Hi, where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with my new iCore and P55 Board _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - so maybe for your iCore too: http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 http://www.xncore.com/node/141 Best Regards - Michael Schmidt> > Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: >> Hi, >> >> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian ? I >> only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with my new >> iCore and P55 Board >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by myself http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/ but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 the last one is working....and it is hd0,0 i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the reason ? Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt:> Hi, > > try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - so maybe > for your iCore too: > > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > http://www.xncore.com/node/141 > > Best Regards > - Michael Schmidt >> >> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: >>> Hi, >>> >>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian ? I >>> only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with my new >>> iCore and P55 Board >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch : # git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-xen # cd linux-2.6-xen # git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable # make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support) # make Boris. --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger <xen@tegger.de> wrote: From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by myself http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/ but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 the last one is working....and it is hd0,0 i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the reason ? Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt:> Hi, > > try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - so maybe for your iCore too: > > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > http://www.xncore.com/node/141 > > Best Regards > - Michael Schmidt >> >> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: >>> Hi, >>> >>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with my new iCore and P55 Board >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
These should work: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.32.9/ On 8 March 2010 11:20, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:> Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch : > > # git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.gitlinux-2.6-xen > # cd linux-2.6-xen > # git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable > # make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support) > # make > > Boris. > > --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger <xen@tegger.de>* wrote: > > > From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian > To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM > > > so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by myself > http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/<http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Eblank/debian/xen-test/> > > but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too > > > Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on > unknown-block(0,0) > > title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64 > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 root=/dev/sda1 ro > console=tty0 > > title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro > console=tty0 > module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 > > title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet > initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 > > > the last one is working....and it is hd0,0 > > i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the reason ? > > > Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt: > > Hi, > > > > try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - so maybe for > your iCore too: > > > > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > > http://www.xncore.com/node/141 > > > > Best Regards > > - Michael Schmidt > >> > >> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian ? I only > found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with my new iCore and P55 > Board > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Xen-users mailing list > >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com<http://mc/compose?to=Xen-users@lists.xensource.com> > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com<http://mc/compose?to=Xen-users@lists.xensource.com> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com<http://mc/compose?to=Xen-users@lists.xensource.com> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
sorry, but i didn''t found dom0 support option only --- Paravirtualized guest support | |Am 08.03.2010 12:20, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:> Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch : > > |# git clone > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-xen > # cd linux-2.6-xen > # git checkout -b xen/stable origin/||xen/stable > # make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support) > # make > > Boris. > | > --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: > > > From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian > To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM > > so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by myself > http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/ > <http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Eblank/debian/xen-test/> > > but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too > > > Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on > unknown-block(0,0) > > title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64 > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 root=/dev/sda1 > ro console=tty0 > > title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel > 2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro > console=tty0 > module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 > > title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro > quiet > initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 > > > the last one is working....and it is hd0,0 > > i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the reason ? > > > Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt: > > Hi, > > > > try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - so > maybe for your iCore too: > > > > > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > > > http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 > > http://www.xncore.com/node/141 > > > > Best Regards > > - Michael Schmidt > >> > >> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian > ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with > my new iCore and P55 Board > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Xen-users mailing list > >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > </mc/compose?to=Xen-users@lists.xensource.com> > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > </mc/compose?to=Xen-users@lists.xensource.com> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > </mc/compose?to=Xen-users@lists.xensource.com> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Am 08.03.2010 12:22, schrieb David Markey:> These should work: > > http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.32.9/ > <http://kernel.ubuntu.com/%7Ekernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.32.9/> >No.... title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-02063209 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-02063209-generic root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-02063209-generic not with this grup option title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-02063209-generic (single-user mode) root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-02063209-generic root=/dev/sda1 ro single initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-02063209-generic and so without xen functionality _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Required screen shots for pvops tuning are here (4 total).
Kernel is old,but actions should be same :-
http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/setup-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-top-of-ubuntu-9-04-server-via-marc-a-dahlhauss-udev-patch/
Boris
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger <xen@tegger.de> wrote:
From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 7:22 PM
sorry, but i didn''t found dom0 support option
only
--- Paravirtualized guest support
Am 08.03.2010 12:20, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:
Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch :
# git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
linux-2.6-xen
# cd linux-2.6-xen
# git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable
# make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support)
# make
Boris.
