Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40075 matches for "blocks".
Did you mean:
block
2013 Apr 05
0
btrfs insane I/O amplification?
I''m on Fedora''s 3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64. I tried to do some
not-very-heavy I/O on my system (i.e. save kernel/sys.c in emacs) and
it took about a minute. Everything went downhill from there. My
system was basically idle at the time. (I have very little in the way
of diagnostics because I couldn''t do much but hit the reset button
after a couple of minutes.)
On
2007 Mar 19
1
Ubuntu 6.06, wine and ALSA
Hello everybody.
I got some strange problem when running wine with ALSA as sound driver.
For example: when I run mdk2 (I compiled wine myself version 0.9.22 -
newest for now) sound is very noisy and crack'y and I get tons of this
errors:
err:dsound:DSOUND_MixInBuffer length not a multiple of block size, len
= 3122, block size = 4
err:dsound:DSOUND_MixInBuffer length not a multiple of block
2004 Jun 24
0
help:about ext3
...ne,I meet a problem: I used reahat9.0(kernel 2.4.20-8smp,I
installed a SCSI RAID Card),and there are always some problems and them
the system is dead.
is anyone can help me about it?
Thanks
Crist
Below is the error log:
Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,18)):
ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1382828372,
count = 1
Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,18)):
ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1481734211,
count = 1
Jun 11 22:19:03 mail1 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,18)):
ext3_free_blocks: Freein...
2007 Jun 16
1
4 GB USB flash disk with FAT ok, with ext3 corrupted files
...> /sys/block/sda/device/max_sectors
But before I tried without reducing max_sectors from the default - no
difference.
root at tarnica:~# mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1
mke2fs 1.40-WIP (07-Apr-2007)
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=4096 (log=2)
Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
523264 inodes, 1046521 blocks
52326 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
First data block=0
Maximum filesystem blocks=1073741824
32 block groups
32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
16352 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736
Writin...
2004 Dec 09
1
resize2fs on LVM on MD raid on Fedora Core 3 - inode table conflicts in fsck
...e this
capability to myself before fully committing to this system as the
primary data storage. I'm having some problems resizing an ext3
filesystem after I've resized the underlying logical volume. Following
the ext3 resize, fsck spits out lots of errors like:
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Group 49's inode table at 1605636 conflicts with some other fs block.
Relocate<y>? no
I believe that I'm following the correct procedure for resizing the
filesystem. Any pointers greatly appreciated. Thanks.
A complete transcript demonstrating this problem follows:
SEVE...
2010 Nov 09
1
Is this a DDoS to reach Asterisk?
Hi Everyone,
I have pfSense running which supplies Asterisk with DHCP. I had some testing
ports opened for a web server which I have totally closed now but when I
chose option 10 (filter log) on pfSense I get all of this type of traffic
(note that it was only 1 single IP and once I blocked that one it was like
opening a can full of bees with all different IPs):
tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no
2005 Mar 22
1
ext2fs_read_bb_inode: Invalid argument && Can't read an block bitmap
...an
search-engine of the archive of this list.
Somehow the ext3 filesystem on one of my machines died an after a reboot
grub wouldn't come up again.
What I did so far:
fsck -y /dev/hda4
fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks...
Block bitmap for group 0 is not in group. (block 2553887680)
Relocate? yes
Inode bitmap for group 0 is not in group. (block 16777216)
Relocate? yes
Inode table for group 0 is not in group. (block 2238581760)
WARNING: SEVERE DATA LOSS POSSIBLE.
Relocate? yes...
2016 Aug 17
0
[PATCH 15/15] block: Add FIXME comment to handle device_add_disk error
...+
drivers/scsi/sr.c | 1 +
58 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c b/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c
index 29dfdd6..ec45cb6 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/emu/nfblock.c
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int __init nfhd_init_one(int id, u32 blocks, u32 bsize)
set_capacity(dev->disk, (sector_t)blocks * (bsize / 512));
dev->disk->queue = dev->queue;
+ /* FIXME: handle error. */
device_add_disk(NULL, dev->disk, NULL);
list_add_tail(&dev->list, &nfhd_list);
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/d...
