thr3ads.net - Xen users - [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5 [Jan 2011]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Chu Qiu

2011-Jan-26 12:40 UTC

[Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

Hi !

 

I have install the xen4+centos5 on my server following the post of 

 

the kernel version is 2.6.32.27 which is download from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git

 

But after I reboot the server ,and run the "ifconfig", whose output
likes
the following

 

 

[root@localhost scripts]# ifconfig

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3  

          inet addr:192.168.1.72  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17897 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17091 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:2009054 (1.9 MiB)  TX bytes:3375426 (3.2 MiB)

 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  

          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0

          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host

          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1

          RX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)  TX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)

 

peth0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3  

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17904 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17242 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 

          RX bytes:2363666 (2.2 MiB)  TX bytes:3459069 (3.2 MiB)

          Interrupt:16 Memory:f8000000-f8012800 

 

virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 26:70:02:2E:12:AD  

          inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2714 (2.6 KiB)

 

 

and the output of "brctl show " is:

bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces

eth0            8000.0015c5eb96c3       no              peth0

virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes

 

and the output of "xm list" is 

[root@localhost scripts]# xm list

Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State
Time(s)

Domain-0                                     0   512     4     r-----
1900.3



the libvirtd''s version is 0.8.4

 

I cannot find the network bridge "xenbr0" and "vif0" , so
Did anyone have
met such problem?

 

Please do me a favour!

 

Thank you very much!

 

Chqiu



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Guido Hecken

2011-Jan-26 12:50 UTC

head link

AW: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

Hi,
I think the standard bridge in xen 4.x is now called "eth0".
 
Guido
 


________________________________

Von: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] Im Auftrag von Chu Qiu
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2011 13:40
An: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Betreff: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5



Hi !

 

I have install the xen4+centos5 on my server following the post of 

 

the kernel version is 2.6.32.27 which is download from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git

 

But after I reboot the server ,and run the "ifconfig", whose output
likes the following

 

 

[root@localhost scripts]# ifconfig

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3  

          inet addr:192.168.1.72  Bcast:192.168.1.255
Mask:255.255.255.0

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17897 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17091 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:2009054 (1.9 MiB)  TX bytes:3375426 (3.2 MiB)

 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  

          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0

          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host

          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1

          RX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)  TX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)

 

peth0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3  

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17904 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17242 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 

          RX bytes:2363666 (2.2 MiB)  TX bytes:3459069 (3.2 MiB)

          Interrupt:16 Memory:f8000000-f8012800 

 

virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 26:70:02:2E:12:AD  

          inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255
Mask:255.255.255.0

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2714 (2.6 KiB)

 

 

and the output of "brctl show " is:

bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces

eth0            8000.0015c5eb96c3       no              peth0

virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes

 

and the output of "xm list" is 

[root@localhost scripts]# xm list

Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State
Time(s)

Domain-0                                     0   512     4     r-----
1900.3



the libvirtd''s version is 0.8.4

 

I cannot find the network bridge "xenbr0" and "vif0" , so
Did anyone
have met such problem?

 

Please do me a favour!

 

Thank you very much!

 

Chqiu



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Chu Qiu

2011-Jan-26 12:55 UTC

head link

答复: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

Hi, Thank firstly

 

so where the vif0.0?

 

Is  the output of “brctl show ” correct?

 

bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces

eth0            8000.0015c5eb96c3       no              peth0

virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes

 

 

 

 

发件人: Guido Hecken [mailto:guido.hecken@gwsnettech.de] 
发送时间: 2011年1月26日 20:50
收件人: Chu Qiu; xen-users@lists.xensource.com
主题: AW: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

 

Hi,

I think the standard bridge in xen 4.x is now called "eth0".

 

Guido

 

 

  _____  

Von: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] Im Auftrag von Chu Qiu
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2011 13:40
An: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Betreff: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

Hi !

 

I have install the xen4+centos5 on my server following the post of 

 

the kernel version is 2.6.32.27 which is download from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git

 

But after I reboot the server ,and run the “ifconfig”, whose output likes
the following

 

 

[root@localhost scripts]# ifconfig

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3  

          inet addr:192.168.1.72  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17897 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17091 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:2009054 (1.9 MiB)  TX bytes:3375426 (3.2 MiB)

 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  

          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0

          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host

          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1

          RX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:8898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)  TX bytes:3501148 (3.3 MiB)

 

peth0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:C5:EB:96:C3  

          inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:feeb:96c3/64 Scope:Link

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:17904 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:17242 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 

          RX bytes:2363666 (2.2 MiB)  TX bytes:3459069 (3.2 MiB)

          Interrupt:16 Memory:f8000000-f8012800 

 

virbr0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 26:70:02:2E:12:AD  

          inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

          TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 

          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:2714 (2.6 KiB)

 

 

and the output of “brctl show ” is:

bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces

eth0            8000.0015c5eb96c3       no              peth0

virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes

 

and the output of “xm list” is 

[root@localhost scripts]# xm list

Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State
Time(s)

Domain-0                                     0   512     4     r-----
1900.3

the libvirtd’s version is 0.8.4

 

I cannot find the network bridge “xenbr0” and “vif0” , so Did anyone
have met such problem?

 

Please do me a favour!

 

Thank you very much!

 

Chqiu



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Fajar A. Nugraha

2011-Jan-26 14:09 UTC

head link

Re: 答复: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

2011/1/26 Chu Qiu <chqiu@cuc.edu.cn>:> Hi, Thank firstly
>
> so where the vif0.0?
Nowhere. You don''t need it anyway.
>
> Is  the output of “brctl show ” correct?
>
>
>
> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
>
> eth0            8000.0015c5eb96c3       no              peth0
>
> virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes
>

Yup.

The default network-bridge setup in older versions of Xen use xenbr0
as bridge name, creates vif0.x and vethx (by using netloop module),
renames eth0 to peth0, and renames veth0 to eth0.

Newer network-bridge setup simply uses eth0 as bridge name, not
needing vif0.x and vethx anymore.

-- 
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more possibly parallel threads

Xen users - Jan 2011 - missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

[Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

AW: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

答复: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

Re: 答复: [Xen-users] missing vif.0 port after install xen4+centos5

Possibly Parallel Threads