Hello all, I'm looking at setting up a sort of 'appliance' server and as such its really not going to have a lot packages etc. I thought of installing 4.2 on a 1gb USB stick, however, the stick is not even recongnized by anaconda. It did appear when I did 'modprobe usb-storage.ko' as /dev/sdc (i have already have 2 SATA disks which are sda, sdb). Then the disk partitioner does not allow me to install on the USB stick, its not even listed as an available drive. Does anyone have any redhat/centos experience with this ? I've successfully managed to get OpenBSD and Ubuntu to install and boot on exactly the same kit so there is nothing wrong hardware wise. I might try and disconnect the SATA drives before attempting the install to see if that make any difference. Thanks. Bards.
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 07:42, Bards1888 wrote:> I'm looking at setting up a sort of 'appliance' server and as such > its really not going to have a lot packages etc.Before you re-invent this particular wheel, you might want to check out the beta 7.x version of SME server at http://contribs.org/modules/phpwiki/index.php?Downloads which is based on Centos4. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
SME 7.x beta series is built on CentOS 4. So it also feels like RHEL. Give it a look see. Chris>>>bards1888 at gmail.com 10/28/05 9:22 am >>>Les Mikesell wrote:>On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 07:42, Bards1888 wrote: > > > >> I'm looking at setting up a sort of 'appliance' server and as such >>its really not going to have a lot packages etc. >> >> > >Before you re-invent this particular wheel, you might want to >check out the beta 7.x version of SME server at >http://contribs.org/modules/phpwiki/index.php?Downloads >which is based on Centos4. > > >Thanks for the link Les, I'm set on Centos, no need for me to try SME, the main reason I like Centos is mainly do to the fact that it 'feels' like RHEL. I dont particularly want to step further away from RHEL towards SME. Did you see my post from yesterday (titled 'Minimal Server Install') where Johnny Hughes said he managed to get Centos 4 down to 550mb ? Also, the tip from Ash Christopher to go here; http://www.owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos/ is fairly useful. I was just providing a bit of background info by mentioning the reduced number of packages. I'm now looking for some help with the USB stuff. Cheers, Brian. CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Bards1888 wrote:> Hello all, > > I'm looking at setting up a sort of 'appliance' server and as such > its really not going to have a lot packages etc. I thought of installing > 4.2 on a 1gb USB stick, however, the stick is not even recongnized by > anaconda. It did appear when I did 'modprobe usb-storage.ko' as /dev/sdc > (i have already have 2 SATA disks which are sda, sdb). Then the disk > partitioner does not allow me to install on the USB stick, its not even > listed as an available drive. Does anyone have any redhat/centos > experience with this ? I've successfully managed to get OpenBSD and > Ubuntu to install and boot on exactly the same kit so there is nothing > wrong hardware wise. I might try and disconnect the SATA drives before > attempting the install to see if that make any difference.RedHat don't support installs on removable drives - see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2005-July/msg00021.html But, looking at the anaconda source - in partedUtils.py at around line 833: if isys.driveIsRemovable(drive) and not flags.expert: DiskSet.skippedDisks.append(drive) continue So it looks like if you boot the installer with 'expert' on the command line it may work. I've just tried this, I can get disk druid to see the USB drive - but I did have to 'go back' and re-try disk druid before it found the USB drive - I didn't get as far as installing (I don't have a 1GB USB stick), but it may work... James Pearson
Possibly Parallel Threads
- anaconda in centOS 4 fails to read md raid arrays
- The new Rocks Linux Cluster Distribution uses CentOS as it's base
- The new Rocks Linux Cluster Distribution uses CentOS as it's base
- Shorewall Documentation Updates, Request for Input
- Centos 4 - text based install - LVM ?