zfs discuss - Jul 2010 - zfs add -r output

I''ve got a system running s10x_u7wos_08 with only half of the disks
provisioned. When performing a dry run of a zpool add, I''m seeing some
strange output:

root# zpool add -n vst raidz2 c0t2d0 c5t1d0 c4t1d0 c4t5d0 c7t1d0 c7t5d0 c6t1d0
c6t5d0 c1t1d0 c1t5d0 c0t1d0 raidz2 c0t5d0 c0t5d0 c4t4d0 c7t0d0 c7t4d0 c6t0d0
c6t4d0 c1t0d0 c1t4d0 c0t0d0 c0t4d0
would update ''vst'' to the following configuration:
        vst
          raidz2
            c5t3d0
            c5t7d0
            c4t3d0
            c4t7d0
            c7t3d0
            c7t7d0
            c6t3d0
            c6t7d0
            c1t3d0
            c1t7d0
            c0t3d0
          raidz2
            c0t7d0
            c5t2d0
            c5t6d0
            c4t2d0
            c4t6d0
            c7t2d0
            c7t6d0
            c6t2d0
            c6t6d0
            c1t2d0
            c1t6d0
          raidz2
            c0t2
            c5t1
            c4t1
            c4t5
            c7t1
            c7t5
            c6t1
            c6t5
            c1t1
            c1t5
            c0t1
          raidz2
            c0t5
            c0t5
            c4t4
            c7t0
            c7t4
            c6t0
            c6t4
            c1t0
            c1t4
            c0t0
            c0t4

I would expect the new configuration would use the full shorthand device names,
including the d0. Is this normal/expected output for a system on s10x_u7wos_08?

Thanks,
-- 
Ryan Schwartz, UNIX Systems Administrator, VitalSource Technologies, Inc. - An
Ingram Digital Company
Mob: (608) 886-3513 ? ryan.schwartz at ingramdigital.com

Hi Ryan,

You are seeing this CR:

http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916574

zpool add -n displays incorrect structure

This is a display problem only.

Thanks,

Cindy

On 07/22/10 15:54, Ryan Schwartz wrote:
> I''ve got a system running s10x_u7wos_08 with only half of the
disks provisioned. When performing a dry run of a zpool add, I''m seeing
some strange output:
> 
> root# zpool add -n vst raidz2 c0t2d0 c5t1d0 c4t1d0 c4t5d0 c7t1d0 c7t5d0
c6t1d0 c6t5d0 c1t1d0 c1t5d0 c0t1d0 raidz2 c0t5d0 c0t5d0 c4t4d0 c7t0d0 c7t4d0
c6t0d0 c6t4d0 c1t0d0 c1t4d0 c0t0d0 c0t4d0
> would update ''vst'' to the following configuration:
>         vst
>           raidz2
>             c5t3d0
>             c5t7d0
>             c4t3d0
>             c4t7d0
>             c7t3d0
>             c7t7d0
>             c6t3d0
>             c6t7d0
>             c1t3d0
>             c1t7d0
>             c0t3d0
>           raidz2
>             c0t7d0
>             c5t2d0
>             c5t6d0
>             c4t2d0
>             c4t6d0
>             c7t2d0
>             c7t6d0
>             c6t2d0
>             c6t6d0
>             c1t2d0
>             c1t6d0
>           raidz2
>             c0t2
>             c5t1
>             c4t1
>             c4t5
>             c7t1
>             c7t5
>             c6t1
>             c6t5
>             c1t1
>             c1t5
>             c0t1
>           raidz2
>             c0t5
>             c0t5
>             c4t4
>             c7t0
>             c7t4
>             c6t0
>             c6t4
>             c1t0
>             c1t4
>             c0t0
>             c0t4
> 
> I would expect the new configuration would use the full shorthand device
names, including the d0. Is this normal/expected output for a system on
s10x_u7wos_08?
> 
> Thanks,