks correct. I think the
problem is in xinetd. Can someone tell me where and what to check?
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Dave
Registered Linux User #184784
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Peat, Dave
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
ORG:;N410
N:Peat;Dave
TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
TITLE:31257
END:VCARD
Return-Path: <mrz.pct@home.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (femail3.rdc1.on.home.com
[24.2.9.90]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222045127 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mustang.pct.com ([24.66.109.21]) by
femail3.rdc1.on.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20
201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id
<20010523192937.PJUY29518.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@mustang.pct.com>
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:29:37 -0700
From: MRZ <mrz.pct@home.com>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Re: Binding Windows to TCP/IP - Alternative?
X-Mailer: Cronos II 0.2.2 (gnome-libs 1.2.11; Linux 2.4.2; i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3B0B8CED.8332FE07@bartlett.house>
References: <3B0B8CED.8332FE07@bartlett.house>
<20010523014111.NJH29518.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@mustang.pc
Message-Id: <20010523192937.PJUY29518.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@mustang.p
ct.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:29:38 -0700
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I realize that print and file-sharing facilities are optionally independent of
each other. The problem as I see it concerns static internet connections for
those of us using cable/dsl modems; a situation where TCP/IP is bound to the
ethernet adaptor not the dial-up.
Has anyone else dealt with this situation and worked out a solution which I can
apply in a home-LAN environment?
> > >From my understanding of the SAMBA documentation it appears to be
a necessity to bind Win9x clients to both TCP/IP and MS Client to successfully
access an SMB Server. This effectively removes the first line of defense (and
almost the only one at that!) available to make a Win9x box more secure.
>
> Nobody is forcing you to *share* files from the box, and you don't have
> to bind MS Client to your Dial-up adapter.
>
> >
> > Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share
doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the
docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed
by the SAMBA dev people..
>
> Nope. Samba runs Netbios over TCP/IP, and cannot operate in any other
> configuration.
>
> Andrew Bartlett
Return-Path: <MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (network.deltaregional.com
[216.220.137.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
B583B4B16 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:31:11 -0700
(PDT)
Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id
<LBM1R984>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:33:17 -0500
Message-ID: <A060EABABD1FD51191E600902786B5B902F3E8@EMAIL>
From: "McEldowney, Michael" <MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com>
To: 'Dave Peat' <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>, samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:33:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
After you changed the "disabled = yes" line, did you restart xinetd?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Peat [mailto:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:23 PM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
>
>
> Hello,
> I recently installed Mandrake 8.0. Now, I can't seem to get SWAT
> running. When I type nmap <machine name> it says:
> 901/tcp open samba-swat.
>
> In /etc/services, 901/tcp and 901/udp are there withOUT a #.
>
> I'm not really familiar with xinetd.conf or xinetd.d, but I
> have edited
> the swat file (removing the line that said something like
> # default=on
>
> I have SAMBA running (I ran smbclient aginst my machine) but I can't
> seem to get SWAT to run. I can't connect from the browser on that
> machine or any other. The services file looks correct. I think the
> problem is in xinetd. Can someone tell me where and what to check?
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
> Registered Linux User #184784
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> X-GWTYPE:USER
> FN:Peat, Dave
> EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
> X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
> ORG:;N410
> N:Peat;Dave
> TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
> TITLE:31257
> END:VCARD
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF060517A for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by
mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id
152eP9-0001lq-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:34:47 -0700
Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com
with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152eP9-00007e-00; Wed, 23
May 2001 12:34:47 -0700
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter@beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com>
To: MRZ <mrz.pct@home.com>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Binding Windows to TCP/IP - Alternative?
In-Reply-To: <20010523192937.PJUY29518.femail3.rdc1.on.home.com@mustang.
p ct.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105231233300.438-100000@beefcake.hdqt.valinu
x.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 23 May 2001, MRZ wrote:
> I realize that print and file-sharing facilities are optionally
> independent of each other. The problem as I see it concerns static
> internet connections for those of us using cable/dsl modems; a
> situation where TCP/IP is bound to the ethernet adaptor not the
> dial-up.
>
> Has anyone else dealt with this situation and worked out a solution
> which I can apply in a home-LAN environment?
A firewall is the best solution.
What exactly are you worried about?
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <Kevin.Bulgrien@TripointGlobal.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from hermes.tripointglobal.com (clifford.vcsd.com
[208.134.148.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C344605
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by hermes.vcsd.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<LFLTVLWG>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:41:35 -0500
Message-ID: <9950AF317148D511956000B0D0AA5230B344@hermes.vcsd.com>
From: "Bulgrien, Kevin" <Kevin.Bulgrien@TripointGlobal.com>
To: Dave Peat <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:41:33 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
This is a message I set to the newsgroup comp.protocols.smb not long ago...
While my installation was RedHat, this information may contain something
helpful, particularly the stuff at the end...
RedHat 7 is xinetd based... If you are using inetd instead, some of this
won't apply across the board.
---
Downloaded from samba.org specifically for RedHat 7.0...
Documentation does not adequately address installation issues for
RedHat 7.0.
I previously had samba 2.0.7 installed, so I had prior configuration
files to work with, but, the following things were missing or
difficult to figure out.
1. Configuring samba to start from xinetd seems to not be addressed
properly either. I could not make it work until two files were
created in /etc/xinetd.d.
/etc/xinetd.d/netbios-ssn should contain:
service netbios-ssn
{
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/sbin/smbd
server_args = smbd
disable = no
}
/etc/xinetd.d/netbios-ns should contain:
service netbios-ns
{
socket_type = dgram
protocol = udp
wait = yes
user = root
server = /usr/sbin/nmbd
server_args = nmbd
disable = no
}
These files are from a working installation, and I had to create
them myself.
I already had netbios-ns and netbios-ssn entries in
/etc/services, and these seemed necessary.
2. SWAT was horrible to get working, and the documentation does NOTHING
to help you get it going.
In the first place, RedHat 7.0 uses xinetd instead of inetd, so the
installation can be difficult to figure out...
/etc/xinetd.d/swat should contain something like this:
service swat
{
port = 901
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/sbin/swat
log_on_failure += USERID
}
This is taken from a working installation. Please be aware that I
know this is insecure, but my server is accessible only by trusted
systems. I have deliberately allowed access other than localhost
access.
By default, the following line was added to keep SWAT access to the
local system:
only_from = localhost
However, according to RedHat, this will not work. One should not
use the "localhost" name, but 127.0.0.1 as in:
only from = 127.0.0.1
This is due to a bug that is in the process of being fixed.
Secondly, as configured in the RPM, SWAT will NOT work on Redhat
7.0 without a very difficult to find procedure to fix a file path
issue...
It took a very determined search to finally locate the following
information:
---
From: "J Donovan" <jjdonovan@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.smb
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: SWAT problems
This is what fixed it for me:
login (or su) as root
cd /usr/share
mkdir samba
cd samba
ln -s ../swat swat
swat works fine, last long time.
HTH,
-jjd
---
This procedure fixed SWAT.
I believe that if an rpm is advertised as RedHat 7.0 specific, it should
not have these problems. Perhaps they should be corrected, or at least
noted in the FAQ.
3) I am not sure if this came into play or not, but I have also noted that
xinetd does not always properly add new services with the traditional
"kill -HUP pid" procedure. I have found before that a reboot is
sometimes necessary.
--
Kevin R. Bulgrien, Engineer
Mailto:kbulgrien@vcsd.com
Vertex RSI, A TriPoint Global Company http://www.vcsd.com/
Controls & Structures Division
1915 Harrison Road Tel: 903-295-1480 x288
Longview, TX 75604-5438 Fax: 903-295-1479
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Peat [mailto:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:23 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Hello,
I recently installed Mandrake 8.0. Now, I can't seem to get SWAT
running. When I type nmap <machine name> it says:
901/tcp open samba-swat.
In /etc/services, 901/tcp and 901/udp are there withOUT a #.
I'm not really familiar with xinetd.conf or xinetd.d, but I have edited
the swat file (removing the line that said something like
# default=on
I have SAMBA running (I ran smbclient aginst my machine) but I can't
seem to get SWAT to run. I can't connect from the browser on that
machine or any other. The services file looks correct. I think the
problem is in xinetd. Can someone tell me where and what to check?
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Dave
Registered Linux User #184784
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Peat, Dave
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
ORG:;N410
N:Peat;Dave
TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
TITLE:31257
END:VCARD
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <jrangi@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f203.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.203]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1129E51B3 for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:44:13 -0700
Received: from 137.216.132.22 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Wed, 23 May 2001 19:44:13 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [137.216.132.22]
From: "Jai Prakash Rangi" <jrangi@hotmail.com>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: About Samab-2.2.0....
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:44:13
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <F203fwjHNuQuN6tdqVv000120c1@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 May 2001 19:44:13.0448 (UTC)
FILETIME=[BE6E0080:01C0E3C0]
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,We are trying to configure Samba-2.2.0 web server on Suse and Turbo
Linux for our file system at South Dakota State University. I read the
documentation from file DIAGNOSIS.txt, which I get with the Samba
downloads. Its a very nice documentation and all the test workd fine for
me. But when I am trying to browse the server from the file manager, the
program does not respond at all. Though I can browse the Samba shares
from dos prompt usind dir command. I get the same problem when I try to
reach the shares thrpough network neighbourhood. I get the icon for
machine but as soon as I try to get the contents of any share some thing
goes wrong and program stops responding. Hope I explanied my problem
quite well. I will appreciate if I could hear some solution from u.ThanksJai
Rangi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Return-Path: <tdiehl@pil.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [207.8.164.9]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C510A4257 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 98297 invoked from network); 23 May 2001 20:46:38 -0000
Received: from dsl-64-34-35-93.telocity.com (HELO kanga.cableline.com)
(64.34.35.93) by richard2.pil.net with SMTP; 23 May 2001 20:46:38
-0000
Received: by kanga.cableline.com (Postfix, from userid 508) id
DC52111804; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:46:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.cableline.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D04A12805; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:46:49 -0400
(EDT)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:46:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Diehl <tdiehl@pil.net>
X-X-Sender: <tdiehl@localhost.localdomain>
To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Beatriz_E._Duran_Casta=F1eda?="
<beatriz@emonterrey.com>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: 7.1 or 7.0
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105231639060.6890-100000@localhost.localdoma
in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Beatriz E. Duran Castaqeda wrote:
> Are there the rpms of samba, samba-client and samba-common (version 2.2.0)?
The individule rpms listed above are a redhat thing. Until redhat or
someone else builds 2.2 rpms for 7.x you will not find them. I just
saved the config files for 2.0.x rpm -e the samba rpms and rpm -Uvh the
2.2 rpms. Dropped the config files in and things came up and played. From
there I modified things to suit. I am still playing with 2.2 config but so far
things seem stable. You might look in rawhide if you just have to have redhat
format samba rpms. I do not know if anything is there but who knows.
HTH,
--
......Tom DARE TO SLACK: When Birds Fly in the Right Formation,
tdiehl@pil.net They Need Only Exert Half The Effort. Even in Nature,
Teamwork Results in Collective Laziness.
Return-Path: <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM (gw2zz.thiokol.com [209.37.209.131])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 043F747C6 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from THIOKOL-Message_Server by NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM with
Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:48:58 -0600
Message-Id: <sb0bcdda.016@NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:48:42 -0600
From: "Dave Peat" <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>
To: <MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com>, <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Yes, I have restarte xinetd.
>>> "McEldowney, Michael"
<MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com> 05/23/01
01:33PM >>>
After you changed the "disabled = yes" line, did you restart xinetd?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Peat [mailto:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:23 PM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
>
>
> Hello,
> I recently installed Mandrake 8.0. Now, I can't seem to get SWAT
> running. When I type nmap <machine name> it says:
> 901/tcp open samba-swat.
>
> In /etc/services, 901/tcp and 901/udp are there withOUT a #.
>
> I'm not really familiar with xinetd.conf or xinetd.d, but I
> have edited
> the swat file (removing the line that said something like
> # default=on
>
> I have SAMBA running (I ran smbclient aginst my machine) but I can't
> seem to get SWAT to run. I can't connect from the browser on that
> machine or any other. The services file looks correct. I think the
> problem is in xinetd. Can someone tell me where and what to check?
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
> Registered Linux User #184784
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> X-GWTYPE:USER
> FN:Peat, Dave
> EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
> X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
> ORG:;N410
> N:Peat;Dave
> TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
> TITLE:31257
> END:VCARD
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Peat, Dave
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
ORG:;N410
N:Peat;Dave
TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
TITLE:31257
END:VCARD
Return-Path: <yhuerta@msi.umn.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.msi.umn.edu (mail.msi.umn.edu [128.101.31.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0934855 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blizzard.msi.umn.edu (blizzard.msi.umn.edu
[128.101.31.37]) by mail.msi.umn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
PAA1777821; Wed, 23 May 2001 15:50:27 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:50:27 -0500 (CDT)
From: Yectli Huerta <yhuerta@msi.umn.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Cc: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Beatriz_E._Duran_Casta=F1eda?="
<beatriz@emonterrey.com>, <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: 7.1 or 7.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105231639060.6890-100000@localhost.localdom
a in>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.33.0105231548020.12650-100000@blizzard.msi.umn.e
du>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
actually, i just queried www.alltheweb.com with "samba-client-2.2.0"
and
a couple of site came up.
try this:
http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/Applications_Networking.html
i guess you could find samba-common the same way,
saludos,
Yectli
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Tom Diehl wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Beatriz E. Duran Castaqeda wrote:
>
> > Are there the rpms of samba, samba-client and samba-common (version
2.2.0)?
>
> The individule rpms listed above are a redhat thing. Until redhat or
> someone else builds 2.2 rpms for 7.x you will not find them. I just
> saved the config files for 2.0.x rpm -e the samba rpms and rpm -Uvh the
> 2.2 rpms. Dropped the config files in and things came up and played. From
> there I modified things to suit. I am still playing with 2.2 config but so
far
> things seem stable. You might look in rawhide if you just have to have
redhat
> format samba rpms. I do not know if anything is there but who knows.
>
>
___________________________________________________________
Yectli Adolfo Huerta email: yhuerta@msi.umn.edu
Unix Support office: 612 624-0540
Supercomputing Institute fax: 612 624-8861
for Digital Simulation and Advanced Computation
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
1200 Washington Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Return-Path: <gdavide@mclink.it>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from localhost (62-122-14-4.flat.galactica.it [62.122.14.4])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00053486F for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debian) by localhost with
smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152fhM-0000Dh-00 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 22:57:40 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Davide Giunchi <gdavide@mclink.it>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: "access permission to the resource denied" via NN
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:57:34 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052322573401.00821@debian>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all.
My problem is that if i try to access via Network Neiborgh to the samba
server i get immediatly this error: "access permission to the resource
denied".
No promt for password, just this error... i've enabled the encrypted
password and i've this problem on some Win95/98/NT client.
Looking at the log down here it seems that he try immediatly with a
password and return with error, but it doesn't prompt me for a password ...
the file /etc/smbpaswd exist and has the user "lorenzo" created with
smbpasswd ....
The shock is that if i connect to server via "struments" and
"connect net
unit" and write \\smb1\homes i get the password request as it would be! and
so why doen't work via NN?
I've this error in a lot of samba server (linux,hp,sco) and i can't
figure it
out how to leave this error message and get the password prompt ...
here i've put my log for user lorenzo and my smb.conf
---------log 1
[2001/05/16 16:34:27, 2] lib/interface.c:(83)
added interface ip=192.168.0.1 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
[2001/05/16 16:34:27, 2] smbd/password.c:(528)
pass_check_smb failed - invalid password for user [lorenzo]
[2001/05/16 16:34:27, 1] smbd/reply.c:(925)
Rejecting user 'lorenzo': authentication failed
[2001/05/16 16:34:27, 2] smbd/password.c:(528)
pass_check_smb failed - invalid password for user [lorenzo]
[2001/05/16 16:34:27, 1] smbd/reply.c:(925)
Rejecting user 'lorenzo': authentication failed
---------------
------------------------ /etc/smb.conf -----------
[global]
workgroup = smb1
server string = %h Server (Samba %v)
log file = /var/adm/smblog/smb.%m
log level = 2
max log size = 64
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
os level = 33
guest account = guestpc
oplocks = false
; security and encryption options
invalid users = root
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
[homes]
comment = Home Directory Personale
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0644
browseable = no
[u]
comment = Archivi
path = /u
guest ok = Yes
browseable = yes
------------
--
Davide Giunchi.
Membro del FoLUG (Forlm Linux User Group) - http://folug.linux.it
Linux: The GNU economy!
GPG Key available on http://www.keyserver.net
Return-Path: <sven@chain.demon.nl>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-11.mail.nl.demon.net
[194.159.73.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F3E486F
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [195.173.248.152] (helo=chain.demon.nl) by
post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 152ftS-000Ou7-00
for samba@lists.samba.org; Wed, 23 May 2001 21:10:10 +0000
Received: from chain.demon.nl (spitfire.chain.loc [192.168.0.2]) by
chain.demon.nl (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4NL5BW52102 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 23:05:11 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from sven@chain.demon.nl)
Message-ID: <3B0C2604.8000808@chain.demon.nl>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 23:05:08 +0200
From: Sven Hazejager <sven@chain.demon.nl>
Organization: CHAIN Software Technology B.V.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; 0.8.1)
Gecko/20010323
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Printer problems - W2K SP1 - Samba 2.2.0 - FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I've just upgraded my ol' Samba 2.0.7 to 2.2.0 and in the process
configured it as a PDC. Works great! But there's one little problem.
I've got one printer shared on the FreeBSD box, and the exact same
config file worked before, but now W2K says "Access denied, unable to
connect" in the queue display. But the strange thing is: printing DOES
work! It's just that applications are very slow now when they try to
access the printer. Any suggestions? Here's my smb.conf:
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------
[global]
workgroup = CHAIN
server string = FreeBSD Samba PDC
interfaces = 192.168.0.1/24
password level = 1
log file = /var/log/log.%m
max log size = 50
os level = 64
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
local master = Yes
hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.2. 127.
print command = /usr/bin/lpr -r -P%p %s
lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p
lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j
time server = yes
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
domain logons = yes
logon path logon drive logon home logon script = time.bat
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096
unix password sync = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *done*
passwd chat debug = yes
min password length = 6
[netlogon]
path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon
writeable = no
write list = ntadmin
browseable = no
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
browseable = No
create mode = 0600
directory mode = 0700
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /usr/local/samba/spool
printable = yes
---------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <dan.tappin@orourke-eng.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com
(h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com [207.228.121.48]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0D8550FC; Wed, 23 May 2001
14:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192.168.0.27 by h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com; Wed,
23 May 2001 15:25:34 -0600
Reply-To: <dan.tappin@orourke-eng.com>
From: "Dan Tappin" <dan.tappin@orourke-eng.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Help for a Linux Newbie
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:25:52 -0600
Message-ID: <NEBBJHEDELJOHGLFBBFFIECJCGAA.dan.tappin@orourke-eng.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20010523190230.E410A5104@lists.samba.org>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Our company has just purchased a file server and had Linux 7 pre-loaded on
it.
All it will be used for is a file server using Linux / Samba.
I am a new user to Linux and Samba and I am looking for some direction:
1.) Network Config
This machine is on our local network network which is behind a firewall.
The firewall machine also has a DHCP server.
I am a bit lost on the network setup for theis machine. The Names and Hosts
panels confuse me the most. The DHCP server works great and I can get on
the web via navigator.
What do I change the 'localhost.local' domain & 'localhost'
fields to??
2.) Starting Samba
I installed Samba but how do I have it start the services once Linux
starts-up?
3.) Samba Config
I assume once 1.) and 2.) are resolved that the http://localhost:901 URL
will work. Right now I get bounced to a Netscape autosearch page.
Please CC: me on any reply to the list.
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan Tappin
Project Engineer - O'Rourke Engineering Ltd.
Calgary, AB
P: 403.298.9639 F: 403.266.2361
Return-Path: <keith.warno@valaran.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.valaran.com (unknown [64.80.113.51]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35C7A51BA for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8706 invoked from network); 23 May 2001 21:24:21 -0000
Received: from foo.valaran.com (HELO valaran.com) (192.168.2.102) by
mail.valaran.com with SMTP; 23 May 2001 21:24:21 -0000
Message-ID: <3B0C2A85.FC50A531@valaran.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:24:21 -0400
From: Keith Warno <keith.warno@valaran.com>
Organization: Valaran Corporation
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba list <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: swat glitch (present in 2.2.0 and probably earlier)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
When swat "HTMLifies" the values of config parameters in smb.conf, it
should use octal entity format in the HTML when needed. For example,
the ``passwd chat'' parameter can contain double quotes. swat generates
the double quotes literally in the HTML source, rather than using their
entity form ("). The double quotes are part of the value attribute
of the corresponding form field, which is itself enclosed in double
quotes -- as it should be -- and this confuses the browser (Netscape
4.76 in my case).
Visual:
If a form text field is to have initial value "foo" (w/ the quotes),
HTML should be:
<input type="text" name="blah"
value=""foo"">
NOT
<input type="text" name="blah"
value=""foo"">
as it is with swat.
Perhaps this has been mentioned by someone else and/or fixed in CVS. If
so, my apologies. If not, it's certainly only a minor issue.
Regards,
kw
PS -- May want to forward this to the samba technical list. I am not
part of that list... yet.
--
| Keith Warno cell: +1 609-209-5800
| http://www.valaran.com/ work: +1 609-716-7200 x243
| Valaran Corporation Penguin Guy SMS : kw-mobile@valaran.com
+--------------------------------------------------------------//
Return-Path: <jkreuzig@massun.peds.mc.uci.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from massun.peds.mc.uci.edu (massun.peds.mc.uci.edu
[160.87.33.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D23B51AC
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (jkreuzig@localhost) by massun.peds.mc.uci.edu
(8.9.3/) with ESMTP id OAA12644 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23
May 2001 14:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Kreuziger <jkreuzig@massun.peds.mc.uci.edu>
Reply-To: James Kreuziger <jkreuzig@uci.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: how to show share only to Valid user ?
In-Reply-To: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050A64@xatl02.atl.hp.com
>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0105231419490.12525-100000@massun.peds.mc.uci
.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 23 May 2001, MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) wrote:
> Sorry Patrick,
> There's no such configuration option to do what you want. Either a
share is
>
> browseable, or it's not.
> There are probably some kludgey ways to do this, like having separate
> smb.conf.username
> files for each of the valid users, so that these shares are only shared out
> when the connection being made is FROM one of the valid users, but
depending
> on how many users we're talking about, this could be tedious to
implement
> and/or maintain.
>
> ie, in the global section of your smb.conf add:
> include = shares.%u
Actually, this should not work as you have written. From my
understanding, the %u variable (current unix name) won't work
with the include statement. The %U variable (requested client username)
should work in this circumstance, but from my experience it
still does not on samba 2.2.0. Setting "browseable = No" by
share, dependant on user logging in is EXACTLY what I would
like to do, as I have one single user that I'd like to restrict
browse access to the shares. It works if I use the %m variable
(client's netbios name), but then I have to restrict the
user to one machine, and nobody else has browse access on
that machine.
I guess one could create a new unix group and set it as the
users primary group. Then you could use the %g (primary group
of %u) like you mentioned above. This should work if you
have a large number of users who you want to restrict.
-Jim
*************************************************
Jim Kreuziger
jkreuzig@uci.edu
*************************************************
>
> and create files named shares.validuser1 shares.validuser2 ....
> where shares.validuser contain the service definition(s) for the shares
you
> want only those valid users to see, and remove the service definitions(s)
> from you main smb.conf file.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Don
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Boucher [mailto:pboucher@robotel.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:42 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: how to show share only to Valid user ?
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have this Fileserver with alot of Share available. My question is:
> How can i show share only to the valid user list ?
> Because right now, Everybody that look in network neigborhood (windows
> 98) will see all of my Shares even if they do not have acces to it.
>
> I know about the browseable option.. But if i say no, nobody will be
> able to "see" them.
>
> I'm looking for an options like: browseable = yes is username is in
> valid user
>
> Does somebody have an idea?
>
>
> --
> Patrick Boucher
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <c-koehn@bethel.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from luther.acns.bethel.edu (luther.acns.bethel.edu
[140.88.32.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4D05211
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ckoehn@localhost) by luther.acns.bethel.edu
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4NLk7P12651; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:46:07
-0500
X-Authentication-Warning: luther.acns.bethel.edu: ckoehn owned process
doing -bs
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:46:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Curtis J. Koehn" <c-koehn@bethel.edu>
X-Sender: <ckoehn@luther.acns.bethel.edu>
To: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: PAM authentication with 2.2.0
In-Reply-To: <3B05F338.32920F55@bartlett.house>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105231638520.12642-100000@luther.acns.bethel
.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Thanks for the response.
> This could work given:
>
> You are using ldap in nsswitch, ie getpwnam() works.
> You are using plain-text passwords.
> (Encrypted password would require the /etc/smbpasswd file, or the
> not-yet-compleate LDAP support).
Unfortunately I have to deal with encrypted passwords - guess I'll have to
wait for LDAP support for this type of solution.
> Another option might be to use
> secuirty = domain or security = server for the authentication, presuming
> you have an NT domain/server to authenticate against.
