Xen devel - Oct 2010 - IDT location safe if > 4GB?

Are there any known or potential problems with Xen''s xmallocing the
secondary cores'' IDT tables from a memory region whose physical address
is higher than 4GB?

 

Thanks

Roger R. Cruz



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 29/10/2010 08:00, "Roger Cruz"
<roger.cruz@virtualcomputer.com> wrote:
> Are there any known or potential problems with Xen¹s xmallocing the
secondary
> cores¹ IDT tables from a memory region whose physical address is higher
than
> 4GB?
No.

 - Keir
> Thanks
> Roger R. Cruz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Thanks Keir. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.xen@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 3:12 AM
To: Roger Cruz; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] IDT location safe if > 4GB?

On 29/10/2010 08:00, "Roger Cruz"
<roger.cruz@virtualcomputer.com> wrote:
> Are there any known or potential problems with Xen¹s xmallocing the
secondary
> cores¹ IDT tables from a memory region whose physical address is higher
than
> 4GB?
No.

 - Keir
> Thanks
> Roger R. Cruz
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.864 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3222 - Release Date: 10/28/10
14:34:00

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel