SRuth@LANDAM.com
2003-May-23 15:11 UTC
[Samba] Inefficient Winbind behavior? Not sure if it posted 1 st time.
Thanks for the response, Jerry. Is there a way for me to verify this is happening? Winbindd has been running for a few days now, and I just did a netstat and the only connections to a DC are to the off-site one, the PDC. Thanks. Sven -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 10:19 PM To: SRuth@LANDAM.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Inefficient Winbind behavior? Not sure if it posted 1st time. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 14 May 2003 SRuth@LANDAM.com wrote:> Shouldn't winbindd use the local DC? Can I configure it to do so? I'm > fairly convinced that authenticating over the WAN link is causing the > delays I'm experiencing. Any ideas are welcome.Is should match one on the local subnet, but it binds to the PDC for a period of time after it has first joined the domain. 15 minutes or so IIRC. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+zZMrIR7qMdg1EfYRAp+xAKC7x/JcfNJ0w+BR4iuAt4rj054IsgCg39Q+ EVyNPtttm64GMdLaQe/WTMM=YE/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
2003-May-23 15:19 UTC
[Samba] Inefficient Winbind behavior? Not sure if it posted 1 st time.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 May 2003 SRuth@LANDAM.com wrote:> Is there a way for me to verify this is happening? Winbindd has been > running for a few days now, and I just did a netstat and the only > connections to a DC are to the off-site one, the PDC.Winbindd will maintain connections as long as possible. Restart winbindd and see if it doesn't bind to the BDC. My guess is that you joined the domain and imeediately started the daemon. Since this was withing the 15 minutes period that winbindd decides it must bind to the PDC, it simply kept those connections up as long as possible. If it still binds to the PDC after restarting, then send me a level 10 debug of from winbindd off list and I'll take a look at it. Also include what version you are using (if you mentioned it before, I forgot). cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE+zjwOIR7qMdg1EfYRAhqPAJ9GDtQL5MAk4OyoslCkOmSh+K1TeQCeKk+Z zG+UlvMukLuooLLEXZBEcKs=Gl8f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Inefficient Winbind behavior?
- Please assist with Winbind issues!
- Inefficient Winbind behavior? Not sure if it posted 1st time.
- [ win32utils-Patches-16627 ] Replace inefficient busy wait loop with UDP/IP loopback socket.
- [Bug 1665] New: prefix_pton is inefficient