Script Head
2006-Feb-02 16:31 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] routing question: multipath routing for SIP
I have two T1s and I'd like to split my SIP traffic over the two. I am looking at this: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html what bothers me about it is the note "Note that balancing will not be perfect, as it is route based, and routes are cached. This means that routes to often-used sites will always be over the same provider.". If all my traffic goes to the same IP, which is a remote SER proxy, will my second T1 be utilized at all? Does anyone have any experiece with this? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060202/4d2afdcd/attachment.htm
gw@adcomcorp.com
2006-Feb-02 19:20 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] routing question: multipath routing for SIP
Yes, and, you will probably need a different method. Are these t1's to the same provider? Have you considered bonding the channels? Greg ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Script Head Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:32 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] routing question: multipath routing for SIP I have two T1s and I'd like to split my SIP traffic over the two. I am looking at this: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html what bothers me about it is the note "Note that balancing will not be perfect, as it is route based, and routes are cached. This means that routes to often-used sites will always be over the same provider.". If all my traffic goes to the same IP, which is a remote SER proxy, will my second T1 be utilized at all? Does anyone have any experiece with this? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060202/f064ebe4/attachment.htm