Is there an email address that we can forward 'defunct' emails like the
one below to so that they can be taken off the mailing list. I
appreciate it means work for someone but this email is probably being
sent out to 400 'original' posters a day if that makes sense.
It could also be the email address that we forward "out of office"
emails to that could automatically suspend them for a period of time.
You could probably automate the service but wouldn't be hard to have a
person read the email, copy the address and paste it into a webpage.
Just a thought.
Cheers,
Dean
_____________________________________________
From: System Administrator
Sent: Friday, 2 September 2005 9:55 AM
To: sesker@dgsystems.com
Subject: Undeliverable:RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Semi-OT:
Sent: 2/09/2005 9:53 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
sesker@dgsystems.com on 2/09/2005 9:55 AM
The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this
message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient
directly to find out the correct address.
<dalweb01.dgs.dgsystems.com #5.1.1>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050902/f7673a31/attachment.htm
Dean Collins [Dean@collins.net.pr] wrote:> (Article auto-converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.) > > Is there an email address that we can forward 'defunct' emails like the > one below to so that they can be taken off the mailing list. I appreciate > it means work for someone but this email is probably being sent out to > 400 'original' posters a day if that makes sense. > > It could also be the email address that we forward "out of office" > emails to that could automatically suspend them for a period of time. > > You could probably automate the service but wouldn?t be hard to have > a person read the email, copy the address and paste it into a webpage. > Just a thought. >It seems to me that an automated solution to this problem would leave itself open to abuse. A moderated system would have to be monitored by someone, and that would seem to be far too much of a chore. You'll probably find that people with the appropriate access will unsubscribe or suspend accounts that send them OoO messages anyway, without further prompting from other subscribers. Perhaps your proposed auto-unsubscribe feature should be reserved for people who insist upon sending HTML emails and/or lazily top-posting their followups. :-) -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ kevin@cursor.biz _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] net/bridge: add drop reasons for bridge forwarding
- Install SciView under Windows Vista
- [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] net/bridge: add drop reasons for bridge forwarding
- Problems with Samba-based Home-Directory
- asterisk and defunct perl procs