samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Nov-20 23:56 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7807] New: Error when using rsync: as protocol prefix and :: as module separator
bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7807 Summary: Error when using rsync: as protocol prefix and :: as module separator Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugs.samba.org at hacking.co.uk QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org When attempting to use rsync with a URL such as that shown below which uses "rsync:" as a protocol prefix and "::" as a module separator the error shown beneath is produced: rsync -a rsync://rsync.mad-hacking.net::hacking-gentoo-overlay ~/test/ ssh: Could not resolve hostname rsync: Name or service not known Using the "/" as a module separator, or omitting the rsync: protocol prefix, as shown below, works normally. rsync -a rsync://rsync.mad-hacking.net/hacking-gentoo-overlay ~/test/ rsync -a rsync.mad-hacking.net::hacking-gentoo-overlay ~/test/ -- Configure bugmail: bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Nov-21 00:53 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7807] Error when using rsync: as protocol prefix and :: as module separator
bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7807 ------- Comment #1 from brian at aljex.com 2010-11-20 18:53 CST ------- The last two syntaxes are described in the man-page and of course they work. The first syntax and anything else you invent will of course not work. I see no bug. -- Configure bugmail: bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2010-Nov-21 01:27 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7807] Error when using rsync: as protocol prefix and :: as module separator
bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7807 bugs.samba.org at hacking.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #2 from bugs.samba.org at hacking.co.uk 2010-11-20 19:27 CST ------- Fair enough - the command in question was being generated by some other software. If you do a quick Google it would seem it is not alone in generating such malformed code. At first glance the man page doesn't seem to say it is invalid although closer inspection does seem to imply that I agree. Perhaps better wording of the examples section would make it clearer? -- Configure bugmail: bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Maybe Matching Threads
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5275] New: user id mapping stopped working with 3.0.0pre10
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4878] New: segfault when i386 client touches x86_64 server (no rsh/ssh) both cvs 3.0.0 today 20070813
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7456] New: exclude directory based on presence of a file
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1890] TLS for rsync protocol
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6032] New: error in rsync protocol data stream