I think I will try this as an interim solution. Using security = domain
along with windbind looks like it will free me from having to create user
accounts on my Samba server.
Thanks again for the help.
--
Curt Koehn
ITS Operations System Analyst
Bethel College
St. Paul, MN 55112
(651) 635-8618
Return-Path: <airlied@samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from holly.csn.ul.ie (holly.csn.ul.ie [136.201.105.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69184521B for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from skynet.csn.ul.ie (skynet [136.201.105.2]) by
holly.csn.ul.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEBB2DBBC for
<samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 22:13:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: by skynet.csn.ul.ie (Postfix, from userid 2139) id 893ECA8A3;
Wed, 23 May 2001 22:13:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skynet.csn.ul.ie
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AD2A813 for <samba@samba.org>; Wed, 23 May
2001 22:13:20 +0100 (IST)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:13:20 +0100 (IST)
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@samba.org>
X-X-Sender: <airlied@skynet>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: new pam_smb mailing list..
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0105232210440.25567-100000@skynet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I've started a pam_smb mailing list for users of pam_smb on
http://mailman.csn.ul.ie/mailman/listinfo.cgi/pam_smb
pam_smb@csn.ul.ie
usual style subscribe... pam_smb-request@csn.ul.ie
or via the webpage..
the main idea is for announcements and trying to get some testing for a
v2.0 release..
Dave.
--
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied@skynet.ie
pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
Return-Path: <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM (gw2zz.thiokol.com [209.37.209.131])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0D7751FF for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 15:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from THIOKOL-Message_Server by NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM with
Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:01:46 -0600
Message-Id: <sb0bdeea.049@NWPRM12.THIOKOL.COM>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:01:24 -0600
From: "Dave Peat" <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>
To: <Kevin.Bulgrien@TripointGlobal.com>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I had read and changed the issue you state in #2 below. I did
everything else you have done here now and rebooted the machine. Now,
the error I get is Netscape: Error) The document contained no dat. Try
again later, or contact the server's administrator.
Any other suggestions I might try?
>>> "Bulgrien, Kevin"
<Kevin.Bulgrien@TripointGlobal.com> 05/23/01
01:41PM >>>
This is a message I set to the newsgroup comp.protocols.smb not long
ago...
While my installation was RedHat, this information may contain something
helpful, particularly the stuff at the end...
RedHat 7 is xinetd based... If you are using inetd instead, some of
this
won't apply across the board.
---
Downloaded from samba.org specifically for RedHat 7.0...
Documentation does not adequately address installation issues for
RedHat 7.0.
I previously had samba 2.0.7 installed, so I had prior configuration
files to work with, but, the following things were missing or
difficult to figure out.
1. Configuring samba to start from xinetd seems to not be addressed
properly either. I could not make it work until two files were
created in /etc/xinetd.d.
/etc/xinetd.d/netbios-ssn should contain:
service netbios-ssn
{
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/sbin/smbd
server_args = smbd
disable = no
}
/etc/xinetd.d/netbios-ns should contain:
service netbios-ns
{
socket_type = dgram
protocol = udp
wait = yes
user = root
server = /usr/sbin/nmbd
server_args = nmbd
disable = no
}
These files are from a working installation, and I had to create
them myself.
I already had netbios-ns and netbios-ssn entries in
/etc/services, and these seemed necessary.
2. SWAT was horrible to get working, and the documentation does NOTHING
to help you get it going.
In the first place, RedHat 7.0 uses xinetd instead of inetd, so the
installation can be difficult to figure out...
/etc/xinetd.d/swat should contain something like this:
service swat
{
port = 901
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/sbin/swat
log_on_failure += USERID
}
This is taken from a working installation. Please be aware that I
know this is insecure, but my server is accessible only by trusted
systems. I have deliberately allowed access other than localhost
access.
By default, the following line was added to keep SWAT access to the
local system:
only_from = localhost
However, according to RedHat, this will not work. One should not
use the "localhost" name, but 127.0.0.1 as in:
only from = 127.0.0.1
This is due to a bug that is in the process of being fixed.
Secondly, as configured in the RPM, SWAT will NOT work on Redhat
7.0 without a very difficult to find procedure to fix a file path
issue...
It took a very determined search to finally locate the following
information:
---
From: "J Donovan" <jjdonovan@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.smb
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: SWAT problems
This is what fixed it for me:
login (or su) as root
cd /usr/share
mkdir samba
cd samba
ln -s ../swat swat
swat works fine, last long time.
HTH,
-jjd
---
This procedure fixed SWAT.
I believe that if an rpm is advertised as RedHat 7.0 specific, it
should
not have these problems. Perhaps they should be corrected, or at
least
noted in the FAQ.
3) I am not sure if this came into play or not, but I have also noted
that
xinetd does not always properly add new services with the traditional
"kill -HUP pid" procedure. I have found before that a reboot is
sometimes necessary.
--
Kevin R. Bulgrien, Engineer
Mailto:kbulgrien@vcsd.com
Vertex RSI, A TriPoint Global Company http://www.vcsd.com/
Controls & Structures Division
1915 Harrison Road Tel: 903-295-1480 x288
Longview, TX 75604-5438 Fax: 903-295-1479
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Peat [mailto:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:23 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Hello,
I recently installed Mandrake 8.0. Now, I can't seem to get SWAT
running. When I type nmap <machine name> it says:
901/tcp open samba-swat.
In /etc/services, 901/tcp and 901/udp are there withOUT a #.
I'm not really familiar with xinetd.conf or xinetd.d, but I have edited
the swat file (removing the line that said something like
# default=on
I have SAMBA running (I ran smbclient aginst my machine) but I can't
seem to get SWAT to run. I can't connect from the browser on that
machine or any other. The services file looks correct. I think the
problem is in xinetd. Can someone tell me where and what to check?
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Dave
Registered Linux User #184784
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Peat, Dave
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
ORG:;N410
N:Peat;Dave
TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
TITLE:31257
END:VCARD
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Peat, Dave
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
ORG:;N410
N:Peat;Dave
TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
TITLE:31257
END:VCARD
Return-Path: <cambria@owt.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42C34531 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from k1 (owt-63-161-151-195.owt.com [63.161.151.195]) by
rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19445 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:18:45 -0700
Message-ID: <200105231618410280.0183B2C5@smtp.owt.com>
X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.20.01.01 (3)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:18:41 -0700
From: "Gregory McCann" <cambria@owt.com>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: ./configure ignores --sysconfdir=DIR ?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
Maybe I am making a stupid oversight somewhere, but I cannot get "configure
--sysconfdir=DIR" to work correctly.
Even though I run "./configure --sysconfdir=/etc", my Makefile still
says
"CONFIGFILE = $(LIBDIR)/smb.conf" and smbd is looking for smb.conf in
/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.
I have to manually change Makefile to "CONFIGFILE = /etc/smb.conf" to
get smbd
to look for smb.conf in the right place.
config.status does show "--sysconfdir=/etc".
This is the newest version of Samba - 2.0.9, just downloaded from
www.samba.org.
Thanks,
Greg
Return-Path: <tpot@samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 87AD6469E;
Wed, 23 May 2001 16:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tim Potter <tpot@valinux.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15116.18040.389482.906567@frungy.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 09:23:36 +1000 (EST)
To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Beatriz_E._Duran_Casta=F1eda?="
<beatriz@emonterrey.com>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: 7.1 or 7.0
In-Reply-To: <KLENLIALNMPEGGPELPCIAEOICAAA.beatriz@emonterrey.com>
References: <KLENLIALNMPEGGPELPCIAEOICAAA.beatriz@emonterrey.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Beatriz=5FE.=5FDuran=5FCasta=F1eda?= writes:
> Are there the rpms of samba, samba-client and samba-common (version 2.2.0)?
I think Gerald made up some RPMs of Samba 2.2.0 a few weeks ago.
Take a look at ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/bin-pkgs/redhat
Tim.
Return-Path: <nailed@videotron.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca
[24.201.245.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E399C4244
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 18:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alain ([24.201.55.103]) by VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GDTFFF01.S7U; Wed, 23
May 2001 21:14:03 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Alain Toussaint <nailed@videotron.ca>
To: Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@mesco.com>, samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Windows 98 Samba performance
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 21:14:03 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <OFF414C800.B00F08A9-ON80256A55.00519D12@plasmon.co.uk>
<01052315190002.10267@hydro.mesco.com>
In-Reply-To: <01052315190002.10267@hydro.mesco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052321140300.00693@alain>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Check the following link. You may be able to fix it by simply
> applying the patch available there.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q236/9/26.asp
quick question,does the patch can be installed in localized (french
canadian) version of win95 with MSIE 5.5sp1 (note that MSIE include an
update to winsock,i think the installed version of winsock is 2.2 or
something like that) ?
TIA
Alain Toussaint
Return-Path: <m_a_sridhar@yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from web9009.mail.yahoo.com (web9009.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.128.171]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85F63421A
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010524020100.84824.qmail@web9009.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [63.204.8.19] by web9009.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 23 May 2001
19:01:00 PDT
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: "M. A. Sridhar" <m_a_sridhar@yahoo.com>
Subject: Samba problems on Red Hat 7.1 (and my workaround)
To: samba@lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I am posting this message in the hope that my experience will be useful to
others in the same situation.
I had a perfectly working Samba installation on a Red Hat 6.0 Linux box.
For various reasons, I had to upgrade to Red Hat 7.1, and I chose all the
Samba packages when upgrading. And then I performed the usual edits of the
Samba configuration file. But I could not get my Windows NT box to map my
home directory via 'map network drive' -- it would complain that
'the
network path was not found'. Someone in one of the news groups suggested
turning off ipchains via the command
service ipchains stop
Now this is safe in my environment because my Linux box is behind a
firewall anway, so I stopped ipchains. I could still not get my map network
drive to work -- NT would complain with a message 'remote computer is not
available'.
After struggling with this for a while, I decided to try removing the Samba
package that came with Red Hat 7.1 (I think it is Samba 2.0.7). I then
downloaded the older Samba 2.0.6 packages from the Red Hat 6.2 distribution
and installed just those three packages into my box, edited the config
file, and voila! I'm able to map network drive.
I don't know what it is about the two Samba versions that causes the
problem, but my setup works now, so I'm a happy camper.
Hope this helps someone.
====Sridhar
---
M. A. Sridhar
m_a_sridhar@yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <robinsda@ohsu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from nims.ohsu.edu (nims.ohsu.edu [137.53.2.68]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7954244A2 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tarkus [137.53.95.161] by nims.ohsu.edu with Novonyx SMTP
Server $Revision: 2.74 $; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David W. Robinson" <robinsda@ohsu.edu>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:19:05 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Problem connecting across subnets
Reply-To: robinsda@ohsu.edu
Message-ID: <3B0C0D29.31924.6641BDF@localhost>
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi
I am reposting this because I think it may have got missed in a preious
thread.
I am new to samba, so please forgive any stupid comments I make here. I
am having problems with subnets. Or at least I think that is the problem.
I have two linux boxes running slackware 7.1 and samba 2.0.7. One of the
computers (linuxA) is on XXX.XXX.95.XXX and the other (linuxB) is on
XXX.XXX.96.XXX. I have a Win2000 Professional box on the 95 subnet that
can see the linuxA box and I can connect to it with no problems. However I
cannot see linuxB whether I type
net use j: \\linuxB\david
or
net use j:\\XXX.XXX.96.XXX\david
at the command prompt of my W2K workstation. Both attempts give me
System Error 53
The network path was not found.
(BTW I can telnet to linuxb using its IP so it is not a connection
problem)
Now, if I smbclient //XXX.XXX.96.XXX/david from linuxA I can connect no
problem, even though both are on different subnets. So there seems to
be something unique to W2K that is preventing me from connecting to the
samba server on a linux box on a different subnet.
There is probably an easy solution to this, but I am stumped at the
moment. Any help would be appreciated, but could I ask that you give
your comments in "idiot-proof" mode as I am new to this whole
business.
Thanks ahead of time
------------------------------
David W. Robinson, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor
Physiology and Pharmacology, L334
Oregon Health Sciences University
3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road
Portland OR 97201
Tel 503-494-7361
Fax 503-494-4352
robinsda@ohsu.edu
------------------------------
Return-Path: <einhverfr@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f17.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.17]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BA9421B for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:36:44 -0700
Received: from 131.107.3.72 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 24 May 2001 02:36:44 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [131.107.3.72]
From: "Christopher Travers" <einhverfr@hotmail.com>
To: robinsda@ohsu.edu, samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Problem connecting across subnets
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:36:44 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F17Dd3OJXsNQptgFrYI0000a377@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2001 02:36:44.0952 (UTC)
FILETIME=[5F79C980:01C0E3FA]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Let me see....
>I have two linux boxes running slackware 7.1 and samba 2.0.7. One of the
>computers (linuxA) is on XXX.XXX.95.XXX and the other (linuxB) is on
>XXX.XXX.96.XXX. I have a Win2000 Professional box on the 95 subnet that
>can see the linuxA box and I can connect to it with no problems. However I
>cannot see linuxB whether I type
>
>net use j: \\linuxB\david
>
>or
>
>net use j:\\XXX.XXX.96.XXX\david
>
>at the command prompt of my W2K workstation. Both attempts give me
>
>System Error 53
>The network path was not found.
>
>(BTW I can telnet to linuxb using its IP so it is not a connection
>problem)
>
>Now, if I smbclient //XXX.XXX.96.XXX/david from linuxA I can connect no
>problem, even though both are on different subnets. So there seems to
>be something unique to W2K that is preventing me from connecting to the
>samba server on a linux box on a different subnet.
OK. We have eliminated several possible causes: Name resolution (IP address
does not work either), OS-level Networking setup on the server (SMB Client
working).
We are left with SAMBA:
A few questions:
1: Are you using a domain model or a workgroup?
2: Do the windows 95 machines see both Linux servers?
3: Are you using encrypted passwords (should not be the cause of this
issue, but never hurts to ask)?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Systems Specialist, BasementMedia.net
>
>There is probably an easy solution to this, but I am stumped at the
>moment. Any help would be appreciated, but could I ask that you give
>your comments in "idiot-proof" mode as I am new to this whole
business.
>
>
>Thanks ahead of time
>------------------------------
>David W. Robinson, Ph.D.
>Research Assistant Professor
>Physiology and Pharmacology, L334
>Oregon Health Sciences University
>3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road
>Portland OR 97201
>
>Tel 503-494-7361
>Fax 503-494-4352
>
>robinsda@ohsu.edu
>------------------------------
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Return-Path: <alexl@redhat.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com
[199.183.24.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587FC4787
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 21:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (alexl@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4O49tX04402 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 00:09:55 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: alexl owned process
doing -bs
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 00:09:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alex Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
X-X-Sender: <alexl@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: License issues
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105240009080.29041-100000@devserv.devel.redh
at.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I'm currently working on a samba based module for gnome-vfs. This
would mean that you can browse windows shares using Nautilus (the new
Gnome file manager). This would basically be a nice graphical version
of smbclient. There are some issues with licenses in this though. Let
me first describe the background.
Gnome-vfs is basically a user space VFS layer. It handles URIs, like
file://home/alex/file.txt and ftp:user:pwd@ftp.gnome.org/pub/foo. You
can even combine/stack several types of URIs like
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/foo.tar.gz#gzip:#tar:/README. You can open an
URI, read, write, seek, stat etc. It handles URI types in a very
general way, essentially the generic code, when given a URI like
foo://dir/file looks for a dynamic library libfoo.so and dlopens it.
So, all I need to do is write libsmb.so an put it in the right dir,
and suddenly Nautilus can browse SMB shares if the user enters
smb://server/share in the location entry.
The problem is that gnome-vfs is licensed under the LGPL, which means
all kinds of apps can link to it, even proprietary ones. If I make a
samba based gnome-vfs module it will be GPL, due to the samba
license. A proprietary app (or just a GPL incompatible free app) might
now suddenly use the GPLd code if the user enters a smb: URI.
gnome-vfs is LGPL, and a GPL module will never be allowed in the core
gnome-vfs package. But nothing prevents separate distribution of a GPL
module, and using such a module with Nautilus (GPLd) would be
perfectly fine. But doing this would also open the possibility for
other apps to use it that may violate the license.
There are (in my mind) two kinds of possibilities for violation here:
a) an app might use the gnome-vfs api to access files in general,
which suddenly means that the app also can read files from smb
shares.
b) An app depends on the existence of the smb module for it's core
functionality.
I would personally see the first case as ok since it just uses a
public LGPL API in a general way, but the second I think is a
violation of the license. But if the app and the library are
distributed separately, who violates the license? The user? But the
GPL only covers distribution, not usage.
What does the samba team think about this? The ones that own the
copyright to the code are the ones that decide whether to pursue any
violators in court.
Is there any possibility of re-licensing the smb client parts of samba
under the LGPL?
/ Alex
Return-Path: <keith.warno@valaran.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.valaran.com (unknown [64.80.113.51]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBCDE4221 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 21:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14942 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 04:44:02 -0000
Received: from vpn29.valaran.com (HELO thenoid) (192.168.4.29) by
mail.valaran.com with SMTP; 24 May 2001 04:44:02 -0000
Message-ID: <000401c0e40d$b840b4d0$0a00a8c0@thenoid>
From: "Keith Warno (home)" <keith.warno@valaran.com>
To: <robinsda@ohsu.edu>, <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <3B0C0D29.31924.6641BDF@localhost>
Subject: Re: Problem connecting across subnets
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 00:55:14 -0400
Organization: Valaran Corporation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
My guess is you just need to set up one of those samba servers as a WINS
server (``wins support = yes'' in your smb.conf), and point all of your
SMB
clients (windows and the other samba server) to it. (For samba, set ``wins
server = IP_of_WINS_server'' in smb.conf; windows machines can be
pointed to
the WINS server via DHCP or manually in the network device config.)
Normally windows boxes use broadcasts to figure out which machine (ie, which
IP) has a given NetBIOS name. These broadcasts don't work across subnets.
A WINS server is essentially a NetBIOS name server (correct me if I'm wrong,
anyone), allowing a machine on any subnet to figure out the IP associated
with a given NetBIOS name. It's sort of similar functionality to DNS.
Whatever you do, make sure there's only one WINS server on the network (if
you are going to be using samba as the WINS server anyway).
The WINS server should probably also be set to be the domain master browser.
Consult the "Using Samba" HTML docs you should have received if you
downloaded the samba source.
Cheers,
kw
PS -- It *can* be done. I have SMB clients talking to each other from 6
subnets. Just get the configs right. ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "David W. Robinson" <robinsda@ohsu.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:19 PM
Subject: Problem connecting across subnets
> Hi
>
> I am reposting this because I think it may have got missed in a preious
> thread.
>
> I am new to samba, so please forgive any stupid comments I make here. I
> am having problems with subnets. Or at least I think that is the problem.
>
> I have two linux boxes running slackware 7.1 and samba 2.0.7. One of the
> computers (linuxA) is on XXX.XXX.95.XXX and the other (linuxB) is on
> XXX.XXX.96.XXX. I have a Win2000 Professional box on the 95 subnet that
> can see the linuxA box and I can connect to it with no problems. However I
> cannot see linuxB whether I type
>
> net use j: \\linuxB\david
>
> or
>
> net use j:\\XXX.XXX.96.XXX\david
>
> at the command prompt of my W2K workstation. Both attempts give me
>
> System Error 53
> The network path was not found.
>
> (BTW I can telnet to linuxb using its IP so it is not a connection
> problem)
>
> Now, if I smbclient //XXX.XXX.96.XXX/david from linuxA I can connect no
> problem, even though both are on different subnets. So there seems to
> be something unique to W2K that is preventing me from connecting to the
> samba server on a linux box on a different subnet.
>
> There is probably an easy solution to this, but I am stumped at the
> moment. Any help would be appreciated, but could I ask that you give
> your comments in "idiot-proof" mode as I am new to this whole
business.
Return-Path: <dave.church@soton-echo.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from nautilus.soton-echo.co.uk (nautilus.soton-echo.co.uk
[194.205.105.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
26E5E5233 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Wed, 23 May 2001 23:05:07 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.139] by nautilus.soton-echo.co.uk with SMTP
id was00iBfCiJZT for <samba@lists.samba.org> (3.3.2/3.3.2); Thu, 24
May 2001 07:05:47 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <000e01c0e417$b3da9000$8b64a8c0@sotonecho.co.uk>
From: "Dave Church" <dave.church@soton-echo.co.uk>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba 2.0.3
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 07:06:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello
We have a problem with samba with the following message:
[2001/05/23 14:17:53, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(376)
read_data: read failure. Error = Connection timed out
This is happening regularly and when it happens we appear to
lose any files that are being worked on at the time. We are
running Samba version 2.0.3 on a Sun Server running Solaris 2.6.
We have been running Samba for a couple of years with no problems so I am
uncertain if the error is caused by Samba or just effecting samba.
Any thoughts?
Dave Church
Regional Systems Manager
Newsquest Southern,
Tel. 023 8042 4751.
Mobile: 07967 339874.
Email dave.church@soton-echo.co.uk
Return-Path: <smakarov@nes.ru>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.nes.ru (mail.nes.ru [212.119.199.38]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BB945EA for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 03:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nes.ru (IDENT:smakarov@raid.nes.ru [212.119.199.53]) by
mail.nes.ru (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f4OAFke21840 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 14:15:47 +0400
Message-ID: <3B0CDF00.D677709B@nes.ru>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:14:24 +0400
From: Sergei Makarov <smakarov@nes.ru>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: smbclient command line option?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
Could someone remind me an option of smbclient, when I want to
authenticate user against local SAM database?
More details. I have Samba controlled domain. And I need to connect to
client NT machine with smbclient. Smbclient, by default, asks PDC for
user authentication. But I need user to be authenticated against local
NT workstation SAM database. What is the option for smbclient to perform
local authentication?
Thanks.
Sergei.
Return-Path: <mblack@csihq.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from picard.csihq.com (picard.csihq.com [204.17.222.1]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9134575 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 03:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mblack (MBLACK.csihq.com [204.17.222.225]) by
picard.csihq.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id
f4OAiJSJ001619 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:44:20
-0400
Message-ID: <00ae01c0e43e$9f1199d0$e1de11cc@csihq.com>
From: "Mike Black" <mblack@csihq.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: 2.2.0 File Dates
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 06:45:16 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
2.2.0 (current CVS as of 5/24/01 and release distribution) is not retaining file
dates when files are copied from a client to the samba server.
Instead of keeping the original file date it sets the current date/time.
2.0.7 behaves correctly (I've reverted to 2.0.7 because of this problem).
I'm running Linux-2.4.4 with glibc-2.2.3 and gcc-3.0
Before I spend a couple of hours chasing this down is anybody else having this
problem?
So far I can see the pending time with the old file date in the debug logs but
I'll have to add more debugging to figure out why it is failing to then set
the file with the pending time.
Copying file "error.log" to samba server:
call_trans2setfilepathinfo: setting pending modtime to Thu Apr 22 16:18:09
1999
Resulting date/time:
May 24 06:37 /CSI/Temp/error.log
________________________________________
Michael D. Black Principal Engineer
mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203
http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations
http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page
FAX 321-676-2355
Return-Path: <nparas@dataways.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from condor.dataways.gr (ns1.dataways.gr [213.140.130.1]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9915269 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 03:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by condor.dataways.gr (8.11.3/8.11.2) id
f4OAsbP10783 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:54:37
+0300
Received: from egelados (egelados.dataways.gr [213.140.132.2])
(authenticated) by condor.dataways.gr (8.11.3/dataways.gr-2.1) with
ESMTP id f4OAsag10700 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001
13:54:36 +0300
Message-ID: <018701c0e43f$ec80f200$02848cd5@egelados>
From: "Nikos Paraskevaidis" <nparas@dataways.gr>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba 2.2.0 serving as PDC / file server
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:54:36 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Goodmorning from Greece . In a late installation of 2.2.0 ( Slackware Linux
2.4.3 kernel ) acting as PDC / File server we are experiencing peculiar and
rather too dangerous situations :
Documents or files in general that were ok and able to be opened from their
assosiated applications , after their copy onto the file server's sharings ,
are scambled
and no more able to be opened .Checking on file sizes before and after copy ,
didn't seem to change . My configuration is the bellow lines
[global]
# SERVER OPTIONS
workgroup = TECHNOLINE
netbios name = iNODE
server string = TECHNOLINE FILE SERVER
os level = 64
wins proxy = yes
wins support = yes
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
local master = yes
load printers = no
hosts allow = 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0
message command = /usr/bin/linpopup
# SECURITY OPTIONS
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %U
encrypt passwords = yes
update encrypted = yes
unix password sync = yes
password level = 0
null passwords = yes
map to guest = never
; guest account = guest
; add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -s /bin/false -g popusers -c "smb
account %u" %u
; delete user script = /usr/sbin/deluser %u
# DOMAIN OPTIONS
security = user
domain logons = yes
logon path = \\%L\netlogon
logon home = \\%L\profile
logon script = %m.bat
# LOGGING OPTIONS
log file = /var/log/samba/%U.log
; syslog = 0
; syslog only = yes
max log size = 50
debug level = 0
# TUNING OPTIONS
; socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
keep alive = 10
dead time = 1
# INTERNATIONALIZATION OPTIONS
client code page = 737
character set = ISO8859-7
# BROWSING OPTIONS
local master = yes
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes
# FILE HANDLING OPTIONS
map archive = no
create mask = 0644
locking = yes
oplocks = yes
level2 oplocks = yes
oplock break wait time = 10
strict locking = no
fake oplocks = no
read size = 512
; fake oplocks = yes
; dead time = 0
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
print ok = yes
browseable = no
available = yes
printable = yes
public = yes
[netlogon]
comment = Domain logon service
path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon
writeable = yes
public = yes
browseable = no
available = yes
[common]
comment = Common directory
path = /part1/common
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
max connections = 20
write cache size = 65535
available = yes
browseable = yes
public = yes
guest only = no
only user = no
[private]
comment = private directory
path = /part1/private
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
max connections = 20
write cache size = 65535
available = yes
browseable = yes
public = yes
guest only = no
only user = no
any clues ?
