Hi Everyone, Has anyone had any trouble getting an HVM Windows Server 2003 Std to work problem with the standard (i.e. non-PV) network drivers? For some reasons, packets can be sent out ok however nothing can be received. I do have iptables/ebtables running on the Dom0, however I''ve ran tcpdump on the Windows DomU interface and I see the arp "is-at" packets... Any ideas? Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
I should probably mention that in the WIndows network status screen, I see that the packets received counter is 0.. Thanks On 03/10/10 17:08, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:> Hi Everyone, > > Has anyone had any trouble getting an HVM Windows Server 2003 Std to > work problem with the standard (i.e. non-PV) network drivers? For some > reasons, packets can be sent out ok however nothing can be received. I > do have iptables/ebtables running on the Dom0, however I''ve ran > tcpdump on the Windows DomU interface and I see the arp "is-at" > packets... > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Can you show us the iptables -L -n output? Xen version? Thanks. Kindest regards, Giam Teck Choon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
I suppose the windows firewall is not active? ---- Original message -----> Hi Everyone, > > Has anyone had any trouble getting an HVM Windows Server 2003 Std to > work problem with the standard (i.e. non-PV) network drivers? For some > reasons, packets can be sent out ok however nothing can be received. I > do have iptables/ebtables running on the Dom0, however I''ve ran tcpdump > on the Windows DomU interface and I see the arp "is-at" packets... > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On 03/10/10 17:49, Teck Choon Giam wrote:> Can you show us the iptables -L -n output? Xen version? > > Thanks. > > Kindest regards, > Giam Teck Choon >Hi There, I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the config file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it works ok. Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? Using Xen 3.4.3 Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Sunday 03 October 2010 20:46:36 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:> On 03/10/10 17:49, Teck Choon Giam wrote: > > Can you show us the iptables -L -n output? Xen version? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Kindest regards, > > Giam Teck Choon > > Hi There, > > I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the > config file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it > works ok. > > Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? > Using Xen 3.4.3 > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-usersWill the e1000 work without the PV drivers? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On 03/10/10 21:08, Bart Coninckx wrote:> On Sunday 03 October 2010 20:46:36 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > >> On 03/10/10 17:49, Teck Choon Giam wrote: >> >>> Can you show us the iptables -L -n output? Xen version? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Kindest regards, >>> Giam Teck Choon >>> >> Hi There, >> >> I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the >> config file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it >> works ok. >> >> Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? >> Using Xen 3.4.3 >> >> Thanks >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > Will the e1000 work without the PV drivers? > > >It did when I was using Windows Server 2008... _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Sunday 03 October 2010 22:33:43 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:> On 03/10/10 21:08, Bart Coninckx wrote: > > On Sunday 03 October 2010 20:46:36 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > >> On 03/10/10 17:49, Teck Choon Giam wrote: > >>> Can you show us the iptables -L -n output? Xen version? > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >>> Kindest regards, > >>> Giam Teck Choon > >> > >> Hi There, > >> > >> I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the > >> config file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it > >> works ok. > >> > >> Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? > >> Using Xen 3.4.3 > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Xen-users mailing list > >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > Will the e1000 work without the PV drivers? > > It did when I was using Windows Server 2008...I''ve seen pages about this occuring in Xen 3.2, but I would expect that to be fixed for 3.4 though _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the config > file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it works ok. > > Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? > Using Xen 3.4.3I always use type=ioemu instead for HVM and didn''t encounter any issues. No PV driver. Kindest regards, Giam Teck Choon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On 04/10/10 00:37, Teck Choon Giam wrote:>> I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the config >> file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it works ok. >> >> Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? >> Using Xen 3.4.3 >> > I always use type=ioemu instead for HVM and didn''t encounter any > issues. No PV driver. > > Kindest regards, > Giam Teck Choon >Hi There, I use that as well, but I also specify a model _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@abpni.co.uk> wrote:> > On 04/10/10 00:37, Teck Choon Giam wrote: >>> >>> I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the >>> config >>> file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it works ok. >>> >>> Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? >>> Using Xen 3.4.3 >>> >> >> I always use type=ioemu instead for HVM and didn''t encounter any >> issues. No PV driver. >> >> Kindest regards, >> Giam Teck Choon >> > > Hi There, > > I use that as well, but I also specify a model >I skipped model as throughout my test for all HVM guests... rhel6, windows xp, windows vista, windows 7, win2k3 and windows 2008 all working fine even with antispoof enabled (need to patch though). However, for FreeBSD might need it though. Sorry didn''t test much in Xen HVM for FreeBSD as I test in KVM (sorry little off-topic)... ... Kindest regards, Giam Teck Choon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On 04/10/10 02:34, Teck Choon Giam wrote:> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jonathan Tripathy<jonnyt@abpni.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 04/10/10 00:37, Teck Choon Giam wrote: >> >>>> I managed to "fix" this issue. All I did was change the model in the >>>> config >>>> file. It origanlly was e1000. I changed it to net_2k and now it works ok. >>>> >>>> Any ideas why the e1000 didn''t work properly? >>>> Using Xen 3.4.3 >>>> >>>> >>> I always use type=ioemu instead for HVM and didn''t encounter any >>> issues. No PV driver. >>> >>> Kindest regards, >>> Giam Teck Choon >>> >>> >> Hi There, >> >> I use that as well, but I also specify a model >> >> > I skipped model as throughout my test for all HVM guests... rhel6, > windows xp, windows vista, windows 7, win2k3 and windows 2008 all > working fine even with antispoof enabled (need to patch though). > However, for FreeBSD might need it though. Sorry didn''t test much in > Xen HVM for FreeBSD as I test in KVM (sorry little off-topic)... ... > > Kindest regards, >No need to appoligse :) I believe they both use qemu anyways for the HVM stuff, so it''s probably the same result.. Hmm, by not specifying a model, what model does the HVM guest get? Thanks> Giam Teck Choon >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> No need to appoligse :) I believe they both use qemu anyways for the HVM > stuff, so it''s probably the same result.. > Hmm, by not specifying a model, what model does the HVM guest get? > > Thanks>From log, it is model=rtl8139.Kindest regards, Giam Teck Choon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users