Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "example_group".
2008 Oct 18
4
Problems when programmatically defining examples
Hi,
I am trying to code an application that is based on Rspec; I am
programmatically building examples, and launching the runner with a custom
formatter. Here are the code snippets from my app:
Launching the runner:
example_groups =
test_expectation.example_groups_for(system_state)
@output = StringIO.new
options = Spec::Runner::OptionParser.parse(["--format",
"RAutotest::Runner::Formatter"], @output, @output)
example_groups.each {|example_group|
options.ad...
2012 Jan 15
1
NoMethodError: undefined method `expect'
...o
ruby-1.9.2-p290 :005 > expect { 2/0 }.to raise_error
ruby-1.9.2-p290 :006?> end
NoMethodError: undefined method `expect'' for #<Class:0x007fe272270590>
from (irb):5:in `block in irb_binding''
from
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:201:in
`module_eval''
from .../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:201:in
`subclass''
from .../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.8.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:187:in
`describe''
from .../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290...
2012 Oct 26
8
Puppet 3.0 rspec and custom resources
...et-0.1.5/lib/rspec-puppet/support.rb:18:in
`build_catalog_without_cache''
/home/nrhuff/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p358/gems/rspec-puppet-0.1.5/lib/rspec-puppet/support.rb:24:in
`build_catalog''
/home/nrhuff/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p358/gems/rspec-puppet-0.1.5/lib/rspec-puppet/example/class_example_group.rb:55:in
`catalogue''
/home/nrhuff/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p358/gems/rspec-puppet-0.1.5/lib/rspec-puppet/example/class_example_group.rb:7:in
`subject''
/home/nrhuff/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p358/gems/rspec-core-2.11.1/lib/rspec/core/subject.rb:64:in
`should''
/home/nrhuff/repos/...
2013 Mar 28
0
Dude, where's my full description? (bug report & suggested fix in rspec-core 2.13.1)
...red into metadata[:description] after the example
is run, but metadata[:full_description] never gets updated. This results in
the following metadata hash for our example:
{
:caller => ...,
:description => "should == \"an object\"",
:description_args = [],
:example_group => ...,
:example_group_block => #<Proc: ...>,
:execution_result => ...,
}
No :full_description entry in sight.
This means that, when someone calls `example.description` after the test is
run, they get the generated matcher description, because the implementation
of Example#...
2011 Jan 02
3
undefined method `run_all' for :Array
...ersion of rspec or it there a better way?
ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:116:in
`run_hook_filtered'': undefined method `run_all'' for []:Array
(NoMethodError)
from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:215:in `eval_after_alls''
from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:237:in `run''
from /Users/kristianconsult/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-head/gems/rspec-
core-2.3.1/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:27:in `block (2 level...
2008 Jul 08
1
Strange behaviour with pending specs and implementation_backtrace
...experiencing strange behaviour with pending specs and implementation_backtrace.
This is my example_pending implementation in rspactor_formatter.rb:
class RSpactorFormatter
def example_pending(example, message)
spec = SpecObject.new(
:name => example.description,
:example_group_name => @example_group.description,
:state => :pending,
:message => message,
:backtrace => example.implementation_backtrace
)
@remote_service.incoming(:spec_run_example_pending, spec)
end
end
If my code contains a pe...
2011 Jan 06
1
View specs - best practices
...9;t change for every
run.
I could default back down to a single it, but that would defeat the
purpose of writing small tests.
I''ve tried before(:all), but rspec doesn''t like it. It generates the
following error:
Failure/Error: render
NoMethodError:
undefined method `example_group'' for nil:NilClass
Cheers,
Jason
2007 Dec 17
14
Change in isolation behaviour 1.08 - 1.10 ?
Hi,
I just moved from 1.08 to 1.10 and now have one example failing, which,
under 1.08, passed. Is the due to a change in behaviour?
Here''s my spec (removed some passing examples)
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../spec_helper''
describe "A user" do
before(:each) do
@user = User.new
@valid_user = User.new(
:email =>
2007 Nov 26
8
Renaming RailsExample to RailsExampleGroup
Fyi, I made the following renames:
* RailsExample -> RailsExampleGroup
* FunctionalExample -> FunctionalExampleGroup
* ControllerExample -> ControllerExampleGroup
* ViewExample -> ViewExampleGroup
* HelperExample -> HelperExampleGroup
* ModelExample -> ModelExampleGroup
This was done to keep the naming consistent with ExampleGroup.
2009 Jun 25
1
Problems resolving most users with winbind and AD/SFU
...(106)
error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(2207) cmd=160 (SMBnttrans)
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
This type of error also appears when I use subinacl to set group permissions
on files owned by a user who does respond to id or wbinfo -i. I've added the
BUILTIN groups using net sam createbuiltingroup example_group -w MYDOM:
[2009/06/24 16:51:22, 3] passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_gid_from_cache(1107)
fetch gid from cache 50000 -> S-1-5-32-544
[2009/06/24 16:51:22, 3] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(966)
unpack_nt_owners: unable to validate owner sid for S-1-5-32-544
[2009/06/24 16:51:22, 3] smbd/error.c...
2009 Jul 01
0
Problems resolving most users with winbind and AD/SFU (Resolved?)
...ns)
>>> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
>>>
>>> This type of error also appears when I use subinacl to set group permissions
>>> on files owned by a user who does respond to id or wbinfo -i. ?I've added the
>>> BUILTIN groups using net sam createbuiltingroup example_group -w MYDOM:
>>>
>>> [2009/06/24 16:51:22, 3] passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_gid_from_cache(1107)
>>> ?fetch gid from cache 50000 -> S-1-5-32-544
>>> [2009/06/24 16:51:22, 3] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(966)
>>> ?unpack_nt_owners: unable to validate ow...