Return-Path: <degerrit@mail.dds.nl>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp2.pandora.be (tartarus.telenet-ops.be
[195.130.132.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55D8043A3
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 05:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22155 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 12:14:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sputnik) ([213.224.8.96]) (envelope-sender
<degerrit@mail.dds.nl>) by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (qmail-ldap-1.03)
with SMTP for <samba@lists.samba.org>; 24 May 2001 12:14:27 -0000
From: "Gerrit Hannaert" <degerrit+sambalist@dds.nl>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:15:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: %s print file name or spool file name? (smb.conf)
Reply-To: degerrit+sambalist@dds.nl
Message-ID: <3B0D1793.11704.2A39C71@localhost>
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I'm using Ghostscript to print to PDF files using a Samba Postscript
printer.
In Samba 2.0.x I could see the file name of the file on the
client's computer using '%s' in the smb.conf file.
In a shell script I then renamed the spool file name to '%s.pdf' and
it was clear which file had been printed. In 2.2 (great work, btw guys!)
this is no longer the case: '%f' and '%s' both contain the spool
file name.
Bug or feature?
- Gerrit
-{{ G3RR|t }}-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
{ g e r r i t _ h a n n a e r t }
contact info http://huizen.dds.nl/~degerrit/%.html
mobile:// +32 (0)495 374 681
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return-Path: <jp@edunau.net>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from relay.empresas.novis.pt (gineta.ip.pt [195.23.132.16]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B595F52CC for
<samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 05:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24324 invoked by uid 1008); 24 May 2001 12:33:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.empresas.novis.pt) (195.23.132.9) by
gineta2.ip.pt with SMTP; 24 May 2001 12:33:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 29423 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 12:33:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO etrn.edunau.net) ([194.79.71.156])
(envelope-sender <jp@edunau.net>) by espadarte.ip.pt (qmail-ldap-1.03)
with SMTP for <samba@samba.org>; 24 May 2001 12:33:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 31755 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 12:46:56 -0000
Received: from jp.plan.edunau.net (HELO jp) (195.23.58.250) by
mailer.plan.edunau.net with SMTP; 24 May 2001 12:46:56 -0000
Reply-To: <jp@edunau.net>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Pedro_Pereira?= <jp@edunau.net>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: W2k Domain
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:26:44 +0100
Message-ID: <MFEAIPANNDBJINCJFMAECEFHCAAA.jp@edunau.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I've been able to add my LINUX Machine to the W2k Domain as it is described
in Documentation, but the Linux Machine can't authorize users to the w2k
PDC. It allways says : ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair
in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid!)
What am I doing wrong?
Josi Pedro Pereira
(Web Designer)
www.edunau.net
jpereira@edunau.net
EDUCARE S.A.
Rua da Imprensa ` Estrela n:17
1200-684 LISBOA
PORTUGAL
Tel: +351 21 3940786
Fax: +351 21 3940788
educare@edunau.net
Return-Path: <kyoshida@mesco.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from megapathdsl.net (snowbird.megapath.net [216.200.176.7])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFEB4C1B for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 05:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.32.131.46] (HELO hydro.mesco.com) by megapathdsl.net
(CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.3) with SMTP id 23794649 for
samba@lists.samba.org; Thu, 24 May 2001 05:55:10 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@mesco.com>
Organization: Municipal Engineering Services Co., P.A.
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Windows 98 Samba performance
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:56:34 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <OFF414C800.B00F08A9-ON80256A55.00519D12@plasmon.co.uk>
<01052315190002.10267@hydro.mesco.com>
<01052321140300.00693@alain>
In-Reply-To: <01052321140300.00693@alain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052408563400.14957@hydro.mesco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 21:14, you wrote:> > Check the following link. You may be able to fix it by simply
> > applying the patch available there.
> >
> > http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q236/9/26.asp
>
> quick question,does the patch can be installed in localized (french
> canadian) version of win95 with MSIE 5.5sp1 (note that MSIE include an
> update to winsock,i think the installed version of winsock is 2.2 or
> something like that) ?
>
> TIA
>
> Alain Toussaint
That I don't know. :( But I do know that the patch used to be named
"236926up.exe" (the one that's posed in the above web site is
named
"236926usa8.exe"), and I found it posted at various web sites in many
languages by doing a quick search at Google.
Now I don't know whether or not the MSIE sp1 fixes the problem. So if you
don't have a slow network problem you may not need to apply this patch I
guess...
Kohei
Return-Path: <neil.hoggarth@physiol.ox.ac.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from oxmail.ox.ac.uk (oxmail4.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.33]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C64527E for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from willis.physiol.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.248.153]) by
oxmail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 152ukk-0000i4-00; Thu, 24
May 2001 14:02:10 +0100
Received: from hal.physiol (hal.physiol [163.1.249.107]) by
willis.physiol.ox.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA13978; Thu, 24
May 2001 14:01:31 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:01:37 +0100 (BST)
From: Neil Hoggarth <neil.hoggarth@physiol.ox.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: <njh@hal.physiol>
To: Patrick Boucher <pboucher@robotel.ca>
Cc: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: what version am i running ?
In-Reply-To: <3B0BDC32.34EBA288@robotel.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0105241358450.1136-100000@hal.physiol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Patrick Boucher wrote:
> My question is: How can i be "sure" that it is Samba 2.0.9 that i
am
> Using..
> Is there an option like: smb -version or something ?
If you log into the server using smbclient you should see a line of
output something like this:
Domain=[YOURWORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.9]
where the "Server=[]" part tells what is actually running on the
server.
Regards,
--
Neil Hoggarth Departmental Computer Officer
<neil.hoggarth@physiol.ox.ac.uk> Laboratory of
Physiology
http://www.physiol.ox.ac.uk/~njh/ University of Oxford, UK
Return-Path: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us
(mail.countygovt.brevard.fl.us [205.153.146.134]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id E38DE52BD for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24
May 2001 06:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us with VINES-ISMTP; Thu,
24 May 2001 9:03:41 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 9:03:38 -0400
Message-ID: <vines.MVC9+PRE1vA@gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
From: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us>(Marion Haines)
Reply-To: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us>
Subject: WinNT Takeover
X-Incognito-SN: 28896
X-Incognito-Version: 5.1.0.78
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm just starting to test Samba and have run across a WinNT issue. The
Samba server is RH 7.0, w/Samba 2.0.7. The NetBIOS name of the server is SMB1
and the workgroup is STGroup.
Win95, etc, are connecting just fine. I have 2 WinNT users participating in the
test (the PC names are TEST1 and TEST2). If I set their workgroup to STGroup,
they can see the Samba server in Network Neighborhood but when they select the
STGroup they only see their own PCs (i.e. TEST1 or TEST2) and DO NOT see the
share (Tdrive). What am I doing wrong???
TIA,
Marion D. Haines
marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us
Network Administrator
Board of County Commissioners
Brevard County, Florida
=============================
Return-Path: <hurtta@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from ns.fmi.fi (ns.fmi.fi [193.166.211.11]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6A352C7 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24
May 2001 06:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ns.fmi.fi id QAA690050; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:20:48 +0300
(EEST)
Received: (Stripped) by ns.fmi.fi (with) id 20010524/QAA690050/000; Thu,
24 May 2001 16:20:47 +0300
Message-Id: <200105241320.f4ODKl44001382@leija.fmi.fi>
Subject: Re: samba & SSL on irix
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.33.0105221120380.12650-100000@blizzard.msi.umn.
e du>
To: Yectli Huerta <yhuerta@msi.umn.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:20:47 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta+samba@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL92 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> I get the following messages, while trying to fire up smbclient.
>
> SSL: Error conencting socket: error:24064064:random number
> generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not seeded
> session request to SFS failed (code 142)
>
> SSL: Error conencting socket: error:24064064:random number
> generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not seeded
> session request to *SMBSERVER failed (code 142)
>
> Irix does not come with an urandom, or random device. is it possible to
> get samba to read "data" from the egd deamon (entropy gathering),
.rnd
> file, or something else.
On IRIX egd (Entropy Gatheting Daemon) should be used.
But perhaps samba does not make posible to specify it...
--
/"\ | Kari
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Hurtta
X Against HTML Mail |
/ \ |
Return-Path: <MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (network.deltaregional.com
[216.220.137.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
80139422E for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:39:19 -0700
(PDT)
Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id
<LBM1R018>; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:41:19 -0500
Message-ID: <A060EABABD1FD51191E600902786B5B902F3EB@EMAIL>
From: "McEldowney, Michael" <MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com>
To: 'Dave Peat' <Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM>, "McEldowney,
Michael"
<MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com>, samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:41:19 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hmmm... What version of Samba? There is a known problem with 2.2.0
RPM. Are you using it?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Peat [mailto:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:49 PM
> To: MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com; samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
>
>
> Yes, I have restarte xinetd.
>
> >>> "McEldowney, Michael"
<MMcEldowney@deltaregional.com> 05/23/01
> 01:33PM >>>
> After you changed the "disabled = yes" line, did you restart
xinetd?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Peat [mailto:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:23 PM
> > To: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Subject: Linux Mandrake 8.0 / SWAT
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> > I recently installed Mandrake 8.0. Now, I can't seem to get SWAT
> > running. When I type nmap <machine name> it says:
> > 901/tcp open samba-swat.
> >
> > In /etc/services, 901/tcp and 901/udp are there withOUT a #.
> >
> > I'm not really familiar with xinetd.conf or xinetd.d, but I
> > have edited
> > the swat file (removing the line that said something like
> > # default=on
> >
> > I have SAMBA running (I ran smbclient aginst my machine) but I
can't
> > seem to get SWAT to run. I can't connect from the browser on that
> > machine or any other. The services file looks correct. I think the
> > problem is in xinetd. Can someone tell me where and what to check?
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dave
> > Registered Linux User #184784
> > BEGIN:VCARD
> > VERSION:2.1
> > X-GWTYPE:USER
> > FN:Peat, Dave
> > EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
> > X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
> > ORG:;N410
> > N:Peat;Dave
> > TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
> > TITLE:31257
> > END:VCARD
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> X-GWTYPE:USER
> FN:Peat, Dave
> EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:Dave.Peat@THIOKOL.COM
> X-GWUSERID:PEATDA
> ORG:;N410
> N:Peat;Dave
> TEL;WORK:(435)863-4105
> TITLE:31257
> END:VCARD
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <hurtta@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from ns.fmi.fi (ns.fmi.fi [193.166.211.11]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F2A46A3 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24
May 2001 06:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ns.fmi.fi id QAA699323; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:42:50 +0300
(EEST)
Received: (Stripped) by ns.fmi.fi (with) id 20010524/QAA699323/000; Thu,
24 May 2001 16:42:49 +0300
Message-Id: <200105241342.f4ODgnbh001429@leija.fmi.fi>
Subject: Re: samba & SSL on irix
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.33.0105221120380.12650-100000@blizzard.msi.umn.
e du>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:42:49 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta+samba@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL92 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> I get the following messages, while trying to fire up smbclient.
>
> SSL: Error conencting socket: error:24064064:random number
> generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not seeded
> session request to SFS failed (code 142)
By to way,
Is any microsoft clients possible to use SSL ?
(if not, what point is using SSL on samba?)
--
/"\ | Kari
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Hurtta
X Against HTML Mail |
/ \ |
Return-Path: <yhuerta@msi.umn.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.msi.umn.edu (mail.msi.umn.edu [128.101.31.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DBA46A3 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blizzard.msi.umn.edu (blizzard.msi.umn.edu
[128.101.31.37]) by mail.msi.umn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
IAA1818179; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:59:40 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:59:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: Yectli Huerta <yhuerta@msi.umn.edu>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta+samba@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: samba & SSL on irix
In-Reply-To: <200105241320.f4ODKl44001382@leija.fmi.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.33.0105240858300.12650-100000@blizzard.msi.umn.e
du>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
thanks for the suggestion. I tried it, but i could not figure out a way
to get samba to point to it. I ended up creating a random file myself and
named it urandom.
seems to work,
yectli
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Kari Hurtta wrote:
> > I get the following messages, while trying to fire up smbclient.
> >
> > SSL: Error conencting socket: error:24064064:random number
> > generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not seeded
> > session request to SFS failed (code 142)
> >
> > SSL: Error conencting socket: error:24064064:random number
> > generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not seeded
> > session request to *SMBSERVER failed (code 142)
> >
> > Irix does not come with an urandom, or random device. is it possible
to
> > get samba to read "data" from the egd deamon (entropy
gathering), .rnd
> > file, or something else.
>
> On IRIX egd (Entropy Gatheting Daemon) should be used.
>
> But perhaps samba does not make posible to specify it...
>
> --
> /"\ | Kari
> \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Hurtta
> X Against HTML Mail |
> / \ |
>
___________________________________________________________
Yectli Adolfo Huerta email: yhuerta@msi.umn.edu
Unix Support office: 612 624-0540
Supercomputing Institute fax: 612 624-8861
for Digital Simulation and Advanced Computation
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
1200 Washington Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Return-Path: <skyraven@jackdaw.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from eniac.cable.net.co (eniac.cable.net.co [196.27.25.66]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673F44683 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 07:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from igomez ([200.68.139.8]) by eniac.cable.net.co
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 637-71558U30000L25000S0V35)
with SMTP id co for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:21:09
-0500
Reply-To: <skyraven@jackdaw.com>
From: "Skyraven" <skyraven@jackdaw.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: files shared +security
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 09:17:15 -0500
Message-ID: <000f01c0e45c$3c523ac0$5e01010a@igomez>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have 5 windows 2000 professional wokstations, 4 win95 workstations and 2
Win98 workstations. All of them are connected to Suse 6.3 Linux Server
through SAMBA. In my Sbm.conf i created my folders and all the user can see
them, my main folder is Archivos as follows:
[Archivos]
comment = Directorio Linux
path = /windows
read only = no
writable = yes
public = yes
browseable =yes
locking =no
Users can not delete the main folder i mean ARCHIVOS. I created many
subfolders inside the archivos folder. Yesterday a User deleted a very
important subfolder inside of the main folder. What can I do to avoid my
users delete de subfolders? the user can delete all of the subfolders
inside the main folder.
I don't know what to do... how to create policies? or something that help
me with this?
oppps... sorry foor my english I'm latino
Cordially
Ignacio Gsmez
novice samba
bogota Colombia
Southamerica
Return-Path: <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail1.svr.pol.co.uk (mail1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.18])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EF252E5 for
<samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 07:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from modem85.tweety.pol.co.uk ([195.92.6.213] helo=christor)
by mail1.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 152wWQ-0006ND-00
for samba@samba.org; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:55:30 +0100
Message-ID: <001e01c0e461$fd6095e0$056464c4@christor>
From: "Chris Rimbault" <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>
To: "samba" <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Samba query
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 15:57:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello
I have recently set up Samba on a Siemens Nixdorf RM300. I am simply trying to
allow a particular directory on the RM as a Windows directory.
This works OK but if the NT server is rebooted the RM becomes the PDC.
Rebooting the machines in the correct order retifies the situation. Obviously
I have a problem with smb.conf. But I have looked at the FAQ';s and and can
finfd nothing about it.
The relvent parts of the smb.conf are
workgroup = shadbolt
server string = oak med samba %v
security = user
dns.proxy = no
domain logons = yes
I would be grateful for any assistance.
Thanks
Chris Rimbault
Computer Support Group Ltd
Return-Path: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from relay1.mail.uk.psi.net (relay1.mail.uk.psi.net
[154.32.105.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB26552F4;
Thu, 24 May 2001 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.plasmon.co.uk ([193.115.5.217]) by
relay1.mail.uk.psi.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 152wqQ-0003lr-00;
Thu, 24 May 2001 16:16:11 +0100
Subject: Re: Samba query
To: "Chris Rimbault" <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>
Cc: "samba" <samba@samba.org>, samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF1B0898DC.E637670D-ON80256A56.0052FA82@plasmon.co.uk>
From: bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:14:56 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Melbourn01/SVR/Plasmon(Release
5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 05/24/2001 04:15:12 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Basically master browser election values are as follows for windows:
NT Server 4.0 33
NT Server 3.51 32
NT WS 4.0 17
NT WS 3.51 16
Win98 2
Win95 1
Win3.1 1
So depending on what you have on your netork you should set the following
paramter in smb.conf to a figure lower than the ones given above.
os level = xx
eg. os level = 5 would men that samba would be the master browser unless
any NT box was up and running
Regards,
Ben
"Chris Rimbault"
<chris@rimbault.soft To: "samba"
<samba@samba.org>
net.co.uk> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Samba query
samba-admin@lists.sa
mba.org
24/05/2001 15:57
Hello
I have recently set up Samba on a Siemens Nixdorf RM300. I am simply trying
to
allow a particular directory on the RM as a Windows directory.
This works OK but if the NT server is rebooted the RM becomes the PDC.
Rebooting the machines in the correct order retifies the situation.
Obviously
I have a problem with smb.conf. But I have looked at the FAQ';s and and can
finfd nothing about it.
The relvent parts of the smb.conf are
workgroup = shadbolt
server string = oak med samba %v
security = user
dns.proxy = no
domain logons = yes
I would be grateful for any assistance.
Thanks
Chris Rimbault
Computer Support Group Ltd
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.irismedia.gr (195.74.252.4 [195.74.252.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB0A52F7 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndemou ([62.1.140.83]) by mail.irismedia.gr (Iris Media
3.3) with ESMTP id ICA36652; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:14:35 +0300
Message-ID: <000a01c0e464$892c0580$0e00a8c0@localenlogic.local>
From: "Nick Demou" <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: "Chris Rimbault" <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>
Cc: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <001e01c0e461$fd6095e0$056464c4@christor>
Subject: Re: Samba query
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 18:16:40 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
the domain logon = yes is aparently the line that causes all these.
It means "try to become a domain controler". Just remove it.
You may check the manual for this option (or smb.conf.5.html if you prefer
html).
> I have recently set up Samba on a Siemens Nixdorf RM300. I am simply
trying to> allow a particular directory on the RM as a Windows directory.
>
>
> This works OK but if the NT server is rebooted the RM becomes the PDC.
> Rebooting the machines in the correct order retifies the situation.
Obviously> I have a problem with smb.conf. But I have looked at the FAQ';s and and
can> finfd nothing about it.
>
>
> The relvent parts of the smb.conf are
>
> workgroup = shadbolt
>
> server string = oak med samba %v
>
> security = user
>
> dns.proxy = no
>
> domain logons = yes
>
> I would be grateful for any assistance.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris Rimbault
>
> Computer Support Group Ltd
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3F04449 for
<samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by
mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id
152wx5-0004dR-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:23:03 -0700
Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com
with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152wx4-0005D7-00; Thu, 24
May 2001 08:23:02 -0700
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter@beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com>
To: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Rimbault <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>, samba
<samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba query
In-Reply-To: <OF1B0898DC.E637670D-ON80256A56.0052FA82@plasmon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105240820040.19977-100000@beefcake.hdqt.vali
nux.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 24 May 2001 bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk wrote:
> Basically master browser election values are as follows for windows:
>
> NT Server 4.0 33
> NT Server 3.51 32
> NT WS 4.0 17
> NT WS 3.51 16
> Win98 2
> Win95 1
> Win3.1 1
Not according to the packet traces I've looked at...
Windows NT4/2000 (DC) 32
WinNT/2000 workstation/server (standalone) 16
Windows 95/98 1
Haven't looked at traces for WfWg 3.11
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from relay1.mail.uk.psi.net (relay1.mail.uk.psi.net
[154.32.105.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F574387
for <samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.plasmon.co.uk ([193.115.5.217]) by
relay1.mail.uk.psi.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 152xKk-0005Z8-00;
Thu, 24 May 2001 16:47:30 +0100
Subject: Re: Samba query
To: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
Cc: Chris Rimbault <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>, samba
<samba@samba.org>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF0AD5BB15.526052DE-ON80256A56.0056941B@plasmon.co.uk>
From: bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:46:17 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Melbourn01/SVR/Plasmon(Release
5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 05/24/2001 04:46:32 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Not sure, the figures below are the ones quoted in the samba manual I
think.
Gerald Carter
<gcarter@vali To:
<bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
nux.com> cc: Chris Rimbault
<chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>, samba <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba query
24/05/2001
16:23
On Thu, 24 May 2001 bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk wrote:
> Basically master browser election values are as follows for windows:
>
> NT Server 4.0 33
> NT Server 3.51 32
> NT WS 4.0 17
> NT WS 3.51 16
> Win98 2
> Win95 1
> Win3.1 1
Not according to the packet traces I've looked at...
Windows NT4/2000 (DC) 32
WinNT/2000 workstation/server (standalone) 16
Windows 95/98 1
Haven't looked at traces for WfWg 3.11
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <urban@teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from fungus.svenskatest.se (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA6F531F
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fw.teststation.com (srvfwume.svenskatest.se
[212.32.186.210]) by fungus.svenskatest.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
RAA22611; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:55:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from COLA by fw.teststation.com via smtpd (for
fungus.teststation.com [212.32.186.211]) with SMTP; 24 May 2001
15:32:00 UT
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 17:55:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw@cola.teststation.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta+samba@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: samba & SSL on irix
In-Reply-To: <200105241342.f4ODgnbh001429@leija.fmi.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105241747020.30068-100000@cola.teststation.c
om>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Kari Hurtta wrote:
> By to way,
>
> Is any microsoft clients possible to use SSL ?
No
> (if not, what point is using SSL on samba?)
There isn't really much point in enabling it, unless you have a very
special setup, see also:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35275
I guess that smbclient <-> smbd is one combination that could use SSL but
I don't know if that works.
smbd <-> smbd transfers could be SSL enabled, for example a hypothetical
samba only PDC <-> BDC setup could use that to exchange information.
/Urban
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047C8531B for
<samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by
mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id
152xZv-0007GW-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:03:11 -0700
Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com
with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152xZv-0005Sq-00; Thu, 24
May 2001 09:03:11 -0700
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 09:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter@beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com>
To: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Rimbault <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>, samba
<samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba query
In-Reply-To: <OF0AD5BB15.526052DE-ON80256A56.0056941B@plasmon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105240856270.20711-100000@beefcake.hdqt.vali
nux.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 24 May 2001 bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk wrote:
>
> Not sure, the figures below are the ones quoted in the samba manual I
> think.
This has been a source of confusion is all our documentation (and books)
for a long time.
Cheers, jerry
Return-Path: <jmorse@lsil.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail2.lsil.com (mail2.lsil.com [147.145.40.22]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861865329 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mhbs.lsil.com (mhbs [147.145.31.100]) by mail2.lsil.com
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA18132 for <samba@lists.samba.org>;
Thu, 24 May 2001 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inca.co.lsil.com by mhbs.lsil.com with ESMTP for
samba@lists.samba.org; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:23:01 -0700
Received: from lsil.com (heeler.co.lsil.com [172.20.4.49]) by
inca.co.lsil.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13242 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:22:59 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <3B0D3562.6E729561@lsil.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:22:59 -0600
From: John Morse <jmorse@lsil.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Help needed with -c option when using smbclient.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm having problems using the -c option when executing smbclient.
Here's the exact syntax I use (with the exception of the actual
password):
rsh ftcsamba /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient //peasee/public password
-c "put /lsi/home/jmorse/top10.csv top10.csv"
Now if I run this from the server (ftcsamba), it works fine, but with
the rsh, it returns as if the syntax for 'put' is bad.
put <filename>
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks...
_____________________________________
PC/UNIX Administrator
LSI Logic - Ft. Collins, CO
john.morse@lsil.com
Any comments, opinions, etc, are my
own and not associated with LSI Logic.
_____________________________________
Return-Path: <jbenedet@unm.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC83D4402 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30596 invoked by uid 124); 24 May 2001 17:11:24 -0000
Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.014266 secs); 24 May 2001
17:11:24 -0000
Received: from dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu (129.24.204.206) by linux06.unm.edu
with SMTP; 24 May 2001 17:11:24 -0000
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:09:32 -0700
From: John Benedetto <jbenedet@unm.edu>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: samba & SSL on irix
Message-ID: <2860094640.990702572@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105241747020.30068-100000@cola.teststation.
c om>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01tZVO4R/3s081+bhgzEi6U/jnwFw+w5YK
Kg=X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Kari Hurtta wrote:
>
>> (if not, what point is using SSL on samba?)
Could you be refering to setting up just SWAT to use SSL? THAT could be a
good thing (not to send ROOT password over the wire unencrypted, right?)...