2012 Mar 19
0
[qemu-upstream-unstable test] 12357: trouble: blocked/broken
flight 12357 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12357/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-oldkern 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 11890
build-i386 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 11890
2016 Oct 29
2
RFC [Bitcode]: Moving block info block state
Hi all,
This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100
That change moves the block info block state from BitstreamReader to
BitstreamCursor in order to accommodate multiple block info blocks (the
idea is that the cursor would store the block info block state for
whichever block info block is active for that cursor).
Duncan objected to it on the grounds that we should aim for a design that
would continue to allow a shared block info block state. I'd agree with him
that such a desig...
2012 Mar 27
0
[xen-unstable test] 12445: regressions - FAIL
flight 12445 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12445/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12437
build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12437
build-amd64 4 xen-build
2012 Aug 06
0
[xen-unstable test] 13557: trouble: blocked/broken
flight 13557 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13557/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-pvops 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 13536
build-i386-oldkern 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 13536
build-amd64-oldkern
2007 Oct 04
1
[PATCH 0/5] Boot protocol changes
...io scheduler deadline registered
[ 1.383342] io scheduler cfq registered (default)
[ 1.405342] rtc: I/O resource 70 is not free.
[ 1.405342] Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
[ 1.406343] RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 65536K size 1024 blocksize
[ 1.407345] PNP: No PS/2 controller found. Probing ports directly.
[ 1.407345] i8042.c: No controller found.
[ 1.408682] mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
[ 1.408682] EDAC MC: Ver: 2.1.0 Oct 3 2007
[ 1.408682] TCP cubic registered
[ 1.408682] NET: Registered protocol...
2007 Oct 04
1
[PATCH 0/5] Boot protocol changes
...io scheduler deadline registered
[ 1.383342] io scheduler cfq registered (default)
[ 1.405342] rtc: I/O resource 70 is not free.
[ 1.405342] Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
[ 1.406343] RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 65536K size 1024 blocksize
[ 1.407345] PNP: No PS/2 controller found. Probing ports directly.
[ 1.407345] i8042.c: No controller found.
[ 1.408682] mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
[ 1.408682] EDAC MC: Ver: 2.1.0 Oct 3 2007
[ 1.408682] TCP cubic registered
[ 1.408682] NET: Registered protocol...
2016 Nov 01
0
RFC [Bitcode]: Moving block info block state
...ingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100>
>
> That change moves the block info block state from BitstreamReader to BitstreamCursor in order to accommodate multiple block info blocks (the idea is that the cursor would store the block info block state for whichever block info block is active for that cursor).
>
> Duncan objected to it on the grounds that we should aim for a design that would continue to allow a shared block info block state. I'd agree with him that su...
2007 Jun 14
0
(no subject)
I installed a fresh copy of Debian 4.0 and Xen 3.1.0 SMP PAE from the
binaries. I had a few issues getting fully virtualized guests up and
running, but finally managed to figure everything out. Now I''m having a
problem with paravirtualized guests and hoping that someone can help.
My domU config:
#
# Configuration file for the Xen instance dev.umucaoki.org, created
# by xen-tools
2016 Aug 17
20
[PATCH 00/15] Fix issue with KOBJ_ADD uevent versus disk attributes
This is an attempt to fix the issue that some disks' sysfs attributes are not
ready at the time its KOBJ_ADD event is sent.
The symptom is during device hotplug, udev may fail to find certain attributes,
such as serial or wwn, of the disk. As a result the /dev/disk/by-id entries are
not created.
The cause is device_add_disk emits the uevent before returning, and the callers
have to create
2016 Aug 17
20
[PATCH 00/15] Fix issue with KOBJ_ADD uevent versus disk attributes
This is an attempt to fix the issue that some disks' sysfs attributes are not
ready at the time its KOBJ_ADD event is sent.
The symptom is during device hotplug, udev may fail to find certain attributes,
such as serial or wwn, of the disk. As a result the /dev/disk/by-id entries are
not created.
The cause is device_add_disk emits the uevent before returning, and the callers
have to create
2010 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Has anyone written this?
It would go something like like the code below. The goal would be to
turn the basic blocks which the graph looks like "...->x->y->..."
where the instructions of x and y could live in the same basic block
without a jump or fall through in between.
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &mf) {
BitVector seen( mf.size() );
for( unsigned i = 0, e =...
2017 Nov 20
2
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 08:42 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 12:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> This is
>>>>
>>>> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to