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger <xen@tegger.de> wrote:
From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian
To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM
so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by
myself
http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/
but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too
Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz
module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 root=/dev/sda1 ro
console=tty0
title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel
2.6.32-3-xen-amd64
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz
module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro
console=tty0
module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64
title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
the last one is working....and it is hd0,0
i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the reason ?
Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt:
> Hi,
>
> try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - so
maybe for your iCore too:
>
> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2
> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2
> http://www.xncore.com/node/141
>
> Best Regards
> - Michael Schmidt
>>
>> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with
debian ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with
my new iCore and P55 Board
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
yes, only some more options, but i get stopped by mounts_rd.o CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86 CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK include/linux/compile.h CC init/do_mounts.o CC init/do_mounts_rd.o init/do_mounts_rd.c:326: internal compiler error: Speicherzugriffsfehler Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions. make[1]: *** [init/do_mounts_rd.o] Fehler 1 make: *** [init] Fehler 2 Am 09.03.2010 01:49, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:> Required screen shots for pvops tuning are here (4 total). > Kernel is old,but actions should be same :- > > http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/setup-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-top-of-ubuntu-9-04-server-via-marc-a-dahlhauss-udev-patch/ > > Boris > > --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: > > > From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 7:22 PM > > sorry, but i didn''t found dom0 support option > only > --- Paravirtualized guest support | > > > |Am 08.03.2010 12:20, schrieb Boris Derzhavets: >> Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch : >> >> |# git clone >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git >> linux-2.6-xen >> # cd linux-2.6-xen >> # git checkout -b xen/stable origin/||xen/stable >> # make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support) >> # make >> >> Boris. >> | >> --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: >> >> >> From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian >> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM >> >> so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by myself >> http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/ >> <http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Eblank/debian/xen-test/> >> >> but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too >> >> >> Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on >> unknown-block(0,0) >> >> title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel >> 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64 >> root (hd0,0) >> kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz >> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 >> root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 >> >> title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel >> 2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >> root (hd0,0) >> kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz >> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >> root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 >> module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >> >> title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >> root (hd0,0) >> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >> root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet >> initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >> >> >> the last one is working....and it is hd0,0 >> >> i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the reason ? >> >> >> Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt: >> > Hi, >> > >> > try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - >> so maybe for your iCore too: >> > >> > >> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 >> > >> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 >> > http://www.xncore.com/node/141 >> > >> > Best Regards >> > - Michael Schmidt >> >> >> >> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with >> debian ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t >> work with my new iCore and P55 Board >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
gunzip attached and copy as .config to building directory.
Then run make.
Boris.
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger <xen@tegger.de> wrote:
From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 8:08 PM
yes, only some more options, but i get stopped by mounts_rd.o
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC init/do_mounts.o
CC init/do_mounts_rd.o
init/do_mounts_rd.c:326: internal compiler error: Speicherzugriffsfehler
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [init/do_mounts_rd.o] Fehler 1
make: *** [init] Fehler 2
Am 09.03.2010 01:49, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:
Required screen shots for pvops tuning are here (4
total).
Kernel is old,but actions should be same :-
http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/setup-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-top-of-ubuntu-9-04-server-via-marc-a-dahlhauss-udev-patch/
Boris
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger <xen@tegger.de> wrote:
From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 7:22 PM
sorry, but i didn''t found dom0 support option
only
--- Paravirtualized guest support
Am 08.03.2010 12:20, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:
Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch :
# git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
linux-2.6-xen
# cd linux-2.6-xen
# git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable
# make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support)
# make
Boris.
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger <xen@tegger.de>
wrote:
From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian
To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM
so i found some 2.6.32 xen
kernel by
myself
http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/
but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too
Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz
module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 root=/dev/sda1 ro
console=tty0
title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel
2.6.32-3-xen-amd64
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz
module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro
console=tty0
module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64
title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
the last one is working....and it is hd0,0
i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the reason ?
Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt:
> Hi,
>
> try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon 5500 - so
maybe for your iCore too:
>
> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2
> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2
> http://www.xncore.com/node/141
>
> Best Regards
> - Michael Schmidt
>>
>> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with
debian ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with
my new iCore and P55 Board
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
hmm, cool, it was working a little bit longer until CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86 CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh CC init/main.o init/main.c:902: internal compiler error: Speicherzugriffsfehler Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions. make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Fehler 1 make: *** [init] Fehler 2 Am 09.03.2010 12:35, schrieb Boris Derzhavets:> gunzip attached and copy as .config to building directory. > Then run make. > > Boris. > > --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: > > > From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 8:08 PM > > yes, only some more options, but i get stopped by mounts_rd.o > > CHK include/linux/version.h > CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h > SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86 > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > CHK include/linux/compile.h > CC init/do_mounts.o > CC init/do_mounts_rd.o > init/do_mounts_rd.c:326: internal compiler error: > Speicherzugriffsfehler > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions. > make[1]: *** [init/do_mounts_rd.o] Fehler 1 > make: *** [init] Fehler 2 > > > > > Am 09.03.2010 01:49, schrieb Boris Derzhavets: >> Required screen shots for pvops tuning are here (4 total). >> Kernel is old,but actions should be same :- >> >> http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/setup-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-top-of-ubuntu-9-04-server-via-marc-a-dahlhauss-udev-patch/ >> >> Boris >> >> --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: >> >> >> From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian >> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> >> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 7:22 PM >> >> sorry, but i didn''t found dom0 support option >> only >> --- Paravirtualized guest support | >> >> >> |Am 08.03.2010 12:20, schrieb Boris Derzhavets: >>> Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch : >>> >>> |# git clone >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git >>> linux-2.6-xen >>> # cd linux-2.6-xen >>> # git checkout -b xen/stable origin/||xen/stable >>> # make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support) >>> # make >>> >>> Boris. >>> | >>> --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: >>> >>> >>> From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> >>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian >>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM >>> >>> so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by myself >>> http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/ >>> <http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Eblank/debian/xen-test/> >>> >>> but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too >>> >>> >>> Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root >>> fs on unknown-block(0,0) >>> >>> title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel >>> 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64 >>> root (hd0,0) >>> kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz >>> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 >>> root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 >>> >>> title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, kernel >>> 2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >>> root (hd0,0) >>> kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz >>> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >>> root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 >>> module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >>> >>> title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >>> root (hd0,0) >>> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >>> root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet >>> initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >>> >>> >>> the last one is working....and it is hd0,0 >>> >>> i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the >>> reason ? >>> >>> >>> Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon >>> 5500 - so maybe for your iCore too: >>> > >>> > >>> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 >>> > >>> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 >>> > http://www.xncore.com/node/141 >>> > >>> > Best Regards >>> > - Michael Schmidt >>> >> >>> >> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working >>> with debian ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but >>> this didn''t work with my new iCore and P55 Board >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
