rspec users - Jan 2011 - undefined method `run_all' for :Array

I''m using the latest ruby 1.9.3-head and recently whenever I run rspec
(2.2+) I get the following error:

I have seen others have run into this issue, but to resolve it just
rolled back to a previous version of rspec or it there a better way?

ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:116:in
`run_hook_filtered'': undefined method `run_all'' for []:Array
(NoMethodError)
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:215:in `eval_after_alls''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:237:in `run''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in `block (2 levels) in
run''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in `map''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in `block in run''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/reporter.rb:12:in `report''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:24:in `run''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:55:in `run_in_process''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:46:in `run''
	from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Kristian Mandrup <kmandrup at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I''m using the latest ruby 1.9.3-head and recently whenever I run
rspec
> (2.2+) I get the following error:
>
> I have seen others have run into this issue, but to resolve it just
> rolled back to a previous version of rspec or it there a better way?
Better is to wait to upgrade to the next version of rspec that fixes the bug:

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/closed#issue/258

To be released as part of rspec-core-2.4 within the next day or so.

Cheers,
David
>
> ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:116:in
> `run_hook_filtered'': undefined method `run_all'' for
[]:Array
> (NoMethodError)
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:215:in
`eval_after_alls''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:237:in `run''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in `block (2 levels) in
> run''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in `map''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in `block in run''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/reporter.rb:12:in `report''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:24:in `run''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:55:in `run_in_process''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:46:in `run''
> ? ? ? ?from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
> core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

David Chelimsky wrote in post #971870:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Kristian Mandrup <kmandrup at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I''m using the latest ruby 1.9.3-head and recently whenever I
run rspec
>> (2.2+) I get the following error:
>>
>> I have seen others have run into this issue, but to resolve it just
>> rolled back to a previous version of rspec or it there a better way?
>
> Better is to wait to upgrade to the next version of rspec that fixes the
> bug:
>
> https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/closed#issue/258
>
> To be released as part of rspec-core-2.4 within the next day or so.
>
> Cheers,
> David
I guess this isn''t fixed? I''m having the same error, and the
version of
rspec that installs is 2.0.1
Unless I''m missing something obvious?

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Yes. It should be fixed. If you upgrade and still get the error, let us
know!

On Thursday, February 7, 2013, Doug Livesey wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote in post #971870:
> > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Kristian Mandrup <kmandrup at
gmail.com<javascript:;>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I''m using the latest ruby 1.9.3-head and recently
whenever I run rspec
> >> (2.2+) I get the following error:
> >>
> >> I have seen others have run into this issue, but to resolve it
just
> >> rolled back to a previous version of rspec or it there a better
way?
> >
> > Better is to wait to upgrade to the next version of rspec that fixes
the
> > bug:
> >
> > https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/closed#issue/258
> >
> > To be released as part of rspec-core-2.4 within the next day or so.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > David
>
> I guess this isn''t fixed? I''m having the same error, and
the version of
> rspec that installs is 2.0.1
> Unless I''m missing something obvious?
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org <javascript:;>
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>

-- 
Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse the brevity and top reply.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20130207/5cb5249f/attachment-0001.html>