I have been playing with asterisk for a couple of weeks now and I have been very happy with its performance. However, I have run into a problem with how I want to deploy this solution. I have a mix of softphones (SJ and Xlite), ATA's, and a couple of IP phones (Snom 190). The asterisk box is on the public network. For my primary users they will reside behind a watchguard 4500 firewall. For the others there will be a mix of Ethernet routers (Linksys/Netgear/DLink). I have been testing the different deployments and have found that the softphones and ATA's work like a champ in getting around the firewall and the NAT of the work at home users. However the Snom phones don't perform as well. I have played with qualify statement in sip.conf and at first I thought that I might have been OK with not using that argument, but it didn't work. I continue to get the following: *CLI> Feb 13 15:50:59 NOTICE[14043]: chan_sip.c:7971 sip_poke_noanswer: Peer '9093' is now UNREACHABLE! When this happens, I can't receive any calls (of course) but I can place outbound calls. Is this normal? Can anyone help me with this?
Additionally when I do receive the unreachable message as soon as I place an outbound call the peer becomes reachable...... dabigshiznizzle wrote:> I have been playing with asterisk for a couple of weeks now and I > have been very happy with its performance. However, I have run into a > problem with how I want to deploy this solution. > > I have a mix of softphones (SJ and Xlite), ATA's, and a couple of IP > phones (Snom 190). The asterisk box is on the public network. For my > primary users they will reside behind a watchguard 4500 firewall. For > the others there will be a mix of Ethernet routers > (Linksys/Netgear/DLink). I have been testing the different > deployments and have found that the softphones and ATA's work like a > champ in getting around the firewall and the NAT of the work at home > users. However the Snom phones don't perform as well. > > I have played with qualify statement in sip.conf and at first I > thought that I might have been OK with not using that argument, but it > didn't work. I continue to get the following: > > *CLI> Feb 13 15:50:59 NOTICE[14043]: chan_sip.c:7971 > sip_poke_noanswer: Peer '9093' is now UNREACHABLE! > > When this happens, I can't receive any calls (of course) but I can > place outbound calls. Is this normal? > > Can anyone help me with this? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >