CentOS - Jun 2005 - LVM problems [ was: bad blocks ... ]

On 6/4/05, John Hinton <webmaster at ew3d.com> wrote:
> 
> Otherwise, I did have troubles with a LVM install and decided to never
> try that one again... at least for a long time.
> 
Now you have my curiosity aroused. Was this with CentOS3 or 4, ie LVM
or LVM2? What problems?

We use LVM on all our RH9 setups at work. No problems at all.

OTOH, LVM2 is a work in progress that RH chose to pass along. I keep
hearing rumors that the support may be more complete in Update 1
whenever that comes along.

-- 
 Collins
       Head teachers of the world unite: you have nothing to lose but 
       the Start button.

On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 11:29 -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
> On 6/4/05, John Hinton <webmaster at ew3d.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Otherwise, I did have troubles with a LVM install and decided to never
> > try that one again... at least for a long time.
> > 
> 
> Now you have my curiosity aroused. Was this with CentOS3 or 4, ie LVM
> or LVM2? What problems?
> 
> We use LVM on all our RH9 setups at work. No problems at all.
> 
> OTOH, LVM2 is a work in progress that RH chose to pass along. I keep
> hearing rumors that the support may be more complete in Update 1
> whenever that comes along.
> 
The problem with LVM2 is this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156673

(resize2fs is missing ... should be there in update 1)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050604/7f476471/attachment-0004.sig>