- john
Return-Path: <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f27.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.27]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30685362 for
<samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:53:34 -0700
Received: from 168.190.200.9 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 24 May 2001 17:53:34 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [168.190.200.9]
From: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba query
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:53:34 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F27i95HfqR77bieLYCT00002dbb@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2001 17:53:34.0286 (UTC)
FILETIME=[739806E0:01C0E47A]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Just curious what is the value for windows 2000 server, advanced server and
professional?
>From: bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk
>To: "Chris Rimbault" <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>
>CC: "samba" <samba@samba.org>, samba-admin@lists.samba.org
>Subject: Re: Samba query
>Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:14:56 +0100
>
>Basically master browser election values are as follows for windows:
>
>NT Server 4.0 33
>NT Server 3.51 32
>NT WS 4.0 17
>NT WS 3.51 16
>Win98 2
>Win95 1
>Win3.1 1
>
>So depending on what you have on your netork you should set the following
>paramter in smb.conf to a figure lower than the ones given above.
>
>os level = xx
>
>eg. os level = 5 would men that samba would be the master browser unless
>any NT box was up and running
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Ben
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Chris Rimbault"
> <chris@rimbault.soft To:
"samba"
><samba@samba.org>
> net.co.uk> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Samba query
> samba-admin@lists.sa
> mba.org
>
>
> 24/05/2001 15:57
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hello
>
>
>I have recently set up Samba on a Siemens Nixdorf RM300. I am simply trying
>to
>allow a particular directory on the RM as a Windows directory.
>
>
>This works OK but if the NT server is rebooted the RM becomes the PDC.
>Rebooting the machines in the correct order retifies the situation.
>Obviously
>I have a problem with smb.conf. But I have looked at the FAQ';s and and
can
>finfd nothing about it.
>
>
>The relvent parts of the smb.conf are
>
>workgroup = shadbolt
>
>server string = oak med samba %v
>
>security = user
>
>dns.proxy = no
>
>domain logons = yes
>
>I would be grateful for any assistance.
>
>Thanks
>
>Chris Rimbault
>
>Computer Support Group Ltd
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Return-Path: <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f120.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.120]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCAE5394 for
<samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:59:30 -0700
Received: from 168.190.200.9 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 24 May 2001 17:59:29 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [168.190.200.9]
From: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba query
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:59:29 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F120x4FR0rmTIVvLVKi000011ef@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2001 17:59:30.0373 (UTC)
FILETIME=[47D69750:01C0E47B]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
if the largest value for the browse master (in windows) is 33 they why have
the value set to 255 in some cases?
brandon caudle
>From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
>To: <bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk>
>CC: Chris Rimbault <chris@rimbault.softnet.co.uk>, samba
<samba@samba.org>
>Subject: Re: Samba query
>Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 09:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
>
>On Thu, 24 May 2001 bblack@allstor-sw.co.uk wrote:
>
> >
> > Not sure, the figures below are the ones quoted in the samba manual I
> > think.
>
>This has been a source of confusion is all our documentation (and books)
>for a long time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Cheers, jerry
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Return-Path: <cyrofilho@bol.com.br>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from webmail.vento.com.br (unknown [200.214.174.71]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2598453BF for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 11:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from servidor.abcorte.net (200.249.252.154) by
webmail.vento.com.br (5.1.061) id 3B0CFB0B00008DE3 for
samba@lists.samba.org; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:32:01 -0300
From: Cyro Corte Real Filho <cyrofilho@bol.com.br>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 15:33:46 -0300
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Authentication doubt with current cvs version..
To: samba@lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052415334601.03019@servidor.abcorte.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
My samba server is now working fine, even with user level security in win98
clients, but there is still one problem, I want to let only one user of the
domain called abcd to log on a win98 machine (that is using config.pol file
to not allow user to press esc key and access the win98 client) because there
is important files on this computer, is there any how to do that? I tried to
use the include option on the smb.conf file, creating a file called
smb.conf.machine and the content of this file is valid users = mary, to allow
only mary to log on, this works but after mary log on she can't see any more
computers in network neighborhood, i think that is a problem with wins, if i
do not use the include line, i can see all computer in network neighborhood
normally. Can anyone help with this, it's very important for me to set this
up.
Tanks everybody for the help, and sorry about my english, i am not american
:-) (I hope you guys will understant what i want)..... he he...
Bye....
Cyro
Return-Path: <c-koehn@bethel.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from luther.acns.bethel.edu (luther.acns.bethel.edu
[140.88.32.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4976844C5
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 11:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ckoehn@localhost) by luther.acns.bethel.edu
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4OImjQ13391 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:48:45 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: luther.acns.bethel.edu: ckoehn owned process
doing -bs
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:48:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Curtis J. Koehn" <c-koehn@bethel.edu>
X-Sender: <ckoehn@luther.acns.bethel.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Name resolution using a W2K WINS server
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105240956100.12642-100000@luther.acns.bethel
.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I can not resolve netbios names from my SAMBA server using the WINS
service on a Windows 2K (service pack 1) server. The W2K server is the
sole domain controller on my vlan, it is the master browser and the
only WINS server. The DC is also a DC for another vlan (1 of 3) which is
on the primary interface, my vlan being on the secondary interface.
Sorry for the length, I've included a bunch of detail that I thought might
be relevant. If anybody has any ideas I'd be gratefull. Thanks.
My smb.conf is as follows:
workgroup = FOOBAR_DOM
server string = FOOBAR Print Server (Samba %v)
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
printing = lprng
guest account = ftp
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
wins server = www.ww.ww.ww
name resolve order = wins
security = USER
encrypt passwords = yes
local master = no
[print$]
path = /var/local/samba/printers
guest ok = yes
browseable = yes
read only = yes
write list = ntadmin
[printers]
comment = All Printers
printable = yes
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = yes
nmbs logs the following related info as it starts:
where www.ww.ww.ww is th IP for the W2K domain controler
sss.ss.ss.ss is the IP for the SAMBA server
FOO is the samba server (RH Linux 6.2, Samba 2.2.0)
BAR is the W2K domain controler/WINS server
FOOBAR_DOM is the domwain
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 2] nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:make_subnet(195)
making subnet name:UNICAST_SUBNET Broadcast address:140.88.80.80 Subnet
mask:www.ww.ww.ww
...
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(249)
add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name *<00> with first IP www.ww.ww.ww
ttl=0 nb_flags=40 to subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(249)
add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name *<20> with first IP www.ww.ww.ww
ttl=0 nb_flags=40 to subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(249)
add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name __SAMBA__<20> with first IP
www.ww.ww.ww ttl=0 nb_flags=40 to subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(249)
add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name __SAMBA__<00> with first IP
www.ww.ww.ww ttl=0 nb_flags=40 to subnet UNICAST_SUBNET
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 3]
nmbd/nmbd_serverlistdb.c:create_server_on_workgroup(173)
create_server_on_workgroup: Created server entry FOO of type
40009a03 (FOOBAR Print Server (Samba 2.2.0)) on workgroup FOOBAR_DOM.
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 3]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:initiate_myworkgroup_startup(273)
initiate_myworkgroup_startup: Added server name entry FOO on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET
[2001/05/23 15:10:27, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(249)
...
[2001/05/23 15:10:48, 2]
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_timeout_response(201)
register_name_timeout_response: WINS server at address www.ww.ww.ww is not
responding.
(msg repeats 5x)
FOO shows up with a WINS entry on the W2K WINS server and with the correct
IP address, it just appears that I can't resolve any addresses using the
WINS server.
I can ping BAR no problem (but it is DNS that is resolving the name). If
I run 'smbclient -L BAR' i get the following:
INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 23777 from pid 23777)
added interface ip=sss.ss.ss.ss bcast=bbb.bb.bb.bb nmask=mmm.mmm.mmm.m
Packet send failed to www.ww.ww.ww(137) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
Connection to bar failed
But if I change 'name resolve order' to 'name resolve order = host
wins'
the 'smbclient -L BAR' displays the services for the W2K server as it
should (I am assuming that it is resolving the name via DNS):
INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 23790 from pid 23790)
added interface ip=sss.ss.ss.ss bcast=bbb.bb.bb.bb nmask=mmm.mmm.mmm.m
Password:
Domain=[FOOBAR_DOM] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
Photoshop5.5 Disk
E$ Disk Default share
MSM Disk
IPC$ IPC Remote IPC
esl Disk
ACC Disk
FFG Disk
NETLOGON Disk Logon server share
PD Disk
SPSS Disk
Apps Disk
PDS Disk
S_HmM-Z Disk
ArcView Disk
ESRI Disk
F$ Disk Default share
hla Disk
ADMIN$ Disk Remote Admin
SYSVOL Disk Logon server share
C$ Disk Default share
REPL$ Disk
S_HmA-L Disk
Dreamweaver3 Disk
Policies Disk
J$ Disk Default share
L$ Disk Default share
Server Comment
--------- -------
BAR
FOO FOOBAR Print Server (Samba 2.2.0)
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
FOOBAR_DOM BAR
SPRINGFIELD
I have the same name resolution problem when trying to join the FOOBAR_DOM
using the "smbpasswd -j FOOBAR_DOM -r BAR" command when 'resolve
order = wins'
--
Curt Koehn
ITS Operations System Analyst
Bethel College
St. Paul, MN 55112
(651) 635-8618
Return-Path: <dogbert@mail.netnevada.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from nermal.donbest.com (nermal.donbest.com [12.110.34.25]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F03D5423 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12279 invoked from network); 24 May 2001 19:10:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO newdbc) (192.168.3.2) by nermal.donbest.com
with SMTP; 24 May 2001 19:10:21 -0000
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010524121133.02483188@mail.netnevada.net>
X-Sender: dogbert@mail.netnevada.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 12:11:33 -0700
To: urban@svenskatest.se
From: Bill Parker <dogbert@mail.netnevada.net>
Subject: What would cause this error message?
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Urban,
We solved a problem with getting information to update
timestamps on files by using a flush() call in codebase, however,
I am trying to figure out why this error occurs (I am able to
write on the NT Server share as a regular user).
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
the permissions on the files are as follows:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 666 Sep 15 1998 LOGCOUNT.BAK
-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 3072 Apr 12 13:39 LOGCOUNT.CDX
-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 1171 May 24 12:08 LOGCOUNT.DBF
-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 322 Sep 11 1998 LOGCOUNT.FXP
-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 8621320 May 23 06:18 USERMAST.BAK
-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 8629730 May 24 12:08 USERMAST.DBF
Do you have any ideas? I'm running Samba 2.2.0 against kernel 2.2.20pre-2
-Bill
Return-Path: <kenny@hereintown.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from lightning.hereintown.net (lightning.hereintown.net
[207.196.96.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF9444EF
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cgi0.hereintown.net ([207.196.96.8]) by
lightning.hereintown.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id
1530vL-0001kt-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:37:31 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 15:39:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kenny <kenny@hereintown.net>
To: Bill Parker <dogbert@mail.netnevada.net>
Cc: "urban@svenskatest.se" <urban@svenskatest.se>,
"samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: What would cause this error message?
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010524121133.02483188@mail.netnevada.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105241538360.22090-100000@cgi0.hereintown.ne
t>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Just because you can write to the share as group 'user' doesn't mean
that
you can write to a file where 'user' group perms are r-x does it?
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Bill Parker wrote:
> Hi Urban,
>
> We solved a problem with getting information to update
> timestamps on files by using a flush() call in codebase, however,
> I am trying to figure out why this error occurs (I am able to
> write on the NT Server share as a regular user).
>
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/USERMAST.cdx access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
>
> the permissions on the files are as follows:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 666 Sep 15 1998 LOGCOUNT.BAK
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 3072 Apr 12 13:39 LOGCOUNT.CDX
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 1171 May 24 12:08 LOGCOUNT.DBF
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 322 Sep 11 1998 LOGCOUNT.FXP
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 8621320 May 23 06:18 USERMAST.BAK
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 8629730 May 24 12:08 USERMAST.DBF
>
> Do you have any ideas? I'm running Samba 2.2.0 against kernel
2.2.20pre-2
>
> -Bill
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>
Return-Path: <erbauza@earlham.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from yang.earlham.edu (yang.earlham.edu [159.28.1.1]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CC74472 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from naomi.earlham.edu (trilluser@spykestpc.esr.earlham.edu
[159.28.19.50]) by yang.earlham.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
OAA22661 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 14:47:36 -0500
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010524144731.00c6ac20@pop.earlham.edu>
X-Sender: erbauza@pop.earlham.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:47:59 -0500
To: samba@lists.samba.org
From: "Zachary D. Noffsinger Erbaugh" <erbauza@earlham.edu>
Subject: Re: What would cause this error message?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
If you're logging on as a member of the users group, try setting
permissions to rwxrwxr-x. Unix permissions have the final word, and only
software.users can write to these files.
At 12:11 PM 5/24/2001 -0700, you wrote:>the permissions on the files are as follows:
>
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 666 Sep 15 1998 LOGCOUNT.BAK
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 3072 Apr 12 13:39 LOGCOUNT.CDX
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 1171 May 24 12:08 LOGCOUNT.DBF
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 322 Sep 11 1998 LOGCOUNT.FXP
>
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 8621320 May 23 06:18 USERMAST.BAK
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 software users 8629730 May 24 12:08 USERMAST.DBF
Zachary D. Noffsinger Erbaugh
Computing Support Specialist
Bethany Theological Seminary and Earlham School of Religion
615 National Road West 228 College Ave.
Richmond, Indiana 47374 Richmond, IN 47374
(765) 983-1262 (Office) (765) 983-1423
(800) BTS-8822 (800) 432-1377
FAX (765) 983-1840 FAX (765) 983-1866
erbauza@earlham.edu
http://www.bethanyseminary.edu/ http://esr.earlham.edu/
Return-Path: <urban@teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from fungus.svenskatest.se (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E7353FC
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fw.teststation.com (srvfwume.svenskatest.se
[212.32.186.210]) by fungus.svenskatest.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
WAA24376; Thu, 24 May 2001 22:57:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from COLA by fw.teststation.com via smtpd (for
fungus.teststation.com [212.32.186.211]) with SMTP; 24 May 2001
20:33:29 UT
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 22:56:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw@cola.teststation.com>
To: Bill Parker <dogbert@mail.netnevada.net>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: What would cause this error message?
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010524121133.02483188@mail.netnevada.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105242252590.31523-100000@cola.teststation.c
om>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Bill Parker wrote:
> Hi Urban,
>
> We solved a problem with getting information to update
> timestamps on files by using a flush() call in codebase, however,
> I am trying to figure out why this error occurs (I am able to
> write on the NT Server share as a regular user).
>
> smb_open: DBFFILES/LOGCOUNT.dbf access denied, access=0, wish=1
I think it is caused by first opening a file O_RDONLY and then opening it
again for writing. That is legal to do but the smbfs code tried to be
clever. On the second open it detects that you still only have read access
when you wanted write.
This should be fixed in 2.4.3, but I have an untested patch for 2.2.0-pre2
at the end (just save the mail and apply it with 'patch -p1 < ...').
Let
me know if it works.
/Urban
diff -urN -X exclude linux-2.2.20-pre2-orig/fs/smbfs/ChangeLog
linux-2.2.20-pre2-smbfs/fs/smbfs/ChangeLog
--- linux-2.2.20-pre2-orig/fs/smbfs/ChangeLog Sun Apr 29 13:39:23 2001
+++ linux-2.2.20-pre2-smbfs/fs/smbfs/ChangeLog Thu May 24 22:51:27 2001
@@ -1,5 +1,16 @@
ChangeLog for smbfs.
+2001-05-24 Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
+
+ * proc.c: fix smb_proc_open to allow open being called more than once
+ with different modes (O_RDONLY -> O_WRONLY) without closing.
+ (bugfix from 2.4.3, fix by Michael Kockelkorn)
+ * inode.c: tail -f fix for non-readonly opened files
+ (related to the smb_proc_open change).
+ (bugfix from 2.4.3)
+ * inode.c: tail -f fix for fast size changes with the same mtime.
+ (bugfix from 2.4.3)
+
2000-11-22 Igor Zhbanov <bsg@uniyar.ac.ru>
* proc.c: fixed date_unix2dos for dates earlier than 01/01/1980
diff -urN -X exclude linux-2.2.20-pre2-orig/fs/smbfs/inode.c
linux-2.2.20-pre2-smbfs/fs/smbfs/inode.c
--- linux-2.2.20-pre2-orig/fs/smbfs/inode.c Mon Dec 11 01:49:44 2000
+++ linux-2.2.20-pre2-smbfs/fs/smbfs/inode.c Thu May 24 22:47:34 2001
@@ -242,21 +242,12 @@
{
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
time_t last_time;
+ off_t last_sz;
int error = 0;
DEBUG1("\n");
/*
- * If this is a file opened with write permissions,
- * the inode will be up-to-date.
- */
- if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && smb_is_open(inode))
- {
- if (inode->u.smbfs_i.access != SMB_O_RDONLY)
- goto out;
- }
-
- /*
* Check whether we've recently refreshed the inode.
*/
if (time_before(jiffies, inode->u.smbfs_i.oldmtime + HZ/10))
@@ -271,8 +262,9 @@
* (Note: a size change should have a different mtime.)
*/
last_time = inode->i_mtime;
+ last_sz = inode->i_size;
error = smb_refresh_inode(dentry);
- if (error || inode->i_mtime != last_time)
+ if (error || inode->i_mtime != last_time || inode->i_size != last_sz)
{
VERBOSE("%s/%s changed, old=%ld, new=%ld\n",
DENTRY_PATH(dentry),
diff -urN -X exclude linux-2.2.20-pre2-orig/fs/smbfs/proc.c
linux-2.2.20-pre2-smbfs/fs/smbfs/proc.c
--- linux-2.2.20-pre2-orig/fs/smbfs/proc.c Sun Apr 29 13:39:23 2001
+++ linux-2.2.20-pre2-smbfs/fs/smbfs/proc.c Thu May 24 22:46:03 2001
@@ -890,8 +890,6 @@
/* smb_vwv2 has mtime */
/* smb_vwv4 has size */
ino->u.smbfs_i.access = (WVAL(server->packet, smb_vwv6) &
SMB_ACCMASK);
- if (!(wish & (O_WRONLY | O_RDWR)))
- ino->u.smbfs_i.access = SMB_O_RDONLY;
ino->u.smbfs_i.open = server->generation;
out:
Return-Path: <Konfuzius73@t-online.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.com
[194.25.134.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F9F5459
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 14:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with
smtp id 1532TJ-0006Dv-01; Thu, 24 May 2001 23:16:41 +0200
Received: from KONFUZIUS (320074702852-0001@[217.85.43.20]) by
fwd07.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1532TY-07Ae5AC; Thu, 24 May 2001
23:16:56 +0200
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 23:18:20 +0200
From: Konfuzius73@t-online.de (Marcus Franke)
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
Reply-To: Marcus Franke <Konfuzius73@t-online.de>
Organization: privat
Message-ID: <9039808178.20010524231820@t-online.de>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Problem
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: 320074702852-0001@t-dialin.net
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello folks,
I've got an annoying little problem, I need a share
to be world writeable from just one or two win98
machines, the users of that machine dont have a login
on this box..
I played around with the config and consulted some
documentation, but it seems that Im way to stupid to
do it right.. I still get errors, when I try to open
the share :(
It is the only share on that particular server at the
moment, so the config file is rather small, but as I
already said, it does not work :(
I get the error message, that there is no such share
and that confuses me very well :)
--
Best regards,
Marcus mailto:Konfuzius73@t-online.de
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a
name of smb.conf]
Return-Path: <yhuerta@msi.umn.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.msi.umn.edu (mail.msi.umn.edu [128.101.31.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974064582 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blizzard.msi.umn.edu (blizzard.msi.umn.edu
[128.101.31.37]) by mail.msi.umn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
RAA1831755 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:16:51
-0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 17:16:50 -0500 (CDT)
From: Yectli Huerta <yhuerta@msi.umn.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: ssl, samba and stunnel
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.33.0105241711390.12654-100000@blizzard.msi.umn.e
du>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
i setup a ssl enabled samba server. I am trying to reach it through a
NT 4.0 workstations to no avail. I am running 3-14 on both the server and
the client, and samba 2.2.0.
this is my error message, any input will be appreciated:
[2001/05/24 16:16:04, 0] smbd/ssl.c:(195)
SSL: Error accepting on socket: error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0)
[2001/05/24 16:16:04, 0] smbd/ssl.c:(264)
Client 128.101.31.228 failed SSL negotiation!
___________________________________________________________
Yectli Adolfo Huerta email: yhuerta@msi.umn.edu
Unix Support office: 612 624-0540
Supercomputing Institute fax: 612 624-8861
for Digital Simulation and Advanced Computation
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
1200 Washington Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Return-Path: <m_zhang66@yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from web12805.mail.yahoo.com (web12805.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.174.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6FF044AD
for <samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010524235328.73124.qmail@web12805.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [150.135.177.115] by web12805.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 24 May
2001 16:53:28 PDT
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: ming zhang <m_zhang66@yahoo.com>
Subject: question
To: samba@samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear Representative:
I am administrating a Sun Soloris Server. I am going
to have clients-computers with Mac OS. Can SAMBA work
with MAC computer? What hardware does Mac computer
need? Will a Mac computer with ethernet card with
TCP/IP support supported by SAMBA?
Thanks in advance for your help.
zhang ming
U. of Arizona
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f285.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.14.160]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31530424D for
<samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:23:58 -0700
Received: from 64.192.118.189 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Fri, 25 May 2001 01:23:57 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [64.192.118.189]
From: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Fwd: Question.
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:23:57 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F285nSYe4nhrKtzcbLD00013ea0@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 May 2001 01:23:58.0149 (UTC)
FILETIME=[5F124750:01C0E4B9]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hey samba guys Victor has a question (email it back to me so i can translate
it) thanks!
I find it necessary to allow users with Win95 stations to change there
passwords, but how and where, in the Control Panel? I tried the parameter
"unix passowrd sync = yes" in set with "password chat " and
"password
program" but I did not have any success.
I use "clear text" for password authentication of the stations and
Samba
2.0.7. I am very been thankful with the aid, and time, i have already
looked in someother places and I did not find an answery.
If in another place I can get this information, please indicate.
Thanks!
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Return-Path: <andrew@ivt.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from entoo.connect.com.au (entoo.connect.com.au
[192.189.54.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113845CC
for <samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 19:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from andrewminett (sil25431-1.gw.connect.com.au [210.8.9.212])
by entoo.connect.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 02252DDE20 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:21:14 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <007301c0e4c1$d6847580$f5c6fea9@andrewminett>
Reply-To: "Andrew Minett (IVT)" <andrew@ivt.com.au>
From: "Andrew Minett (IVT)" <andrew@ivt.com.au>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Active Scripting to mount samba shares on a win98 machine
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:24:30 +1000
Organization: Internet Vision Technologies
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Has anyone used Active Scripting to mount samba shares using a remote
(internet connected) Win98 machine? If so could you please give me some
clues or reference scripts etc on how to do it.
Thanks muchly,
Andrew Minett
Return-Path: <"_ emailadv_ert_"@post.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from Info (unknown [213.96.224.5]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 06FC0520A for <samba@samba.org>; Thu, 24 May
2001 22:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <517820015424152348506@Info>
X-EM-Version: 5, 0, 0, 18
X-EM-Registration: #01B0530810E603002D00
Reply-To: info_marketus@yahoo.com
From: "Info" <_ emailadv_ert_@post.com>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: E-mail Advertisement
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 19:23:48 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
P`qq{kj` B`xei hmtnpl`vhh on }kejrpnmm{l `dpeq`l 30 r{qw (!) npc`mhg`vhi
Lnqjb{.
Jnknqq`k|m` nrd`w`.
Nr $120.
info_marketus@yahoo.com
Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de
[212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F1E5466
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 24 May 2001 23:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id IAA15658; Fri, 25 May 2001 08:38:58 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP
id IAA21392; Fri, 25 May 2001 08:38:58 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA03825; Fri, 25 May 2001 08:38:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:38:57 +0200
From: Michael Ott <Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de>
To: Skyraven <skyraven@jackdaw.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: files shared +security
Message-ID: <20010525083857.A3377@erlm.siemens.de>
Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de
References: <000f01c0e45c$3c523ac0$5e01010a@igomez>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <000f01c0e45c$3c523ac0$5e01010a@igomez>; from
skyraven@jackdaw.com on Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:17:15AM -0500
Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hallo ingacio!
> [Archivos]
> comment = Directorio Linux
> path = /windows
> read only = no
> writable = yes
> public = yes
> browseable =yes
> locking =no
>
>
> Users can not delete the main folder i mean ARCHIVOS. I created many
> subfolders inside the archivos folder. Yesterday a User deleted a very
> important subfolder inside of the main folder. What can I do to avoid my
> users delete de subfolders? the user can delete all of the subfolders
> inside the main folder.
>
> I don't know what to do... how to create policies? or something that
help> me with this?
do you have to try the option directory mask and create mask
Gru_ & bye
Michael Ott
---------------------------------
- Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL -
- Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 -
- 91050 Erlangen -
- Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 -
- Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de -
---------------------------------
open-source and you have much fun
Return-Path: <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.irismedia.gr (195.74.252.4 [195.74.252.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7234A44B3 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 01:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndemou ([62.1.143.181]) by mail.irismedia.gr (Iris Media
3.3) with ESMTP id ICA36652 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May
2001 11:13:43 +0300
Message-ID: <001901c0e4f2$e51d5fe0$0e00a8c0@localenlogic.local>
From: "Nick Demou" <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <OF1B0898DC.E637670D-ON80256A56.0052FA82@plasmon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Samba query ( "Master Browser" vs "Domain
Controler" )
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:15:43 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Basically master browser election values are as follows for windows:
> ...
> So depending on what you have on your netork you should set the following
> paramter in smb.conf to a figure lower than the ones given above.
> ...
CAUTION!
There is a lot of confusion between a PC acting as a master browser and one
acting as a domain controler. BUT THOSE TWO ARE TOTALY DIFERENT ROLES (they
may or may not be perfomed by the same machine, although in practise the
domain controler will usualy end up acting as a master browser also).
The master browser is the PC that holds the names and IPs of all the PCs of
the workgroup or domain. When the user opens the Network Neighborhood the
information displaied are given by the master browser.
The domain controler is the PC that holds the database of the login names
and passwords of all the domain users. By providing user authentication the
DC is responsible for network resources security. It only exists in networks
organised in domains (in fact it's the DC that promotes a simple workgroup
to a domain)
Hope this helps
Nick Demou
Return-Path: <hsec@usa.net>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from wwcst269.netaddress.usa.net (wwcst269.netaddress.usa.net
[204.68.23.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA15154A7
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 01:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20215 invoked by uid 60001); 25 May 2001 08:32:32 -0000
Message-ID: <20010525083232.20214.qmail@wwcst269.netaddress.usa.net>
Received: from 204.68.23.14 by wwcst269 for [206.99.205.93] via
web-mailer(34FM.0700.17C.01) on Fri May 25 08:32:32 GMT 2001
Date: 25 May 2001 02:32:32 MDT
From: harpreet singh <hsec@usa.net>
To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au
Subject: File Locking
X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34FM.0700.17C.01)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear Sir
I am a Autocad R14 user i want to know if their is any option to lock
or make file read only so that the other person could not edit the file. If
their any thing can be done please inform me. Your early action shall be
highly appreciated
Regards
Harpreet
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Return-Path: <ufz6@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
(mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E9D4389 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25
May 2001 02:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amir (hhi104.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.20.238.10]) by
mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id
153DwR-000258-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:34:59 +0200
From: "Amir Bukhari" <ufz6@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
To: "SambaList" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba 2.2.0 Browsing
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:33:22 +0200
Message-ID: <NEBBJAGEJKOBODBCANIDOEGGCEAA.ufz6@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hallo,
now I have two computer, one is debian linux -samba 2.2.0 server, which
connect to a LAN and I have configure it as Firewal, the second is windows
2k. In windows I could do any things "surfing , e-mail", because I
have
configure the firewall that er every thing gone, because my private network
is reachable -there now route to it.
There problem is : I can see the other Workgroup in windows 2k , but when I
try to see his member, it is empty.
this is my smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from amir.bukhari.de (172.20.241.22)
# Date: 2001/05/25 11:31:57
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = AMIRNET
netbios name = HHI104
server string = %h server (Samba %v)
interfaces = eth0 eth1
bind interfaces only = Yes
encrypt passwords = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n
*Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n .
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 3
syslog = 0
max log size = 1000
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096
domain logons = Yes
os level = 65
domain master = True
wins server = 172.20.238.126
socket address invalid users = root
admin users = bukhari
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
create mask = 0700
directory mask = 0700
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /tmp
create mask = 0700
printable = Yes
browseable = No
Return-Path: <ufz6@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
(mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B797447B for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25
May 2001 02:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amir (hhi104.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.20.238.10]) by
mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id
153E2q-0002Qv-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:38:08 +0200
From: "Amir Bukhari" <ufz6@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
To: "SambaList" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba 2.2.0 Browsing
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:39:59 +0200
Message-ID: <NEBBJAGEJKOBODBCANIDAEGHCEAA.ufz6@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hallo,
now I have two computer, one is debian linux -samba 2.2.0 server, which
connect to a LAN and I have configure it as Firewal, the second is windows
2k. In windows I could do any things "surfing , e-mail", because I
have
configure the firewall that er every thing gone, because my private network
is reachable -there now route to it.
There problem is : I can see the other Workgroup in windows 2k , but when I
try to see his member, it is empty.
this is my smb.conf
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from amir.bukhari.de (172.20.241.22)
# Date: 2001/05/25 11:31:57
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = AMIRNET
netbios name = HHI104
server string = %h server (Samba %v)
interfaces = eth0 eth1
bind interfaces only = Yes
encrypt passwords = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n
*Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n .
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 3
syslog = 0
max log size = 1000
socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096
domain logons = Yes
os level = 65
domain master = True
wins server = 172.20.238.126
socket address invalid users = root
admin users = bukhari
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
read only = No
create mask = 0700
directory mask = 0700
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /tmp
create mask = 0700
printable = Yes
browseable = No
Return-Path: <jk@serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in (serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in
[144.16.85.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F13D45D0
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 04:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in (cmctest.serc.iisc.ernet.in
[144.16.82.130]) by serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with
ESMTP id RAA20083 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001
17:10:19 +0530
Message-ID: <3B0E4475.6A216C8@serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:09:33 +0530
From: jk <jk@serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in>
Organization: cmc
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: unable to see the linux machine from windows
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi..
I have installed and configured samba on Red Hat Linux 6.2.But i am
unable to see my linux machine on my windows network neighbourhood .
I have attached the smb.conf file for reference
Any help in this regard
Thanks in Advance
Regards
jk@serc415.serc.iisc.ernet.in
# This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the
# smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed
# here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too
# many!) most of which are not shown in this example
#
# Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash)
# is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a #
# for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you
# may wish to enable
#
# NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command
"testparm"
# to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors.
#
#======================= Global Settings
====================================[global]
# workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name
workgroup = SERC
# server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field
server string = SERC415
# This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict
# connections to machines which are on your local network. The
# following example restricts access to two C class networks and
# the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see
# the smb.conf man page
hosts allow = 144.16.82.130
# if you want to automatically load your printer list rather
# than setting them up individually then you'll need this
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
# It should not be necessary to spell out the print system type unless
# yours is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include:
# bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx
; printing = bsd
# Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd
# otherwise the user "nobody" is used
guest account = nobody
# this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine
# that connects
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
# Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb).
max log size = 50
# Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See
# security_level.txt for details.
security = user
# Use password server option only with security = server
; password server = <NT-Server-Name>
# Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for
# all combinations of upper and lower case.
; password level = 8
; username level = 8
# You may wish to use password encryption. Please read
# ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation.
# Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents
; encrypt passwords = yes
; smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
# The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to
# update the Linux sytsem password also.
# NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file'
above.
# NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only
# the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password
# to be kept in sync with the SMB password.
; unix password sync = Yes
; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
; passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
# Unix users can map to different SMB User names
; username map = /etc/smbusers
# Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration
# on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name
# of the machine that is connecting
; include = /etc/smb.conf.%m
# Most people will find that this option gives better performance.
# See speed.txt and the manual pages for details
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
# Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces
# If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them
# here. See the man page for details.
interfaces = 144.16.85.101/20
# Configure remote browse list synchronisation here
# request announcement to, or browse list sync from:
# a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below)
remote browse sync = 144.16.80.0
# Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here
remote announce = 144.16.80.0
# Browser Control Options:
# set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master
# browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply
local master = yes
# OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser
# elections. The default value should be reasonable
os level = 33
# Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This
# allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this
# if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job
domain master = yes
# Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup
# and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election
preferred master = yes
# Use only if you have an NT server on your network that has been
# configured at install time to be a primary domain controller.
; domain controller = <NT-Domain-Controller-SMBName>
# Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for
# Windows95 workstations.
domain logons = yes
# if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or
# per user logon script
# run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine)
; logon script = %m.bat
# run a specific logon batch file per username
; logon script = %U.bat
# Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT)
# %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username
# You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below
; logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U
# All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP Addresses
# 'Name Resolve Order' allows the named resolution mechanism to be
specified
# the default order is "host lmhosts wins bcast". "host"
means use the unix
# system gethostbyname() function call that will use either /etc/hosts OR
# DNS or NIS depending on the settings of /etc/host.config, /etc/nsswitch.conf
# and the /etc/resolv.conf file. "host" therefore is system
configuration
# dependant. This parameter is most often of use to prevent DNS lookups
# in order to resolve NetBIOS names to IP Addresses. Use with care!
# The example below excludes use of name resolution for machines that are NOT
# on the local network segment
# - OR - are not deliberately to be known via lmhosts or via WINS.
; name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast
# Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section:
# WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS
Server
wins support = yes
# WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client
# Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both
; wins server = w.x.y.z
# WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on
# behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be
# at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO.
; wins proxy = yes
# DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names
# via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes,
# this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no.
dns proxy = no
# Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_
# NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis
; preserve case = no
; short preserve case = no
# Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files
; default case = lower
# Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things!
; case sensitive = no
#============================ Share Definitions
=============================[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = yes
writable = yes
# Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /home/netlogon
guest ok = yes
writable = no
share modes = no
# Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share
# the default is to use the user's home directory
[Profiles]
path = /home/profiles
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
# NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to
# specifically define each individual printer
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
# Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
guest ok = no
writable = no
printable = yes
# This one is useful for people to share files
[tmp]
comment = Temporary file space
path = /tmp
read only = no
public = yes
# A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in
# the "staff" group
;[public]
; comment = Public Stuff
; path = /home/samba
; public = yes
; writable = yes
; printable = no
; write list = @staff
# Other examples.
#
# A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in
fred's
# home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory,
# wherever it is.
;[fredsprn]
; comment = Fred's Printer
; valid users = fred
; path = /homes/fred
; printer = freds_printer
; public = no
; writable = no
; printable = yes
# A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write
# access to the directory.
;[fredsdir]
; comment = Fred's Service
; path = /usr/somewhere/private
; valid users = fred
; public = no
; writable = yes
; printable = no
# a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects
# this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could
# also use the %u option to tailor it by user name.
# The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting.
;[pchome]
; comment = PC Directories
; path = /usr/pc/%m
; public = no
; writable = yes
# A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files
# created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so
# any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this
# directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course
# be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead.
;[public]
; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public
; public = yes
; only guest = yes
; writable = yes
; printable = no
# The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two
# users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this
# setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the
# sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to
# as many users as required.
;[myshare]
; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff
; path = /usr/somewhere/shared
; valid users = mary fred
; public = no
; writable = yes
; printable = no
; create mask = 0765
Return-Path: <meissner@at12.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from www.at12.de (unknown [195.4.254.133]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE4D4648 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25
May 2001 04:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fs.in.at12.de (knuth.at12.de [195.4.254.131]) by
www.at12.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4PBljN03649 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 13:47:45 +0200
Received: from smila (smila.in.at12.de [192.168.12.6]) by fs.in.at12.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA30328 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri,
25 May 2001 13:47:44 +0200
From: "Markus Meissner" <meissner@at12.de>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba 2.2 / win2k / quotas without quota
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:47:45 +0200
Message-ID: <HLEJIHIKMCFFCPCMFPEKKECHCJAA.meissner@at12.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
First of all: Great work, samba team! Thanx a log that I can have a server
cabinet without a windows server =)
I am using samba since 2.0 and I do not have any huge problems till 2.2. We
have 6 client stations (win2k), one smb server on redhat 6.2 with the samba
2.2 cvs tree / final and 10 Users. There are two administrator accounts
(users who are in the domadmin group). All users can log on an all clients
without problems. But one user, the one with admin rights, gets the
following message if he has Photoshop and Outlook open at the same time(and
large photos / outlook.pst):
"You don't have enought quotas to access the requestes service"
(This is
translated from german, the origial message is: "Nicht genuegend Quoten, um
den angeforderten Dienst auszuf|hren").
We are not using qouta (windows/linux), no one execpt this account has ever
got this error msg. The account has no special things, he is in the same
group as the other admin, I have deleted the profile, I really don't know
what to do next. Has any one a suggestion or solution?
Beste Gr|_e / Best regards,
Markus
Return-Path: <werbung@dlite.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from www.at12.de (unknown [195.4.254.133]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 071A64738 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25
May 2001 04:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fs.in.at12.de (knuth.at12.de [195.4.254.131]) by
www.at12.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4PBnGU03665 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 13:49:16 +0200
Received: from smila (smila.in.at12.de [192.168.12.6]) by fs.in.at12.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA30332 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri,
25 May 2001 13:49:14 +0200
From: "Markus" <werbung@dlite.de>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba 2.2 / win2k / quotas without quota
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:49:16 +0200
Message-ID: <HLEJIHIKMCFFCPCMFPEKOECHCJAA.werbung@dlite.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
First of all: Great work, samba team! Thanx a log that I can have a server
cabinet without a windows server =)
I am using samba since 2.0 and I do not have any huge problems till 2.2. We
have 6 client stations (win2k), one smb server on redhat 6.2 with the samba
2.2 cvs tree / final and 10 Users. There are two administrator accounts
(users who are in the domadmin group). All users can log on an all clients
without problems. But one user, the one with admin rights, gets the
following message if he has Photoshop and Outlook open at the same time(and
large photos / outlook.pst):
"You don't have enought quotas to access the requestes service"
(This is
translated from german, the origial message is: "Nicht genuegend Quoten, um
den angeforderten Dienst auszuf|hren").
We are not using qouta (windows/linux), no one execpt this account has ever
got this error msg. The account has no special things, he is in the same
group as the other admin, I have deleted the profile, I really don't know
what to do next. Has any one a suggestion or solution?
Beste Gr|_e / Best regards,
Markus
Return-Path: <robjohnson666@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (law2-f56.hotmail.com [216.32.181.56]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D01478B for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 05:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Fri, 25 May 2001 05:01:14 -0700
Received: from 208.249.144.229 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri,
25 May 2001 12:01:14 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [208.249.144.229]
From: "Rob Johnson" <robjohnson666@hotmail.com>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Win 2000 connects/Win 98 gets IPC - Solution
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 08:01:14 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <LAW2-F56uNY1SWoBDys00017f43@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 May 2001 12:01:14.0903 (UTC)
FILETIME=[65F3EA70:01C0E512]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have seen several messages, but no solution to this problem.
The situation:
Samba 2.2 - encrypt password = yes
Windows 2000 - Has no problems
Windows 98 SE - Can see the server in Network Neigborhood but always brings
up IPC$ dialog and no matter what is entered you can't get past it.
What I found:
Both Windows machines log in using the account "Johnson"
I added a user to the linux server named "Johnson" and used smbpasswd
to add
him there as well. This is the scenario that fails for Win98
I deleted the "Johnson" user from the server and instead added
"johnson" all
lower case. In this scenario the windows 98 machine works perfectly. I
haven't had a chance to try the 2000 machine but I'll update this with
the
results when I do.
Not sure if this is a known issue or a potential bug, but for anyone having
this problem this is worth trying.
Rob J
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Return-Path: <kristof.hardy@mediamine.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.hostit.be (mail.hostit.be [212.113.64.3]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B91439B for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 05:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.hostit.be (8.8.7/) id OAA05879
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:15:22 +0200
Received: from UNKNOWN(212.113.71.66), claiming to be "MMB9JK30J" via
SMTP by mail.hostit.be, id smtpda05870; Fri May 25 14:15:14 2001
From: "Kristof Hardy" <kristof.hardy@mediamine.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: 2gb copies of several files
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:15:09 +0200
Message-ID: <NPEILOGDABGAHPLFHCFBAEMICHAA.kristof.hardy@mediamine.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
When copying some large files (about 200, in total approx. 2 gb) to the
SAMBA PDC the machine starts behaving very slow. At the same time I'm logged
in through SSH to do some other tasks. But my SSH goes that slow...
Is this 'normal' behaviour or is there something I can do about it?
I'm using Samba2.2 release on a Debian 2.2r2 system. (it's a PIII-733
with
256 mb ram)
Thanks in advance.
Kristof.
Return-Path: <Georg.List@rtr.at>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mx1.netway.at (mx1.netway.at [195.96.0.129]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B315440D for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 06:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.rtr.at (mail.tkc.at [195.248.51.100]) by
mx1.netway.at (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4PDEKa08709 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:14:21 +0200
Subject: profile - problem
To: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF733EB6A9.9AA73947-ONC1256A57.0042DFCB@rtr.at>
From: Georg.List@rtr.at
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:28:32 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SMAIL1/REGULIERUNG(Release 5.0.7
|March 21, 2001) at 25.05.2001 15:14:54
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am working with samba 2.2 and an win2000 (SP1) - domaincontroller. When I
am doing a login from a Win2000 Workstation (SP2) I get the following error
message:
Windows cannot copy file \\tkcs07\profiles\watzer\Application Data\Dr.
Materna GmbH\Office EDITION for Lotus Notes\data\trcmngr.ini to location C:
\Documents and Settings\watzer\Application Data\Dr. Materna GmbH\Office
EDITION for Lotus Notes\data\trcmngr.ini. Contact your network
administrator.
DETAIL - Access is denied.
Does anybody know this problem?
smb.conf:
# Global parameters
workgroup = REGULIERUNG
server string = slinux1 (Samba 2.2)
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = sds1, sds2
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 200
read size = 16384
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192
# dns proxy = No
wins server = 192.168.0.12
local master = no
debug level = 2
# nt acl support = yes #default ist yes
character set = iso8859-1
# deadtime = 15
#GL 13.10.00
mangled names = no
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
# eingef|gt am 16.05.2001 von GL/UL
oplocks = False
[profiles]
path = /home2/profiles
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
writable = yes
# eingef|gt am 16.05.2001 von GL/UL
oplocks = False
Return-Path: <r.j.lang@worldnet.att.net>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net
[204.127.131.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0310849AE
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 06:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from worldnet.att.net ([12.79.188.200]) by
mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16
201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id
<20010525134049.GMZX2291.mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net@worldnet.att.net>
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 13:40:49 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0E60E6.8BB52C5D@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:40:54 -0400
From: Robert Lang <r.j.lang@worldnet.att.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: Procedure for Partition Mount
References: <3B095893.6F65626F@worldnet.att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Somebody recommended Samba to me as a way of performing a Linux
partition mount from Windows. I think this recommendation is to remedy
the circumstance where Linux can partition mount Windows with relative
ease, but how is this complemented by Windows. Since Samba has become a
book entity, I'm not sure what project time I have to comb through every
feature of Samba to accomplish this simple feature. I am on the Wide
Area Network (WAN) with a 56k modem, and gradually gaining familiarity
with Windows 95 networking features (I have the Windows 95 Resource
Kit). The man pages for 'smb.conf' seems too long but
'smb.conf' itself
looks reasonable enough to know.
Is there some documentation that indicates a procedure for this
configuration ? My understanding at this point is that I am probably
attempting a "workaround" for something Samba is not mostly known for.
Below is a submission of my document need to the Samba patch group.
Robert Lang wrote:
> Samba Team:
>
> I was informed by someone from a Microsoft newsgroup that I can
> use Samba to mount a UNIX partition from Windows to gain file access
> (file sharing). I run a dual-operating system on a single computer,
> Redhat Linux 6.1 and Windows 95. I can install the Samba package (3
> individual packages) from the Linux CD to my Linux workstation
> partition. I was given the command: net use H: \\Samba\<username>
> which is issued from a DOS window. 'Samba' is the server string
and I
> use 'root' for a username. I wasn't given an explanation for
the
> drive letter H. The /etc/smb.conf file was checked with
'testparm'
> and I started Samba with: 'samba start', receiving confirmation of
> the services 'smbd' and 'nmbd'.
> When I boot to Windows (Linux is now in the 'off state'), I
> configure Networking with: Client for Microsoft Networks, TCP/IP, and
> File and printer sharing for Microsoft Networks. I don't use a
> network adapter card but a modem card (56k analog modem). I
> configure the identification tab with MYGROUP as the workgroup, and
> the other two fields appear optional.
> I don't see any sign of a Linux partition in Network
> Neighborhood, and when I issue the 'net use' command it replies
that I
> am not logged on. (What logon is this ? I am clear of a Windows
> password due to the installation option in Windows 95.)
> How close am I to achieving this partition mount ? Is there a
> step-by-step procedure for accomplishing a partition mount for a dual
> operating system computer, or am I attempting a 'workaround' in one
of
> Samba's features ?
>
> Robert Lang
> r.j.lang@att.net
>
Return-Path: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us
(mail.countygovt.brevard.fl.us [205.153.146.134]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 8B2E145BA for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25
May 2001 06:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us with VINES-ISMTP; Fri,
25 May 2001 9:55:10 -0400
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 9:55:09 -0400
Message-ID: <vines.MVC9+oHa1vA@gc2a-hplh4.countygovt.brevard.fl.us>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
From: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us>(Marion Haines)
Reply-To: <marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us>
Subject: 2.2.0 Printer Install Question
X-Incognito-SN: 28896
X-Incognito-Version: 5.1.0.78
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I've been following several threads about Samba 2.2.0 providing a
"Win2K-like" capability to have various print drivers loaded on the
Samba server and to have them used without downloading them to the client PC.
I'm unfamiliar with this process and have a couple of questions.
Just for an example, lets say you have an HP LaserJet 4 and a Ricoh AP305 color
laser printer and a user is going to send a print stream to the Ricoh from
Word97.
1. What is the procedure to load the drivers from CD? I.E. do you load the
print drivers to the Samba server just like you do with Win2k/WinNT?
2. Do the drivers have to be for Linux or are they the standard Win2K drivers
for the example printers?
3. The user selects the Ricoh printer for printing. Is the driver downloaded
to the client PC or does the driver remain on the Samba server and apply itself
to the print stream from there?
Thanks for the help,
Marion D. Haines
marion.haines@countygovt.brevard.fl.us
Network Administrator
Board of County Commissioners
Brevard County, Florida
=============================
Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au
Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de
[212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63886446F
for <samba@samba.anu.edu.au>; Fri, 25 May 2001 07:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id QAA19079; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:02:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP
id QAA05417; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:02:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA12133; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:02:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:02:34 +0200
From: Michael Ott <Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de>
To: harpreet singh <hsec@usa.net>
Cc: samba@samba.anu.edu.au
Subject: Re: File Locking
Message-ID: <20010525160234.G3377@erlm.siemens.de>
Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de
References: <20010525083232.20214.qmail@wwcst269.netaddress.usa.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <20010525083232.20214.qmail@wwcst269.netaddress.usa.net>;
from hsec@usa.net on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:32:32AM -0600
Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hallo harpreet
With reference to harpreet singh on 25.05 02:32:> Dear Sir
> I am a Autocad R14 user i want to know if their is any option to
lock> or make file read only so that the other person could not edit the file. If
> their any thing can be done please inform me. Your early action shall be
> highly appreciated
have you try it with create mask and force user
if only one can edit the file:
with create mask you can set permissions for a new file and the force user
is the owner of the file.
or try it with read only and in the write list you can write, with person
have permission for writing
i hope that i can help you
Gru_ & bye
Michael Ott
---------------------------------
- Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL -
- Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 -
- 91050 Erlangen -
- Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 -
- Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de -
---------------------------------
open-source and you have much fun
Return-Path: <urban@teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from fungus.svenskatest.se (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E408487A
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 08:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fw.teststation.com (srvfwume.svenskatest.se
[212.32.186.210]) by fungus.svenskatest.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
RAA01365; Fri, 25 May 2001 17:44:27 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from COLA by fw.teststation.com via smtpd (for
fungus.teststation.com [212.32.186.211]) with SMTP; 25 May 2001
15:20:46 UT
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:44:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw@cola.teststation.com>
To: Robert Lang <r.j.lang@worldnet.att.net>
Cc: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Procedure for Partition Mount
In-Reply-To: <3B0E60E6.8BB52C5D@worldnet.att.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105251716410.1953-100000@cola.teststation.co
m>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Robert Lang wrote:
> Somebody recommended Samba to me as a way of performing a Linux
> partition mount from Windows. I think this recommendation is to remedy
You have a style of writing that is very "roundabout". I think you
were
misunderstood because of it. Here is my understanding of what you are
trying to do:
+ You have a dual boot linux/windows95 machine.
+ You want to reach data on the linux filesystems while running windows.
+ This is on the same machine so the network is irrelevant.
Samba is not the answer. Samba is a server for unix (and others) that
makes it look sort of like a windows machine on a network. Of course when
you boot into win95 the linux part won't be running ... You'd need 2
machines for this to be any help.
I know of 2 ways to access ext2 (a common linux filesystem) from windows,
don't know how well they work.
* FSDEXT2, a filesystem driver for win95 that reads ext2 (unsupported)
http://www.yipton.demon.co.uk/
* fs driver for winNT and a link to a user-mode "Ext2 explorer"
http://ashedel.chat.ru/ext2fsnt/
A simpler way may be to put the information you want to share between the
two OSes on a filesystem that both can read (vfat, the win95 filesystem).
> > I was informed by someone from a Microsoft newsgroup that I can
> > use Samba to mount a UNIX partition from Windows to gain file access
> > (file sharing). I run a dual-operating system on a single computer,
Which is true if the unix box and windows box are two different machines.
