similar to: Bug#648691: ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The build fails on 3.14 kernel with the following error: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c: In function ?blktap_ring_make_tr_request?: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c:314:32: error: ?struct bio? has no member named ?bi_sector?

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean

tags 742515 + patch tags 742515 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for blktap-dkms (versioned as 2.0.93-0.2) and uploaded it directly to the archive as discussed on IRC. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: blktap-dkms-2.0.93-0.2-nmu.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 2499 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) blktap fails to build on kernel 3.13 and probably older kernels as well. According to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1245009 VM_RESERVED is deprecated as of 3.7. Building with the patch described in that bug allows for

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: apw at ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu xenial ubuntu-patch Mainline 4.4 switches how we detect atomicity. Follow that change when compiling against 4.4 based kernels. We are using this in Ubuntu with our latest kernels. Thanks for considering the patch. -apw -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have. Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package did make it rebuild the kernel module. Thomas Goirand (zigo) --

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-2 X-Debbugs-CC: wzssyqa at gmail.com This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system, which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib, while is not the default architecture, mips* for example. On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32 libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64. Beside the way, on

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.3 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to build a kernel module for the current sid kernel: Setting up blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.3) ... Loading new blktap-2.0.93 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... dpkg: warning: version

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.10 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, blktap-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 4.12: Selecting previously unselected package blktap-dkms. (Reading database ... 34976 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.10_amd64.deb ... Unpacking blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.10) ...

Hi, I''m currently trying to install xapi on debian (unstable), following the following wiki page: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XAPI_on_debian 1. Install squeeze 32-bits (it''s not specified on the wiki, but I guess it wont work with 64-bit as the xapi *.deb files are for 32). note: you must leave an unused 1mb partition somewhere when creating your

FYI: The status of the blktap-dkms source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 2.0.90-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for

Hey folks, I'd like to get a .deb of the unmodified_drivers put together. I just filed ITP, and I would love to have your help with it. http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=653 I've never built a kernel package before, nor have I used DKMS, so it's going to be a bumpy ride for me. Do any of you have experience with these tools? Have you built the unmodified_drivers modules recently?

Package: blktap-utils Version: 2.0.90-2 Severity: important Tapdisk fails to start and exit's silently after failing to detect current kernel version. This happens only on newer kernel versions missing sublevel field. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP

On 11/14/2011 07:43 AM, Jon Ludlam wrote: > On 12 Nov 2011, at 09:17, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 11/12/2011 12:16 AM, Jonathan Ludlam wrote: >>> Secondly, there are a few more things that need to be done to your >>> blktap >>> packaging prior to uploading: >>> >>> * The xen-org/blktap.git repository builds and works for amd64 >> >>

FYI: The status of the blktap-dkms source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.0.90-1 Current version: 2.0.91-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more

My OQO boxes have the AR5413 wifi chipset, so for the first time in quite a while, I again need to run madwifi. So I went looking for the dkms madwifi rpms, but could not find them. They use to be on rpmforge, as I recall. dkms is there. So have I lost some memory cells or have these rpms taken a hike?

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > owner 693137 pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Bug #693137 [wnpp] ITP: swift-plugin-s3 -- swift3 (S3 compatibility) middleware plugin for swift Owner changed from Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> to pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Package: blktap-dkms Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, blktap-dkms FTBFS against linux 3.10-1 from unstable: Cheers, Moritz CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.c:30:0: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/blktap.h:75:41: warning: variably modified ?pending? at file scope [enabled by

Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop (latitude-e4500) for an employee. I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf - enclosed are the errors messages. The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS. The errors prior to rebuilding the kernel are identical to the errors after rebuilding the kernel and rebooting - minus the error

Hi everyone. I was trying to test a more recent version of btrfs on my current kernel (2.6.37) using dkms, without success. I followed these instructions: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories - cloned the repo - symlinked to /usr/src/btrfs-git - patched version.sh: Please note version.sh requires bash (better to change the shebang or fix the script). Even with the