okay, i found an RAM Error, now i must do a reclamation Am 10.03.2010 00:26, schrieb Tegger:> hmm, cool, it was working a little bit longer until > > CHK include/linux/version.h > CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h > SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86 > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > CC init/main.o > init/main.c:902: internal compiler error: Speicherzugriffsfehler > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions. > make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Fehler 1 > make: *** [init] Fehler 2 > > > > > Am 09.03.2010 12:35, schrieb Boris Derzhavets: >> gunzip attached and copy as .config to building directory. >> Then run make. >> >> Boris. >> >> --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: >> >> >> From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian >> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> >> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 8:08 PM >> >> yes, only some more options, but i get stopped by mounts_rd.o >> >> CHK include/linux/version.h >> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h >> SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86 >> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >> CHK include/linux/compile.h >> CC init/do_mounts.o >> CC init/do_mounts_rd.o >> init/do_mounts_rd.c:326: internal compiler error: >> Speicherzugriffsfehler >> Please submit a full bug report, >> with preprocessed source if appropriate. >> See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions. >> make[1]: *** [init/do_mounts_rd.o] Fehler 1 >> make: *** [init] Fehler 2 >> >> >> >> >> Am 09.03.2010 01:49, schrieb Boris Derzhavets: >>> Required screen shots for pvops tuning are here (4 total). >>> Kernel is old,but actions should be same :- >>> >>> http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/25/setup-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-top-of-ubuntu-9-04-server-via-marc-a-dahlhauss-udev-patch/ >>> >>> Boris >>> >>> --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: >>> >>> >>> From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> >>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian >>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> >>> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 7:22 PM >>> >>> sorry, but i didn''t found dom0 support option >>> only >>> --- Paravirtualized guest support | >>> >>> >>> |Am 08.03.2010 12:20, schrieb Boris Derzhavets: >>>> Could you build yourself 2.6.32.9 from scratch : >>>> >>>> |# git clone >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-xen >>>> # cd linux-2.6-xen >>>> # git checkout -b xen/stable origin/||xen/stable >>>> # make menuconfig ( enable Xen Dom0 support) >>>> # make >>>> >>>> Boris. >>>> | >>>> --- On *Mon, 3/8/10, Tegger /<xen@tegger.de>/* wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Tegger <xen@tegger.de> >>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian >>>> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>>> Date: Monday, March 8, 2010, 5:55 AM >>>> >>>> so i found some 2.6.32 xen kernel by myself >>>> http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test/ >>>> <http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Eblank/debian/xen-test/> >>>> >>>> but there are a kernel panic, with xncore kernel too >>>> >>>> >>>> Kernel panix - not syncing : VFS: Unable to mount root >>>> fs on unknown-block(0,0) >>>> >>>> title Xen 3.4-amd64 / XNCore , kernel >>>> 2.6.31-8-xen-amd64 >>>> root (hd0,0) >>>> kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz >>>> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001 >>>> root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 >>>> >>>> title Xen 3.4-amd64 / Debian GNU/Linux, >>>> kernel 2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >>>> root (hd0,0) >>>> kernel /boot/xen-3.4-amd64.gz >>>> module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >>>> root=/dev/sda1 ro console=tty0 >>>> module /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-3-xen-amd64 >>>> >>>> title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >>>> root (hd0,0) >>>> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >>>> root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet >>>> initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 >>>> >>>> >>>> the last one is working....and it is hd0,0 >>>> >>>> i have used reiserfs instead of ext3, could this be the >>>> reason ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 08.03.2010 09:11, schrieb Michael Schmidt: >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > try the following one, it works with lenny and xeon >>>> 5500 - so maybe for your iCore too: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-image-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 >>>> > >>>> http://www.xncore.com/kernel/linux-source-2.6.31.8-xncore-1001.tar.bz2 >>>> > http://www.xncore.com/node/141 >>>> > >>>> > Best Regards >>>> > - Michael Schmidt >>>> >> >>>> >> Am 07.03.10 21:55, schrieb Tegger: >>>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working >>>> with debian ? I only found patches for .31 Kernel, but >>>> this didn''t work with my new iCore and P55 Board >>>> >>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hello, Am 07.03.2010 um 21:55 Uhr schrieb Tegger <xen@tegger.de>:> where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian ? I only > found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with my new iCore and > P55 Boardit seems 2.6.32-10 is in the NEW queue: http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html There will be a xen (dom0) flavor :-) Great! -- greetings eMHa _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Yeah!!! Great news! http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 support linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! Cheers! Thiago On 17 March 2010 16:46, Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net>wrote:> Hello, > > Am 07.03.2010 um 21:55 Uhr schrieb Tegger <xen@tegger.de>: > > where can i find a 2.6.32 Kernel which is working with debian ? I only > > found patches for .31 Kernel, but this didn''t work with my new iCore and > > P55 Board > > it seems 2.6.32-10 is in the NEW queue: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html > > There will be a xen (dom0) flavor :-) Great! > > > -- > greetings > > eMHa > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hello, Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>:> Yeah!!! Great news! > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 > support > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 > support > It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?!i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now i''ve found no definite information about that. Another info about the kernel: http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release -- greetings eMHa _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
I''ve built 2.6.32.10 via checkout from JF''s Git Repo on Ubuntu 9.10 Server with no problems. What''s wrong with Debian Squeeze ? B. --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net> wrote: From: Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian To: "Martinx - ジェームズ" <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 4:21 AM Hello, Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>:> Yeah!!! Great news! > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 > support > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 > support > It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?!i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now i''ve found no definite information about that. Another info about the kernel: http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release -- greetings eMHa -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hello, Am 18.03.2010 um 11:48 Uhr schrieb Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>:> I''ve built 2.6.32.10 via checkout from JF''s Git Repo on Ubuntu 9.10 Server > with no problems. What''s wrong with Debian Squeeze ?nothing is wrong. We''re just happy that Debian squeeze will now have a xen dom0 kernel!> --- On Thu, 3/18/10, Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net> wrote: > > From: Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.32 Kernel Debian > To: "Martinx - ジェームズ" <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com> > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Date: Thursday, March 18, 2010, 4:21 AM > > Hello, > > Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ジェームズ > > <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>: > > Yeah!!! Great news! > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 > > support > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 > > support > > It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! > > i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now i''ve > found no definite information about that. > > Another info about the kernel: > http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-relea >se-- greetings eMHa _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi! The Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org is a rock solid. I REALLY do not understand why the Debian Xen Team just don''t pack the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org for Squeeze dom0, if there are no stable options available out there. *What is the point in make a hard work to get a unstable system?* As the Lenny (dom0) and the Hardy (dom0), for example?!? *No one actually are using it!* I never use in a production environment, the Xen packaged from some distribution. They always have a bug here and there... Then I am forced to manually compile Xen and Linux from xen.org and all my problems go away as magic! And if Debian Squeeze works seamlessly with the Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen, I believe that the maintainers of the Xen in the Debian SHOULD only pack the sources from xen.org WITHOUT any significant modifications. Of course, only when you want a dom0. Some will say that the Linux 2.8.18.8 is prehistoric but, then why not use the same kernel used in the project XCP, the kernel-2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065.src.rpm for the Squeeze? It is stable too and much more recent than the 2.6.18! Regards, Thiago 2010/3/18 Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net>> Hello, > > Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ジェА璽爛 > <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>: > > Yeah!!! Great news! > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 > > support > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 > > support > > It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! > > i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now i''ve > found > no definite information about that. > > Another info about the kernel: > > http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release > > > -- > greetings > > eMHa >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi, Well : who fix the security problems from the 2.6.18 ? And it doesn''t boot at all on modern hardware. Who use the dom0 kernel from lenny on production ? Me, at least on some simple setup, and the pv_ops kernel on others setup. If my actual pv_ops kernel is part of Squeeze, I really really be happy to don''t have to maintain it anymore. The pv_ops dom0 kernel is the futur of Xen, so it''s logic that Debian choose it for his *future* version. Olivier On 18/03/2010 17:43, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:> Hi! > > The Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org is a rock solid. > > I REALLY do not understand why the Debian Xen Team just don''t pack > the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org for Squeeze dom0, if there > are no stable options available out there. > > *What is the point in make a hard work to get a unstable system?