similar to: USB Stick Install

Has anybody encountered this problem? I have a box that has FC2 installed. I wanted to trash the FC2 installation and install CentOS 4. I have a pxeboot/dhcp/kickstart environment and so I tried automatic disk partitioning (clear all partitions and then create new ones), manual disk partitioning but everything else is automated and finally, zero automation, just a manual installation through

The Rocks Linux Cluster Distribution picks CentOS to build it's new distro on: http://www.rocksclusters.org/Rocks/ RocksClusters joins these other projects as picking CentOS for their base OS: SME Server: http://contribs.org/modules/phpwiki/index.php/Upcoming%20Releases%20page OpenFiler: http://www.openfiler.org/sponsors/ Asterisk at Home: http://asteriskathome.sourceforge.net/ We at the

The Rocks Linux Cluster Distribution picks CentOS to build it's new distro on: http://www.rocksclusters.org/Rocks/ RocksClusters joins these other projects as picking CentOS for their base OS: SME Server: http://contribs.org/modules/phpwiki/index.php/Upcoming%20Releases%20page OpenFiler: http://www.openfiler.org/sponsors/ Asterisk at Home: http://asteriskathome.sourceforge.net/ We at the

Hello, I have the go ahead to fix documentation. For starters I will clean all extraneous crap from the markup. Then fix any errors and typos. If anyone sees any gramatical errors or typos or needed clarifications or expansions or whatever, please post them here. Or additional FAQ entries, etc, all will be considered. I hope to keep most of this conversation on the shorewall-devel list. Any

Has anyone gotten this to work ? I can define a raid device but cant put a VG on it. I then tried 'autopartition' and it created an 'LVM' of sorts, when I tried to edit it I wasnt able to as a message appeared saying, LVM editing was not allowed in text mode. Any help ? Cheers, Brian. PS - PIII-500mhz 128mb RAM, 4mb AGP.

Is the new kernel 2.6.9-34 the one that will come with 4.3 ?

I noticed that the changelog for the new kernel 2.6.9-34 on the redhat enterprise watchlist states on of the fixes as; 145061 - SMART support in SATA driver (P1) Does this mean that with that kernel we should be able to interrogate SATA drives now ? Cheers, Bards.

After failing to install on two different machines that were running Windows, I realized that one machine had a bad hard-drive, and the other bad memory. So I've collected the good parts into one machine and installed CentOS with SME. This was the fastest install of Linux I have every seen, 15 minutes done, configured, and running, web and email server. It is a very secure config, no GUI

I've upgraded my x86_64 4.2 box to the latest kernel 2.6.9.34 and tried an lvm snapshot. It worked fine and I was able to mount the snapshot etc. Now I cannot seem to remove the snapshot. If I try a 'lvremove' it asks if I want to remove the 'active' snapshot, if I say yes it just hangs and the box goes to 99% wait io, however the disk lights do not come on during this. The

Hello, I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc. I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it. That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ? The other thing I noticed is

On 7/8/08, Marko A. Jennings <markobiz at bluegargoyle.com> wrote: > On Tue, July 8, 2008 10:03 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On 7/8/08, Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Ross Cavanagh

Hiya, > Ok with me -- if I get too frustrated with DocBook, I''ll just start > editing the HTML again. > > -Tom > Well the fact that VIM is supported by Docbook is a plus .. But I still think the Wiki idea is well .. Lets get the doc at a CVS and Docbook stage .. Walking before running .. plz plz .. Francesca PS: I have thrown Windoze out the Window here (Pardon The

Hi All, What are my e-mail serving options? I need to host POP, IMAP and SMTP. I must admit that non-windows e-mail hosting has always been a chore for me. I remember QMail and QPopper IIRC. -Jason

Hi, OpenSSH 6.9 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This release contains some substantial new features and a number of bugfixes. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable OpenSSH is

Hi All I know this is not a LPRng list but I'm trying to build the latest SRPM from http://lprng.sourceforge.net/DISTRIB/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.27-1.src.rpm so that I may use it on my CentOS 5 box, but it fails with the following errors <snip> + make MAKEPACKAGE=YES if [ "UTILS" = po ] ; then \ for i in po/Makefile* ; do \ if [ -f "$i" ] ;

Hi all, I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. I basically need the following: - firewall - nat - VPN - bandwidth limiting / monitoring - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware - file & printer sharing - RAID support - if possible fail-over / high availability support. I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would like to keep

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Yes it is used in production :-) > > Samba has changed a little bit since 2001 :-D > Yes, I know it has. My point was that I've been working with Samba for quite some time, so this is not all new to me. I've also been contributing to the SME Server project on this front for

I have been running a customized version Amahi for a couple years for my Samba server. It is time for an upgrade, and I will be moving away from Amahi, as they have abandoned Fedora for Ubuntu. Back when I selected Amahi to replace my 15 year old NT server, I looked around and only considered SME Server as an alternative, but they were still on Centos 4.7 with the Centos 5 based version

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote: > NO NO I can't take anymore :-D > > Please read the rest of the thread, it will explain all. People seriously use this in a production environment? The lack of documentation and confusion surrounding pretty basic posix auth is extremely surprising. I'm no noob at *nix admin and

Dear All, Thank you very much to every one on the list for the sincere suggestion and recommendations I have received amazing response from all; I will try to recap a) Use CentOS for server infrastructure and fedora 8 on the workstations b) Use K12ltsp-terminal server and all the client machines as thin clients c) Use CentOS as Server and Ubuntu as client OS d) Use