> > partition. I was given the command: net use H:
\\Samba\<username>
> > which is issued from a DOS window. 'Samba' is the server
string and I
> > use 'root' for a username. I wasn't given an explanation
for the
> > drive letter H. The /etc/smb.conf file was checked with
'testparm'
H is just a random letter, just as username could be any share that the
samba server has.
/Urban
Return-Path: <beatriz@emonterrey.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [207.248.53.226]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A8D4490 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emabraxas ([192.168.1.100]) by localhost.localdomain
(8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f4PG9p132571 for <samba@lists.samba.org>;
Fri, 25 May 2001 11:09:55 -0500
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Beatriz_E._Duran_Casta=F1eda?="
<beatriz@emonterrey.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Tape
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:12:19 -0500
Message-ID: <KLENLIALNMPEGGPELPCIMEBCCBAA.beatriz@emonterrey.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Im using RedHat 7.1, in /dev I found st0 only, but if I need to use it as
/dev/st0n I can't couse it doesn't exist
why it doesn't appears in the directory?
www.eMonterrey.com: Technology Laboratory
Beatriz E. Duran Castaqeda
Network and Systems Department
Return-Path: <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from home.smithconcepts.com (ubr-35.28.151.oviedo.cfl.rr.com
[65.35.28.151]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B7E481E
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ieee.org (IDENT:bjsmith@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com
[172.24.24.192]) by home.smithconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
MAA18685; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:19:43 -0400
Message-ID: <3B0E8A44.31A4FCCB@ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:37:24 -0400
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
Organization: SmithConcepts, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Beatriz E. Duran =?iso-8859-1?Q?Casta=F1eda?="
<beatriz@emonterrey.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Tape
References: <KLENLIALNMPEGGPELPCIMEBCCBAA.beatriz@emonterrey.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
"Beatriz E. Duran Castaqeda" wrote:> Im using RedHat 7.1, in /dev I found st0 only,
> but if I need to use it as /dev/st0n I can't couse
> it doesn't exist why it doesn't appears in the
> directory?
I think you are looking for "/dev/nst0" (no rewind)?
-- TheBS
P.S. I don't think this is a Samba question, but I'm not an
authority on the ettique either. Your local LUG can always be of
assistance.
--
Bryan J. Smith, President mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
(407)366-7013 pager:(888)694-5793 chat:thebs413@AOL/MS/Yho
=========================================================SmithConcepts, Inc.
http://www.SmithConcepts.com
Consulting Engineers and IT Professionals
Return-Path: <clubcolacao@colacao.es>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.onenet.es (mail.onenet.es [213.52.1.5]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B544950 for
<SAMBA@SAMBA.ORG>; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nuria.epsilon-technologies.com (BCN-50-145.onenet.es
[213.52.50.145]) by mail.onenet.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA17101
for <SAMBA@SAMBA.ORG>; Fri, 25 May 2001 18:24:05 +0200
From: clubcolacao@colacao.es
Message-Id: <200105251624.SAA17101@mail.onenet.es>
X-Mailer: s-directMail
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: SAMBA@SAMBA.ORG
Subject: BOMBACAO
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 18:38:18 +0100
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hola Socio/a,
?Csmo va todo?. Por aqum, en el Club Cola Cao seguimos divirtiindonos
muchmsimo.
Te escribo porque he visto que has jugado al juego de la BombaCao. Durante
estos 4 primeros dmas de juego, hemos detectado que algunos socios que usaban
algunas versiones de navegador han tenido algzn problema con la puntuacisn al
final de la partida. Ya esta solucionado. Ahora funciona correctamente, o sea,
que ya puedes hacerte con los premios que vamos a dar en esta seccisn.
Por cierto: ?Ya has visto la BombaCao? Ya esta en las tiendas los envases de
Cola Cao con la BombaCao gratuita dentro.
Bueno, espero verte pronto por el Club, y ... ya lo sabes !Este verano
pasatelo Bomba con la BombaCao!
Hasta luego socio/a.
NURIA
Return-Path: <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from home.smithconcepts.com (ubr-35.28.151.oviedo.cfl.rr.com
[65.35.28.151]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB73651CE
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ieee.org (IDENT:bjsmith@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com
[172.24.24.192]) by home.smithconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
MAA18919; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:39:07 -0400
Message-ID: <3B0E8ED1.E718AFA6@ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:56:49 -0400
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
Organization: SmithConcepts, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kristof Hardy <kristof.hardy@mediamine.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: 2gb copies of several files <- I/O bottleneck?
References: <NPEILOGDABGAHPLFHCFBAEMICHAA.kristof.hardy@mediamine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Re: 2gb copies of several files <- I/O bottleneck?
Kristof Hardy wrote:> When copying some large files (about 200, in total
> approx. 2 gb) to the SAMBA PDC the machine starts
> behaving very slow. At the same time I'm logged
> in through SSH to do some other tasks. But my SSH
> goes that slow...
> Is this 'normal' behaviour or is there something I
> can do about it?
> I'm using Samba2.2 release on a Debian 2.2r2 system.
> (it's a PIII-733 with 256 mb ram)
Although you can tweak the OS (and Linux 2.4 improves things a bit),
tweak Samba (various settings), play with priorities, this is
definately going to be an hardware I/O bottleneck issue. And even
some people make the mistake of going dual processor, but on the
cheap (~$150-400 mainboards) which leaves still a single PCI bus and
memory channel, which does not address the I/O bottleneck.
You'd be surprised how cheap it is to go dual or 3x PCI and dual or
quad memory bus with a dual-CPU board c/o RCC/ServerWorks chipsets
(~$300-700 mainboards). Putting your disk controller and network
interface on separate PCI busses makes a big difference, as does a
wider memory bus. ServerWorks' chipsets are so good that Intel has
OEM'd them and cross-licensed patents with ServerWorks (e.g.,
ServerWorks will have a DDR SDRAM chipset for the Pentium IV later
this year, whereas ViA will not and is stuck at the Pentium III).
Gigabit Ethernet is also getting very affordable, with the $300
NetGear GA620 NIC and a 802.1q multi-frame VLAN compatible Linksys
24-port, 10/100 "Gigaswitch" (with two MII Gigabit upgrade ports)
runs ~$700 with ~$250 for a 1000Base-SX duplex upgrade port.
We can talk more off-list (since this is getting mighty off-topic).
I have been meaning to update my web site with the info as well.
-- TheBS
--
Bryan J. Smith, President mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
(407)366-7013 pager:(888)694-5793 chat:thebs413@AOL/MS/Yho
=========================================================SmithConcepts, Inc.
http://www.SmithConcepts.com
Consulting Engineers and IT Professionals
Return-Path: <kkanno@rivenet.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.rivenet.com (dns2.rivenet.com [63.150.23.98]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B824950 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ex02.ad.rivenet.com (ex02.ad.rivenet.com [10.10.0.15]) by
mail.rivenet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFED64C0D for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:46:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by ex02.ad.rivenet.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <KRYAPTZ3>; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:46:24 -0500
Message-ID: <0C3A66859AEF6E42A1B4AB53307B77AA0AF46E@ex02.ad.rivenet.com>
From: "Kanno, Ken" <kkanno@rivenet.com>
To: "'samba@lists.samba.org'" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:46:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
We're running samba 2.0.7 with win2000 clients. Under [global] security is
set to server.
The logs show nonstop errors such as:
===[2001/05/25 11:08:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/05/25 11:14:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/05/25 11:20:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/05/25 11:26:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/05/25 11:32:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/05/25 11:38:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
===
for all clients. For the most part the sama shares seem to work, but do
flake out requiring the usr to reboot theri computer in order to gain access
to a share again.
What are these errors, what do they mean and how do I make them go away?
KEN
Return-Path: <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.internet.gr (mail.internet.gr [62.1.0.81]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A412B5276 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12177 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 17:35:09 -0000
Received: from vdp181-noc04.cas.internet.gr (HELO ndemou) (62.1.143.181)
by mail.internet.gr with SMTP; 25 May 2001 17:35:09 -0000
Message-ID: <007501c0e540$b4d501a0$0e00a8c0@localenlogic.local>
From: "Nick Demou" <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: <skyraven@jackdaw.com>
Cc: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <000f01c0e45c$3c523ac0$5e01010a@igomez>
Subject: Re: files shared +security
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:32:17 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
do a lot of reading in samba man pages and the using samba document
(keep in mind that a user having write access has delete access too)
Nick Demou
Return-Path: <saina@sjm.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from ussvml03.ventritex.com (unknown [205.185.16.207]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66162549B for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by USSVML03 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<LKK2XN1A>; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:46:35 -0700
Message-ID: <ADBFFED9CB40D5118C5A0008C7864BA1BD36@USSVML03>
From: "Aina, Sam" <saina@sjm.com>
To: "'samba@samba.org'" <samba@samba.org>
Cc: "Aina, Sam" <saina@sjm.com>
Subject: Samba's Problem
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:46:34 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Samba guys,
My name is Sam AINA. I am trying to configure Samba in my environment.
My environment contains both Unix and NT workstations.
I installed samba on Unix server and aAfter the configuration it works okay
, I discovered that only the users that have thesame user IDs both on Unix &
NT were allowed to login but not users with different user IDs were able to
login.
I belief this is a small problem somewhere and I want you guys to put me
through.
I have changed the option Security in global parameter to SHARE
"security=share" but still couldn't work.
Thanks for your assistance.
Here is my samba configuration.
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 150.202.165.113 (150.202.165.113)
# Date: 2000/11/30 10:30:11
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = SJMSV
netbios name = BIGBIRD
security = SERVER
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
password server = ussvis01
unix password sync = no
load printers = No
os level = 1
oplocks = False
local master = No
wins server = ussvis02
[bigbird]
writeable = Yes
guest ok = no
browseable = No
[CP]
comment = CP
path = /u/pj2/CP
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0755
force create mode = 0755
security mask = 03777777
force security mode = 03777777
force directory mode = 0755
directory security mask = 03777777
force directory security mode = 03777777
guest ok = no
Key
Bigbird = unix server
ussvis01/ussvis02 = NT server.
Sam Aina
St. Jude Medical
(408)522-6429 Office
(818)424-1653 Cell
Return-Path: <whit@transpect.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from free.transpect.com (china.patternbook.com
[216.254.75.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74644268
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by free.transpect.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id OAA01793 for samba@lists.samba.org;
Fri, 25 May 2001 14:59:36 -0500
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:59:36 -0500
From: Whit Blauvelt <whit@transpect.com>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: 2.2.0 trouble where 2.0.7 works fine
Message-ID: <20010525145936.A1781@free.transpect.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Putting 2.2.0 on a Debian 2.2 system (compiling it from tar) ended up with a
situation where users could connect, but often only after several attempts.
Reverting to the 2.0.7 that's standard on Potato solved the problem. Both
are using precisely the same smb.conf - the only difference is the version
of the daemons.
Am I missing some additional configuration directives required to get 2.2.0
to behave normally? If not, what would be causing this? This is on an
ethernet where the most services are handled by an NT server - Samba is just
providing access to the filespace on the Linux Web/FTP server.
Thanks,
Whit
Return-Path: <jhill2@maine.rr.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.maine.rr.com (smtp-server.maine.rr.com
[204.210.65.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC56D448D
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jhill ([24.25.180.29]) by mail.maine.rr.com (Post.Office
MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with SMTP id
com; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:24:31 -0400
Message-ID: <01d201c0e54f$3f3ccc20$d500a8c0@sawmillmanager.com>
From: "John Hill" <jhill@sawmillmanager.com>
To: "Aina, Sam" <saina@sjm.com>, <samba@samba.org>
References: <ADBFFED9CB40D5118C5A0008C7864BA1BD36@USSVML03>
Subject: Re: Samba's Problem
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:16:48 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
There is a user map option that allows you to create a file on the UNIX
server that maps the users NT login to their UNIX login.
John Hill
Logical Systems, Inc.
258 Main Street
P.O. Box 649
Yarmouth, ME 04096
Phone: (207) 846-3669
Fax: (207) 846-3804
E-Mail: jhill@sawmillmanager.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aina, Sam" <saina@sjm.com>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Cc: "Aina, Sam" <saina@sjm.com>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 2:46 PM
Subject: Samba's Problem
Hi Samba guys,
My name is Sam AINA. I am trying to configure Samba in my environment.
My environment contains both Unix and NT workstations.
I installed samba on Unix server and aAfter the configuration it works okay
, I discovered that only the users that have thesame user IDs both on Unix &
NT were allowed to login but not users with different user IDs were able to
login.
I belief this is a small problem somewhere and I want you guys to put me
through.
I have changed the option Security in global parameter to SHARE
"security=share" but still couldn't work.
Thanks for your assistance.
Here is my samba configuration.
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 150.202.165.113 (150.202.165.113)
# Date: 2000/11/30 10:30:11
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = SJMSV
netbios name = BIGBIRD
security = SERVER
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
password server = ussvis01
unix password sync = no
load printers = No
os level = 1
oplocks = False
local master = No
wins server = ussvis02
[bigbird]
writeable = Yes
guest ok = no
browseable = No
[CP]
comment = CP
path = /u/pj2/CP
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0755
force create mode = 0755
security mask = 03777777
force security mode = 03777777
force directory mode = 0755
directory security mask = 03777777
force directory security mode = 03777777
guest ok = no
Key
Bigbird = unix server
ussvis01/ussvis02 = NT server.
Sam Aina
St. Jude Medical
(408)522-6429 Office
(818)424-1653 Cell
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E9304467; Fri, 25 May 2001
12:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14
port:4513]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id:
<548@intsrv> for <samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001
20:38:39 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>
Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<KSXN5678>; Fri, 25 May 2001 20:38:59 +0100
Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74936D@EMAILSRV>
From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>
To: "Samba (E-mail)" <samba@lists.samba.org>, "SNTDom
(E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Network Printer
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:38:58 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
How do I add a printer to samba that is shared on another win9x machine?
(you'll have to start from the beginning - I don't have a printcap entry
for
it!)
Actually - is it possible?
--
C.S.Mager
charlie@csmager.co.uk
This email and the information that it contains may be confidential,
legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended
recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise)
arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any
information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for
any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium.
Return-Path: <thimm@pua.physik.fu-berlin.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from pua.physik.fu-berlin.de (thimm.dialup.fu-berlin.de
[160.45.217.207]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8DC53B3
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from thimm@localhost) by pua.physik.fu-berlin.de
(8.11.0/8.11.0) id f4PKbgN12043; Fri, 25 May 2001 22:37:42 +0200
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 22:37:41 +0200
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Thomas Bitzer <thobi@fh-konstanz.de>, Kevin Cho
<kevin@i-cho.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba PDC, Win2k Clients (German), Problem writing profiles
Message-ID: <20010525223741.B11565@pua.nirvana>
References: <3B0E5E4C.FD265D0B@fh-konstanz.de>
<002001c0e553$8db26960$2f0a030a@msk.mckesson.com>
<3B0E5E4C.FD265D0B@fh-konstanz.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3B0E5E4C.FD265D0B@fh-konstanz.de>; from
thobi@fh-konstanz.de on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:29:48PM +0200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:29:48PM +0200, Thomas Bitzer
wrote:> I am using Redhat 7.1 and Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC for win2k clients. I also
> want to store win2k user profiles on that PDC. It works fine for
> root/Administrator accounts. But I have some trouble with other accounts
> (group users). At the end of each user session the profiles are
> stored. There I am getting the error msg can't copy
> .../Startmen|/Programme/Zubehvr...; details: permission denied. The
> directory 'Zubehvr' is created but it is empty. Other files and
directories
> are created correctly. There is also an error msg in smb log file:
> smbd/open.c: open_directory(1037) open_directory: unable to create
> user/Startmen~A/Programme. Error was Permission denied. It might be a
> problem with the german v,|,d.
> Does anyone have experience with samba PDCs and german win2k clients?
Ja. ;)
> Does anyone know how to fix this problem?
Yes, pick a more recent copy of the samba sources from cvs. I am running
happily those from 19.5 (around noon ;) and they also seem to support W2Ksp2.
Regards, Axel.
--
Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de
Return-Path: <dparker@pallisersd.ab.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.pallisersd.ab.ca (unknown [199.216.197.5]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C634256 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pallisersd.ab.ca ([199.216.196.1]) by
mail.pallisersd.ab.ca (Netscape Messaging Server 4.1) with ESMTP id
GDWT6Y00.8A3 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:04:10
-0600
Message-ID: <3B0EC92A.E5122577@pallisersd.ab.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:05:46 -0600
From: "Dave Parker" <dparker@pallisersd.ab.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: samba 2.2 binary pkg for sol 2.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi, I was wondering if there is a binary package of samba 2.2 available
for solaris 2.6. At the download site there are samba 2.2 packages for
solaris 2.7 and 2.8, but not solaris 2.6. Will the 2.7 package work for
solaris 2.6?
Thanks,
Dave
Return-Path: <drankin@cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from europa.cox-internet.com (unknown [208.180.118.40]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29CC424C for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 19:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by
europa.cox-internet.com (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110
license dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
<20010526021500.WJHD1750.europa@cox-internet.com> for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 21:15:00 -0500
Message-ID: <3B0F122F.F4D147B1@cox-internet.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 21:17:19 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin@cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [expert] getting time right]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [expert] getting time right
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 20:17:57 -0600
From: "D. R. Evans" <N7DR@cadant.com>
Reply-To: N7DR@cadant.com
Organization: Cadant, Inc.
To: expert@linux-mandrake.com
I should have given a bit more detail in my initial e-mail (it was
contained in a followup):
with the configuration as described below, both "date" and "date
-u"
return the current local time.
I completely gave up trying to get time to work correctly with respect
to Samba. I didn't look deeply into exactly what time is getting
served, etc., but I know that if I edit a file on the Linux box using a
program running on the Win98 box, the timestamp on the final (edited)
file on the Linux box is returned on the Linux box as being several
hours in the future. (So "make" then proceeds to give lots of nasty
warnings after I've been editing source code, because it realises that
the time stamps are hosed.)
The exact situation under those circumstances (I just tested this) is
that if I use the Win98 editor to edit a Linux file, the timestamp
associated with the file after I have finished editing is reported
correctly by Windows explorer, but the time reported by Linux lies six
hours in the future (I am actually six hours behind GMT).
Your configuration sounds closer to "correct" than mine, so I'd be
interested in knowing exactly what you have for your /etc/localtime and
clock files.
>From what I have read, it should be possible to have everything (except
possibly Samba) working correctly with the BIOS time running on local
time, but I'm beginning to suspect that in fact the only way to get it
all right (again, except for Samba) is to have the BIOS running on GMT.
Doc Evans
PS One is tempted to wonder why something so basic hasn't been reduced
to a simple configuration dialog for idiots. At this point, I feel like
I would qualify.
On 24 May 01, at 21:01, David Rankin wrote:
> "D. R. Evans" wrote:
>
> > Where can I find something that definitively and correctly tells me
how
> > to get my Linux 7.2 system to return the correct results when I try
the
> > following commands:
> >
> > 1. date
> > 2. date -u
> >
> > The BIOS clock is running on local time (US Mountain time).
> >
> > According to the documentation I have read, the correct configuration
> > is to have /etc/localtime be set to /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Mountain
> > and to have the following contents of /etc/sysconfig/clock:
> > ARC=false
> > UTC=false
> > Zone=America/Denver
> >
> > This causes "date" to respond correctly, and the clock on
the screen to
> > display the correct time, but "date -u" gives the wrong
time.
> >
> > I've fiddled around with these files, but nothing I've tried
has been
> > the magic combination.
> >
> > Doc Evans
> >
>
> Doc, I don't know what type of problem you're having, but I have
had an
> ongoing nightmare with Linux system time and the time Samba as a timeserver
> reports to the WinXX clients. The problem I experience occurs when system
> time is set to GMT, localtime to America/Chicago (or anything else). Linux
> shows the correct time, but the time that gets served to the Samba clients
> is shifted in the opposite direction be the appropriate GMT offset for the
> CST timezone. Say GMT is 1800 zulu, CST (in the real world is 1200), Samba
> serves WinXX clients 0000. I am still chasing this one.
>
> With the system clock set to CST, I get the right time served and I
don't
> have any problems with functioning of the clock. The downside is I
can't
> use xntpd to sync my system clock to the atomic clock because the realworld
> of timekeeping functions in GMT. Let me know your symptoms and I will see
> if I can't prepare a differential diagnosis upon which further
diagnostics
> can be done to eliminate the invalid points and arrive at a final
> diagnosis.
>
>
> --
> David Rankin
> Nacogdoches, Texas
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +1 303 494 0394
Mobile: +1 720 839 8462
Fax: +1 781 240 0527
--------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <drankin@cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from io.cox-internet.com (unknown [208.180.118.41]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52794B31 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 19:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by io.cox-internet.com
(InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110 license
dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
<20010526023019.DBJE29067.io@cox-internet.com>; Fri, 25 May 2001
21:30:19 -0500
Message-ID: <3B0F1581.E928BA2D@cox-internet.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 21:31:29 -0500
From: David Rankin <drankin@cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: N7DR@cadant.com, samba <samba@lists.samba.org>, mandrake
<expert@linux-mandrake.com>
Subject: Re: [expert] getting time right
References: <20010525132038.NSIP1750.europa@cadant1.cadant.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
"D. R. Evans" wrote:>
> On 24 May 01, at 21:05, David Rankin wrote:
>
> > "D. R. Evans" wrote:
> >
> > > On 25 May 01, at 0:47, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > >
> > > > So sprach D. R. Evans am Thu, May 24, 2001 at 03:28:29PM
-0600:
> > > > > This causes "date" to respond correctly, and
the clock on the screen to
> > > > > display the correct time, but "date -u" gives
the wrong time.
> > > >
> > > > Define 'wrong' time. My system clock is running on
UTC and I live in CEST
> > > > zone (GMT/UTC +0200):
> > > >
> > > > [askwar@teich pear]$ date
> > > > Fre Mai 25 00:47:16 CEST 2001
> > > > [askwar@teich pear]$ date -u
> > > > Don Mai 24 22:47:18 UTC 2001
> > > >
> > > > Everything's fine.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Fine. Now please tell me how you did it :-)
> > >
> > > I told you what I did (following the documentation in "Linux
> > > Installation, Configuration and Use" for Red Hat systems),
and that
> > > gives me the wrong UTC time. Here, being a perverse sort of chap,
I
> > > define "wrong" as "not right" :-)
> > >
> > > [n7dr@localhost n7dr]$ date
> > > Thu May 24 18:29:18 /etc/localtime 2001
> > > [n7dr@localhost n7dr]$ date -u
> > > Thu May 24 18:29:21 UTC 2001
> > >
> > > Doc Evans
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Phone: +1 303 494 0394
> > > Mobile: +1 720 839 8462
> > > Fax: +1 781 240 0527
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Your softlink from etc/localtime to America/Denver isn't set....
> >
> >
>
> Well, that's what I thought too. But:
>
> [n7dr@localhost n7dr]$ ls -al /etc/localtime
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 May 24 15:13 /etc/localtime
-> /usr/share/zoninfo/US/Mountain
>
> Doc
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Phone: +1 303 494 0394
> Mobile: +1 720 839 8462
> Fax: +1 781 240 0527
> --------------------------------------------------------------
Whoa Doc, the message your replying to wasn't sent by me - David Rankin.
I think it was a reply to my response to you. I really think you and I
are talking about the same phenominon. You linux file stamps are 6 hours
in the future and the time samba serves for me is 5 hours in the future
(localtime not set) 10 hours in the future with localtime set to
America/Chicago. Hmmm.. something strange, but consistent is going on
here. Hopefully someone reading will have some additionaly insight as to
why time is slightly warped in our systems.
--
David Rankin
Rankin*Bertin, PLLC
Nacogdoches, Texas
Return-Path: <fred@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au
(ha2.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.51]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 485634214 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 25
May 2001 22:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by
mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20
201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010526050819.VTHR25209.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@thesystem.plan
b> for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 15:08:19 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ray <nojunkmail@optushome.com.au>
Reply-To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: winbind howto?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 15:08:16 +1000
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052615081601.22694@thesystem.planb>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Does anyone know of (or have) something like a howto for winbind? Maybe even
a simple set of instructions?
I am running Samba 2.2.0, but I think I'm supposed to be running HEAD or
TNG,
otherwise winbind won't work at all. Can anyone confirm?
Thanks in advance!
--
Return-Path: <hurtta@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from ns.fmi.fi (ns.fmi.fi [193.166.211.11]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id DA37C4396 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26
May 2001 01:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ns.fmi.fi id LAA782046; Sat, 26 May 2001 11:39:26 +0300
(EEST)
Received: (Stripped) by ns.fmi.fi (with) id 20010526/LAA782046/001; Sat,
26 May 2001 11:39:25 +0300
Message-Id: <200105260839.f4Q8dP6c006953@leija.fmi.fi>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [expert] getting time right]
In-Reply-To: <3B0F122F.F4D147B1@cox-internet.com>
To: David Rankin <drankin@cox-internet.com>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:39:25 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: samba <samba@lists.samba.org>
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta+samba@leija.mh.fmi.fi>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL92 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [expert] getting time right
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 20:17:57 -0600
> From: "D. R. Evans" <N7DR@cadant.com>
> Reply-To: N7DR@cadant.com
> Organization: Cadant, Inc.
