I saw some other people have a similar problem but reports claimed this was ''fixed in release 42'' which is many months old, I''m running the latest version. I made a RAIDz2 of 8x500GB which should give me a 3TB pool: zfs list: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pile 269K 2.67T 40.4K /pile What happened to my 330GB? Sam This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:48:25PM -0800, Sam wrote:> I saw some other people have a similar problem but reports claimed > this was ''fixed in release 42'' which is many months old, I''m running > the latest version. I made a RAIDz2 of 8x500GB which should give me a > 3TB pool:How many sectors on these 500GB disks?> zfs list: > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > pile 269K 2.67T 40.4K /pileWhat do you have for zpool list? 3.00TB ~~ 2.73TiB -- Darren Dunham ddunham at taos.com Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
2008/2/13, Sam <sam at smugmug.com>:> I saw some other people have a similar problem but reports claimed this was ''fixed in release 42'' which is many months old, I''m running the latest version. I made a RAIDz2 of 8x500GB which should give me a 3TB pool: >Disk manufacturers use ISO units, where 1k is 1000. ZFS uses "computer" units, where 1k is 1024. So your 500GB is realy 465GB. Check the exact number with format.
zpool list reports 3.67T, df reports 2.71 which is pretty close to 2.73 so I imagine you guys are right in the difference being 465GB vs 500GB for the size of each disc, guess I''ll go pick up another pair :) Thanks! Sam This message posted from opensolaris.org