Thomas Goirand
2011-Nov-14 06:30 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#648691: ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> * Package name : blktap-dkms Version : 2.0.90 Upstream Author : Jon Ludlam <jonathan.ludlam at eu.citrix.com> * URL : http://www.xen.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package This package contains the source for the blktap kernel module. It includes DKMS support so that installation of this package will result in a working blktap kernel module.
Ben Hutchings
2011-Nov-14 07:29 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#648691: ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:30 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:> Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> > > * Package name : blktap-dkms > Version : 2.0.90 > Upstream Author : Jon Ludlam <jonathan.ludlam at eu.citrix.com> > * URL : http://www.xen.org/ > * License : GPL-2 > Programming Lang: C > Description : Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package > > This package contains the source for the blktap kernel module. It > includes DKMS support so that installation of this package will > result in a working blktap kernel module.Is this really still worthwhile? The last I read was that it is to be replaced by qemu qdisk. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The world is coming to an end. Please log off. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 828 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20111114/c0fcf184/attachment.pgp>
Debian Bug Tracking System
2011-Nov-28 16:06 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#648691: marked as done (ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:02:32 +0000 with message-id <E1RV3f6-0000xY-1X at franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#648691: fixed in blktap-dkms 2.0.90-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #648691, regarding ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 648691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648691 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> Subject: ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:30:10 +0800 Size: 2547 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20111128/2be7843e/attachment.mht> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> Subject: Bug#648691: fixed in blktap-dkms 2.0.90-1 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:02:32 +0000 Size: 4745 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20111128/2be7843e/attachment-0001.mht>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Bug#748953: blktap-dkms: Struct bio was changed in 3.14 breaking build
- Bug#694429: blktap-dkms: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /lib/modules/$KVERS/kernel/
- Bug#742515: blktap-dkms: diff for NMU version 2.0.93-0.2
- Bug#742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build
- Bug#813678: blktap-dkms: fails to build with mainline 4.4 based kernels