eXeC001er
2010-May-18 17:19 UTC
[zfs-discuss] spares bug: explain to me status of bug report.
Hi. In bugster i found bug about spares. I can to reproduce the problem. but developer set status "Not a defect". Why? http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6905317 Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20100518/558d0a2a/attachment.html>
Cindy Swearingen
2010-May-18 17:38 UTC
[zfs-discuss] spares bug: explain to me status of bug report.
Hi-- The scenario in the bug report below is that the pool is exported. The spare can''t kick in if the pool is exported. It looks like the issue reported in this CR''s See Also section, CR 6887163 is still open. Thanks, Cindy On 05/18/10 11:19, eXeC001er wrote:> Hi. > > In bugster i found bug about spares. > I can to reproduce the problem. but developer set status "Not a defect". > Why? > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6905317 > > Thanks. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
eXeC001er
2010-May-18 18:08 UTC
[zfs-discuss] spares bug: explain to me status of bug report.
6887163 </bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6887163> 11-Closed:Duplicate (Closed) 6945634 </bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6945634> 11-Closed:Duplicate (Closed) 2010/5/18 Cindy Swearingen <cindy.swearingen at oracle.com>> Hi-- > > The scenario in the bug report below is that the pool is exported. > > The spare can''t kick in if the pool is exported. It looks like the > issue reported in this CR''s See Also section, CR 6887163 is still > open. > > Thanks, > > Cindy > > > On 05/18/10 11:19, eXeC001er wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> In bugster i found bug about spares. I can to reproduce the problem. but >> developer set status "Not a defect". Why? >> >> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6905317 >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zfs-discuss mailing list >> zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20100518/23b98d82/attachment.html>
Cindy Swearingen
2010-May-18 18:56 UTC
[zfs-discuss] spares bug: explain to me status of bug report.
I think the remaining CR is this one: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6911420 cs On 05/18/10 12:08, eXeC001er wrote:> 6887163 > </bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6887163> 11-Closed:Duplicate (Closed) > 6945634 > </bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6945634> 11-Closed:Duplicate (Closed) > > > 2010/5/18 Cindy Swearingen <cindy.swearingen at oracle.com > <mailto:cindy.swearingen at oracle.com>> > > Hi-- > > The scenario in the bug report below is that the pool is exported. > > The spare can''t kick in if the pool is exported. It looks like the > issue reported in this CR''s See Also section, CR 6887163 is still > open. > > Thanks, > > Cindy > > > On 05/18/10 11:19, eXeC001er wrote: > > Hi. > > In bugster i found bug about spares. I can to reproduce the > problem. but developer set status "Not a defect". Why? > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6905317 > > Thanks. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org <mailto:zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > >