I was just wondering:
I added a SLOG/ZIL to my new system today...i noticed that the L2ARC shows
up under it''s own heading....but the SLOG/ZIL doesn''t....is
this correct?
see:
capacity operations bandwidth
pool alloc free read write read write
---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
rpool 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0
c6t4d0s0 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0
---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
tank 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M
raidz2 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M
c4t6d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M
c4t5d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c5t7d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c5t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c8t0d0 - - 0 354 0 37.6M
c4t7d0 - - 0 351 0 37.6M
c4t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c5t8d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M
c5t0d0 - - 0 348 0 37.6M
c8t1d0 - - 0 353 0 37.6M
c6t5d0s0 0 8.94G 0 0 0 0
cache - - - - - -
c6t5d0s1 37.5G 0 0 158 0 19.6M
It seems sort of strange to me that it doesn''t look like this instead:
capacity operations bandwidth
pool alloc free read write read write
---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
rpool 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0
c6t4d0s0 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0
---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
tank 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M
raidz2 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M
c4t6d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M
c4t5d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c5t7d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c5t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c8t0d0 - - 0 354 0 37.6M
c4t7d0 - - 0 351 0 37.6M
c4t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M
c5t8d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M
c5t0d0 - - 0 348 0 37.6M
c8t1d0 - - 0 353 0 37.6M
log - - - - - -
c6t5d0s0 0 8.94G 0 0 0 0
cache - - - - - -
c6t5d0s1 37.5G 0 0 158 0 19.6M
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20100525/724b7f5f/attachment.html>
Hi Thomas, This looks like a display bug. I''m seeing it too. Let me know which Solaris release you are running and I will file a bug. Thanks, Cindy On 05/25/10 01:42, Thomas Burgess wrote:> I was just wondering: > > I added a SLOG/ZIL to my new system today...i noticed that the L2ARC > shows up under it''s own heading....but the SLOG/ZIL doesn''t....is this > correct? > > > see: > > > > capacity operations bandwidth > pool alloc free read write read write > ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- > rpool 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 > c6t4d0s0 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 > ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- > tank 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M > raidz2 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M > c4t6d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M > c4t5d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c5t7d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c5t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c8t0d0 - - 0 354 0 37.6M > c4t7d0 - - 0 351 0 37.6M > c4t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c5t8d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M > c5t0d0 - - 0 348 0 37.6M > c8t1d0 - - 0 353 0 37.6M > c6t5d0s0 0 8.94G 0 0 0 0 > cache - - - - - - > c6t5d0s1 37.5G 0 0 158 0 19.6M > > > > It seems sort of strange to me that it doesn''t look like this instead: > > > > > > > capacity operations bandwidth > pool alloc free read write read write > ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- > rpool 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 > c6t4d0s0 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 > ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- > tank 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M > raidz2 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M > c4t6d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M > c4t5d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c5t7d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c5t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c8t0d0 - - 0 354 0 37.6M > c4t7d0 - - 0 351 0 37.6M > c4t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M > c5t8d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M > c5t0d0 - - 0 348 0 37.6M > c8t1d0 - - 0 353 0 37.6M > log - - - - - - > c6t5d0s0 0 8.94G 0 0 0 0 > cache - - - - - - > c6t5d0s1 37.5G 0 0 158 0 19.6M > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
i am running the last release from the genunix page uname -a output: SunOS wonslung-raidz2 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Cindy Swearingen < cindy.swearingen at oracle.com> wrote:> Hi Thomas, > > This looks like a display bug. I''m seeing it too. > > Let me know which Solaris release you are running and > I will file a bug. > > Thanks, > > Cindy > > > On 05/25/10 01:42, Thomas Burgess wrote: > >> I was just wondering: >> >> I added a SLOG/ZIL to my new system today...i noticed that the L2ARC shows >> up under it''s own heading....but the SLOG/ZIL doesn''t....is this correct? >> >> >> see: >> >> >> >> capacity operations bandwidth >> pool alloc free read write read write >> ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >> rpool 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 >> c6t4d0s0 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 >> ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >> tank 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M >> raidz2 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M >> c4t6d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M >> c4t5d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c5t7d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c5t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c8t0d0 - - 0 354 0 37.6M >> c4t7d0 - - 0 351 0 37.6M >> c4t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c5t8d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M >> c5t0d0 - - 0 348 0 37.6M >> c8t1d0 - - 0 353 0 37.6M >> c6t5d0s0 0 8.94G 0 0 0 0 >> cache - - - - - - >> c6t5d0s1 37.5G 0 0 158 0 19.6M >> >> >> >> It seems sort of strange to me that it doesn''t look like this instead: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> capacity operations bandwidth >> pool alloc free read write read write >> ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >> rpool 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 >> c6t4d0s0 15.3G 44.2G 0 0 0 0 >> ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >> tank 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M >> raidz2 10.9T 7.22T 0 2.43K 0 300M >> c4t6d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M >> c4t5d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c5t7d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c5t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c8t0d0 - - 0 354 0 37.6M >> c4t7d0 - - 0 351 0 37.6M >> c4t3d0 - - 0 350 0 37.6M >> c5t8d0 - - 0 349 0 37.6M >> c5t0d0 - - 0 348 0 37.6M >> c8t1d0 - - 0 353 0 37.6M >> log - - - - - - >> c6t5d0s0 0 8.94G 0 0 0 0 >> cache - - - - - - >> c6t5d0s1 37.5G 0 0 158 0 19.6M >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zfs-discuss mailing list >> zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20100525/e473226c/attachment.html>