Bruce Montague
2006-Dec-31 20:15 UTC
[Xen-users] What distro is best to use when tracking xen-unstable?
Hi, xen-users. Here is a naive question! I have been building and using xen-unstable daily on one machine for a couple of months and also using stock xen binary distributions on other machines. (I''ve primarily been using FC6; so far this has mostly been a learning exercise.) Many of the problems I''ve experienced using xen-unstable seem to have been due to "normal" incompatible/out-of-phase versions and upgrade paths between xen, the distribution, and other external packages (Much of this likely reflects the xen 2.6.16 kernel vs. FC6 2.6.18 kernel issue.) Is there a recommended Linux distribution/version to use when tracking xen-unstable, if one''s goal is to track xen-unstable while also having a source-development platform (not necessarily just for xen)? Is there a "stock" distro/version used by the xen development team, or by a large percentage of the xen core team? Is it best practice in this situation to stick with a 2.6.16 environment? Basically, what is the most tested/used environment for xen and xen-related development, given no other pre-conditions? I''m not partial to any particular Linux distribution. In regard to *ix development I''m coming from a FreeBSD source-centric background. I''d really like to build everthing, xen, kernel, apps, etc., from source, whenever, while maximizing the probability that such builds will not fail and also maximizing my general compatibility with other folks tracking xen-unstable. Thus, I image a Debian distro would be my best bet, but which one? Any advice most appreciated, - bruce _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users