> To: expert@linux-mandrake.com
>
> I should have given a bit more detail in my initial e-mail (it was
> contained in a followup):
>
> with the configuration as described below, both "date" and
"date -u"
> return the current local time.
"date -u" on unix (and linux) should return UTC time. Otherwise it is
wrong.
--
/"\ | Kari
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Hurtta
X Against HTML Mail |
/ \ |
Return-Path: <thomas.jarosch@styletec.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.com
[194.25.134.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDFA42FB
for <samba@samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 01:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with
smtp id 153ZiW-0004ZN-02; Sat, 26 May 2001 10:46:36 +0200
Received: from intranator.local (320058631742-0001@[217.0.94.130]) by
fmrl04.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 153ZjF-0Z40f2C; Sat, 26 May 2001
10:47:21 +0200
Received: from aqua.local (aqua.local [172.16.1.1]) by intranator.local
(8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4Q8kTh31286 for <samba@samba.org>; Sat,
26 May 2001 10:46:29 +0200
Received: from storm (storm.local [172.16.1.2]) by aqua.local
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA12703 for <samba@samba.org>; Sat, 26 May
2001 10:46:07 +0200
Message-ID: <000e01c0e5c0$4a7e3300$020110ac@local>
From: "Thomas Jarosch" <thomas.jarosch@styletec.de>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: [patch] Samba 2.09: /etc/passwd.samba instead of /etc/passwd
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 10:46:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: 320058631742-0001@t-dialin.net
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi there,
I've developed a short, dirty patch for Samba 2.09
that allows me to have a separate /etc/passwd for Samba.
(and so allows me to have virtual users running under the UID of
"nobody")
It's based upon the diet libc (www.fefe.de/dietlibc/)
getpwnam() and getpwuid() functions.
Please CC: any comments as I'm not on the Samba list.
Enjoy, Thomas.
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a
name of samba-getpwnam.patch]
Return-Path: <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3C142A5 for <samba@samba.org>; Sat, 26 May
2001 04:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as1-119.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.9.119]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f4QBcFS11161; Sat, 26 May 2001 21:38:17 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root@yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
VAA28380; Sat, 26 May 2001 21:38:01 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet@piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
VAA07696; Sat, 26 May 2001 21:38:00 +1000
Message-ID: <3B0F9598.44855499@bartlett.house>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 21:38:00 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@styletec.de>
Cc: samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Samba 2.09: /etc/passwd.samba instead of
/etc/passwd
References: <000e01c0e5c0$4a7e3300$020110ac@local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Thomas Jarosch wrote:>
> Hi there,
>
> I've developed a short, dirty patch for Samba 2.09
> that allows me to have a separate /etc/passwd for Samba.
> (and so allows me to have virtual users running under the UID of
"nobody")
>
> It's based upon the diet libc (www.fefe.de/dietlibc/)
> getpwnam() and getpwuid() functions.
>
> Please CC: any comments as I'm not on the Samba list.
>
> Enjoy, Thomas.
>
> [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which
had a name of samba-getpwnam.patch]
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
You will need to send it as plain-text, as binary attachments are
striped by the list. Also, the best destination is
samba-patches@samba.org, possibly CCing this list or
samba-techincal@samba.org, where they are indexed for future reference.
However, based on your description I suspect that there may be some
issues with the patch, but I would need to see it to tell. In
particualar, I would worry about how it would work on PAM based systems
and on the possiblity that different utilities might operate on one
smbpasswd file with compleatly different world views, with 'interesting'
results.
Andrew Bartlet
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet@pcug.org.au
Return-Path: <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.irismedia.gr (195.74.252.4 [195.74.252.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EF248BA for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 08:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndemou ([62.1.140.149]) by mail.irismedia.gr (Iris Media
3.3) with ESMTP id ICA36652; Sat, 26 May 2001 18:43:43 +0300
Message-ID: <003901c0e596$6b0dde60$0e00a8c0@localenlogic.local>
From: "Nick Demou" <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: "Aina, Sam" <saina@sjm.com>
Cc: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <ADBFFED9CB40D5118C5A0008C7864BA1BD36@USSVML03>
Subject: Re: Samba's Problem
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 06:46:16 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
OK Sam,
Answers for your problem reside under the "security=" setting in
smb.conf.5.html (or the equivalent man page). Read the section that begins
under the subheading "security = share". I give it a look myself and
it
seems that in your case you need to use the service name as the username. So
you need to add a samba user having the service name and give him a password
that your clients will have to enter to get access.
As an alternative use the guest only option if security is not so important
for you
> I installed samba on Unix server and aAfter the configuration it works
okay> , I discovered that only the users that have thesame user IDs both on Unix
&> NT were allowed to login but not users with different user IDs were able
to> login.
> I belief this is a small problem somewhere and I want you guys to put me
> through.
> I have changed the option Security in global parameter to SHARE
> "security=share" but still couldn't work.
>
> Thanks for your assistance.
>
Return-Path: <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.irismedia.gr (195.74.252.4 [195.74.252.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94354A76 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 08:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndemou ([62.1.140.149]) by mail.irismedia.gr (Iris Media
3.3) with ESMTP id ICA36652 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May
2001 18:47:09 +0300
Message-ID: <004901c0e596$e62651e0$0e00a8c0@localenlogic.local>
From: "Nick Demou" <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: re: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 06:49:42 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I was having a lot of this kind of errors when I was using a TCP/IP packet
filtering program in the w2k server (specificaly a personal firewall) but
I've also seen in this list a lot of reports for such an error from others
in other situations
> > We're running samba 2.0.7 with win2000 clients. Under [global]
security
is> > set to server.
> >
> > The logs show nonstop errors such as:
> >
> > ===> > [2001/05/25 11:08:12, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > [2001/05/25 11:14:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > [2001/05/25 11:20:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > [2001/05/25 11:26:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > [2001/05/25 11:32:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > [2001/05/25 11:38:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> >
> > ===> >
> > for all clients. For the most part the sama shares seem to work, but
do
> > flake out requiring the usr to reboot theri computer in order to gain
> access
> > to a share again.
> >
> > What are these errors, what do they mean and how do I make them go
away?
> >
> > KEN
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <dm@belkam.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from pipe.aspec.ru (pipe.aspec.ru [195.161.29.125]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D68F4783 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmsystems (dm.dialup.aspec.ru [195.161.29.106]) by
pipe.aspec.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f4QG5fQ16219 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 21:05:42 +0500 (SAMST)
Message-ID: <006601c0e607$123cade0$6a1da1c3@dmsystems>
From: "Dmitry Melekhov" <dm@belkam.com>
To: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <004901c0e596$e62651e0$0e00a8c0@localenlogic.local>
Subject: Re: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 21:12:39 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Demou <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: samba List <samba@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 7:49 AM
Subject: re: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> I was having a lot of this kind of errors when I was using a TCP/IP packet
> filtering program in the w2k server (specificaly a personal firewall) but
> I've also seen in this list a lot of reports for such an error from
others> in other situations
>
I have no such error with 2.0, but this message is really nonstop with 2.2.
I sended debug level 10 log to list, no replies.
Wire connection and Windows reinstallation senior engineer
Dmitry Melekhov
http://www.belkam.com/~dm
2:5050/11.23@fidonet
> > > We're running samba 2.0.7 with win2000 clients. Under
[global]
security> is
> > > set to server.
> > >
> > > The logs show nonstop errors such as:
> > >
> > > ===> > > [2001/05/25 11:08:12, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > > [2001/05/25 11:14:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > > [2001/05/25 11:20:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > > [2001/05/25 11:26:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > > [2001/05/25 11:32:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > > [2001/05/25 11:38:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540)
> > > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
> > >
> > > ===> > >
> > > for all clients. For the most part the sama shares seem to work,
but
do> > > flake out requiring the usr to reboot theri computer in order to
gain
> > access
> > > to a share again.
> > >
> > > What are these errors, what do they mean and how do I make them
go
away?> > >
> > > KEN
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
the
> > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.internet.gr (mail.internet.gr [62.1.0.81]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 413324B27 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1424 invoked from network); 26 May 2001 16:07:38 -0000
Received: from vdp149-noc01.cas.internet.gr (HELO ndemou) (62.1.140.149)
by mail.internet.gr with SMTP; 26 May 2001 16:07:38 -0000
Message-ID: <007501c0e599$16e2e760$0e00a8c0@localenlogic.local>
From: "Nick Demou" <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: dos filetimes resolution=yes isn't working!
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 07:04:57 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
If you use a DOS command (like xcopy) to copy files from samba to windows
then the files that have a modification time with odd seconds are copied
with their time rounded to an even number (e.g. 6:00:59 ==> 6:00:58). This
makes the target file to always look older than the source one. In order to
overcome this I've searched the manual and came on to the "dos filetime
resolution" setting. This was supposed to force samba to always return even
seconds when it is asked for the modification time. However this is not
working in my case.
Has anybody else ever noticed this problem and / or used this setting???
(by the way the manual implies that the issue has to do only with shares
that have oplocks enabled and where files are accessed by visual c++, are
they missing something? have I missunderstund something??)
Nick Demou
Return-Path: <mk@mkd-gmbh.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mkd-gmbh.de (ns.mkd-gmbh.de [194.15.218.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22BF4408 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 13:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mkd-gmbh.de (mknt.mkd-gmbh.de [194.15.218.9]) by
mkd-gmbh.de (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id
f4QKHUu09536 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 22:17:30
+0200
X-Authentication-Warning: mkd.mkd-gmbh.de: Host mknt.mkd-gmbh.de
[194.15.218.9] claimed to be mkd-gmbh.de
Message-ID: <3B100F5A.95B27EE2@mkd-gmbh.de>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 22:17:30 +0200
From: Michael Krauss <mk@mkd-gmbh.de>
Organization: MKD GmbH
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,de-DE
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: problem with Samba 2.2.0/Win2K/MS-Access Database
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi !
I am experiencing a wired problem with the following setup:
Server: Samba 2.2.0 running on Suse 6.3 Kernel 2.2.13
5 Clients: Win2K prof. running an application that uses the MS-Access
DB-engine (*.mdb, *.ldb files)
smb.conf:
[global]
preserve case = yes
; The Name we use
netbios name = SERVER
; NT-Domain we are a member of
workgroup = KIMNET
; type of security
security = user
status = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
; enshure to become a domain master-browser
domain master = yes
local master = yes
preferred master = yes
; use a high os-level for samba to become a master-browser
os level = 65
; enable SAMBAs builtin WINS-support
wins support = yes
; if we have multiple interfaces only
interfaces = 172.16.1.1/255.255.255.0
; Performance boost for transfering small files
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
domain logons = yes
domain admin group = @pcadmin
; specify a generic logon script for all users
; this is a relative path to the [netlogon] share
logon script = start.bat
; where to store user profiles?
logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u
auto services = public
print command = /usr/bin/lpr -r -P%p %s
lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p
printer name = lp4
printcap name = /etc/printcap
guest account = nobody
debug level = 0
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
[....]
[lagler]
comment = Lagler Programme und Daten
path = /local/shares/LAGLER
public = no
writable = yes
browsable = yes
printable = no
write list = @pcuser
force create mode = 0660
force directory mode = 0770
force group = pcuser
oplocks = False
[...]
All DB-files are on this share. Other programs like Office 2K work well
(on other shares without the 'oplocks = False' setting).
What happens is, that the application seems to have problems with
inconsistent caching or not being able to write to the DB-files.
I often get error like 'Code 3040-Disc-I/O Error during read',
'record is currently locked' or even 'Code
3049-N:/Lagler/Hauptfa/Daten/LA-Stamm.MDB"
is corrupted or isn't at Microsoft Access database'.
I always have to run a DB-reorganization to be able to use the DB again.
Before I installed this setup, we used Samba 2.0.7 on the same server
and
Win98/Win95 Clients without any problems. As I need the
domain-controller
functionality for Win2K I had to upgrade to 2.2.0
I suspect the Win2K of using a more aggressive caching algorithm or
Samba
2.2.0 having problems with the locking. Anyway, turning off the
oplocks (as I read in some postings) didn't help.
Any tips and hints welcome.
Thanks,
Michael Krauss
Return-Path: <mark@axeon.screaming.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com
(mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.72]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F62C4B62 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 16:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp-1-91.5800-6.access.uk.worldonline.com
([62.64.153.91]) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com with esmtp
(Exim 3.22 #3) id 153nAV-000D39-00 for samba@lists.samba.org; Sun, 27
May 2001 00:08:24 +0100
Subject: Setting ACLs
From: Mark Westcott <mark@axeon.screaming.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release)
Date: 02 Jun 2001 13:09:26 +0100
Message-Id: <991483767.805.0.camel@mark-debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello all.
I have a room of 25 Windows 95 Workstations, which use samba as their
PDC, and for app/cdrom serving. I would like to be able to let users
(admins other than myself) change ACLs on files. This can not be done
with Windows 95, i think, and there are no NT/2000 workstations. This
leaves editing the ACLs in a text editor on the linux box, which is not
nearly as neat. Is there either:
a) A way to set ACLs from a 9x box?
b) A filemanager for Linux which will allow graphical setting of
ACLs (prefarably based on the domain info. I think the chances
of this are pretty slim.)
Thanks a lot
Mark Westcott
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA97D4BD7 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26 May 2001 16:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA03629; Sat, 26 May 2001
18:43:51 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 18:49:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
X-Sender: gcarter@pogo.plainjoe.org
To: Mark Westcott <mark@axeon.screaming.net>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Setting ACLs
In-Reply-To: <991483767.805.0.camel@mark-debian>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105261847580.13646-100000@pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On 2 Jun 2001, Mark Westcott wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I have a room of 25 Windows 95 Workstations, which use samba as their
> PDC, and for app/cdrom serving. I would like to be able to let users
> (admins other than myself) change ACLs on files. This can not be done
> with Windows 95, i think, and there are no NT/2000 workstations. This
> leaves editing the ACLs in a text editor on the linux box, which is not
> nearly as neat. Is there either:
>
> a) A way to set ACLs from a 9x box?
> b) A filemanager for Linux which will allow graphical setting of
> ACLs (prefarably based on the domain info. I think the chances
> of this are pretty slim.)
I thought there was an add-in for 95 that allowed this. Was it part of
the Nexus tools? Don't remember exactly. Was from MS I'm fairly sure.
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <tpot@samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 15D804CDF;
Sat, 26 May 2001 19:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tim Potter <tpot@valinux.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15120.18739.272733.284917@frungy.org>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 10:24:19 +1000 (EST)
To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: winbind howto?
In-Reply-To: <01052615081601.22694@thesystem.planb>
References: <01052615081601.22694@thesystem.planb>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Ray writes:
> Does anyone know of (or have) something like a howto for winbind? Maybe
even
> a simple set of instructions?
There should be some information in the manual page for winbindd
on how to set it up. A proper howto is probably needed though.
> I am running Samba 2.2.0, but I think I'm supposed to be
> running HEAD or TNG, otherwise winbind won't work at all. Can
> anyone confirm?
You should be able to run Samba 2.2.0 smbd/nmbd and the HEAD
winbindd with no problems.
Tim.
Return-Path: <fred@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au
(ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 635434CB0 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26
May 2001 21:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by
mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20
201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010527043045.DUNO10996.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@thesystem.plan
b>; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:30:45 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ray <nojunkmail@optushome.com.au>
Reply-To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au
To: Tim Potter <tpot@valinux.com>
Subject: Re: winbind howto?
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 14:30:41 +1000
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
References: <01052615081601.22694@thesystem.planb>
<15120.18739.272733.284917@frungy.org>
In-Reply-To: <15120.18739.272733.284917@frungy.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052714304100.31326@thesystem.planb>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Sun, 27 May 2001 10:24, Tim Potter wrote:> Ray writes:
> > Does anyone know of (or have) something like a howto for winbind?
Maybe
> > even a simple set of instructions?
> There should be some information in the manual page for winbindd
> on how to set it up. A proper howto is probably needed though.
Beaut, thanks.
> > I am running Samba 2.2.0, but I think I'm supposed to be
> > running HEAD or TNG, otherwise winbind won't work at all. Can
> > anyone confirm?
> You should be able to run Samba 2.2.0 smbd/nmbd and the HEAD
> winbindd with no problems.
Dumb question time; How/where do I get the HEAD version of winbindd only (ie;
without samba)?
Ray
Return-Path: <bhanu@gdit.iiit.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gdit.iiit.net (unknown [196.12.44.6]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 674A4424B for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 26
May 2001 23:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bhanu@localhost) by gdit.iiit.net
(8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA22474 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun,
27 May 2001 12:11:35 +0530
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 12:11:35 +0530 (IST)
From: "Bhanu Kalyan CH-RollNo.2000-13" <bhanu@gdit.iiit.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105271209020.22426-100000@gdit.iiit.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
How can we get the list of shares available for sharing in windows? I need
the actual information about how the master browser is communicated. Can i
find the information somewhere?
bhanu
Return-Path: <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from forthnet.gr (athmta01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B4B4D57 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 02:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndemou (ppp1395.ath.forthnet.gr [212.251.93.110]) by
forthnet.gr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA22198; Sun, 27 May 2001
12:35:29 +0300
Message-ID: <000701c0e690$0eed84a0$6e5dfbd4@localenlogic.local>
From: "Nick Demou" <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
To: "Michael Krauss" <mk@mkd-gmbh.de>
Cc: "samba List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <3B100F5A.95B27EE2@mkd-gmbh.de>
Subject: Re: problem with Samba 2.2.0/Win2K/MS-Access Database
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 12:33:04 +0300
Organization: enLogic
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm expiriencing the same problem (or at least very similar) with Samba
2.2.0 on RedHat 7 for some weeks now.
My case goes like this:
1) I have an mdb wich is loaded with data only (tables) on a samba share.
2) I open an access app that is using the mentioned mdb's data (has linked
tables to it) from one or more clients and things go fine.
3) All the problems seem to come up when you open it twice on the SAME
client PC. In that case I've expirienced the following types of symptoms (or
combinations):
a) the second instance of the app will run from slow to extremely slow and
if you insist on working it will terminate with errors mentioning that this
table is probably opened for exclusive use from user ADMIN on this PC. After
that the 1st instance is also expiriencing problems and you'll have to
restart it in order to be able to work again.
b) when one instance adds a record to a table this record will be left
locked
c) the 2nd instance will fail to start complaining of some other user having
locked the data for exclusive use.
Opening the same data from diferent PCs arises no problem at all (at least
two weeks of continous every day intensive work have passed) but I must note
that I have oplocks disabled. However I'm not sure if enabling oplocks will
indeed cause touble. I have the suspicion that it made access failing rarely
even when running on diferent PCs but I can't be sure because at the time I
had the problems and disabled oplocks I hadn't spoted the previously
mentioned failure mechanism. Anyway after disabling oplocks errors became
less frequent (coincidence?) and later I noticed all the stuff I mentioned
early and was able to eliminate errors by not opening the database twice in
the same PC. Unfortunately testing is not easy in my case. Erroneus
behaviour may not apear in a controlable test and doing the test in the real
working environment makes me nervous since it involves critical data of my
company.
I'm not happy with samba 2.2.0. Please let me now for anything else you
discover on this subject. I think we should do a posting in the
samba-technical list, what do you think?. Hope that something will came up.
Nick Demou
> Hi !
>
> I am experiencing a wired problem with the following setup:
>
> Server: Samba 2.2.0 running on Suse 6.3 Kernel 2.2.13
>
> 5 Clients: Win2K prof. running an application that uses the MS-Access
> DB-engine (*.mdb, *.ldb files)
>
> smb.conf:
...>
> All DB-files are on this share. Other programs like Office 2K work well
> (on other shares without the 'oplocks = False' setting).
>
> What happens is, that the application seems to have problems with
> inconsistent caching or not being able to write to the DB-files.
> I often get error like 'Code 3040-Disc-I/O Error during read',
> 'record is currently locked' or even 'Code
> 3049-N:/Lagler/Hauptfa/Daten/LA-Stamm.MDB"
> is corrupted or isn't at Microsoft Access database'.
>
> I always have to run a DB-reorganization to be able to use the DB again.
>
> Before I installed this setup, we used Samba 2.0.7 on the same server
> and
> Win98/Win95 Clients without any problems. As I need the
> domain-controller
> functionality for Win2K I had to upgrade to 2.2.0
>
> I suspect the Win2K of using a more aggressive caching algorithm or
> Samba
> 2.2.0 having problems with the locking. Anyway, turning off the
> oplocks (as I read in some postings) didn't help.
>
> Any tips and hints welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael Krauss
Return-Path: <thomas.jarosch@styletec.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.de (mailout03.sul.t-online.com
[194.25.134.81]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997544D57;
Sun, 27 May 2001 02:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fwd03.sul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.de with
smtp id 153wzQ-0000yr-01; Sun, 27 May 2001 11:37:36 +0200
Received: from intranator.local (320058631742-0001@[62.158.20.119]) by
fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 153x05-2DWNTEC; Sun, 27 May 2001
11:38:17 +0200
Received: from aqua.local (aqua.local [172.16.1.1]) by intranator.local
(8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4R9bTh08105; Sun, 27 May 2001 11:37:29
+0200
Received: from storm (storm.local [172.16.1.2]) by aqua.local
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA15001; Sun, 27 May 2001 11:37:06 +0200
Message-ID: <001001c0e690$9607da30$020110ac@local>
From: "Thomas Jarosch" <thomas.jarosch@styletec.de>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Cc: <samba-patches@samba.org>, <samba-technical@samba.org>
References: <000e01c0e5c0$4a7e3300$020110ac@local>
<3B0F9598.44855499@bartlett.house>
Subject: [patch] Samba 2.09: /etc/passwd.samba instead of /etc/passwd
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 11:37:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: 320058631742-0001@t-dialin.net
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> > I've developed a short, dirty patch for Samba 2.09
> > that allows me to have a separate /etc/passwd for Samba.
> > (and so allows me to have virtual users running under the UID of
"nobody")> >
> > It's based upon the diet libc (www.fefe.de/dietlibc/)
> > getpwnam() and getpwuid() functions.
> >
> > Please CC: any comments as I'm not on the Samba list.
> >
> > Enjoy, Thomas.
> >
> > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
which had a name of samba-getpwnam.patch]> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
> You will need to send it as plain-text, as binary attachments are
> striped by the list. Also, the best destination is
> samba-patches@samba.org, possibly CCing this list or
> samba-techincal@samba.org, where they are indexed for future reference.
>
> However, based on your description I suspect that there may be some
> issues with the patch, but I would need to see it to tell. In
> particualar, I would worry about how it would work on PAM based systems
> and on the possiblity that different utilities might operate on one
> smbpasswd file with compleatly different world views, with
'interesting'
> results.
>
> Andrew Bartlet
Okay, I've resent it. I don't know much about PAM,
but if it provides a wrapper for the getpwent()/getfpwent() functions
then it could work. Someone should give it a try.
Thomas.
diff -r -u samba-2.0.7/source/lib/system.c
samba-2.0.7.pwnam/source/lib/system.c
--- samba-2.0.7/source/lib/system.c Wed Apr 26 01:06:52 2000
+++ samba-2.0.7.pwnam/source/lib/system.c Fri May 25 17:34:23 2001
@@ -718,9 +718,55 @@
Wrapper for getpwnam(). Always returns a static that can be modified.
****************************************************************************
/
+struct passwd *my_getpwnam(const char * name) {
+ struct passwd *tmp;
+ FILE *in = fopen ("/etc/passwd.samba", "rb");
+ if (in == NULL)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ tmp=fgetpwent(in);
+ if (!tmp) {
+ fclose (in);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (!strcmp(tmp->pw_name,name)){
+ fclose (in);
+ return tmp;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/**************************************************************************
+ Wrapper for getpwuid(). Always returns a static that can be modified.
+***************************************************************************
*/
+
+struct passwd *my_getpwuid(uid_t uid) {
+ struct passwd *tmp;
+ FILE *in = fopen ("/etc/passwd.samba", "rb");
+ if (in == NULL)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ tmp=fgetpwent(in);
+ if (!tmp) {
+ fclose (in);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (tmp->pw_uid==uid) {
+ fclose (in);
+ return tmp;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/**************************************************************************
+ Wrapper for getpwnam(). Always returns a static that can be modified.
+***************************************************************************
*/
+
struct passwd *sys_getpwnam(const char *name)
{
- return setup_pwret(getpwnam(name));
+ return setup_pwret(my_getpwnam(name));
}
/**************************************************************************
@@ -729,7 +775,7 @@
struct passwd *sys_getpwuid(uid_t uid)
{
- return setup_pwret(getpwuid(uid));
+ return setup_pwret(my_getpwuid(uid));
}
/**************************************************************************
Return-Path: <mk@mkd-gmbh.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mkd-gmbh.de (ns.mkd-gmbh.de [194.15.218.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AF543A0 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mkd-gmbh.de (mknt.mkd-gmbh.de [194.15.218.9]) by
mkd-gmbh.de (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id
f4RBRku21289; Sun, 27 May 2001 13:27:46 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: mkd.mkd-gmbh.de: Host mknt.mkd-gmbh.de
[194.15.218.9] claimed to be mkd-gmbh.de
Message-ID: <3B10E4B1.88E2711@mkd-gmbh.de>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 13:27:45 +0200
From: Michael Krauss <mk@mkd-gmbh.de>
Organization: MKD GmbH
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,de-DE
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick Demou <ndemou@enlogic.gr>
Cc: samba List <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: problem with Samba 2.2.0/Win2K/MS-Access Database
References: <3B100F5A.95B27EE2@mkd-gmbh.de>
<000701c0e690$0eed84a0$6e5dfbd4@localenlogic.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Nick,
you didn' mention what OS you are running on the Client. Is it Win2K,
too ?