* As > the Lenny (dom0) and the Hardy (dom0), for example?!? _No one actually > are using it!_ > > I never use in a production environment, the Xen packaged from some > distribution. They always have a bug here and there... Then I am > forced to manually compile Xen and Linux from xen.org <http://xen.org> > and all my problems go away as magic! > > And if Debian Squeeze works seamlessly with the Xen and the Linux > 2.6.18.8-xen, I believe that the maintainers of the Xen in the Debian > SHOULD only pack the sources from xen.org <http://xen.org> WITHOUT any > significant modifications. Of course, only when you want a dom0. > > Some will say that the Linux 2.8.18.8 is prehistoric but, then why > not use the same kernel used in the project XCP, the > kernel-2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065.src.rpm for the Squeeze? It is > stable too and much more recent than the 2.6.18! > > Regards, > Thiago > > 2010/3/18 Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net > <mailto:Markus@hochholdinger.net>> > > Hello, > > Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ジェームズ > <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com <mailto:thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>>: > > Yeah!!! Great news! > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen > dom0 > > support > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, > Xen dom0 > > support > > It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! > > i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now > i''ve found > no definite information about that. > > Another info about the kernel: > http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release > > > -- > greetings > > eMHa > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Hi! For sure! I agree with you! Today I have, for the first time, the Xen, the Linux (2.6.32.9 pvops dom0) and a composite enabled dom0 Desktop! I can see that this mess from the past is going to change... But when? The Debian team maybe can delay the freeze of the Squeeze for after the release of the Xen 4.0 and the pvops dom0 support in mainline Linux? - Thiago On 18 March 2010 13:53, Olivier B. <xen.list@daevel.fr> wrote:> Hi, > > Well : who fix the security problems from the 2.6.18 ? And it doesn''t boot > at all on modern hardware. > > Who use the dom0 kernel from lenny on production ? Me, at least on some > simple setup, and the pv_ops kernel on others setup. > If my actual pv_ops kernel is part of Squeeze, I really really be happy to > don''t have to maintain it anymore. > > The pv_ops dom0 kernel is the futur of Xen, so it''s logic that Debian > choose it for his *future* version. > > Olivier > > > On 18/03/2010 17:43, Martinx - ジェА璽爛 wrote: > > Hi! > > The Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org is a rock solid. > > I REALLY do not understand why the Debian Xen Team just don''t pack the > Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from http://xen.org for Squeeze dom0, if there are no > stable options available out there. > > *What is the point in make a hard work to get a unstable system?* As the > Lenny (dom0) and the Hardy (dom0), for example?!? *No one actually are > using it!* > > I never use in a production environment, the Xen packaged from some > distribution. They always have a bug here and there... Then I am forced to > manually compile Xen and Linux from xen.org and all my problems go away as > magic! > > And if Debian Squeeze works seamlessly with the Xen and the Linux > 2.6.18.8-xen, I believe that the maintainers of the Xen in the Debian SHOULD > only pack the sources from xen.org WITHOUT any significant modifications. > Of course, only when you want a dom0. > > Some will say that the Linux 2.8.18.8 is prehistoric but, then why not use > the same kernel used in the project XCP, the > kernel-2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065.src.rpm for the Squeeze? It is > stable too and much more recent than the 2.6.18! > > Regards, > Thiago > > 2010/3/18 Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@hochholdinger.net> > >> Hello, >> >> Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ジェА璽爛 >> <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>: >> > Yeah!!! Great news! >> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html >> > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 >> > support >> > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 >> > support >> > It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! >> >> i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now i''ve >> found >> no definite information about that. >> >> Another info about the kernel: >> >> http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release >> >> >> -- >> greetings >> >> eMHa >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.comhttp://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:43:30PM -0300, Martinx - ?$B%8%''!<%`%: wrote:> Hi! > >  The Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from [1]http://xen.org is a rock > solid. > >  I REALLY do not understand why the Debian Xen Team just don''t pack the > Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from [2]http://xen.org for Squeeze dom0, if there are > no stable options available out there. >linux-2.6.18-xen from xen.org doesn''t have the latest security updates in it, so it would be extra work for distribution kernel maintainers to manage security updates for another/extra kernel.>  What is the point in make a hard work to get a unstable system? As the > Lenny (dom0) and the Hardy (dom0), for example?!? No one actually are > using it! >Distributions like Debian don''t have dedicated full-time developers that can troubleshoot, debug and fix bugs. So Debian wants to rely on the long-term supported 2.6.32 kernel for Squeeze, because it will be included in other distributions aswell, so the patches for bugs are much easier to get, since there are much more developers working and maintaining the kernel.>  I never use in a production environment, the Xen packaged from some > distribution. They always have a bug here and there... Then I am forced to > manually compile Xen and Linux from [3]xen.org and all my problems go away > as magic! >Yeah, linux-2.6.18-xen is stable, if it supports your hardware.>  And if Debian Squeeze works seamlessly with the Xen and the Linux > 2.6.18.8-xen, I believe that the maintainers of the Xen in the Debian > SHOULD only pack the sources from [4]xen.org WITHOUT any significant > modifications. Of course, only when you want a dom0. >The upcoming Xen 4.0.0 release from xen.org will be using pv_ops dom0 kernel (2.6.32) as a default! linux-2.6.18-xen will still work with xen 4.0.0 hypervisor, but linux-2.6.18-xen is not the default or recommended kernel for Xen 4.0.0+ anymore.>  Some will say that the Linux 2.8.18.8 is prehistoric but, then why not > use the same kernel used in the project XCP, the > kernel-2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065.src.rpm for the Squeeze? It is > stable too and much more recent than the 2.6.18! >It''s again about the maintenance, and the amount of work needed to do it. Debian wants to ship just a single kernel! -- Pasi> Regards, > Thiago > > 2010/3/18 Markus Hochholdinger <[5]Markus@hochholdinger.net> > > Hello, > > Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ã*žã*§ã*Œã* ã*º > <[6]thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>: > > Yeah!!! Great news! > > >  [7]http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > >  linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 > > support > >  linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen > dom0 > > support > >  It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! > > i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now i''ve > found > no definite information about that. > > Another info about the kernel: > [8]http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release > > -- > greetings > > eMHa > > References > > Visible links > 1. http://xen.org/ > 2. http://xen.org/ > 3. http://xen.org/ > 4. http://xen.org/ > 5. mailto:Markus@hochholdinger.net > 6. mailto:thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com > 7. http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > 8. http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release> _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:00:59PM -0300, Martinx - ?$B%8%''!<%`%: wrote:> Hi! > > For sure! I agree with you! Today I have, for the first time, the Xen, > the Linux (2.6.32.9 pvops dom0) and a composite enabled dom0 Desktop! I > can see that this mess from the past is going to change... But when? >Yep.. pv_ops dom0 is getting there!> The Debian team maybe can delay the freeze of the Squeeze for after the > release of the Xen 4.0 and the pvops dom0 support in mainline Linux? >Just remember Xen is just one part of Debian, there are thousands of other packages aswell. So I''m not sure if they''ll decide release dates based only on Xen. Also feel free to offer your help for the Debian kernel team and Xen maintenance team, I''m sure they''ll accept all the help they can get. -- Pasi> - > Thiago > > On 18 March 2010 13:53, Olivier B. <[1]xen.list@daevel.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > Well : who fix the security problems from the 2.6.18 ? And it doesn''t > boot at all on modern hardware. > > Who use the dom0 kernel from lenny on production ? Me, at least on some > simple setup, and the pv_ops kernel on others setup. > If my actual pv_ops kernel is part of Squeeze, I really really be happy > to don''t have to maintain it anymore. > > The pv_ops dom0 kernel is the futur of Xen, so it''s logic that Debian > choose it for his *future* version. > > Olivier > > On 18/03/2010 17:43, Martinx - .$B%8%''!<%`%:.(B wrote: > > Hi! > > The Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from [2]http://xen.org is a rock > solid. > > I REALLY do not understand why the Debian Xen Team just don''t pack > the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from [3]http://xen.org for Squeeze dom0, if > there are no stable options available out there. > > What is the point in make a hard work to get a unstable system? As > the Lenny (dom0) and the Hardy (dom0), for example?!? No one actually > are using it! > > I never use in a production environment, the Xen packaged from some > distribution. They always have a bug here and there... Then I am > forced to manually compile Xen and Linux from [4]xen.org and all my > problems go away as magic! > > And if Debian Squeeze works seamlessly with the Xen and the Linux > 2.6.18.8-xen, I believe that the maintainers of the Xen in the Debian > SHOULD only pack the sources from [5]xen.org WITHOUT any significant > modifications. Of course, only when you want a dom0. > > Some will say that the Linux 2.8.18.8 is prehistoric but, then why > not use the same kernel used in the project XCP, the > kernel-2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065.src.rpm for the Squeeze? It is > stable too and much more recent than the 2.6.18! > > Regards, > Thiago > > 2010/3/18 Markus Hochholdinger <[6]Markus@hochholdinger.net> > > Hello, > > Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - .$B%8%''!<%`%:.(B > <[7]thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>: > > Yeah!!! Great news! > > > [8]http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen > dom0 > > support > > linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen > dom0 > > support > > It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! > > i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now > i''ve found > no definite information about that. > > Another info about the kernel: > [9]http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release > > -- > greetings > > eMHa > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > [10]Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > [11]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > [12]Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > [13]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:xen.list@daevel.fr > 2. http://xen.org/ > 3. http://xen.org/ > 4. http://xen.org/ > 5. http://xen.org/ > 6. mailto:Markus@hochholdinger.net > 7. mailto:thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com > 8. http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > 9. http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release > 10. mailto:Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > 11. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > 12. mailto:Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > 13. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users> _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Thank you guys for the clarification! I can''t wait to see the mainline Linux with dom0 support! ^_^ On 18 March 2010 16:02, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:43:30PM -0300, Martinx - ?$B%8%''!<%`%: wrote: > > Hi! > > > >  The Xen and the Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from [1]http://xen.org is a rock > > solid. > > > >  I REALLY do not understand why the Debian Xen Team just don''t pack > the > > Linux 2.6.18.8-xen from [2]http://xen.org for Squeeze dom0, if there > are > > no stable options available out there. > > > > linux-2.6.18-xen from xen.org doesn''t have the latest security updates in > it, > so it would be extra work for distribution kernel maintainers to manage > security updates for another/extra kernel. > > >  What is the point in make a hard work to get a unstable system? As > the > > Lenny (dom0) and the Hardy (dom0), for example?!? No one actually are > > using it! > > > > Distributions like Debian don''t have dedicated full-time developers that > can > troubleshoot, debug and fix bugs. > > So Debian wants to rely on the long-term supported 2.6.32 kernel for > Squeeze, > because it will be included in other distributions aswell, so the patches > for bugs are much easier to get, since there are much more developers > working and > maintaining the kernel. > > >  I never use in a production environment, the Xen packaged from some > > distribution. They always have a bug here and there... Then I am > forced to > > manually compile Xen and Linux from [3]xen.org and all my problems go > away > > as magic! > > > > Yeah, linux-2.6.18-xen is stable, if it supports your hardware. > > >  And if Debian Squeeze works seamlessly with the Xen and the Linux > > 2.6.18.8-xen, I believe that the maintainers of the Xen in the Debian > > SHOULD only pack the sources from [4]xen.org WITHOUT any significant > > modifications. Of course, only when you want a dom0. > > > > The upcoming Xen 4.0.0 release from xen.org will be using pv_ops dom0 > kernel (2.6.32) as a default! > > linux-2.6.18-xen will still work with xen 4.0.0 hypervisor, but > linux-2.6.18-xen is not the default or > recommended kernel for Xen 4.0.0+ anymore. > > >  Some will say that the Linux 2.8.18.8 is prehistoric but, then why > not > > use the same kernel used in the project XCP, the > > kernel-2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065.src.rpm for the Squeeze? It is > > stable too and much more recent than the 2.6.18! > > > > It''s again about the maintenance, and the amount of work needed to do it. > Debian wants to ship just a single kernel! > > -- Pasi > > > Regards, > > Thiago > > > > 2010/3/18 Markus Hochholdinger <[5]Markus@hochholdinger.net> > > > > Hello, > > > > Am 17.03.2010 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Martinx - ã*žã*§ã*Œã* ã*º > > <[6]thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>: > > > Yeah!!! Great news! > > > > >  [7] > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > > >  linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen > dom0 > > > support > > >  linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, > Xen > > dom0 > > > support > > >  It will be a paravirt_ops or the SUSE port forward?! > > > > i''m not sure, it rumours it will be a pv_ops kernel. But till now > i''ve > > found > > no definite information about that. > > > > Another info about the kernel: > > [8] > http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release > > > > -- > > greetings > > > > eMHa > > > > References > > > > Visible links > > 1. http://xen.org/ > > 2. http://xen.org/ > > 3. http://xen.org/ > > 4. http://xen.org/ > > 5. mailto:Markus@hochholdinger.net > > 6. mailto:thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com > > 7. > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6/news/20100317T161016Z.html > > 8. > http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/debian-linux-packages-the-big-bang-release > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users