Kurt
2004-Jun-15 05:29 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: OT: fax obsoleted? Was: Re: Fax via email (Steve Underwood)
Old managers will change its the LaLawyershat don't change. Every dam law office that I been in has at least one fax machine that is constantly printing something out. But to say fax is dead is an understatement. AT&T said that about teletype service, you know 50 - 300 baud service, years ago and then one day they noticed that traffic across their teletype seservicetarted growing. If anyone is going to develop fax fufurtherthey should look into T.38. All the big VoVoIPahardwareendors are developing or have developed T.38 on their gateways. A couple examples: CiCiscond NuNuera- Even this little poky cocompanyalled InInnomedias developing it for their SIP based ATATAs Kurt __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Andrew Kohlsmith
2004-Jun-15 05:56 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: OT: fax obsoleted? Was: Re: Fax via email (Steve Underwood)
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 08:29, Kurt wrote:> Old managers will change its the LaLawyershat don't > change. Every dam law office that I been in has at > least one fax machine that is constantly printing > something out. But to say fax is dead is an > understatement. > AT&T said that about teletype service, you know 50 - > 300 baud service, years ago and then one day they > noticed that traffic across their teletype > seservicetarted growing. > > If anyone is going to develop fax fufurtherthey should > look into T.38. All the big VoVoIPahardwareendors are > developing or have developed T.38 on their gateways. > A couple examples: CiCiscond NuNuera- Even this > little poky cocompanyalled InInnomedias developing it > for their SIP based ATATAsHave ye a keyboard problem? :-) -A.
Steve Underwood
2004-Jun-15 06:36 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: OT: fax obsoleted? Was: Re: Fax via email (Steve Underwood)
Kurt wrote:>Old managers will change its the LaLawyershat don't >change. Every dam law office that I been in has at >least one fax machine that is constantly printing >something out. But to say fax is dead is an >understatement. >AT&T said that about teletype service, you know 50 - >300 baud service, years ago and then one day they >noticed that traffic across their teletype >seservicetarted growing. > >If anyone is going to develop fax fufurtherthey should >look into T.38. All the big VoVoIPahardwareendors are >developing or have developed T.38 on their gateways. >A couple examples: CiCiscond NuNuera- Even this >little poky cocompanyalled InInnomedias developing it >for their SIP based ATATAs > >Kurt > >All joking/justifiable venom aside, lawyers fit my second category of FAX users perfectly - lots of markup to pass around, and lots of documents that need a signature. The next major round of updates to the fax stuff in spandsp should complete the core functions. T.38 is the next step. I build the FAX machine mostly as a platform for fax<->e-mail interface and T.38 Regards, Steve
Reasonably Related Threads
- Re: OT: fax obsoleted? Was: Re: Fax via email (Steve Underwood)
- Re: OT: fax obsoleted? Was: Re: Fax via email (Steve Underwood)
- Re: RES: Working E1 MFC/R2 M?xico !!! (Steve Underwood)
- [LLVMdev] SCEV and induction variable identification
- Non-kbuild klibc obsoleted