The core of the problem may indeed be the multiopening of one DB from
the
same client.
Since I disabled oplocks, I notice that smbstatus shows the same file
opened from one client several times.
> I think we should do a posting in the samba-technical list, what do
> you think?.
I'm not sure where this belongs to. Since your description is more
detailed
than mine, would you do the posting ?
Yours,
Michael
Return-Path: <mark@axeon.screaming.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.worldonline.com
(mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.71]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92B3424E for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 06:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp-1-205.5800-5.access.uk.worldonline.com
([62.64.148.205]) by mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.worldonline.com with esmtp
(Exim 3.22 #3) id 1540SG-000PXA-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:19:37 +0100
Subject: Re: Setting ACLs
From: Mark Westcott <mark@axeon.screaming.net>
To: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105261847580.13646-100000@pogo.plainjoe.org
>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105261847580.13646-100000@pogo.plainjoe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <991534415.1739.0.camel@mark-debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10 (Preview Release)
Date: 03 Jun 2001 03:20:21 +0100
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On 26 May 2001 18:49:07 -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:> On 2 Jun 2001, Mark Westcott wrote:
>
> > Hello all.
> >
> > I have a room of 25 Windows 95 Workstations, which use samba as their
> > PDC, and for app/cdrom serving. I would like to be able to let users
> > (admins other than myself) change ACLs on files. This can not be done
> > with Windows 95, i think, and there are no NT/2000 workstations. This
> > leaves editing the ACLs in a text editor on the linux box, which is
not
> > nearly as neat. Is there either:
> >
> > a) A way to set ACLs from a 9x box?
> > b) A filemanager for Linux which will allow graphical setting
of
> > ACLs (prefarably based on the domain info. I think the
chances
> > of this are pretty slim.)
>
> I thought there was an add-in for 95 that allowed this. Was it part of
> the Nexus tools? Don't remember exactly. Was from MS I'm fairly
sure.
>
You were right, its in nexus. Did you ever see this working? On My 95
workstations pressing 'change permissions' has no effect (no dialog
pops up)
I'll try 98, see if it works for that, just out of interest (ACLs are
working fine from a 2k box)
Mark
Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de
[212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0244658
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 07:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id QAA28017 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 16:16:50
+0200 (MET DST)
Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP
id QAA28907 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 16:16:50
+0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA26974 for samba@lists.samba.org; Sun, 27 May 2001
16:16:50 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 16:16:49 +0200
From: Michael Ott <Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de>
To: SAMBA-Mailing-List <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: profile-problem
Message-ID: <20010527161649.A26879@erlm.siemens.de>
Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hallo guys!
i have a profile problem
my win98 write the profile into the homes-dir of the user and not into the
profile-dir of the user. and it write it everytime, when i shutdown M$
why?
i am using 2.2.0
my config-file (a part of it)
[global]
logon script = %a.bat
printer driver file = /home/samba/printer/printers.def
logon path = \\%N\profile\%U
[homes]
comment = Home-Directory of %S
path = %H
browsable = no
writable = yes
valid users = %S
locking = no
create mode = 0600
directory mode = 700
[netlogon]
comment = NETLOGON service
path = /home/samba/netlogon
writable = no
;public = yes
locking = no
browsable = no
[profile]
comment = Windows 95 user profiles
path = /home/samba/profiles/win95
writable = yes
browsable = yes
create mode = 0600
directory mode = 0770
;preexec = /etc/samba/buildProfileWin95.sh %U
--
Gru_ & bye
Michael Ott
---------------------------------
- Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL -
- Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 -
- 91050 Erlangen -
- Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 -
- Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de -
---------------------------------
open-source and you have much fun
Return-Path: <hoeffgen@hjdt.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from psmtp1.dnsg.net (psmtp1.dnsg.net [193.168.128.41]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDD634249 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 08:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1894 invoked from network); 27 May 2001 17:00:50 +0200
Received: from essn-3e3680af.pool.mediaways.net (HELO
Server.Music-Art.de) (62.54.128.175) by psmtp1.dnsg.net with SMTP; 27
May 2001 17:00:50 +0200
Received: from hjdt.de (hoeffgen@Client.Music-Art.de [172.100.100.2]) by
Server.Music-Art.de (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA07214 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:06:55 +0200
Message-ID: <3B11180E.40202@hjdt.de>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 17:06:54 +0200
From: "B. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6ffgen?=" <hoeffgen@hjdt.de>
Organization: H&J-Datentechnik e. Kfm.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686; de-DE; m18)
Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Problem changing passwords
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
i will change my samba and the system password.
But samba don't execute passwd.
Who can help me? What's wrong?
My smb.conf:
global]
workgroup = test
netbios name = Client
server string = Samba
keep alive = 30
security = user
domain logons = no
domain master = no
default service = reference
protocol = NT1
encrypt passwords = true
bind interfaces only = yes
unix password sync = true
update encrypted = false
guest ok = no
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New Password* %n\n *Re-enter new password* %n\n
*Password changed*
printing = bsd
preferred master = yes
local master = yes
wins support = yes
Thanks
Boris Hvffgen
Return-Path: <gator@gator.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (mail.cs.tu-berlin.de
[130.149.17.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920194890
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 09:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from swamp.bayern.net (gator.home.cs.tu-berlin.de
[130.149.146.103]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
SAA01871 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 18:47:49 +0200
(MET DST)
Received: (from gator@localhost) by swamp.bayern.net (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE
Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f4RGHqo08165; Sun, 27 May 2001 18:17:52 +0200
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 18:17:52 +0200 (MEST)
From: Peter Daum <gator@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Reply-To: Peter Daum <gator@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: \\server\service%username: does it actually work?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105271747550.7961-100000@swamp.bayern.net>
Keywords: samba percent username
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
as far as I could tell from the list archive, this question had
been asked before, but I couldn't find any answer:
The samba documentation vaguely mentions a
"\\server\service%username method of passing a username" without
providing any further details.
I am desperately looking for an easy way to get Win9x to connect
to a samba share with a different username than that of the
currently logged on user, something like that would be ideal for
me.
I experimented with different samba-versions, but without any
luck. Obviously, Windows regards the "%username" as part of the
share's name, so I assume, that it is also transmitted, but it
looks like samba totally ignores it. So: is there any way, to get
this to work, or is the samba documentation misleading? Is there
any other way to accomplish the same?
Any help would be appreciated ...
Regards,
Peter Daum
Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de
[212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA83448A0
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 10:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP
id TAA07732 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 19:20:52
+0200 (MET DST)
Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de
[146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP
id TAA17120 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 19:20:51
+0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de
(8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA29252 for samba@lists.samba.org; Sun, 27 May 2001
19:20:52 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 19:20:52 +0200
From: Michael Ott <Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de>
To: SAMBA-Mailing-List <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: install certificate
Message-ID: <20010527192052.A29244@erlm.siemens.de>
Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hallo guys!
i am reading "Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours.
i made certificates for the client. but i do not know, where i must install
the client certificates on win9x and winnt
can you help me
thanx
Gru_ & bye
Michael Ott
---------------------------------
- Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL -
- Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 -
- 91050 Erlangen -
- Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 -
- Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de -
---------------------------------
open-source and you have much fun
Return-Path: <john@chattanooga.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from s60.highertech.net (s60.highertech.net [209.54.120.60])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0479F4AED for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 13:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slave1.highertech.net (john.highertech.net
[209.140.59.96]) by s60.highertech.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
f4RKADC02566 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 16:10:13
-0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: John Aldrich <john@chattanooga.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: mounted systems not staying mounted?
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 16:10:13 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01052716101300.12985@slave1.highertech.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I've got Red Hat 7.1 here... and I've got Samba up and running to
connect to
my Windows 98 SE box. However for some reason, when I mount a remote shared
drive / directory structure, it doesn't stay mounted.
Any suggestions?
John
Return-Path: <john@chattanooga.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from s60.highertech.net (s60.highertech.net [209.54.120.60])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1664B26 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slave1.highertech.net (john.highertech.net
[209.140.59.96]) by s60.highertech.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
f4RLEHC05867 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:14:18
-0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: John Aldrich <john@chattanooga.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: mounted systems not staying mounted?
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 17:14:17 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <01052716101300.12985@slave1.highertech.net>
In-Reply-To: <01052716101300.12985@slave1.highertech.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <01052717141705.12985@slave1.highertech.net>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Sunday 27 May 2001 04:10 pm, you wrote:> I've got Red Hat 7.1 here... and I've got Samba up and running to
connect
> to my Windows 98 SE box. However for some reason, when I mount a remote
> shared drive / directory structure, it doesn't stay mounted.
> Any suggestions?
>
PS... I' ve got the RedHat "errata" updates which I *think* update
me to 2.2,
but rpm -q still says 2.08.... *shrug*
John
Return-Path: <tdiehl@pil.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [207.8.164.9]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5B1C4BBB for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 15:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24036 invoked from network); 27 May 2001 22:19:46 -0000
Received: from dsl-64-34-35-93.telocity.com (HELO kanga.cableline.com)
(64.34.35.93) by richard2.pil.net with SMTP; 27 May 2001 22:19:46
-0000
Received: by kanga.cableline.com (Postfix, from userid 508) id
A12FB11804; Sun, 27 May 2001 18:19:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.cableline.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F01A12805; Sun, 27 May 2001 18:19:58 -0400
(EDT)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 18:19:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tom Diehl <tdiehl@pil.net>
X-X-Sender: <tdiehl@localhost.localdomain>
To: Ray <nojunkmail@optushome.com.au>
Cc: Tim Potter <tpot@valinux.com>, <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: winbind howto?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105271814490.30276-100000@localhost.localdom
ain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Ray wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2001 10:24, Tim Potter wrote:
> > Ray writes:
> > > Does anyone know of (or have) something like a howto for winbind?
Maybe
> > > even a simple set of instructions?
> > There should be some information in the manual page for winbindd
> > on how to set it up. A proper howto is probably needed though.
>
> Beaut, thanks.
>
> > > I am running Samba 2.2.0, but I think I'm supposed to be
> > > running HEAD or TNG, otherwise winbind won't work at all. Can
> > > anyone confirm?
> > You should be able to run Samba 2.2.0 smbd/nmbd and the HEAD
> > winbindd with no problems.
>
> Dumb question time; How/where do I get the HEAD version of winbindd only
(ie;
> without samba)?
Dumb question # 2, Is it really necessary to use the HEAD version of
winbindd to get this working or can we just use the winbindd version that
comes with 2.2.0? I am about to try to set up a pdc using samba but have not
started yet. I really would like to keep everything rpm'ed since I have
numerous machines that I am going to put 2.2.x on. I guess I could have just
the PDC machine non rpm but I would prefer not to do that.
TIA,
--
......Tom DARE TO SLACK: When Birds Fly in the Right Formation,
tdiehl@pil.net They Need Only Exert Half The Effort. Even in Nature,
Teamwork Results in Collective Laziness.
Return-Path: <chrish@apc.edu.ph>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.apc.edu.ph (unknown [203.87.128.134]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695B14C8A for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 15:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cgharavata ([10.106.1.125]) by mail.apc.edu.ph
(8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id GAA21385 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon,
28 May 2001 06:37:20 +0800
Reply-To: <chrish@apc.edu.ph>
From: "Chris G Haravata" <chrish@apc.edu.ph>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: STATUS..LCK
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 06:29:55 +0800
Message-ID: <AJEDKMGKCNNHONCEHBEGCEFPCAAA.chrish@apc.edu.ph>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hi, guys!
just this morning, i changed the location of one of my samba servers. after
doing that, i opened the server, and as usual, did some system checks to
find out if the server is working fine. everything seems to be working fine
except when i did a smbstatus. it gave me an error message:
Couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/STATUS..LCK
what did i do wrong? your help will be highly appreciated...
setup: SuSE 7.0 with kernel 2.4.2
Samba 2.0.7
Chris
Return-Path: <andrewwu@Princeton.EDU>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from Princeton.EDU (postoffice.Princeton.EDU
[128.112.129.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
BBAB94B90 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 16:20:05 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU
[128.112.129.65]) by Princeton.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
TAA13545 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 19:20:38 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from tucson.Princeton.EDU (tucson.Princeton.EDU
[128.112.129.181]) by smtpserver1.Princeton.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with
ESMTP id TAA16210 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001
19:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 19:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Andrew M. Wu" <andrewwu@Princeton.EDU>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Question on viewing shares
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10105271914090.4014-200000@tucson.Princeton.E
DU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from MULTIPART/MIXED by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
To all,
Hi, I have just joined this list and had tried unsuccessfully to search
through the archives, mainly because I'm unsure as to exactly what to
search for.
I've compiled (via the samba.spec included with the source for RPM) Samba
2.2.0 and have the smbd and nmbd servers running successfully. I can see
my own machine listed under the workgroup to which I've added the server,
but I can't get into any shares. I believe I've allowed myself (as
user)
and guests ok, following what I could understand from man smb.conf. I've
added myself and the guest user accounts (nobody and ftp) via smbpasswd.
I've enabled encrypt passord = yes and also map to guest = Bad User
However, I get the following in log.smbd:
[2001/05/27 18:46:36, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_accountcheck(381)
PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User!
[2001/05/27 18:46:36, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_accountcheck(381)
PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User!
[2001/05/27 18:47:23, 0] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(877)
rejected invalid user ftp
[2001/05/27 18:47:26, 0] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(877)
rejected invalid user ftp
[2001/05/27 18:47:38, 0] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(877)
rejected invalid user ftp
Attached is my current smb.conf (edited the sample / provided smb.conf).
I'm running kernel 2.4.4 on a base Mandrake 7.0 system.
Any pointers and advice is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Andrew
# This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the
# smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed
# here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too
# many!) most of which are not shown in this example
#
# Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash)
# is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a #
# for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you
# may wish to enable
#
# NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command
"testparm"
# to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors.
#
#======================= Global Settings
====================================[global]
# workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name
workgroup = PRINCETON
# server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field
server string = Samba Server
# This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict
# connections to machines which are on your local network. The
# following example restricts access to two C class networks and
# the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see
# the smb.conf man page
; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127.
# if you want to automatically load your printer list rather
# than setting them up individually then you'll need this
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
# It should not be necessary to spell out the print system type unless
# yours is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include:
# bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx
; printing = bsd
# Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd
# otherwise the user "nobody" is used
guest account = ftp
# Below added by Andrew Wu on May 27, 2001 for allowing guest access to Samba
# shares on Princeton's domain
map to guest = Bad User
# this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine
# that connects
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
# Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb).
max log size = 50
# Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See
# security_level.txt for details.
security = user
# Use password server option only with security = server
; password server = <NT-Server-Name>
# Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for
# all combinations of upper and lower case.
; password level = 8
; username level = 8
# You may wish to use password encryption. Please read
# ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation.
# Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
# The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to
# update the Linux sytsem password also.
# NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file'
above.
# NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only
# the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password
# to be kept in sync with the SMB password.
; unix password sync = Yes
; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
; passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n
*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully*
# Unix users can map to different SMB User names
; username map = /etc/smbusers
# Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration
# on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name
# of the machine that is connecting
; include = /etc/smb.conf.%m
# Most people will find that this option gives better performance.
# See speed.txt and the manual pages for details
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
# Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces
# If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them
# here. See the man page for details.
; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24
# Configure remote browse list synchronisation here
# request announcement to, or browse list sync from:
# a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below)
; remote browse sync = 192.168.3.25 192.168.5.255
# Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here
; remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.44
# Browser Control Options:
# set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master
# browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply
; local master = no
# OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser
# elections. The default value should be reasonable
; os level = 33
# Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This
# allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this
# if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job
; domain master = yes
# Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup
# and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election
; preferred master = yes
# Use only if you have an NT server on your network that has been
# configured at install time to be a primary domain controller.
; domain controller = <NT-Domain-Controller-SMBName>
# Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for
# Windows95 workstations.
; domain logons = yes
# if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or
# per user logon script
# run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine)
; logon script = %m.bat
# run a specific logon batch file per username
; logon script = %U.bat
# Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT)
# %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username
# You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below
; logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U
# All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP Addresses
# 'Name Resolve Order' allows the named resolution mechanism to be
specified
# the default order is "host lmhosts wins bcast". "host"
means use the unix
# system gethostbyname() function call that will use either /etc/hosts OR
# DNS or NIS depending on the settings of /etc/host.config, /etc/nsswitch.conf
# and the /etc/resolv.conf file. "host" therefore is system
configuration
# dependant. This parameter is most often of use to prevent DNS lookups
# in order to resolve NetBIOS names to IP Addresses. Use with care!
# The example below excludes use of name resolution for machines that are NOT
# on the local network segment
# - OR - are not deliberately to be known via lmhosts or via WINS.
; name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast
# Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section:
# WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS
Server
; wins support = yes
# WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client
# Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both
; wins server = w.x.y.z
# WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on
# behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be
# at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO.
; wins proxy = yes
# DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names
# via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes,
# this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no.
dns proxy = no
# Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_
# NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
case sensitive = no
# Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files
; default case = lower
# Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things!
; case sensitive = no
#============================ Share Definitions
=============================[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = yes
writable = no
# The following user entry created by Andrew Wu on 10/3/2000 temporarily:
[Andrew]
Comment="Andrew Wu's Multimedia"
path=/home/andrewwu/Multimedia
valid users=andrewwu
public=yes
writable=no
browseable=yes
# Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons
; [netlogon]
; comment = Network Logon Service
; path = /home/netlogon
; guest ok = yes
; writable = no
; share modes = no
# Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share
# the default is to use the user's home directory
;[Profiles]
; path = /home/profiles
; browseable = no
; guest ok = yes
# NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to
# specifically define each individual printer
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
printable = yes
# Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
guest ok = no
read only = no
writable = no
Return-Path: <wnelto@wm.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from email.wm.edu (mars.wm.edu [128.239.10.11]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4BE4A8C for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elton1 (cx103537-b.hmpt1.va.home.com [65.2.81.111]) by
email.wm.edu (2.1.2/8.9.1/Execmail 2.1) with ESMTP id UAA29803 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 20:18:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Norman Elton" <wnelto@wm.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: W2K Connection Problems
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 20:19:47 -0400
Message-ID: <OOEAJNOFFHEDHCMCLCGIKECOEEAA.wnelto@wm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Does anyone know why smbclient would refuse to connect to a Windows 2000
Server box over the internet? I can connect to another machine on the local
network fine, but I have trouble going over the 'net to any other boxes.
I'm
behind a firewall, although I tried putting my computer outside and it
didn't seem to help. Here's what I've been getting:
-----
Unknown parameter encountered: "ssl CA certFile"
Ignoring unknown parameter "ssl CA certFile"
added interface ip=192.168.1.2 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
added interface ip=192.168.149.1 bcast=192.168.149.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
timeout connecting to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:139
Connection to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX failed
------
I get the same messages when connecting to another box inside the firewall,
but the connection doesn't timeout. If it helps, I'm running RH7.1,
xinetd,
PortSentry.
Any hints?
Thanks
Norman Elton
Return-Path: <deedsmis@aculink.net>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from ganymede.aculink.net (204-118-157-8.aculink.net
[204.118.157.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A044254
for <samba@samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 19:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdm01.deedsmiscentral.net
(IDENT:root@204-118-157-159.aculink.net [204.118.157.159]) by
ganymede.aculink.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4S2N6e28721 for
<samba@samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 20:23:07 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from redneck@localhost) by cdm01.deedsmiscentral.net
(8.11.3/8.11.3/ver) id f4S2Qeu15992 for Samba (Request)
<samba@samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 20:26:40 -0600
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 20:26:40 -0600
Message-Id: <200105280226.f4S2Qeu15992@cdm01.deedsmiscentral.net>
X-no-archive: yes
From: SoloCDM <deedsmis@aculink.net>
Subject: Printer Items Not Printed
Reply-To: <deedsmis@aculink.net>, <samba@samba.org>
To: Samba (Request) <samba@samba.org>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Until this recent 2.0.9-1.3 version of Samba, all printer requests
were printed at the server. Now they just dissipate . . . hopefully!
The /etc/smb.conf configurations for Linux are defaulted to cups,
so I used a semicolon to comment them out. Samba expects Lprng
to have lpr, lpq, ... But, the lpr = lpr-lpd, lpq = lpq-lpd, ...
How do I fix this problem? Do links need to be made to the commands
or is there something in /etc/smb.conf that fixes this dilemma.
Note: When you reply to this message, please include the mailing
list/newsgroup address and my email address in To:.
*********************************************************************
Signed,
SoloCDM
Return-Path: <tpot@samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id CB7444C33;
Sun, 27 May 2001 19:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15121.45075.440010.430359@frungy.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 11:55:31 +1000 (EST)
To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: winbind howto?
In-Reply-To: <01052714304100.31326@thesystem.planb>
References: <01052615081601.22694@thesystem.planb>
<15120.18739.272733.284917@frungy.org>
<01052714304100.31326@thesystem.planb>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
From: Tim Potter <tpot@valinux.com>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Ray writes:
> Dumb question time; How/where do I get the HEAD version of
> winbindd only (ie; without samba)?
Follow the instructions for CVS at http://www.samba.org/samba/cvs.html to
obtain a CVS version of Samba. You then have to compile it
yourself using:
cd source
./configure
make nsswitch
then install winbindd from the source/nsswitch directory and the
nss library by copying source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib
and doing a 'ln -s /lib/libnss_winbind.so
/lib/libnss_winbind.so.2' as root.
Tim.
>
> Ray
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <tpot@samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id D7F1542F6;
Sun, 27 May 2001 19:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15121.46944.514018.567896@frungy.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:26:40 +1000 (EST)
To: Tom Diehl <tdiehl@pil.net>
Cc: Ray <nojunkmail@optushome.com.au>, <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: winbind howto?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105271814490.30276-100000@localhost.localdo
m ain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105271814490.30276-100000@localhost.localdom
ain>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2
From: Tim Potter <tpot@valinux.com>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Tom Diehl writes:
> Dumb question # 2, Is it really necessary to use the HEAD version of
> winbindd to get this working or can we just use the winbindd version that
> comes with 2.2.0? I am about to try to set up a pdc using samba but have
not
The winbind that comes with 2.2.0 doesn't compile! I've just
recently merged working code into the HEAD branch. I think
Jeremy may port it across for 2.2.2.
Tim.
Return-Path: <shane.laffin@reece.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from plughole.reece.com.au (unknown [203.25.254.34]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385FE4CD7 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 19:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from laffins ([10.3.99.242]) by plughole.reece.com.au
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f4S2aCK32380 for <samba@lists.samba.org>;
Mon, 28 May 2001 12:36:12 +1000
Message-ID: <015401c0e71e$df34f9c0$f263030a@reece.com.au>
From: "Shane Laffin" <shane.laffin@reece.com.au>
To: "Samba NTDom List" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: %G in share name..??
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:35:33 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all,
Hope you can help..!!!
Is it possible to have a users group name included in the samba share name.
i.e. ( smb.conf )
[%G-Share]
path = /fred/%G/%G-shared
.......
etc
shane.
Return-Path: <drankin@cox-internet.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from io.cox-internet.com (unknown [208.180.118.41]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78BB4233 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 21:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.76.40.151]) by io.cox-internet.com
(InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110 license
dd72657b95c070b1853187e4f5a0d6a7) with ESMTP id
<20010528041232.TWRU29067.io@cox-internet.com> for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 23:12:32 -0500
Message-ID: <3B11D077.21DA7A1A@cox-internet.com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 23:13:43 -0500
From: root <drankin@cox-internet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-4.1mdk i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Need help installing 2.09 rpm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I need someone to tell me why I am having problems upgrading Samba 2.07
to 2.09. [No -- personal comments refecting on my personal abilities -
or lack thereof - is not the response I am looking for]
Setup:
LM 7.2, stock install, kernel upgraded to 2.2.19-4.1
Samba is not loaded
I downloaded:
samba-common-2_0_9-1_1mdk_i586.rpm
samba-2_0_9-1_1mdk_i586.rpm
samba-client-2_0_9-1_1mdk_i586.rpm
When I try to install the rpms, the following occurs:
[root@Skyline i586]# rpm -Uvh samba-2_0_9-1_1mdk_i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
samba-common = 2.0.9 is needed by samba-2.0.9-1.1mdk
[root@Skyline i586]# rpm -Uvh samba-common-2_0_9-1_1mdk_i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
samba-common = 2.0.7 is needed by samba-2.0.7-18mdk
samba-common = 2.0.7 is needed by samba-client-2.0.7-18mdk
[root@Skyline i586]# rpm -Uvh samba-client-2_0_9-1_1mdk_i586.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
samba-common = 2.0.9 is needed by samba-client-2.0.9-1.1mdk
A check of the installed packages reveals the following:
[root@Skyline i586]# rpm -qa | grep samba
samba-common-2.0.7-18mdk
samba-2.0.7-18mdk
samba-client-2.0.7-18mdk
[root@Skyline i586]#
